Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, spirit of norm smith said:

I think JT has a dozen names already listed for his pick 18,19 options (end up pick 22/23) and who might even be left at 28 (#34/35). 
 

Finlay Macrae**

Archie Perkins **

Jack Carroll**

Nik Cox **

Brayden Cook

Bailey Laurie

Caleb Poulter 

Eddie Ford

Isaiah Winder

Nick Stevens 

Zavier Maher

and perhaps a possible bid at Brandon Walker. 

(** I think these will all go prior to our pick but who knows on draft day ) 

What do you think of Jake Bowey? Looked good to me in that that futures game.  On the small side at 175cm but plays wing and has some real zip and looks a really good kick. Exactly what we need. 

 
On 11/13/2020 at 9:52 AM, deelusions from afar said:

Knightmare on bigfooty was asked about who might be the best fits for the dees at 18,19 and 28.  He responded with:

 

Interesting... can’t see it with Berry being inside mid, but if we do keep both picks and 28 he def is talented enough to go there. But I’d be more akin to players like Connor Donnie, Archie Perkins, Macrae (I think we may move up little further to secure him personally, unless mail Is that he will be around at 18 which is possible but with his exquisite foot skills maybe not) O’Driscoll is another I thinks a big chance to be in red and blue, good user and decision maker, line breaking speed AND can go inside as well as outside contest.

Others I believe in frame are Archie Perkins who’s got a massive ceiling but is raw & could go anywhere from 7-37. Carroll is def on the radar for sure, Bailey Laurie another id be keeping eye on, a Smokey for 28 I think he can potentially fall that far if we are lucky. B.Cook is another who uses ball well and could be a wing or insider, even flanker. Poulter I like a lot and can see that one being a potential pick but one I’d have ahead of him is a JT Smokey unnamed at this stage but let’s just say he’s not in top50 frame anywhere else at this stage.but he ready for it should he be selected with 28. Hopefully we get him with 50 but I’m hearing we won’t risk it. 

Zac Dumesny is also rated v highly by JT’s team , another one he’s said to taken a real shine to is Tariek Newchurch, whom oozes X factor dare dash and can play midfield minutes which is the dimension I think appeals, in similar vein to why Joel Western is also in consideration, sublime skills and a fed who could become a mid so expect a bid to come for him.

Lastly, I can almost guarantee that if Henry Walsh is available with our last pick #50 (around 57-62) the Dees will jump on him. Talented Ruck (brother of Sam) who has more genuine ruck craft and tapwork than Jackson, so far more a genuine ruck where Jackson may end up more a mid-fwd, but Walsh is improving below knees & is a kid who could become a great ruck/fwd and would add some talent to our lean (bodied) ruck-stocks.

So bids on Newchurch, Western and McInnes for sure and who knows we may be able to land one of them.

Edited by Nudge

 
15 minutes ago, Grimes Times said:

Hmm, an inside mid (Berry) with our first pick? Doubtful. 

Winder makes sense from the descriptions I’ve read at our next pick.

Wouldn’t have thought we would be going for a tall forward (Allison) with pick 28 either.

I like reading Knightmare's stuff but he leaves me scratching my head sometimes 


31 minutes ago, Grimes Times said:

This is excellent viewing guys, like the selections but still can’t see Berry being our pick with 18. Maybe 19/28 for sure but I think there are 1-2 ahead of him but he def has loads of talent and uses the ball in manner none of our current mids can (apart form Gus and Trac at times).

I really like Archie Perkins after watching him live last year. He's got x-factor and could be a damaging fwd-mid type. Reckon he's got star potential and will likely go between picks 6-13.
Macrae looks to be a good accumulator with great footskills. He'd help balance our midfield.
Cook looks to be a dashing runner who hits the scoreboard. He'd slot in on the other wing or play half forward.

I think those 3 are the best options for our list, but I expect all 3 to be gone a few picks before ours. I'm hoping we trade further up the draft board to land one of them.

 

Zavier Maher sounds like the type of player we need, explosive and lowers his eyes and hits targets inside 50m. 

1 hour ago, adonski said:

I like reading Knightmare's stuff but he leaves me scratching my head sometimes 

Agree. Has no idea about the clubs list management.  We don’t need Berry (inside mid) or Allison. 

But he lives in reality and I agree that Perkins, Macrae and Carroll will unfortunately be likely to be gone before our picks. 

He has put up my draft prediction of MFC grabbing Isiah Winder, but we were trying to keep him under wraps ?. Does he read Demonland?

Based on his predictions of these already gone before our picks, we would go for Isiah Winder, Eddie Ford, or Zavier Maher. That would be a handy trio. 


Yeah can’t see Berry or Allison being selected but it’s still a great mock draft in terms of info and listing top talent.

The Berry appeal is his disposal and would give a POD to current mid group in year or 2.

Jordon and Sparrow still doing though though and they both look good to me so I think an electric tall mid-wing-fwd will be what we target but who knows.. ie if a kid like Zach Reid or Chapman are available at 18/19 it won’t matter who we have already we will take them.

Cook is far more likely than Berry if available if not We have plenty of great options and there is no doubt in this crop a few Can Brice Nat Fyfe James Hird hidden gems about.. so glad we traded into this draft it could be a real winner if we get some luck!!!

NOTE: After missing on Georgiadis I wouldn’t at ALL be surprised if Kaine Baldwin comes into calculations.. His talent is immense and the risk/reward might just be worth it with pick 19/28 which is really 24/36ish)

 

This is a link to Bailey Laurie on "Talent Talk" facebook

https://www.facebook.com/TalentTalkAFL/

His feature Episode 3 was posted on September 28, so you need to scroll through to that. 

Brendan, one of thethe presenters, works for both Oakleigh and Caulfield, so has some insight into the kid.

7 hours ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

Was junior footy played in those states this season? 

 

WA had close to a full junior season.  11 game season as opposed to the usual 15 + finals. 10 games H & A with top 2 playing the GF.

There was 8 game WAFL Colts + finals.

WAFL Development Squads had their trials for u/14 & 15s squads across the 9 WAFL clubs with final squads selected.  Each WAFL development squad played 2 matches against other WAFL development squads in their relevant year group 

8 minutes ago, Pennant St Dee said:

WA had close to a full junior season.  11 game season as opposed to the usual 15 + finals. 10 games H & A with top 2 playing the GF.

There was 8 game WAFL Colts + finals.

WAFL Development Squads had their trials for u/14 & 15s squads across the 9 WAFL clubs with final squads selected.  Each WAFL development squad played 2 matches against other WAFL development squads in their relevant year group 

Thanks  for the info.  Makes sense there would be a lot of SA and WA kids in the draft then.  VIC kids missed a whole year of development.

3 hours ago, drdrake said:

Zavier Maher sounds like the type of player we need, explosive and lowers his eyes and hits targets inside 50m. 

I've had a bit to do with Zav through the bushies.

The kid can certainly play, and has enormous upside. Can see him late 1st early 2nd round.


7 minutes ago, Pickett2Jackson said:

Thanks  for the info.  Makes sense there would be a lot of SA and WA kids in the draft then.  VIC kids missed a whole year of development.

Yep made comment on another thread (can't recall which one it was) but saw a very special IMO future talent in the Subiaco 14s Malachy Champion, who I think is one to look out for in 2023 draft

6 hours ago, Pulp Fritschon said:

What do you think of Jake Bowey? Looked good to me in that that futures game.  On the small side at 175cm but plays wing and has some real zip and looks a really good kick. Exactly what we need. 

Yes it’s a tough. If he was 182cms, he’d be top 30. I think he will make the grade and get drafted but I’m not sure it’s by the Dees. 

9 hours ago, Gawndog98 said:

I really want us to get Carroll as it will allow Salem to push up to a wing

 

The idea that Salem can be released to the wing is a fallacy in my opinion. 

The wing position has been our biggest whole for 2 years. In 2019 we had no one who could adequately fill the role on either side of the ground. We subsequently recruited both Langdon and Tomlinson to fill these roles. 

Langdon has been a god send, but Tomlinson was found a bit lacking and we plugged the hole with Vanders for most of the year. As well as vanders did in playing out of position, I think we can mostly agree that its still our greatest weakness. 

If Salem could play the role he would have been doing so consistently a long time ago. He simply doesn't have the tank to be effective as a midfielder.

In saying all of that. I would love to pick up another youngster who can start at hbf and develop into a winger.

4 minutes ago, BAMF said:

 

The idea that Salem can be released to the wing is a fallacy in my opinion. 

The wing position has been our biggest whole for 2 years. In 2019 we had no one who could adequately fill the role on either side of the ground. We subsequently recruited both Langdon and Tomlinson to fill these roles. 

Langdon has been a god send, but Tomlinson was found a bit lacking and we plugged the hole with Vanders for most of the year. As well as vanders did in playing out of position, I think we can mostly agree that its still our greatest weakness. 

If Salem could play the role he would have been doing so consistently a long time ago. He simply doesn't have the tank to be effective as a midfielder.

In saying all of that. I would love to pick up another youngster who can start at hbf and develop into a winger.

Agree 100%.  Don't people remember Salem was meant to be moving to the wing in early 2019 and it didn't work.  Admittedly half the team was underdone at the start of 2019 but he didn't look like he belonged there - i think it might be due to his tank as you suggest.  I think there's more chance of him succeeding as a half forward than a winger.

I'm hoping we can find a draftee or 2 who has the tools to make this position their own - let them fight it out with Baker / Hunt for 2021.  

Some have suggested Rivers might be able to play this role.  Did he play any junior footy there?

Just now, deelusions from afar said:

Agree 100%.  Don't people remember Salem was meant to be moving to the wing in early 2019 and it didn't work.  Admittedly half the team was underdone at the start of 2019 but he didn't look like he belonged there - i think it might be due to his tank as you suggest.  I think there's more chance of him succeeding as a half forward than a winger.

I'm hoping we can find a draftee or 2 who has the tools to make this position their own - let them fight it out with Baker / Hunt for 2021.  

Some have suggested Rivers might be able to play this role.  Did he play any junior footy there?

I remember him training with the mids in the preseason a few years ago, but he only played a few games until he was moved to the half back flank where he seemed to fit.

From what I recall, he played as an inside mid. I know he attended the centre bounce regularly for 2 games and while he didn't have much of an impact, neither did his opponent. 

Rivers was a great hbf as a junior and should get more games this year in that position! Hoping he can develop into a wing too. Love this kid. A real find.


1 hour ago, BAMF said:

 

The idea that Salem can be released to the wing is a fallacy in my opinion. 

The wing position has been our biggest whole for 2 years. In 2019 we had no one who could adequately fill the role on either side of the ground. We subsequently recruited both Langdon and Tomlinson to fill these roles. 

Langdon has been a god send, but Tomlinson was found a bit lacking and we plugged the hole with Vanders for most of the year. As well as vanders did in playing out of position, I think we can mostly agree that its still our greatest weakness. 

If Salem could play the role he would have been doing so consistently a long time ago. He simply doesn't have the tank to be effective as a midfielder.

In saying all of that. I would love to pick up another youngster who can start at hbf and develop into a winger.

Agree. Dean's have the fitness base. But, Yze has already flagged that mix of Salem, Rivers, Sparrow, Kos, Harmes, Spargo, Baker & Jackson will play midfield mix roles if they can get their burst fitness to where it needs to be. So if Chrisrian can get mid-time but pure outside not inside or centre bounce likesbeen tried prev and does what's needed he def could have impact especially i50 delivery & composite. The club genuinely feels we have betteroptions than Phillips/Polec and that's largely.based on Yze and his views based on ext opinion and reviewing of players done via research so far.  

Edited by Nudge
Typos

Statistically Salem was actually second in distance covered per game for us this year, his tank is something he has been working on and I think with a full pre season under his belt with Burgo I think he could become an effective winger. Its also to do with Salem's 'chip kick' sort of style of kicking, his kicking isn't line breaking which is what you want in a half back flanker but his kicking is good at hitting forwards inside 50 as his chip kicks make are easy to mark for the forwards, which is what you want in a winger. I'm also happy to draft a winger like Cook but personally I think Salem's playing style is more suited to a wing and would compliment Langdon really well. 

Edited by Gawndog98

7 hours ago, drdrake said:

Zavier Maher sounds like the type of player we need, explosive and lowers his eyes and hits targets inside 50m. 

Yes definitely in the frame for our picks 18,19,28

 
1 hour ago, Gawndog98 said:

Statistically Salem was actually second in distance covered per game for us this year, his tank is something he has been working on and I think with a full pre season under his belt with Burgo I think he could become an effective winger. Its also to do with Salem's 'chip kick' sort of style of kicking, his kicking isn't line breaking which is what you want in a half back flanker but his kicking is good at hitting forwards inside 50 as his chip kicks make are easy to mark for the forwards, which is what you want in a winger. I'm also happy to draft a winger like Cook but personally I think Salem's playing style is more suited to a wing and would compliment Langdon really well. 

Hey, don't get me wrong. I think Salem has the tools required.  But in 2019 when we are crying out for 2 wingers and the coaches refuse to play Salem in those roles, you have to figure they have made a decision for whatever reason that he isn't suited.

I would be shocked if that reason was that we have no half back flankers to play Salems role.

Even as typing this I realise how often Goodwin has done this though!

On 11/14/2020 at 10:47 PM, spirit of norm smith said:

Isaiah Winder. He’s one I’d really like to see in Demons colours in 2020. I’m thinking he is one that alongside Pickett would be very very dangerous across our forward line.  He’s a classy midfielder who across half forward would be Tim Kelly like.  

Back on the subject. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Collingwood

    It's Game Day and the Demons face a monumental task as they take on the top-of-the-table Magpies in one of the biggest games on the Dees calendar: the King's Birthday Big Freeze MND match. Can the Demons defy the odds and claim a massive scalp to keep their finals hopes alive?

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 592 replies
  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies