Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

Adding to our long list of predicaments going into 2020 is the set-up of our midfield.

Currently we have:

Inside: Viney, Harmes, Oliver, Brayshaw, Jones, Sparrow 

Outside: Vandenberg, Kolodjashnij, Baker, Langdon?, Amon?, ANB, Potential draftee (Ash/Young/D.Stephens), Salem

Blokes who can roll through: Petracca, Salem, Melksham, 

So what's our set-up going to look like next season? I think Petracca if he drops some weight should absolutely be a starting mid with his power and breakaway speed.

Viney and Harmes both can play a lock-down role however Viney is the far less versatile of the two. Harmes was tried at half-back in the last game with mixed results

Oliver is the best of the lot and I think he and Brayshaw must be in there 

I'd have Viney (tag), Petracca and Oliver on the ball, with Harmes at HBF and Gus on the bench rotating through.

Langdon and Amon (if we get them) on the wings with AVB rotating 

 
  • Author

Also didn't include blokes like Stretch, JKH and Wagner as I'm fully expecting them to get the chop

Assuming everyone is fit for Round 1 and not counting any trade/draft inclusions (other than Langdon):

B:        Jetta                        May                     Lever

HB:     Kolodjashnij           Frost                    Hibberd

C :       Langdon                 Viney                    Salem

HF:      VandenBerg          T McDonald         Petracca

F:         Spargo                   Weideman            Melksham

R:        Gawn                      Oliver                     Brayshaw

Int:     Harmes                  Hore                       Hannan                   Jones

 

Centre square:  Gawn, Oliver, Viney, Brayshaw (rotation, Harmes, Trac, Milkshake)

Wings: Langdon, Salem, (back-up: Baker, KK - hopefully he can make a come back)

a pretty good group imo but we need depth/more outside talent

I'd go with assuming a few trades and stuff 

 

  • Neville Jetta          Steven May            Jake Lever
  • Michael Hibberd   Sam Frost              Christian Salem
  • Ed Langdon            Clayton oliver        Issac Smith 
  • Jake Melksham    Tom McDonald     James Harmes 
  • Bailey Fritsch         Sam Weideman    Jack Viney 
  • Max Gawn              Christian Petracca   Angus Brayshaw 
  • Nathan Jones, Lachie Ash, Karl Amon, Aaron Vandenberg 

 

 


9 minutes ago, Patches O’houlihan said:

I'd go with assuming a few trades and stuff 

 

  • Neville Jetta          Steven May            Jake Lever
  • Michael Hibberd   Sam Frost              Christian Salem
  • Ed Langdon            Clayton oliver        Issac Smith 
  • Jake Melksham    Tom McDonald     James Harmes 
  • Bailey Fritsch         Sam Weideman    Jack Viney 
  • Max Gawn              Christian Petracca   Angus Brayshaw 
  • Nathan Jones, Lachie Ash, Karl Amon, Aaron Vandenberg 

 

 

Like your thinking Viney in the pocket.  In the old days he would have been a second rover having explosive bursts on the ball and a tough proposition for any back pocket.

With a preseason I full expect Viney to bounce back to better form and it's time to get Petracca in to the midfield, he should be a mid/forward not the other way around.

There's enough minutes and match ups to work with all of Viney, Oliver, Petracca, Brayshaw and Harmes playing through the centre square. One week you might use Harmes at half back, another it might be Petracca forward or a heavy rotation of Oliver/Viney/Brayshaw through the forward line but it can all be done.

Trade for Langdon and that's one wing sorted, then it's a matter of seeing how the list shapes up for the other wing.

Viney doesn't have enough tricks when sent forward. He is not that smart with ball in hand and his goal sense isn't killer either. He's of most value when he is going fullbore at the coalface which means stints on the bench to get his break.

Clayton, Petracca and Gus can all play forward and have attributes that suit a forward role. Strong overhead and genuine goal sense. Harmes has the capacity to play at either end although his positioning let's him down a lot at times.

Just as important as our starting midfield six will be what we do on the half-forwardline and half-backline imo. We've been playing inside mids in those positions for the best part of three years.

Langdon doesn't excite me but obviously you'd prefer him to Jones or Brayshaw on a wing.

I want Papley/Bolton or Higgins/Smith to add to that mix.

We need to go hard, the comp waits for nobody and teams rise and fall every year now. Gone are the days of bottoming out to win a premiership. 

I await eagerly the trade period.

Edited by stevethemanjordan

 

If the reports of Trac being upset at not getting more midfield time are true, the challenge for him over summer is to drop a bit of weight (not at the expense of strength) and really build his tank. IMV he's at a critical point in his career where a real A grader would step up and fulfill his potential.

If he wants to play more of a midfield role, its time to rise to the challenge!

In addition to a new, lean, mean Trac, I'm hoping Burgess works on Clarry's power. They guy is a bull, and if he didn't look to give the hands all the time could very easily become a powerful, break free of stoppages and kick long mid ala Danger and Martin.  


15 minutes ago, stevethemanjordan said:

Viney doesn't have enough tricks when sent forward. He is not that smart with ball in hand and his goal sense isn't killer either. He's of most value when he is going fullbore at the coalface

Agree. Viney's focus should be shutdown. Did a good job on Cunnington in the last round and there are other examples. He doesn't have tricks, period. Forward or mid he's not overly creative, quick or accurate with his disposal. What he is good at though is nudging, niggling and crunching tackles.

Lost a yard of pace and a little strength this year though, hopefully that comes back. 

I prefer Jones on a HFF if desperate. At least he's a chance to kick a goal when in and around the 50 

6 minutes ago, Good Lord George said:

In addition to a new, lean, mean Trac, I'm hoping Burgess works on Clarry's power. They guy is a bull, and if he didn't look to give the hands all the time could very easily become a powerful, break free of stoppages and kick long mid ala Danger and Martin.  

Agree on this as well. If Trac can lift his endurance he'll be a weapon in the middle. Nearly impossible to tackle, upper body strength to get his arms free and kicks like a mule. 

Viney should tag, wether that is in the midfield or on a damaging hbf. 

Brayshaw should be in the guts always, Oliver too, Harmes, Trac, Salem also swinging in there.

25 minutes ago, Moonshadow said:

If the reports of Trac being upset at not getting more midfield time are true, the challenge for him over summer is to drop a bit of weight (not at the expense of strength) and really build his tank. IMV he's at a critical point in his career where a real A grader would step up and fulfill his potential.

If he wants to play more of a midfield role, its time to rise to the challenge!

Oath.

If he wants full-time midfield minutes he needs to be leaving the coaches no other option but to play him there.

Starts on the track.

6 minutes ago, stevethemanjordan said:

Starts on the trac

I couldn't resist bro...


My issue with Viney is he actually upsets the midfield set up quite a bit, some mids make the guys around them better, Viney has the opposite effect. he attacks the ball hard but other than that and a burst of speed doesn't offer much. at least up forward he could chase and tackle and pressure. 

our midfield mix looks so much better when it's Brayshaw, Oliver and Harmes, and Petracca rotating through.

Don't forget a bloke by the name of Sparrow. He could fit  into our inside mix next season.

if they were all fit i'd probably go with the following,

Inside mids- Viney, Oliver, Brayshaw, Petracca(Fwd)

Wings- Salem, Langdon

inside/outside rotations- Harmes, Vandenberg, Sparrow(HBF)

Petracca should play more minutes through the guts next year, close to a 50/50 split Mid/Forward would be good and help keep him involved in the game, and as a scoring option. thought he was under utilised on ball this year with the others not really setting the world on fire there most of the year.

Salem to play an outside mid role where he can use his quick kicks under pressure to good use and link up the play.

Langdon, sounds like its a done deal, he can play as the fat side Winger to use his running power to good effect.

Harmes and Vanders off the bench rotating through wings/on ball/tag/forward as needed.

and play Sparrow off half back flank with brief stints either on ball or through the wing.

 

 

 

  • Author

can we stop putting Viney in a forward pocket? He will never play there

3 hours ago, Patches O’houlihan said:

My issue with Viney is he actually upsets the midfield set up quite a bit, some mids make the guys around them better, Viney has the opposite effect. he attacks the ball hard but other than that and a burst of speed doesn't offer much. at least up forward he could chase and tackle and pressure. 

our midfield mix looks so much better when it's Brayshaw, Oliver and Harmes, and Petracca rotating through.

I have been shouting from the rooftops about Viney in the Fwd Pocket. WOuld make others walk taller because of his strngth and willingness to attack the ball. He would ease the pressure on our defence because our lack of forward pressure lead ot our defence being swamped too often.

Petracca in the guts would provide someone with his vision and hands to clear the ball out better.


Geez our midfield looks bad on paper all of a sudden. You'd have to try Salem in there in pre season games for some polish. Otherwise we have no great ball users in there or anyone with breakaway pace.

2 hours ago, billyblanks35 said:

Geez our midfield looks bad on paper all of a sudden. You'd have to try Salem in there in pre season games for some polish. Otherwise we have no great ball users in there or anyone with breakaway pace.

If we rotate Tracc, Melksham and Salem through the middle we potentially get better breakaway pace and ball use out of the middle. The reverse of this is we need to develop more versatile roles for the current insiders. Oliver can play forward and Harmes can play wing/half forward. Brayshaw needs to develop another string to his bow. 

I still think a great midfield coach could get a lot more out of having a dominant ruckman and Oliver with the quickest hands in the competition. The great Hawthorn midfields always seemed to have time and space to gain possession with clean hands, then flick it around to someone in the clear and moving forward. Mitchell, Lewis and co didn’t have great pace but could move the ball quickly to Smith or Hill on the outside. 

On 9/2/2019 at 3:27 PM, Collar-Jazz-Knee said:

Assuming everyone is fit for Round 1 and not counting any trade/draft inclusions (other than Langdon):

B:        Jetta                        May                     Lever

HB:     Kolodjashnij           Frost                    Hibberd

C :       Langdon                 Viney                    Salem

HF:      VandenBerg          T McDonald         Petracca

F:         Spargo                   Weideman            Melksham

R:        Gawn                      Oliver                     Brayshaw

Int:     Harmes                  Hore                       Hannan                   Jones

No love for Fritsch forward?  <Spargo?

 
10 minutes ago, monoccular said:

No love for Fritsch forward?  <Spargo?

I realised after I missed him.... yes 100% Fritsch ahead of Spargo.

On ‎9‎/‎2‎/‎2019 at 4:41 PM, Moonshadow said:

If the reports of Trac being upset at not getting more midfield time are true, the challenge for him over summer is to drop a bit of weight (not at the expense of strength) and really build his tank. IMV he's at a critical point in his career where a real A grader would step up and fulfill his potential.

If he wants to play more of a midfield role, its time to rise to the challenge!

what is this annoying myth Petrraca is carrying extra weight?. reports have been his skin folds etc ar excellent. his work rate and attitude are excellent. yes work on the tank but its annoying these comments are made but based on what ? if Dusty couldn't run all day then you'd be saying well its because hes fat.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 15

    As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

      • Like
    • 36 replies
  • REPORT: Port Adelaide

    Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 2 replies
  • CASEY: Essendon

    Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

      • Clap
    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Gold Coast

    The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Thanks
    • 110 replies
  • PODCAST: Port Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 16th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Power.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 32 replies
  • POSTGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons simply did not take their opportunities when they presented themselves and ultimately when down by 25 points effectively ending their finals chances. Goal kicking practice during the Bye?

      • Haha
      • Thanks
    • 252 replies