Jump to content

Featured Replies

I don't think we can afford him?

But why not roll the dice and at least inquire?

We definitely need a good quality tall forward desperately.

Sadly if Jeremy Cameron was going to leave GWS it would probably be to Collingwood.

 
11 hours ago, Supreme_Demon said:

Sadly if Jeremy Cameron was going to leave GWS it would probably be to Collingwood.

very much doubt they can afford him with signing up grundy to a big deal, and the likes of moore, de goey, mihocek, and daicos all out of contract this year

No point targeting key forwards until we can get the players that can deliver the ball.  We could have Tony Lockett in our forward line and he would struggle

 
24 minutes ago, drdrake said:

No point targeting key forwards until we can get the players that can deliver the ball.  We could have Tony Lockett in our forward line and he would struggle

While I understand where you are coming from, I disagree with this. We have two major problems.  A weak forward line and a poorly skilled midfield. Fixing the skill of midfield is not going to be easy, as our best players are also our biggest culprits. And they cannot play anywhere else.

I think a gun forward and another wingman are the players we should target this off season. Cameron, Daniher, Mihocek, Gunston, Brown, Breust and De Goey are all players we should be trying to get.

Edited by Fat Tony
typo

We should definitely consider but I doubt we can meet his wage demands.


On 9/11/2020 at 11:20 AM, Accepting Mediocrity said:

with all due to respect to Neitz and Lyon, he'd be our best full forward since Fred Fanning.

hes not a patch on Neita .not even sure where he plays- obviously somewhere between the centre and deep forward .

17 minutes ago, kallangurdemon said:

hes not a patch on Neita .not even sure where he plays- obviously somewhere between the centre and deep forward .

Always hard to compare players from different eras, but statistically speaking Cameron has him covered.

Neitz was a club champion and one of my all time faves, but if we're being honest he was always a rung or two below the best forwards in the league (Carey, Lloyd, Riewoldt etc). Cameron is having a down year, but he's just about the best forward in the comp when he's in form. His record is phenomenal.

He would do more to improve our side than just about any other player in the league IMO. Doubt we can afford him, but definitely worth a crack.

2 hours ago, Fat Tony said:

While I understand where you are coming from, I disagree with this. We have two major problems.  A weak forward line and a poorly skilled midfield. Fixing the skill of midfield is not going to be easy, as our best players are also our biggest culprits. And they cannot play anywhere else.

I think a gun forward and another wingman are the players we should target this off season. Cameron, Daniher, Mihocek, Gunston, Brown, Breust and De Goey are all players we should be trying to get.

So he can stand there take his 1.2mil per season with arms in the air frustrated by the players missing him by 3-5m or kicking to him when it is 3 on 1.  Spend that money on players who can hit a forward, we can kick enough goals if we can hit a target.  It is chicken and egg spend all that money on a forward but get the same delivery which severely effects his performance or improve the delivery first.  For that price tag we want to make sure we aren't going to flush it down the toilet and I think with current delivery it will be wasted money.

I also think Weiderman can be a 50-60 goal a year forward if we could kick to him properly

 
14 minutes ago, drdrake said:

So he can stand there take his 1.2mil per season with arms in the air frustrated by the players missing him by 3-5m or kicking to him when it is 3 on 1.  Spend that money on players who can hit a forward, we can kick enough goals if we can hit a target.  It is chicken and egg spend all that money on a forward but get the same delivery which severely effects his performance or improve the delivery first.  For that price tag we want to make sure we aren't going to flush it down the toilet and I think with current delivery it will be wasted money.

I also think Weiderman can be a 50-60 goal a year forward if we could kick to him properly

Doc, I agree that Cameron at $1.2m might not be the best value recruit - even though he is a free agent. But I still think a gun forward is something we lack and that, from a list management perspective, it will be the simplest way for us to improve. (We need to dangle a few lines out and see if we get any bites.) And Weideman will be a better player with another top player around him.

Our midfield needs to improve as well, but I think that needs to happen organically. Oliver, Viney, Brayshaw, Petracca, Harmes, Sparrow and Langdon collectively need to improve their disposal. But I don't think we have room in the rotation to add another recruit in the centre square.

On 9/11/2020 at 6:04 AM, GCDee said:

Lose Viney, Jones and tmac and we might be in business

That is a very fair price, with the added bonus of getting a good forward. 


1 hour ago, Fat Tony said:

Doc, I agree that Cameron at $1.2m might not be the best value recruit - even though he is a free agent. But I still think a gun forward is something we lack and that, from a list management perspective, it will be the simplest way for us to improve. (We need to dangle a few lines out and see if we get any bites.) And Weideman will be a better player with another top player around him.

Our midfield needs to improve as well, but I think that needs to happen organically. Oliver, Viney, Brayshaw, Petracca, Harmes, Sparrow and Langdon collectively need to improve their disposal. But I don't think we have room in the rotation to add another recruit in the centre square.

Agree we need another forward, I would rather go to the draft to get one, let Jackson develop and have another developing getting ready for when Gawn is done and Jackson takes No1 ruck spot.

I don't think players mid 20 can improve their kicks, in fact if you don't have the correct motor skills by about 15 yo it is near on impossible to change.  They can improve decision making and composure with the ball which will help but I don't think they can get to the level we need.  Issue we have you can carry a few poor kickers we have an entire midfield of bad kicks.

 

 

3 minutes ago, drdrake said:

Agree we need another forward, I would rather go to the draft to get one, let Jackson develop and have another developing getting ready for when Gawn is done and Jackson takes No1 ruck spot.

I don't think players mid 20 can improve their kicks, in fact if you don't have the correct motor skills by about 15 yo it is near on impossible to change.  They can improve decision making and composure with the ball which will help but I don't think they can get to the level we need.  Issue we have you can carry a few poor kickers we have an entire midfield of bad kicks.

 

 

I agree, it is highly preferable that any forward that we recruit compliments Jackson and Weideman. We also don't know if Petty (uncontracted) will play again or if TMac (unlikely) can rediscover form. Of the list I gave, Gunston, Breust or De Goey would seem to be the best fits for us - adding class and maintaining forward pressure. And, I also agree that we should definitely be looking to add mid and small forwards in the draft.

However, Cameron is one of the top 25 players in the game. If we have any chance to get him, we should take it IMO.

2 hours ago, drdrake said:

So he can stand there take his 1.2mil per season with arms in the air frustrated by the players missing him by 3-5m or kicking to him when it is 3 on 1.  Spend that money on players who can hit a forward, we can kick enough goals if we can hit a target.

I reckon the importance of midfield delivery for a forward's success is massively overblown. In his second season, Cameron kicked 62 goals in a side that won 1 game all year (against us, because of course it was). To name a few, Tom Lynch, Fevola, Pavlich, Richardson and Jack Riewoldt all spent a fair portion of their careers in rubbish teams and kicked plenty of goals.

Not saying that we shouldn't be looking at skilled mids, but the best forwards kick goals no matter who is delivering it to them.

3 minutes ago, Accepting Mediocrity said:

I reckon the importance of midfield delivery for a forward's success is massively overblown. In his second season, Cameron kicked 62 goals in a side that won 1 game all year (against us, because of course it was). To name a few, Tom Lynch, Fevola, Pavlich, Richardson and Jack Riewoldt all spent a fair portion of their careers in rubbish teams and kicked plenty of goals.

Not saying that we shouldn't be looking at skilled mids, but the best forwards kick goals no matter who is delivering it to them.

GWS played pagans paddock for Cameron, he basically had the entire 50m arc to himself.  Can't compare old school forwards to today, they basically played one on one or at worse had 1 player drop back in the hole.  Also they had ownership of the forward 50m arc everyone else out.

 

I'm not against bringing in a key forward, I am against bringing in one that will take 1mil+ out of your cap, we just aren't ready for that at this time

5 hours ago, Fat Tony said:

While I understand where you are coming from, I disagree with this. We have two major problems.  A weak forward line and a poorly skilled midfield. Fixing the skill of midfield is not going to be easy, as our best players are also our biggest culprits. And they cannot play anywhere else.

I think a gun forward and another wingman are the players we should target this off season. Cameron, Daniher, Mihocek, Gunston, Brown, Breust and De Goey are all players we should be trying to get.

Nailed it, with our key forward stocks looking pretty thin we should be having a big crack at all of them (maybe not De Goey)


Weed and Jackson are the 2 key forwards for us in 2021. Pickett works on his composure, and Fritsch improves his kicking and that’s 35 more goals in 2021. I like Spargo if he puts his hand up and says he’s your bread and butter hard worker - and he proves it every week.

Petracca moves through their too. 

We need outside midfield class to deliver the ball. That’s where our money needs to go.

On 9/15/2020 at 2:03 PM, drdrake said:

I'm not against bringing in a key forward, I am against bringing in one that will take 1mil+ out of your cap, we just aren't ready for that at this time

Agree

Daniher took unders from Essendon when he last signed... said to be around $600-650k when he could have demanded $800k at least.

Assuming Daniher leaves Bombers would still have to find another half million a year.

Just shows how hard it is to accommodate these huge salaries unless you are prepared to mortgage the club on  a Franklin type deal.

Believe it or not I can see GWS letting Cameron go and then keeping all the other players they want.

His output this year has been poor.

He is on a fortune.

They have Himmelberg, Finlayson and Riccardi and maybe others.

I know it sounds stupid, but they want to keep a lot of players, who are going to cost plenty. Williams, Taranto and Kelly for starters.

PS. I actually posted this before the previous post came up on screen.

Edited by Redleg

I reckon they will let him go, just depends who is going to want to spend up and take him?

I’d rather keep Whitfield, Taranto, Williams and Kelly over Cameron 

Geelong has been mentioned but would their ground suit him?

 


It is interesting to see who is after Cameron.

The Pies could do with a KPF but wouldn't seem to have the cap space with Moore, De Goey and Mihocek out of contract and Grundy on a monster deal.

The Tigers, Dockers, PA and Blues don't need a KPF.

The Bombers are trying to keep Daniher but could target him if he leaves.

The Dogs are getting a young gun KPF in the draft and have Naughton and Bruce is on big money.

The Crows, NM and Hawks are rebuilding and would not be that attractive to Cameron.

The Eagles might want a replacement for Kennedy, but surely they haven't got the cap space with Nic Nat, McGovern and Kelly on big money.

I can't believe the Cats have the cap room either.

The Saints seem to be locked in to building around King and probably want to focus on the midfield.

The Swans, Lions, GCS and Dees would be the most likely external bidders.

he's one of the highest paid players in the competition and wants to remain so

his output and body language in games this year has been really poor

no doubt he's a gun

i'm guessing he'll go to the peptides, the filth, or the cats cos they don't seem to operate salary caps like other sides

He looks like a guy who's made the decision to leave and is going through the motions. i wouldn't be surprised if a team has offered him a massive deal, Norf potentially could have offered him a boat load of cash 

 

 
24 minutes ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

 

Please let us get this guy.    We would all like to see a flag before we die.

He won't get you a flag.

I smell the Cats in a big way on this.

Viney/Crouch and Cameron and they would see all their problems solved in one hit.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thumb Down
    • 528 replies