Jump to content

Featured Replies

13 minutes ago, Demonland said:

Rumour gaining media traction.

 

No real story, just "Melbourne is considering making a change" - of course they are,  it's called selection committee

No source provided, just "Sam Landsberger understands". Wonder if Sam spends his time searching fan blogs or Facebook...

Way to create your own news on a slow news day

Has anyone managed to get more substance on this rumour?

Edited by Graeme Yeats' Mullet

 

I would understand it - Tyson is more suited to the style of game we wish to play if Smith is to come in for a player - it would make sense to be Fritsch.

I wouldn’t do it, because I think escaping the backline is more important than whatever small improvement Smith would have on playing on one of the smalls. 

*However, if this is to put Smith on Darling and OMac onto Vardy/Lycett then I understand it even more; it releases Hibberd a bit more.

 

 
19 minutes ago, Clint Bizkit said:

If we drop Fritsch I'll spew up.

I'm all for bringing Smith in but doing so it will allow Fritsch to move to the wing.

I like it. Smith is good, my only concern is his ability to immediately step in to the finals cauldron of pressure. Fritta has looked a bit fatigued over the past couple of weeks


8 minutes ago, rpfc said:

However, if this is to put Smith on Darling and OMac onto Vardy/Lycett then I understand it even more; it releases Hibberd a bit more.

That is what I was thinking. Smith totally suits that setup. Still prefer no change.

Edited by Clintosaurus

Smith absolutely butchered the ball against Adelaide so as long as he lets Lewis or Salem do the kicking, then I’m ok with this change.

 
1 minute ago, Brownie said:

Just play 19 men. That seems to work allright

The trick is to have 23 men, that way when they look at the bench theres still 4 players. 

45 minutes ago, Clint Bizkit said:

If we drop Fritsch I'll spew up.

I'm all for bringing Smith in but doing so it will allow Fritsch to move to the wing.

Id have a sick bag ready...


8 minutes ago, At the break of Gawn said:

Smith absolutely butchered the ball against Adelaide so as long as he lets Lewis or Salem do the kicking, then I’m ok with this change.

Plus Tyson is a below average kick and Fritsch is one of our best kicks.

My only real thinking re Fritsch is he's been, like most the team adjusting quite well to the tempo and pressure of finals footy.

We bring in someone else who isn't ? Bit odd to me.

If Smith comes in, I prefer Baley to go forward for Spargo. 

Bayley does most things better than Spargo (sorry Charlie).

No change, to me, makes the most sense.

However, if the selection committee feel that Joel Smith is the right choice for this weekend's game, and Fritsch is the one to miss out, I'm not sure I could argue with them based on the decisions that have been made recently.  They know what they are doing, and while I'll be shattered for Fritsch, he might get a run in the GF if they feel he is better suited to the match ups in that game.


If we swap Smith for Fritsch it would be a huge blunder IMO.

I do not rate Smith at all. When he was fit and playing in the team he practically did SFA. Fritsch is a much better decision-maker and disposer of the ball, plus he gets to way more contests than Smith could ever dream to. Throw in Bailey's versatility and it should be a no-brainer.

Well it may be a matchup that Fritsch is dropped but gee I will be disappointed if he is dropped. He has a great set of hands and Id feel more confident with him down the back than Smith. Im sorry, Smith in his past few games got in the way of some of our players when they were trying to get the ball. 1 game gawn was about to take the mark and smith got in his way. 

Fritsch is also really good with the ball. 

I just don't think we should change a winning team. The last 2 weeks have been great. Don't mess with it. 

6 minutes ago, dees189227 said:

Well it may be a matchup that Fritsch is dropped but gee I will be disappointed if he is dropped. He has a great set of hands and Id feel more confident with him down the back than Smith. Im sorry, Smith in his past few games got in the way of some of our players when they were trying to get the ball. 1 game gawn was about to take the mark and smith got in his way. 

Fritsch is also really good with the ball. 

I just don't think we should change a winning team. The last 2 weeks have been great. Don't mess with it. 

If they drop Fritsch and win, Bayley is going to tear that vfl grand final apart on Sunday.

Gotta go with the wisdom of the coaches but geez he's been pretty good playing out of position.

I guess it would be more about match ups than form if he's dropped.


1 minute ago, Demonland said:

 

Given he can play forward as well as back or mid and take a grab too, I would not be dropping him. 

Just now, Redleg said:

Given he can play forward as well as back or mid and take a grab too, I would not be dropping him. 

Totally agree. He seems quite at home in finals. Some saying fumbly but a lot of players have difficulties at times with ball zipping around. He still is quite calm...still taking excellent grabs...and when you NEED to !!

Maybe me...just don't see that Smith is BETTER just atm...and in context of finals. 

I will struggle to understand Fritsch being dropped for Smith. Although I have a tremendous amount of faith in our club as a whole these days so perhaps we are missing some crucial circumstances that we demonlanders are not acquainted with at this stage. 

My logic is telling me Smith for Tyson and push Fritsch up to the wing. Time will tell.  

 

This is all speculation, mind.

Could just be lairising with the Eagles. To what end I don't know, so perhaps it is not baseless at all.

I'll spew but. But then I'm not working in a FD in a prelimary final-playing team.

I understand the need for match ups, particularly against the WCE tall forwards but J Smith hasn't impressed me for form just yet

Having said that, the Weid made a mark in Perth against my expectations - here's hoping J Smith can do the same


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 15

    As the Demons head into their Bye Round, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches being played. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons if we can manage to turn our season around? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

    • 2 replies
  • REPORT: Port Adelaide

    Of course, it’s not the backline, you might argue and you would probably be right. It’s the boot studder (do they still have them?), the midfield, the recruiting staff, the forward line, the kicking coach, the Board, the interchange bench, the supporters, the folk at Casey, the head coach and the club psychologist  It’s all of them and all of us for having expectations that were sufficiently high to have believed three weeks ago that a restoration of the Melbourne team to a position where we might still be in contention for a finals berth when the time for the midseason bye arrived. Now let’s look at what happened over the period of time since Melbourne overwhelmed the Sydney Swans at the MCG in late May when it kicked 8.2 to 5.3 in the final quarter (and that was after scoring 3.8 to two straight goals in the second term). 

    • 2 replies
  • CASEY: Essendon

    Casey’s unbeaten run was extended for at least another fortnight after the Demons overran a persistent Essendon line up by 29 points at ETU Stadium in Port Melbourne last night. After conceding the first goal of the evening, Casey went on a scoring spree from about ten minutes in, with five unanswered majors with its fleet of midsized runners headed by the much improved Paddy Cross who kicked two in quick succession and livewire Ricky Mentha who also kicked an early goal. Leading the charge was recruit of the year, Riley Bonner while Bailey Laurie continued his impressive vein of form. With Tom Campbell missing from the lineup, Will Verrall stepped up to the plate demonstrating his improvement under the veteran ruckman’s tutelage. The Demons were looking comfortable for much of the second quarter and held a 25-point lead until the Bombers struck back with two goals in the shadows of half time. On the other side of the main break their revival continued with first three goals of the half. Harry Sharp, who had been quiet scrambled in the Demons’ first score of the third term to bring the margin back to a single point at the 17 minute mark and the game became an arm-wrestle for the remainder of the quarter and into the final moments of the last.

    • 0 replies
  • PREGAME: Gold Coast

    The Demons have the Bye next week but then are on the road once again when they come up against the Gold Coast Suns on the Gold Coast in what could be a last ditch effort to salvage their season. Who comes in and who comes out?

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 102 replies
  • PODCAST: Port Adelaide

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 16th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees disappointing loss to the Power.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Love
    • 31 replies
  • POSTGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons simply did not take their opportunities when they presented themselves and ultimately when down by 25 points effectively ending their finals chances. Goal kicking practice during the Bye?

      • Like
    • 252 replies