Jump to content

Featured Replies

Free kick count 0-7.... 

I wonder if they will crack double digits before we get one.

 
2 minutes ago, Jaded said:

Not only is our team painful to watch we also need to put up with garbage umpiring. Why do I bother?

 

2 minutes ago, jules7 said:

These umpires are atrocious. 

 

Just now, olisik said:

Free kicks 0-7 lol

 

Just now, Demonland said:

These umps are like Oprah for the Eagles. You get a free kick and you get a free kick. You all get a free kick. 

 

Just now, FireInTheBelly said:

Free kicks 0-7

Classic Dees fans. Always someone else's fault hey.

 

Free kick, free kick, free kick. It is becoming a [censored] joke.

Weak rubbish from Preuss there.

 

Jesus Christ Pruess, you have a chance to smash McGovern and you let him go. 

Your goal

I hate what AFL football looks like now. Bloody terrible.


1 minute ago, Lord Nev said:

 

 

 

 

Classic Dees fans. Always someone else's fault hey.

We are terrible. But 9-0 frees to West Coast?! Give me a break! 

Just now, Demonland said:

9 frees to 0

7 of which were there, 2 weren’t. The thing I have a problem is is the 5-6 frees not paid for the same things to us.

having said that we are loosing at our own boot, not because of the umpire.

5 minutes ago, Demonland said:

You can't breathe on an Eagles player. 

You don’t tug on superman’s cape

You don’t spit into the wind

You don’t pull the mask of that old Lone Ranger

And you don’t breathe on an Eagle

Afl umpirinf is a bad joke.

And pruess ffs that is weak as [censored]


How can anyone argue with the umpiring? You have to earn free kicks.  A couple of questionable ones but most free kicks have been there

0-9 hahahahhaa

Where's the throw on redden? 

PRUESS let go knowing the fat [censored] big Mac McGovern would have just dropped in anyway and it would have been a free against 

normally dont worry about umps but really this is terrible peuss spun him 360 so that is a free


The AFL have the umpires running two sets of rules.  One for the big boy clubs and one for the lessor lights.

Earlier today Danger took a mark in the exact same position up against the boundary as Salem just then.  Danger wheeled inside about 2 meters and set his own mark well inside the boudary....no "Play On" called.

Salem takes one step or so in side the boundary and DOES NOT play on, no more than 2 feet, but is automatically called to "Play on"....there are two leagues running with two sets of umpiring interpretations going on, depending on who the team is on the receiving end.

Edited by Rusty Nails

Nearly every free has been there, we’re [censored] stupid. 

Why don’t our spoils ever go more than 2 metres? Never seen anything like it. 

1 minute ago, —coach— said:

7 of which were there, 2 weren’t. The thing I have a problem is is the 5-6 frees not paid for the same things to us.

having said that we are loosing at our own boot, not because of the umpire.

Can’t think of the 5-6 they’ve missed tbh

 

WOWOWOOWOWOWOW WE GOT A FREE

Looks a lot like the first half of the Preliminary Final. But, of course we won’t remember that.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thumb Down
    • 178 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 328 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Sad
      • Love
    • 31 replies