Jump to content


Recommended Posts



Posted

The year's four best sides get there. Dogs vs lions you could barely split them, in home and away, and in finals. But we're here now. 

Dees vs Port clearly the bookies choice.
Dees vs Dogs is not without a chance.

Cats vs anyone can GDIAF

  • Demonland changed the title to PF: Port Adelaide vs Bulldogs
Posted
6 minutes ago, Gouga said:

Ok, the path is set.

We know we have to beat geelong and one of port/bulldogs. It suddenly feels very real. 

I’m not going to going to lie. I’m an instant nervous [censored] wreck whenever I think about the next two weeks. 


Posted

Great game and effort by both sides tonight but Port will pump the Dogs, 70+ points. 
Bont injured, Weightman out, no ruckman, 1 tall fwd, Port off the weeks rest. 



Posted
10 minutes ago, layzie said:

Port have one of the most vacant freeway drives to a GF in recent memory. They couldn't stuff this up

I may be wrong but pleased we don't face dogs midfield till gf. Cats have a couple of potent forwards yes. But dees have appropriate AA defenders. Plus others. 

Cats midfield is manageable. 

Happier port have dogs.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Demon17 said:

I may be wrong but pleased we don't face dogs midfield till gf. Cats have a couple of potent forwards yes. But dees have appropriate AA defenders. Plus others. 

Cats midfield is manageable. 

Happier port have dogs.

Yeah that's probably a fair point depending on how these sore guys pull up. 

Posted

Fox Footy were saying just before that Cody Weightman could potentially play because he was subbed due to a head knock but not ruled as concussion? 

Did anyone see that?


Posted
4 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Fox Footy were saying just before that Cody Weightman could potentially play because he was subbed due to a head knock but not ruled as concussion? 

Did anyone see that?

Someone must've put a gun to the Doc's head in the rooms.

Posted
7 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Fox Footy were saying just before that Cody Weightman could potentially play because he was subbed due to a head knock but not ruled as concussion? 

Did anyone see that?

Yes, same thing apparently happened with a Collingwood player throughout the year and the AFL didn’t let them play the following week. So will be very interesting what happens this week. 

Posted
10 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Fox Footy were saying just before that Cody Weightman could potentially play because he was subbed due to a head knock but not ruled as concussion? 

Did anyone see that?

What the [censored] is the difference? You get a head knock that renders you unable to play out a game. Is that not a concussion? I’m very confused by what is a head knock so severe you can’t play, if it’s not a concussion 🤷‍♀️

  • Like 5

Posted

Bloody ridiculous if you can’t play the next week just because are subbed out. Unless you are concussed. Play on!


Posted
21 minutes ago, Jaded said:

What the [censored] is the difference? You get a head knock that renders you unable to play out a game. Is that not a concussion? I’m very confused by what is a head knock so severe you can’t play, if it’s not a concussion 🤷‍♀️

Not a doctor, but I imagine you could cop an injury that fractures your skull but does not cause a concussion. Conceivable I suppose.

Posted
23 minutes ago, Jaded said:

What the [censored] is the difference? You get a head knock that renders you unable to play out a game. Is that not a concussion? I’m very confused by what is a head knock so severe you can’t play, if it’s not a concussion 🤷‍♀️

https://www.afl.com.au/news/674193/dogs-sweating-on-bont-flea-as-injuries-sour-special-semi-final-win

Posted
30 minutes ago, Jaded said:

What the [censored] is the difference? You get a head knock that renders you unable to play out a game. Is that not a concussion? I’m very confused by what is a head knock so severe you can’t play, if it’s not a concussion 🤷‍♀️

It might depend on how he came off the ground, was he groggy and stumbling off the ground?

I didn't see the incident was he assisted by medical staff or players?

Sounds very suspect though.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...