Jump to content

The Zurich Logo 99 members have voted

  1. 1. Would you like the blue rectangle removed from the Zurich Logo on the front of the jumper?

Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Featured Replies

 
3 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

and do the same for the (ughh) afl logo

pfft, just get that cr@p off the jumper all together!

p.s. maybe replace it with another major sponsor!!!

Edited by Demon Disciple

 

Voted no to be different because the answer is so bloody obvious. 

Sorry. 


29 minutes ago, Gorgoroth said:

The prob with the rectangle is it makes it look amateurly just stuck on as a last resort.

The problem is the Blue is their Brand Colour, without the rectangle and just Zürich written in white, is not their Logo

8 hours ago, Demonland said:

Saw the following on Twitter and I must say I agree. 

 Would you like to see a cleaner logo on the jumper preserving the red yolk?

Problem would be solved and it would all look much better if both the AFL logo and the Zurich were moved down and out by 25mm or so into the predominantly navy blue area, but probably not permitted to do thay due to some petty marketing thing the AFL has going - just like the one where 'all' clubs need to have a predominantly white clash jumper.

P.S. now that my attention has been drawn to it, the NB up the top is pretty freaking anoying as well!

Edited by Rodney (Balls) Grinter

 

My god we are majoring in minors. Better start playing games people have too much think time.


1 hour ago, Demonland said:

Here are the new training guernseys without the blue background on the Zurich logo. Admittedly there is no red yolk on the jumper but it looks so much better. 

BCA987A6-9234-49E3-97D1-5D84754072B1.jpeg

That's a really cool jumper. Hope they sell it this year at the Demon Shop.

The logo looks much better without the background too.

Edited by Deeminion

1 hour ago, Demonland said:

Here are the new training guernseys without the blue background on the Zurich logo. Admittedly there is no red yolk on the jumper but it looks so much better. 

BCA987A6-9234-49E3-97D1-5D84754072B1.jpeg

this would make for a pretty decent 'clash' jumper if they made it in the 'colour tv-era blue' of the away guernsey

4 minutes ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

this would make for a pretty decent 'clash' jumper if they made it in the 'colour tv-era blue' of the away guernsey

I'm happy with the current Royal Blue mirroring our regular jumper. I'm not sure Royal Blue would suit this training guernsey for some reason. Could someone with skills do a mock up. Looks great in the navy blue though.

I would however be perfectly happy to replace our regular jumper with this one in the extremely unlikely event that we were forced to change it at gunpoint.

Edited by Bondi


Not 100% the correct blue, but gives you an idea?!

Blue.jpg

Edited by Demonator

9 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

The problem is the Blue is their Brand Colour, without the rectangle and just Zürich written in white, is not their Logo

Every company has a "reverse" logo in their specifications for placement on a dark background.

The circle could be either their corporate blue with a white Z, or a white circle with a blue Z as in the training guernsey. There's no rectangle integral to the Zurich logo.

Just wear this bad boy. I love this jumper so much 

C382E5E7-A49C-45CA-877A-9D5830228914.jpeg

2 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Just wear this bad boy. I love this jumper so much 

C382E5E7-A49C-45CA-877A-9D5830228914.jpeg

100% Best jumper we have by a long way!

12 minutes ago, mauriesy said:

Every company has a "reverse" logo in their specifications for placement on a dark background.

The circle could be either their corporate blue with a white Z, or a white circle with a blue Z as in the training guernsey. There's no rectangle integral to the Zurich logo.

from their home page, and from their building. the buiding one would be perfect

Image result for zurich insurance logo

Image result for zurich insurance logo


All companies have guidelines on their logo. I work for a large multinational company and logo guidelines are very strict. I imagine that having two different colours behind the Zurich logo would be against company guidelines for using logo. Zurich is large global company that would need hq signoff for all use of logo. Unfortunately I can't see this changing 

Edited by Bates Mate

3 minutes ago, Bates Mate said:

All companies have guidelines on their logo. I work for a large multinational company and logo guidelines are very strict. I imagine that having two different colours behind the Zurich logo would be against company guidelines for using logo. Zurich is large global company that would need hq signoff for all use of logo. Unfortunately I can't see this changing 

That was my understanding being a Global Company. I would have thought its use was only given under rock solid guidelines. 

But i am not up with the latest specs. It’s just nice to be sponsored by real companies. Energy Watch was a long time ago...

43 minutes ago, Sir Why You Little said:

That was my understanding being a Global Company. I would have thought its use was only given under rock solid guidelines. 

But i am not up with the latest specs. It’s just nice to be sponsored by real companies. Energy Watch was a long time ago...

Yep this ad is so representative of the "dark" times

 

 

 

 
38 minutes ago, Bates Mate said:

Yep this ad is so representative of the "dark" times

 

 

:) Wow i had forgotten that, till now. 

Jack isn’t even looking at the camera!!!

i have often wondered what happened to the rogue CEO of Energy Watch

He made some waves for a short time. 

39 minutes ago, Bates Mate said:

Yep this ad is so representative of the "dark" times

 

 

Wow. ....and I thought Russell Crowe was bad. Clip for the ages that one.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 216 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 528 replies