Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

Do any of the players likely to be dropped have a father named John? 

 
15 hours ago, Demonstone said:

But that would make him 136cm, or a bit under four foot six in the old money.

That's much too short to be an AFL player, no matter how good he might be.

Comedy gold right there Demonstone. Bout time some lightened the mood of Demonland.


3 hours ago, Deestinga2 said:

Comedy gold right there Demonstone. Bout time some lightened the mood of Demonland.

Paul Callery says Hi

Can somebody advise me on something? 
 

Whenever the subject of replacing a defender arises - in this case the potential of resting Hibberd - why is Lockhart barely ever mentioned? He’s been in our best-on-ground lists two of the last three rounds. Even the write-up of last week’s Casey game on the MFC website goes into great detail, yet never mentions his name once. Except to say he was second-best on ground in the stats. 
 

What am I missing here? 

13 minutes ago, Mel Bourne said:

Can somebody advise me on something? 
 

Whenever the subject of replacing a defender arises - in this case the potential of resting Hibberd - why is Lockhart barely ever mentioned? He’s been in our best-on-ground lists two of the last three rounds. Even the write-up of last week’s Casey game on the MFC website goes into great detail, yet never mentions his name once. Except to say he was second-best on ground in the stats. 
 

What am I missing here? 

Bloody good point - he's out of favour here on Demonland, but is that the reality for the FD? 

 
7 minutes ago, Engorged Onion said:

Bloody good point - he's out of favour here on Demonland, but is that the reality for the FD? 

The running joke is (insert name) must have parked In Goodwin’s spot. I can only assume his spot was free because Lockhart stole the car and set it on fire in the middle of Casey Fields. 

27 minutes ago, Mel Bourne said:

Can somebody advise me on something? 
 

Whenever the subject of replacing a defender arises - in this case the potential of resting Hibberd - why is Lockhart barely ever mentioned? He’s been in our best-on-ground lists two of the last three rounds. Even the write-up of last week’s Casey game on the MFC website goes into great detail, yet never mentions his name once. Except to say he was second-best on ground in the stats. 
 

What am I missing here? 

Not totally sure, but my guess would be that he's perceived as more of a pure small lockdown defender and our defensive setup this year seems to require more rebounding small defenders.


I heard that he's having trouble with his weight from overeating and is now nicknamed Lockhart Gorge.

Not saying I necessarily believe that scuttlebutt.  :D

7 minutes ago, Lord Nev said:

Not totally sure, but my guess would be that he's perceived as more of a pure small lockdown defender and our defensive setup this year seems to require more rebounding small defenders.

Interesting. It’s strange to me that a player who’s in form would be overlooked for such a thing, given the amount of general overlap in lockdown/rebounding. Lockhart has good skills and is a reliable kick, so it’s odd to me that he couldn’t be viewed playing a rebounding role when the need arises. 

4 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

I heard that he's having trouble with his weight from overeating and is now nicknamed Lockhart Gorge.

Not saying I necessarily believe that scuttlebutt.  :D

He does spend a fair amount of time playing video games. Often that pursuit is paired well with high calorie snacks. 

But he looks in pretty good shape. The only extra weight he seems to be carrying is a moustache. 

3 minutes ago, Mel Bourne said:

Interesting. It’s strange to me that a player who’s in form would be overlooked for such a thing, given the amount of general overlap in lockdown/rebounding. Lockhart has good skills and is a reliable kick, so it’s odd to me that he couldn’t be viewed playing a rebounding role when the need arises. 

Personally I think we should be looking to add a more specific lockdown small into the backline mix before finals. It's gradually becoming more and more of a concern how easily we're scored against once the ball is on the deck inside defensive 50.

Lockhart has some strengths that we are lacking. Speed and defensive pressure when ball hits the ground in the backline. 

 

He is prone to a few mulligans each game though.


27 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

I heard that he's having trouble with his weight from overeating and is now nicknamed Lockhart Gorge.

Not saying I necessarily believe that scuttlebutt.  :D

south west coast joke... 

Is Bowey confirmed as yet??

On 7/28/2021 at 2:13 PM, adonski said:

Surely Hibbo instead

Bowey for Hibbo, Sparrow for Jordon.

Too many fumbles for Hibbo. Glad they kept Rivers in.

Bowey Sparrow in, Hibbo Jordan out

Edited by Mickey

2 minutes ago, adonski said:

Bowey for Hibbo, Sparrow for Jordon.

Too many fumbles for Hibbo. Glad they kept Rivers in.

Pretty good changes. Might have been useful to bring in Weid for Jacko, if for no other reason than to give Jacko a break - and try a few things before finals. Also happy Rivers will play.


Surprised that Hibbo got the chop, he’s a cool head to have back there usually. Still, good luck to Bowey! We’ve been found out in the small defender department lately so this is the young lads chance to make a place for himself in a team heading towards finals. 

Sparrow for Jordon is a good shout. 

2 hours ago, Mel Bourne said:

Can somebody advise me on something? 
 

Whenever the subject of replacing a defender arises - in this case the potential of resting Hibberd - why is Lockhart barely ever mentioned? He’s been in our best-on-ground lists two of the last three rounds. Even the write-up of last week’s Casey game on the MFC website goes into great detail, yet never mentions his name once. Except to say he was second-best on ground in the stats. 
 

What am I missing here? 

I also think he's unlucky to miss ahead of Bowey Mel after watching him in a number of Casey games.  Appeared ripe to me

17 minutes ago, Red But Mostly Blue said:

Pretty good changes. Might have been useful to bring in Weid for Jacko, if for no other reason than to give Jacko a break - and try a few things before finals. Also happy Rivers will play.

LJ is very much in need of a refresh break that's for sure.  IMHO Max needs one also.

Not going to happen but Daw for one week to cover those two and Melk as the in for LJ up forward wouldn't have hurt against the sons.

 
3 minutes ago, Rusty Nails said:

LJ is very much in need of a refresh break that's for sure.  IMHO Max needs one also.

Reckon we're going to see some changes in their mix and roles this week.

 

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • REPORT: Gold Coast

    From the start, Melbourne’s performance against the Gold Coast Suns at Peoples First Stadium was nothing short of a massive botch up and it came down in the first instance to poor preparation. Rather than adequately preparing the team for battle against an opponent potentially on the skids after suffering three consecutive losses, the Demons looking anything but sharp and ready to play in the opening minutes of the game. By way of contrast, the Suns demonstrated a clear sense of purpose and will to win. From the very first bounce of the ball they were back to where they left off earlier in the season in Round Three when the teams met at the MCG. They ran rings around the Demons and finished the game off with a dominant six goal final term. This time, they produced another dominant quarter to start the game, restricting Melbourne to a solitary point to lead by six goals at the first break, by which time, the game was all but over.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
  • CASEY: Gold Coast

    Coming off four consecutive victories and with a team filled with 17 AFL listed players, the Casey Demons took to their early morning encounter with the lowly Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium with the swagger of a team that thought a win was inevitable. They were smashing it for the first twenty minutes of the game after Tom Fullarton booted the first two goals but they then descended into an abyss of frustrating poor form and lackadaisical effort that saw the swagger and the early arrogance disappear by quarter time when their lead was overtaken by a more intense and committed opponent. The Suns continued to apply the pressure in the second quarter and got out to a three goal lead in mid term before the Demons fought back. A late goal to the home side before the half time bell saw them ten points up at the break and another surge in the third quarter saw them comfortably up with a 23 point lead at the final break.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Rd 17 vs Adelaide

    With their season all over bar the shouting the Demons head back on the road for the third week in a row as they return to Adelaide to take on the Crows. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 57 replies
  • POSTGAME: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    The Demons did not come to play from the opening bounce and let the Gold Coast kick the first 5 goals of the match. They then outscored the Suns for the next 3 quarters but it was too little too late and their season is now effectively over.

      • Sad
      • Like
    • 225 replies
  • VOTES: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    Max Gawn has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award ahead of Jake Bowey, Christian Petracca, Clayton Oliver and Kysaiah Pickett. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1.

      • Thanks
    • 34 replies
  • GAMEDAY: Rd 16 vs Gold Coast

    It's Game Day and the Demons are back on the road again and this may be the last roll of the dice to get their 2025 season back on track as they take on the Gold Coast Suns at People First Stadium.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 546 replies