Jump to content

Featured Replies

12 minutes ago, Demonland said:

Holy [censored]

I hope this wasn't an intentional ad placement.

 

unbelievable, they don't miss an opportunity do they? lol

 
  • Author
19 minutes ago, Demonland said:

Holy [censored]

I hope this wasn't an intentional ad placement.

 

Something tells me a Freo supporter has done this work..

 

Let's hope Accent gives Andrew Brayshaw a fully paid mouth reconstruction.

Surely if they are any decent, it would be great exposure and more than worth absorbing the cost. 

6 hours ago, Dr.D said:

disagree. He definitely didn't mean to punch him in the face. Those swinging right hands are usually targeted into the chest/top of the jumper region but gaff missed. Gaff certainly didn't look at him and punch him in the face. not sure what vision you were watching. 

I was watching the close up vision of the punch. he was getting pushed, then he stopped, steadied, looked at Brayshaw and punched his face. So you contend he was going to punch his chest in this round-house/hook motion?  it would have hit his shoulder if so.

My point overall, is why do we need to straight away feel sorry for Gaff?  in the weeks to come maybe we can see his side of things and have some sympathy but at the moment the sympathy should be with Brayshaw and Gaff should cop his punishment - as he is


59 minutes ago, radar said:

Nat Jones and JLT out of contract end 2019. Bernie and Pedo this year. Ballic gone. 

Does this leave a possible massive war chest to chase S May or Josh Kelly- or both?

Don't think so.  none of those are on big money

If we have planned correctly however we should be in a position to offer big money should a star become availble

59 minutes ago, radar said:

Nat Jones and JLT out of contract end 2019. Bernie and Pedo this year. Ballic gone. 

Does this leave a possible massive war chest to chase S May or Josh Kelly- or both?

and don't forget the  the $70k for wattsy 

30 minutes ago, radar said:

Given Gus"s response in media today maybe leave Gaff alone.

Couldn't imagine any Petracca- like chin tickling between Gus and Gaff.

 

Then, those two Crows hated each other. 

Haven't seen or heard of anything @radar- what was his response?

also, what's the crows comment in reference to?

Edited by Danelska

 
6 minutes ago, Danelska said:

Haven't seen or heard of anything @radar- what was his response?

also, what's the crows comment in reference to?

Think I read it in THE AGE - contradicted Nesbitt.  Hard to see them being team mates.

McLeod/Edwards - google

On 7/24/2018 at 2:44 PM, picket fence said:

Would anyone have a qualm if he became our highest paid player?? I wouldn't!!

It is on the afl podcast from last night.


The real question is, how can such lovely people (The Brayshaws), be related to that [censored] from North Melbourne? 

As a former Arts/Philosophy student of a left-wing university, I find this 'coward' terminology in reference to Gaff's act as problematic.

If Gaff had signalled his intention to hit Brayshaw, and Brayshaw squared up, would the hit then be heroic?

Morton was once considered a coward for running away from an aggressor. If he had stopped and decked the Port player, would that then be brave?

Also, many people wouldn't have the cajones to take a swing at an unsuspecting person. It arguably takes a lot of courage to do something like that.

Please discuss (300 word limit and submissions are final).

52 minutes ago, radar said:

Think I read it in THE AGE - contradicted Nesbitt.  Hard to see them being team mates.

McLeod/Edwards - google

That was fairly soon after the incident and he still sounded a bit shaken by it.

His Dad has recently come out to say all is forgiven and they want to move on. Also heard Hamish Brayshaw will be organising a meeting between them both to 'move on'.

If Gaff wants to become a Dee there will be no issues between him and Angus.

20 minutes ago, Skuit said:

As a former Arts/Philosophy student of a left-wing university, I find this 'coward' terminology in reference to Gaff's act as problematic.

If Gaff had signalled his intention to hit Brayshaw, and Brayshaw squared up, would the hit then be heroic?

Morton was once considered a coward for running away from an aggressor. If he had stopped and decked the Port player, would that then be brave?

Also, many people wouldn't have the cajones to take a swing at an unsuspecting person. It arguably takes a lot of courage to do something like that.

Please discuss (300 word limit and submissions are final).

Two words - or maybe one.  Bull [censored], or [censored].

1 hour ago, Demonland said:

Holy [censored]

I hope this wasn't an intentional ad placement.

 

Not surprising really. The West Australian is another one of Rupert Murdoch’s newspapers of anything for a buck fake news.

Edited by america de cali


If we get Gaff it will actually make the Fremantle meeting, next year, interesting! 

1 minute ago, america de cali said:

Not surprising really. The West Australian is another one of Rupert Murdoch’s newspapers of fair and balanced fake news.

nah, it's owned by stokes

same same but different

2 minutes ago, whatwhatsaywhat said:

nah, it's owned by stokes

same same but different

Thanks for the correction.

18 minutes ago, Is Dom Is Good said:

 

If Gaff wants to become a Dee there will be no issues between him and Angus.

Gus told you that has he, or you are just speculating as if it is a fact?

1 minute ago, Redleg said:

Gus told you that has he, or you are just speculating as if it is a fact?

I could ask the same question of people saying Gus won't want Gaff at the Dees.

It's all ridiculous innuendo. These are grown men playing football, the will be able to move on from this.


2 minutes ago, Is Dom Is Good said:

I could ask the same question of people saying Gus won't want Gaff at the Dees.

It's all ridiculous innuendo. These are grown men playing football, the will be able to move on from this.

And your answer to my question is?

Angus and Gaff are meeting to clear the air. I'd think Gaff is def considering joining Melbourne otherwise i wouldn't see the point in meeting Angus. I also think it's important to consider people around the situation have said it won't be an issue (e.g. Jonesy and Mark Brayshaw saying they forgive him)

2 minutes ago, MurDoc516 said:

Angus and Gaff are meeting to clear the air. I'd think Gaff is def considering joining Melbourne otherwise i wouldn't see the point in meeting Angus. I also think it's important to consider people around the situation have said it won't be an issue (e.g. Jonesy and Mark Brayshaw saying they forgive him)

I detected that in Jonesy response to the Gaff hit, he gave a very diplomatic response to the question, if this is the case Re clear the air talks.

 
2 minutes ago, MurDoc516 said:

Angus and Gaff are meeting to clear the air. I'd think Gaff is def considering joining Melbourne otherwise i wouldn't see the point in meeting Angus. I also think it's important to consider people around the situation have said it won't be an issue (e.g. Jonesy and Mark Brayshaw saying they forgive him)

I heard that, but then shortly after it was said that Gaff will meet Andrew. Not sure if there is some confusion in the reporting.

If he is meeting Gus, then we are likely in the picture to get him, you would think.

3 minutes ago, MurDoc516 said:

Angus and Gaff are meeting to clear the air. I'd think Gaff is def considering joining Melbourne otherwise i wouldn't see the point in meeting Angus. I also think it's important to consider people around the situation have said it won't be an issue (e.g. Jonesy and Mark Brayshaw saying they forgive him)

I've seen it mentioned on here that Gus and Gaff are meeting. Is it correct? I read today that Hamish and Andrew are meeting him in Perth next week but wouldn't mind clarification of the Gus meet.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies