Jump to content

Featured Replies

Ā 

No change. Forget about Garlett. The pressure would be too much for him and he might have to actually tackle which doesn't seem to be in his rule book. He is a good goal sneak though.

7 minutes ago, big_red_fire_engine said:

I do wonder about anyone who thinks Garlett would be a good in in a final. If Kent happened to becomeĀ available it might make thingsĀ interesting though.Ā 

Agree

Kent is really the only one to 'come back' and JKH is boderline but the rest don't seem to be putting genuine pressure on for spots, will be a matter of support for injuries

Spargo would be first out in my mind,Ā a few nice kicks for goal assists but not much else really, and the miss from 30m out (shank kick out on full) was disappointing, that should be his bread and butter

Probably no changeĀ 

 
6 minutes ago, deanox said:

I honestly don't understand anyone suggesting Garlett or Hunt.

Past glories I spose. In Garlett's case, he has played great footy in his career, and for us as recently as last year when some had him in AA calculations. Hunt likewise, if we're serious about blooding youth they would think about exposing him, even though he's out of form. I had him as a core player coming into this season... I actually have Smith not too far off that point too.

But yeah, this isn't a making up the numbers thing... win next weekend (which we absolutely should back ourselves to do), and we're in a prelim.


Purely a hypothetical, but if Hogan & Lever were both fit, had match fitness & form, do they both come in? And for whom?

No change for me.

Spargo will be better this week, offers so much off the ball. Tyson just needs to take the first option and not try and dance around players in tight spots, always gets tackled and pinged for htb.

4 hours ago, wheaters31 said:

I believe that Melksham is carrying a groin injury.Ā 

Not enough to force him out, but they will have toĀ manageĀ it for rest of season.

I hope that explains his left foot kick for goal.

Ā 

Ā 
40 minutes ago, big_red_fire_engine said:

I do wonder about anyone who thinks Garlett would be a good in in a final. If Kent happened to becomeĀ available it might make thingsĀ interesting though.Ā 

People have to stop thinking of the Garlett from over 12 months ago,

One of the things that really stands out to me is our lack of front and centre/small fwd pace when we bring it to ground. A Garlett type would be a real benefit but he ainā€™t performing so I wouldnā€™t expect any changes.Ā 


2 hours ago, Whispering_Jack said:

There were noĀ charges laid from the Match Review of last nightā€™sĀ Elimination Final so we are all clear on that front.

One matter was explained further.

Aaron Vandenberg cleared contact JMurdoch, 2nd term. It was ruled Vandenberg made a genuine attempt to tackle and his actions were not unreasonable in the circumstances

WTF incident was that? Ā Ā 

46 minutes ago, big_red_fire_engine said:

I do wonder about anyone who thinks Garlett would be a good in in a final. If Kent happened to becomeĀ available it might make thingsĀ interesting though.Ā 

Trust is vital in finals .... so no Jeffy for me.

Were Kent to be available they would at least have to look at Spargo.Ā 

Wouldn't know who to drop.Ā 

Bernie Vince could be an in with his experience and possibly last games. He has a beautiful kick and we saw what experience can give with the example of Jordan.

Another being Joel Smith who brings a little x-factor with his marking and flexibility to play back and forward, Ā though the step up with final pressure may be too much to expect.Ā 

Jay Kennedy-Harris for his pressure acts, run and ability to be in contest.

We have some players who can cover if there are injuries.

8 hours ago, Mr Steve said:

Charlie Spargo ā€“ 5
The first-year youngster was not overawed in his first final, but as you would expect he did not have a lot of impact on the game. What he did best was dish the ball to teammates, ending the night with three score assists ā€“ the most of any player on the ground.Ā 

he's a distributor. and clever.

3 hours ago, Whispering_Jack said:

There were noĀ charges laid from the Match Review of last nightā€™sĀ Elimination Final so we are all clear on that front.

One matter was explained further.

Aaron Vandenberg cleared contact JMurdoch, 2nd term. It was ruled Vandenberg made a genuine attempt to tackle and his actions were not unreasonable in the circumstances

no selwood staging charges? i'm surprised


If Vince is fit, we should bring him in because he is experienced and composed, which is exactly what we need against Hawthorn.
If Vince isn't fit, we should just leave it.

I'm very worried about Isaac Smith though, and could Hannan possibly go to him in aĀ shutdown role? Similar body shapes, and could hurt Smith going the other way.

4 hours ago, samcantstandya said:

I like the way u think. I'd like 2 c Smith in.

Actually, we may need JSmith or other, I'm concerned about Burgoyne.Ā  Or JK-H

And Frawley might take TMc, I suspect.Ā Ā  Maybe we need one more tall up front in TSmith to free up the Weide.Ā  One has to drag Frawley high.

4 hours ago, monoccular said:

Agree the only change that may be considered could be JKH for Spartacus, though I don''t really think so.

AND since you raise the issue, how about RDB sitting with his old arch rival, Murray Weideman cheering on young Sam to even greater heights. ?

It was him was it, I was wondering about that. ?

1 hour ago, Graeme Yeats' Mullet said:

Agree

Kent is really the only one to 'come back' and JKH is boderline but the rest don't seem to be putting genuine pressure on for spots, will be a matter of support for injuries

Spargo would be first out in my mind,Ā a few nice kicks for goal assists but not much else really, and the miss from 30m out (shank kick out on full) was disappointing, that should be his bread and butter

Probably no changeĀ 

Not the Only one JK-H... Vince, as run with?

I want Burgoyne blanketed.

25 minutes ago, 000 said:

Wouldn't know who to drop.Ā 

Bernie Vince could be an in with his experience and possibly last games. He has a beautiful kick and we saw what experience can give with the example of Jordan.

Another being Joel Smith who brings a little x-factor with his marking and flexibility to play back and forward, Ā though the step up with final pressure may be too much to expect.Ā 

Jay Kennedy-Harris for his pressure acts, run and ability to be in contest.

We have some players who can cover if there are injuries.

Who are you concern players, we need to cover ?

13 minutes ago, DV8 said:

Who are you concern players, we need to cover ?

I looked at their list and think they have 10 players who we shouldĀ close down.

Sicily, Impey, Burgoyne, O'mera, Mitchell, Isac Smith, Gunston,Ā Breust, Puopolo and Roughhead.

Ā 

Ā 

Edited by 000


37 minutes ago, 000 said:

Ā 

Bernie Vince could be an in with his experience and possibly last games. He has a beautiful kick and we saw what experience can give with the example of Jordan.

Ā 

We need more mobility if anything at all against Hawthorn. Bernie cant run any more.Ā 

Very likely no change, though Tyson butchered the ball as per normal and Spargo although not having a mare was for me not very influential.Ā 

If Kent were to cleared fit I would potentially look at bringing him in for one of them.Ā 

It is interesting to consider who would come out if Lever and Hogan were fit to play. Tough call!

Whoā€™s home game is it?Ā 

Ā 

Ā 

Look, this is brutal, but I would love to release Fritsch up the ground. Smith or Hunt in for Spargo...

Yeah, I donā€™t like it but footy is tough.

8 minutes ago, 000 said:

I looked at their list and think they have 10 players who we shouldĀ close down.

Sicily, Impey, Burgoyne, O'mera, Mitchell, Isac Smith, Gunston,Ā Breust, Puopolo and Roughhead.

Ā 

Ā 

They're a good side.Ā 

Under the radar,,,,Ā  the Hawks this year.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Essendon

    Itā€™s Game Day, and the Demons are staring down the barrel of an 0-5 start for the first time since 2012 as they take on Essendon at Adelaide Oval for Gather Round. In that forgettable season, Melbourne finally broke their drought by toppling the Bombers. Can lightning strike twice? Will the Dees turn their nightmare start around and breathe life back into 2025?

      • Haha
      • Like
    • 50 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Essendon

    As the focus of the AFL moves exclusively to South Australia for Gather Round, the question is raised as to what are we going to get from the Ā Melbourne Football Club this weekend? Will it be a repeat of the slop fest of the last three weeks that have seen the team score a measlyĀ 174 points and concede 310 or will a return to the City of Churches and the scene where they performed at their best in 2024 act as a wakeup call and bring them out of their early season reverie?Ā  Or will the sleepy Dees treat their fans to a reenactment of their lazy effort from the first Gather Round of two years ago when they allowed the Bombers to trample all over them on a soggy and wet Adelaide Oval? The two examples from above tell us how fickle form can be in football. Last year, a committed group of players turned up in Adelaide with a businesslike mindset. They had a plan, went in confidently and hard for the football and kicked winning scores against both home teams in a difficult environment for visitors. And they repeated that sort of effort later in the season when they played Essendon at the MCG.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Essendon

    Facing the very real and daunting prospect of starting the season with five straight losses, the Demons head to South Australia for the annual Gather Round, where theyā€™ll take on the Bombers in search of their first win of the year. Who comes in, and who comes out?

      • Like
    • 489 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 05

    Gather Round is here, kicking off with a Thursday night blockbuster as Adelaide faces Geelong. The Crows will be out for redemption after a controversial loss last week. Saturday starts with the Magpies taking on the Swans. Collingwood will be eager to cement their spot in the top eight, while Sydney is hot on their heels. In the Barossa Valley, two rising sides go head-to-head in a fascinating battle to prove they're the real deal. Later, Carlton and West Coast face off at Adelaide Oval, both desperate to notch their first win of the season. The action then shifts to Norwood, where the undefeated Lions will aim to keep their streak alive against the Bulldogs. Sundayā€™s games begin in the Barossa with Richmond up against Fremantle. In Norwood, the Saints will be looking to take a scalp when they come up against the Giants. The round concludes with a fiery rematch of last year's semi-final, as the Hawks seek revenge for their narrow loss to Port Adelaide. Who are you tipping this week and what are the best results for the Demons besides us winning?

    • 193 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Geelong

    There was a time in the second quarter of the game at the Cattery on Friday afternoon when the Casey Demons threatened to take the game apart against the Cats. The Demons had been well on top early but were struggling to convert their ascendancy over the ground until Tom Fullartonā€™s burst of three goals in the space of eight minutes on the way to a five goal haul and his best game for the club since arriving from Brisbane at the end of 2023. He was leading, marking and otherwise giving his opponents a merry dance as Casey grabbed a three goal lead in the blink of an eye. Fullarton has now kicked ten goals in Caseyā€™s three matches and, with Melbourneā€™s forward conversion woes, he is definitely in with a chance to get his first game with the club in next weekā€™s Gather Round in Adelaide. Despite the tall forwardā€™s efforts - he finished with 19 disposals and eight marks and had four hit outs as back up to Will Verrall in the second half - it wasnā€™t enough as Geelong reigned in the lead through persistent attacks and eventually clawed their way to the lead early in the last and held it till they achieved the end aim of victory.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Geelong

    I was disappointed to hear Goody say at his post match presser after the teamā€™s 39 point defeat against Geelong that "we're getting high quality entry, just poor execution" because Melbourneā€™s problems extend far beyond that after its 0 - 4 start to the 2025 football season.Ā There are clearly problems with poor execution, some of which were evident well before the current season and were in play when the Demons met the Cats in early May last year and beat them in a near top-of-the-table clash that saw both sides sitting comfortably in the top four after round eight.Ā Since that game, the Demonsā€™ performances have been positively Third World with only five wins in 19 games with a no longer majestic midfield and a dysfunctional forward line that has become too easy for opposing coaches to counter. This is an area of their game that is currently being played out as if they were all completely panic-stricken.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland