Jump to content

Featured Replies

3 minutes ago, Clint Bizkit said:

Not only that, midfielders who accumulate a lot of the ball tend to win it.

Neale, Tom Mitchell and now Wines are all very good players but I’d argue that there are others who have a lot more of an impact on games than these players.

Yes, maybe Max's votes could have come from one or two umpire's voting.

Ā 
8 hours ago, rjay said:

I didn't watch it...like watching grass grow or paint dry.

...but was Bont really cut to miss out?

I lasted 5min watching it when they got onto some little piece about how the medal gets made. It is such a dull night.

Strange that Langdon or ANB didn’t poll, and Salem only in one game - confirms that if you are not a mid-fielder don’t bother, the award doesn’t apply to you.

 

Pardon me for not reading the whole thread and risking repetition. First Congratulations to Ollie Wines he had a terrific year and to the others over the 30 mark.

Ok down to business, the brownlow doesn't celebrate the best in the game, just the best in the midfield. I get they tend to be ball accumulators and often are players who turn games but that is not the whole story of the game. For example why should Tmac get more votes than Lever or May? I am glad Tmac was recognised but backmen get no recognition beyond all Australian.Ā 

It really needs to be addressed, at least forwards have the Coleman which is a pretty objective award, why isn't the coleman medal awarded on Brownlow night?Ā Ā 

13 minutes ago, Robbie57 said:

Pardon me for not reading the whole thread and risking repetition. First Congratulations to Ollie Wines he had a terrific year and to the others over the 30 mark.

Ok down to business, the brownlow doesn't celebrate the best in the game, just the best in the midfield. I get they tend to be ball accumulators and often are players who turn games but that is not the whole story of the game. For example why should Tmac get more votes than Lever or May? I am glad Tmac was recognised but backmen get no recognition beyond all Australian.Ā 

It really needs to be addressed, at least forwards have the Coleman which is a pretty objective award, why isn't the coleman medal awarded on Brownlow night?Ā Ā 

You are right.Ā  This morning I read through all of the votes and the lack of representation by defenders is simply wrong. We know, perhaps better than most fans, that defenders can win games.Ā  There is too much emphasis on possession numbers and none on defensive acts.


I don’t rate bont all that much for where he finished in the poll last night.Ā 
His second half of the year was ordinaryĀ 

I remember watching the gcs vs dogs game and Touk Miller absolutely killed it and he got no votes and Bont got 3 votes. I couldn’t believe it. The love child saying of the bont was 100% confirmed last night. I’m glad Wines won

The voting is stuffed, but we already knew that. Walsh is a good young player, but the fact he equaled peak Judd in votes last night shows how out of whack it is. Same for that many players over 20 votes. There’s no way that many players are best on ground in that many matches. Not even close.

Salem had 1 vote the halfway point. He was sitting top 10 in the coaches votes at that stage. Coaches rated him top 10 in the league, umpires didn’t rate him in the top 50+.Ā 

There needs to be an award for defenders. Brownlow is for midfielders. Coleman is for forwards. Need a defenders award too. I would take the impact of May or Lever over most of the top 20 in the Brownlow last night! Teams literally plan their match around those two, such is their influence!

The Brownlow is not the best player anymore. Who do you trust, the umpires or the coaches? Answer is obvious. Let’s hope the umpires don’t hand the Dogs the flash this weekend!

I enjoyed Wines’ speech at least. Some class in there and thought he was genuinely happy to win it. Good on him even though some of the votes were head scratchers throughout the evening. Liked the bit where he congratulated both Grand Finalists and urged the audience to applaud.

Ā 

He's a classy guy and it's not hard to see why Port Adelaide viewed him as captaincy material. very happy Wines got the job done,Ā 

In a broader sense i couldn't help but feel almost a sense of irrelevance to the award, it seems in general there has been a shift to the Coaches association award being the big individual prize, and i also think the Norm Smith, doing it on the biggest stage are just about the two most prestigious awards these days.Ā 

I'd like to see the coaches award and the brownlow in the opposite way, the brownlow votes revealed post match and a big night celebrating the coaches votes at the end of season.Ā 

11 minutes ago, Dwight Schrute said:

He's a classy guy and it's not hard to see why Port Adelaide viewed him as captaincy material. very happy Wines got the job done,Ā 

In a broader sense i couldn't help but feel almost a sense of irrelevance to the award, it seems in general there has been a shift to the Coaches association award being the big individual prize, and i also think the Norm Smith, doing it on the biggest stage are just about the two most prestigious awards these days.Ā 

I'd like to see the coaches award and the brownlow in the opposite way, the brownlow votes revealed post match and a big night celebrating the coaches votes at the end of season.Ā 

It was interesting opposition players not really rating or wanting to rate Clarry.Ā 


12 hours ago, Demonland said:

Ā 

This makes sense, you can use the same time periods for when the team that finished on top of the ladder won the premiership. 8 out of 9 times we've finished on top we've won the flag, soon to be 9 out of 10.Ā 

96 votes for the team out of a possible 132 votes is phenomenal. The 36 votes that went against us:

Round (Votes) Opponent
3Ā  Ā  Ā  1. T. Greene (GWS)
5Ā  Ā  Ā  1. J.O’Meara (HAW)
7Ā  Ā  Ā  3. B.Cunnington (NM)
8Ā  Ā  Ā  1. C.Mills (SYD)
9Ā  Ā  Ā  1. S.Walsh (CAR)
10Ā  Ā  Ā  1. B.Keays (ADE)
12Ā  Ā  Ā  1. Z.Bailey (BL)
13Ā  Ā  Ā  3. S.Pendlebury (COL)
13Ā  Ā  Ā  1. J.De Goey (COL)
15Ā  Ā  Ā  2. Z.Merrett (ESS)
16Ā  Ā  Ā  3. J.Kelly (GWS)
16Ā  Ā  Ā  1. T.Taranto (GWS)
18Ā  Ā  Ā  3. T.Mitchell (HAW)
19Ā  Ā  Ā  3. M.Bontempelli (WB)
19Ā  Ā  Ā  2. J.Macrae (WB)
21Ā  Ā  Ā  2. E.Yeo (WC)
22Ā  Ā  Ā  3. P.Seedsman (ADE)
22Ā  Ā  Ā  2. B.Keays (ADE)
23Ā  Ā  Ā  2. J.Selwood (GEE)

I thought Ben Cunnington getting BOG in a 5 goal losing side was a surprise, but we didn't play great in the first half of that game and it was really the 3rd quarter that put that game away. Other results were fair enough with the exception of the Adelaide game at the MCG which was just bizarre - the best 2 players on the ground in a 7 goal losing side? Spare me. But 16 of 22 BOG performances to a dees player is terrific.

Ā 

15 minutes ago, In Harmes Way said:

96 votes for the team out of a possible 132 votes is phenomenal. The 36 votes that went against us:

Round (Votes) Opponent
3Ā  Ā  Ā  1. T. Greene (GWS)
5Ā  Ā  Ā  1. J.O’Meara (HAW)
7Ā  Ā  Ā  3. B.Cunnington (NM)
8Ā  Ā  Ā  1. C.Mills (SYD)
9Ā  Ā  Ā  1. S.Walsh (CAR)
10Ā  Ā  Ā  1. B.Keays (ADE)
12Ā  Ā  Ā  1. Z.Bailey (BL)
13Ā  Ā  Ā  3. S.Pendlebury (COL)
13Ā  Ā  Ā  1. J.De Goey (COL)
15Ā  Ā  Ā  2. Z.Merrett (ESS)
16Ā  Ā  Ā  3. J.Kelly (GWS)
16Ā  Ā  Ā  1. T.Taranto (GWS)
18Ā  Ā  Ā  3. T.Mitchell (HAW)
19Ā  Ā  Ā  3. M.Bontempelli (WB)
19Ā  Ā  Ā  2. J.Macrae (WB)
21Ā  Ā  Ā  2. E.Yeo (WC)
22Ā  Ā  Ā  3. P.Seedsman (ADE)
22Ā  Ā  Ā  2. B.Keays (ADE)
23Ā  Ā  Ā  2. J.Selwood (GEE)

I thought Ben Cunnington getting BOG in a 5 goal losing side was a surprise, but we didn't play great in the first half of that game and it was really the 3rd quarter that put that game away. Other results were fair enough with the exception of the Adelaide game at the MCG which was just bizarre - the best 2 players on the ground in a 7 goal losing side? Spare me. But 16 of 22 BOG performances to a dees player is terrific.

Ā 

Cunnington getting the votes was actually one the umpires got right, we had no answer for him.

The biggest surprise was O’Meara getting votes in a game where were won by over 50 points.

Great to see Ben Counsins there last night. His roadmap to recovery is on a better trajectory than slow plan Dan.


Hopefully our boys have something more worthwhile to wear later this week.Ā 
Ā 

Not even a fan of interstate players being eligible.Ā 
Brownlow should be for Victorian clubs only.Ā 
Ā 

13 minutes ago, Dee-lusional said:

Apparently Big Maxy was in Brisbane last night

Ā 

Ā 

image.png

Damn it, how will he get back in time to quarantine before the GF?! We are screwed!!!! 🤣

1 minute ago, Demonland said:

Ā 

Last team to do that and win a flag was Essendon in 2000....Ā 

This Sucks Season 3 GIF by The Office


1 hour ago, Dee-lusional said:

Apparently Big Maxy was in Brisbane last night

Ā 

Ā 

image.png

Reminds of the soccer chant "he's here, he's there, he's every bl00dywhere"Ā 

If I take the Brownlow as an umpires award, I can accept it. They have a unique and (mostly) unbiased view of the game, and can only notice what is around them. Even with this in mind I look at players like Gawn, Mundy, McCrae and Miller and wonder how they could score so mildly when Oliver, Bont Wines etc... can rack up BOG's. Sometimes after attending a game live, I am gob smacked to find out on the way home that a certain player had so much of the ball.Ā 

Thinking about defenders, the Brownlow seems to award those who MAKE the game, not those who thwart or STOP it, however meaningful the defenders role is. Backmen like Hardeman, Wanganeen, Hardy, and Glendinning all had a definite play-making ability that saw them make the play, so maybe that is what the umpires notice.

Ā 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 2 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Haha
    • 187 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak.Ā Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds.Ā 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards?Ā Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre?Ā 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
    • 449 replies