Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

Why isn't Harmes tagging anymore? Harmes played his best footy as a tagger. It got him engaged in the game and he was one of the first picked players when he was in this role. 

Another example of Goodwins inabilities as a coach. 

 
  On 28/07/2020 at 03:24, Dr.D said:

Why isn't Harmes tagging anymore? Harmes played his best footy as a tagger. It got him engaged in the game and he was one of the first picked players when he was in this role. 

Another example of Goodwins inabilities as a coach. 

I agree, but I think it's more an example of Goodwin's stubbornness as a coach. I believe he has the ability.

  On 28/07/2020 at 03:24, Dr.D said:

Why isn't Harmes tagging anymore? Harmes played his best footy as a tagger. It got him engaged in the game and he was one of the first picked players when he was in this role. 

Another example of Goodwins inabilities as a coach. 

Would have clamped down on Neale and won comfortably. Did not change the dynamic of our midfield set up one bit and it cost us.

Edited by Win4theAges


  On 27/07/2020 at 09:28, CHF said:

The selections for the Port game will really depend on how the players pull up after the game on Sunday.

However, if selection was on form in the game, there would be a couple of changes. 

In defence, I saw Jetta as as weakness. He just does not seem to be able to track fast enough to a contest or his reading of the play is not what it used to be. After his head knocks, I could see him getting a rest and possibly brought back for the game after Port. I like the way the rest of the backline is playing. May, OMac, Lever, Salem and Hibberd are developing a good understanding and Lockhart, much to my surprise, is slotting in there well. Who gets a game in place of Jetta? well the obvious one would be Rivers but I would not be surprised to see Josh Wagner get  run.

Midfield did not perform up to standard at Max's feet. Not sure what the problem was? Caoching or players? If all have pulled up ok I would not change any in there. Petracca, Oliver and Viney on the inside with Brayshaw rotating there and Harmes used in a tagging role on an opposition key mid would be the way I would go. Langdon on one wing and a few, including Jones to rotate through the other. I do not see Jones getting dropped after one game. 

In the forwards o would definately retain Wiedeman, Jackson, Melksham combination at the heart of the attack. Fritsch is there sa well but I would be looking to use him up the ground a bit more on an HFF as I like his mobility and delivery. Hannan had just a game on Sunday but I would retain him. One of Bennell or Pickett I would replace. I would be tempted to give Pickett a rest. I would like to see Sparrow given a run in his place.

With regard to TMac, well, I do not see any great reason to get him back in just yet. He was not in form in all the games he played prior to his eye injury and I don't think it is necessary to have a third tall against Port.

So, for me... 

Out: Jetta, Pickett

In: Wagner, Sparrow

Wagner not even in the hub.

  On 28/07/2020 at 03:29, Win4theAges said:

Would have clamped down on Neale and won comfortably. Did not change the dynamic of our midfield set up one bit and it cost us.

Would not be the first time that a logical tagger in Harmes going to players like Neale was not applied by the coaching fraternity. I agree, but this type of  oversight happens all too frequently at Melbourne.

  On 28/07/2020 at 03:29, Win4theAges said:

Would have clamped down on Neale and won comfortably. Did not change the dynamic of our midfield set up one bit and it cost us.

Please....Harmes stopped tagging because he was bad at it last year. He would not have had any impact on Neale who has worked through tags all season. Most overated player on this forum.

 
  On 27/07/2020 at 17:44, CHF said:

Have a look at the games he played in 2018. he was very good in a number of them I believe. At some stage during this season we need to get a look at him to see if he can provide depth.

I would like to see what he brings when he has a well structured defence around him. Smith is not the answer. If he is then you are asking the wrong question.We know what Rivers can bring to t he table and he will develop over time. With the short turn around to the Port game I would like to see some freshness in the team.

It's a good point CHF The Wagner's can run a bit although they are on the fringe they have produced at times. they played a dozen games each in 2019  IMO they did well. I would rather Josh in the side at 190 cm than have a project player in Smith play.  I can't understand what they see in him.

I think Rivers was a bit stiff to be dropped However l would like to think TMac could come in for his excperiece and strength. He started to hold marks get involved with the inclusion of the Weid in the 1st quarter and ended with the eye injury as he was starting look ok.

  On 28/07/2020 at 03:24, Dr.D said:

Why isn't Harmes tagging anymore? Harmes played his best footy as a tagger. It got him engaged in the game and he was one of the first picked players when he was in this role. 

Another example of Goodwins inabilities as a coach. 

  On 28/07/2020 at 03:28, Lord Nev said:

I agree, but I think it's more an example of Goodwin's stubbornness as a coach. I believe he has the ability.

 

  On 28/07/2020 at 03:58, picket fence said:

Would not be the first time that a logical tagger in Harmes going to players like Neale was not applied by the coaching fraternity. I agree, but this type of  oversight happens all too frequently at Melbourne.

 

  On 28/07/2020 at 03:29, Win4theAges said:

Would have clamped down on Neale and won comfortably. Did not change the dynamic of our midfield set up one bit and it cost us.

So who out of Petracca, Oliver and Viney did you want out of the primary midfield rotation to enable this to happen?


  On 28/07/2020 at 04:13, nosoupforme said:

It's a good point CHF The Wagner's can run a bit although they are on the fringe they have produced at times. they played a dozen games each in 2019  IMO they did well. I would rather Josh in the side at 190 cm than have a project player in Smith play.  I can't understand what they see in him.

I think Rivers was a bit stiff to be dropped However l would like to think TMac could come in for his excperiece and strength. He started to hold marks get involved with the inclusion of the Weid in the 1st quarter and ended with the eye injury as he was starting look ok.

Nice pun

  On 28/07/2020 at 03:28, Lord Nev said:

I agree, but I think it's more an example of Goodwin's stubbornness as a coach.

Unsubstantiated speculation from someone who has has zero actual experience of Goodwin's coaching.

T Mac has to come in. 4 goals in the magoos and he's a very proficient kick for goal - something that was sorely lacking on the weekend.

Wouldn't mind having a look at Swallow who's apparently in contention. He looked ok in a practice match.

One of Harmes or Brayshaw should get dropped after continued ordinary performances and to keep the standards up.

Jetta might be an out when combining a head knock and an ordinary performance.

 

IN - T Mac, Sparrow

Out - Brayshaw, Jetta (or Jackson if they don't want to go 3 talls.)

  On 26/07/2020 at 12:48, Leoncelli_36 said:

Lol

Get 'em in. One forward, one back?

Edited by Grr-owl


  On 28/07/2020 at 05:20, Bring-Back-Powell said:

T Mac has to come in. 4 goals in the magoos and he's a very proficient kick for goal - something that was sorely lacking on the weekend.

Wouldn't mind having a look at Swallow who's apparently in contention. He looked ok in a practice match.

One of Harmes or Brayshaw should get dropped after continued ordinary performances and to keep the standards up.

Jetta might be an out when combining a head knock and an ordinary performance.

 

IN - T Mac, Sparrow

Out - Brayshaw, Jetta (or Jackson if they don't want to go 3 talls.)

Who goes into the back six rotation if you're dropping Jetta and not replacing him with a back pocket or even a back flanker?  Can't see Tom or Sparrow really playing there.

I'd like to get another look at Sparrow at senior level, although I still think he's behind someone like Tomlinson who will get another crack before he goes.

  On 28/07/2020 at 04:27, Pollyanna said:

 

 

So who out of Petracca, Oliver and Viney did you want out of the primary midfield rotation to enable this to happen?

It's a fair point re: Harmes.  Those three are our best midfielders at the minute and deserve as much time in the middle as possible.  Using Harmes in a tagging role is going to take someone out of there, which I think they want to guard against at the minute.  

I'd like to see Harmes given a run with role across half forward.  He has a good set of hands and gets to the right spots, and he could be a bit of weapon clamping down on one of their primary runners off half back which would either help us in forcing more turnovers or locking the ball inside our 50.

  On 28/07/2020 at 05:34, Wiseblood said:

Who goes into the back six rotation if you're dropping Jetta and not replacing him with a back pocket or even a back flanker?  Can't see Tom or Sparrow really playing there.

I'd like to get another look at Sparrow at senior level, although I still think he's behind someone like Tomlinson who will get another crack before he goes.

Fair point about the need to replace Jetta like for like.

I just feel that he won't get selected this week, and they either move the magnets around (and bring in Sparrow as a separate inclusion) or bring in Smith or Rivers as a replacement defender.

 

Edited by Bring-Back-Powell

  On 28/07/2020 at 03:41, Grimes Times said:

Wagner not even in the hub.

As I understand, all the club’s available players are now in the QLD hub and are available post quarantine and I assume that would include J Wagner

  On 28/07/2020 at 04:27, Pollyanna said:

 

 

So who out of Petracca, Oliver and Viney did you want out of the primary midfield rotation to enable this to happen?

Neale was running hot for the 2nd qtr especially, Clarry could have gone forward for a period and Harmes to Neale to clamp down on him and disturb his rhythm.

5 minutes per quarter wouldn't have hurt Polly.

 

Edited by Win4theAges


I'd bring in TMac and play Jackson HFF, he'd be a hard match up for a back flanker. Harmes to tag maybe as Wise suggested. 

Selectors need to have a good think about Kossi, Bennell, Brayshaw

Edited by loges
spelling

  On 28/07/2020 at 05:41, Bring-Back-Powell said:

Fair point about the need to replace Jetta like for like.

I just feel that he won't get selected this week, and they either move the magnets around (and bring in Sparrow as a separate inclusion) or bring in Smith or Rivers as a replacement defender.

 

I agree in terms of selection - I think the coaches like the experience his brings, but he looked off the pace all game and the head knocks won't have done him any favours.

Rivers would be a good option.  I'd prefer him to Smith for the role he will play.

I do hope Sparrow gets a crack in the coming weeks, though.  I think the kid might have a future for us and getting a few games into him would certainly help.

 
  On 28/07/2020 at 05:18, bing181 said:

Unsubstantiated speculation from someone who has has zero actual experience of Goodwin's coaching.

every [censored] coach in the afl has had more experience than us. 

According yo your theory, there's no such thing as bad coaches because they have experience. flawed logic

  On 28/07/2020 at 05:52, CHF said:

As I understand, all the club’s available players are now in the QLD hub and are available post quarantine and I assume that would include J Wagner

they are in there own hub I think on the goldy, not sure when they complete there quarantine but they wont be joining the others or playing until they do

Edited by Grimes Times


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Brisbane

    And just like that, we’re Narrm again. Even though the annual AFL Sir Doug Nicholls Round which commemorates the contributions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture to our game has been a welcome addition to our calendar for ten years, more lately it has been a portent of tough times ahead for we beleaguered Narrm supporters. Ever since the club broke through for its historic 2021 premiership, this has become a troubling time of the year for the club. For example, it all began when Melbourne rebranded itself as Narrm across the two rounds of the Sir Doug Nicholls Round to become the first club to adopt an Indigenous club name especially for the occasion. It won its first outing under the brand against lowly North Melbourne to go to 10 wins and no losses but not without a struggle or a major injury to  star winger Ed Langdon who broke his ribs and missed several weeks. In the following week, still as Narrm, the team’s 17 game winning streak came to an end at the hands of the Dockers. That came along with more injuries, a plague that remained with them for the remainder of the season until, beset by injuries, the Dees were eliminated from the finals in straight sets. It was even worse last year, when Narrm inexplicably lowered its colours in Perth to the Waalit Marawar Eagles. Oh, the shame of it all! At least this year, if there is a corner to turn around, it has to be in the direction of something better. To that end, I produced a special pre-game chant in the local Narrm language - “nam mi:wi winnamun katjil prolin ambi ngamar thamelin amb” which roughly translated is “every heart beats true for the red and the blue.” >y belief is that if all of the Narrm faithful recite it long enough, then it might prove to be the only way to beat the Brisbane Lions at the Gabba on Sunday. The Lions are coming off a disappointing draw at Marvel Stadium against a North Melbourne team that lacks the ability and know how to win games (except when playing Melbourne). Brisbane are, however, a different kettle of fish at home and have very few positional weaknesses. They are a midfield powerhouse, strong in defence and have plenty of forward options, particularly their small and medium sized players, to kick a winning score this week after the sting of last week’s below par performance.

    • 5 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Hawthorn

    There was a time during the current Melbourne cycle that goes back to before the premiership when the club was the toughest to beat in the fourth quarter. The Demons were not only hard to beat at any time but it was virtually impossible to get the better them when scores were close at three quarter time. It was only three or four years ago but they were fit, strong and resilient in body and mind. Sadly, those days are over. This has been the case since the club fell off its pedestal about 12 months ago after it beat Geelong and then lost to Carlton. In both instances, Melbourne put together strong, stirring final quarters, one that resulted in victory, the other, in defeat. Since then, the drop off has been dramatic to the point where it can neither pull off victory in close matches, nor can it even go down in defeat  gallantly.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Footscray

    At twenty-four minutes into the third term of the game between the Casey Demons and Footscray VFL at Whitten Oval, the visitors were coasting. They were winning all over the ground, had the ascendancy in the ruck battles and held a 26 point lead on a day perfect for football. What could go wrong? Everything. The Bulldogs moved into overdrive in the last five minutes of the term and booted three straight goals to reduce the margin to a highly retrievable eight points at the last break. Bouyed by that effort, their confidence was on a high level during the interval and they ran all over the despondent Demons and kicked another five goals to lead by a comfortable margin of four goals deep into the final term before Paddy Cross kicked a couple of too late goals for a despondent Casey. A testament to their lack of pressure in the latter stages of the game was the fact that Footscray’s last ten scoring shots were nine goals and one rushed behind. Things might have been different for the Demons who went into the game after last week’s bye with 12 AFL listed players. Blake Howes was held over for the AFL game but two others, Jack Billings and Taj Woewodin (not officially listed as injured) were also missing and they could have been handy at the end. Another mystery of the current VFL system.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Brisbane

    The Demons head back out on the road in Round 10 when they travel to Queensland to take on the reigning Premiers and the top of the table Lions who look very formidable. Can the Dees cause a massive upset? Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 136 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Hawthorn

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Demons loss to the Hawks. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 52 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Hawthorn

    Wayward kicking for goal, dump kicks inside 50 and some baffling umpiring all contributed to the Dees not getting out to an an early lead that may have impacted the result. At the end of the day the Demons were just not good enough and let the Hawks run away with their first win against the Demons in 7 years.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 376 replies
    Demonland