Jump to content

Featured Replies

It is bewildering we are back to here again after that big thumping from Hawthorn early last year with seemingly a set of very similar issues.

 
16 minutes ago, ProDee said:

I hasten to add that I'm not ''panicking'' and think we'll come good.

However, my present feelings are like putting on an old comfy pair of slippers.

Not so comfy for me.
More like having stones in my boots.
And having the corkheads into me at work 2nd round in is great fun.

Edited by Fork 'em

don't think we've ever had an easy season that I can recall.

Even 1988 we won seven of the first 8 ( I was overseas and missed it) and then proceeded to win regularly with a few losses until ... yep we lost five straight and just made the final 5 on 13 wins.

And then there was ??? when we topped the ladder with two rounds or so to go and beset with injuries we lost every game

 

If we lose to the bummers then it will be time to hit the shed. 

Welcome back to the Daniher years.

The druggies will think they're a huge chance with us.
They always do.


4 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

don't think we've ever had an easy season that I can recall.

Even 1988 we won seven of the first 8 ( I was overseas and missed it) and then proceeded to win regularly with a few losses until ... yep we lost five straight and just made the final 5 on 13 wins.

And then there was ??? when we topped the ladder with two rounds or so to go and beset with injuries we lost every game

Yep. even when we've been decent, we've been a mental basketcase.
How 'bout 2001, when we went from Grand Finalists to 11th.

3 hours ago, Lucifer's Hero said:

... or not making finals is acceptable to you.  If the former tell me how given our fixture.  If the latter, well I just don't know what to say.

There are no givens in sport, and much of what happens is beyond anyone's control (e.g. injuries/luck, your opponent's injuries/luck). Acceptable or not doesn't come into it. If as a club we do everything we need to to get to the finals, and we still don't, then so be it.

Though I still think many here are seriously underestimating the impact of our non-preseason. Not in terms of player match fitness (though that's certainly a factor), but in terms of team play. If training together as a team wasn't important, players could just train their fitness individually then meet up at the club before each match. What we're currently seeing is exactly what you'd expect for a team that has had limited time *together*.

Short pre-seasons never bothered the Dawks or Cats when they were swapping flags.

 

Edited by Fork 'em

 
6 minutes ago, Fork 'em said:

Short pre-seasons never bothered the Dawks or Cats when they were swapping flags.

 

Off season surgery to 12 of their best players would have bothered them.

I'm sure they had their moments.
Just never used them as excuses.


15 minutes ago, Fork 'em said:

I'm sure they had their moments.
Just never used them as excuses.

For Fork's Sake, @Fork 'em - ? = Is the MFC actually using this as an excuse? Or is it supporters trying to make sense of things? 

There is no doubt 12 surgery's is a factor... 

54 minutes ago, Fork 'em said:

Short pre-seasons never bothered the Dawks or Cats when they were swapping flags.

 

But then the AFL and AFLPA reduduced the player/club contact hrs even further this year.  Add that to our injuries.

I'm not looking for excuses, more so that it provides hope that we will dramatically improve our form over the next few weeks.

I still remember how many wrote us off last year after the late season losses to Geelong and Sydney, only for us to go on and convincingly beat West Coast and GWL to lock in a solid top 8 position.

Zip and 5 would be hard to make much of a season out of (although didn't Sydney make a GF from there a few years back?), but if we can scratch out a few wins from the next 4, then we give ourselves a fighting chance to have a good back end of 2019.

At a bare minimum we need to win 2 out of the next 3 I think to get back into the season 

6 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Mere words

That’s generally what commentators have to offer on the radio 

3 minutes ago, Smokey said:

That’s generally what commentators have to offer on the radio 

Yes, a constant stream...


3 hours ago, A F said:

Yep, unfortunately where I'm at now. It worries me that a reasonably level-headed and reasonably positive football fan like yourself is at that stage, but how can we not be, after years of pathetic performances. And until we are consistent for more than one year (and I wouldn't even say 2018 was a consistent year), I don't think the club and its stakeholders could possibly/reasonably expect the supporter base to act or feel any differently.

Its funny watching you [censored] in someone’s pocket who is trying to be positive around here after the way you reacted to me recently. Fascinating really. I was accused of all but high treason haha. 

‘Perhaps I’m slightly less eloquent, but my message was similar. 

Edited by Smokey

2 hours ago, Fork 'em said:

The druggies will think they're a huge chance with us.
They always do.

Let us hope they do, Fe`.  Lets hope they do.   We need a good bloody blue, and a win.  Like a rooot in the brush.   We need it.

1 hour ago, Fork 'em said:

Short pre-seasons never bothered the Dawks or Cats when they were swapping flags.

 

More available depth, combined with maturity. we are still building our list. still in progress.

 

2 hours ago, Fork 'em said:

Short pre-seasons never bothered the Dawks or Cats when they were swapping flags.

 

Geelong 2006 and Hawthorn 2009 beg to differ.


2 hours ago, Smokey said:

Its funny watching you [censored] in someone’s pocket who is trying to be positive around here after the way you reacted to me recently. Fascinating really. I was accused of all but high treason haha. 

‘Perhaps I’m slightly less eloquent, but my message was similar. 

It's the complete opposite of what you were saying mate. You implied a bunch of our supporter base has a lack of mental resilience if we have a problem with the loss. PD was saying something very different.

1 hour ago, DeeSpencer said:

Geelong 2006 and Hawthorn 2009 beg to differ.

I was thinking that today, the Dorks were banged up after a big campaign in 2008 so struggled in early 2009. The trouble with the comparison with MFC 2018 is that the Dorks managed to win a flag 2008 that they should never have won, not sure.

5 hours ago, Diamond_Jim said:

don't think we've ever had an easy season that I can recall.

Even 1988 we won seven of the first 8 ( I was overseas and missed it) and then proceeded to win regularly with a few losses until ... yep we lost five straight and just made the final 5 on 13 wins.

And then there was ??? when we topped the ladder with two rounds or so to go and beset with injuries we lost every game

2004 on top & lost last 4 rounds & then to essendon in the elimination final.

We just always struggle with staying dominate for long enough

 
2 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

Geelong 2006 and Hawthorn 2009 beg to differ.

Better example, how about Adelaide 2018?

Improved considerably in 2017 to make the GF, were most people's flag favourites going into 2018 but their pre-season from hell and injuries wrecked their year despite them having a list stocked with talent.

Our pre-season was not good and it is impacting our form. It's magnified by the new runner rule and no Lewis - we haven't trained together enough and there's not a lot we can do about it mid-match because the runner can't get out there to yell at us and there aren't proper leaders in the back or forward line (meanwhile Gawn is getting physically annihilated and Jones is likely too busy focusing on his form).


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies