Jump to content

2 million dollar man, Dawes

Featured Replies

He isn't the future.  Never has been.

The problem is that we don't have the right replacement as such.  We all know his flaws, we all know that right now he contributes little to the senior side.  But if you take him out, who goes in?  Weed and Hulett just aren't ready.  Pedersen is out.  Dunn or Garland up forward?  We tried, with little success.  They even had to abandon the Frost experiment.

Until there is someone to take his spot we might just have to put up with him a little longer...

 
38 minutes ago, Wiseblood said:

He isn't the future.  Never has been.

The problem is that we don't have the right replacement as such.  We all know his flaws, we all know that right now he contributes little to the senior side.  But if you take him out, who goes in?  Weed and Hulett just aren't ready.  Pedersen is out.  Dunn or Garland up forward?  We tried, with little success.  They even had to abandon the Frost experiment.

Until there is someone to take his spot we might just have to put up with him a little longer...

And that is the saddest part of all.

I will give him one plaudit He tries hard.

1 hour ago, Undeeterred said:

Who would you replace him with? Give reasons.

anyone who can stand upright 

 
5 hours ago, Moonshadow said:

Would make a great goal umpire because his marking action is same as a 9 pointer super goal

503D7BA6-0A0A-4C42-B529-84D1C98E3BE3_zps

Unfortunately, he'd only get games during the NAB Challenge.


And there's no problem here, but I'd play Spencer instead of Dawes. Spencer is more likely to kick goals, he's also more likely to take marks and I wouldn't be surprised if Spencer (who is surprisingly fast) is quicker. Dawes' man runs off him anyway, as long as it's not super wet, I'd be playing Spencer until Pedo is fit and/or Hulett or Weideman is ready.

 

2 hours ago, Wiseblood said:

He isn't the future.  Never has been.

The problem is that we don't have the right replacement as such.  We all know his flaws, we all know that right now he contributes little to the senior side.  But if you take him out, who goes in?  Weed and Hulett just aren't ready.  Pedersen is out.  Dunn or Garland up forward?  We tried, with little success.  They even had to abandon the Frost experiment.

Until there is someone to take his spot we might just have to put up with him a little longer...

 If Garland were to come in (or Dunn maybe), I'd have him back and put T Mac forward. Even though his role is still important a change of position would help his confidence. Frost has a bit of goal sense but will hardly get a touch up there. We could also go smaller, placing Harmes/Petracca inside 50 (both of whom played a lot behind the ball), but both are very strong and can leap. I think the undersized key forward can still work, such as Sicily at Hawthorn.

Dawes blah blah blah....

Dawes bleat bleat bleat.....

Dawes is REQUIRED to give a chop out to Hogan, Watts and our small forwards.

Let it go.

He had a bad day......everyone does.

 

I'd be happy to see Dawes go so I wouldn't have to listen to Melbourne supporters complain about him on the train going home after the game.

10 minutes ago, jumbo returns said:

Dawes blah blah blah....

Dawes bleat bleat bleat.....

Dawes is REQUIRED to give a chop out to Hogan, Watts and our small forwards.

Let it go.

He had a bad day......everyone does.

Has a few of those .. bad days


22 minutes ago, jumbo returns said:

Dawes blah blah blah....

Dawes bleat bleat bleat.....

Dawes is REQUIRED to give a chop out to Hogan, Watts and our small forwards.

Let it go.

He had a bad day......everyone does.

4 years of bad games.

25 minutes ago, jumbo returns said:

Dawes blah blah blah....

Dawes bleat bleat bleat.....

Dawes is REQUIRED to give a chop out to Hogan, Watts and our small forwards.

Let it go.

He had a bad day......everyone does.

You are leading with your jaw jr.

Would be happy to be at the opposite end of a Garlett like trade using Dawes. Can't believe he is comfortable collecting his pay cheque after performances like that.

8 hours ago, The Song Formerly Known As said:

Can't mark.

csnt kick goals.

if your highest paid key forward can't do those two things then what's the point?

Hey, don't forget he's a "defensive" forward. Sounds odd but such things exist in other sports and other vocations. Like hurdlers in track and field who can't jump. ("Give him a break, he's a non-jumping hurdler.") Shooters who can't hit targets. Pool players who can't sink balls. Musicians who can't play their instrument. They can be very successful. Think George W Bush. Or Sid Vicious. Or Eddie the Eagle.

8 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

The Alistair Nicholson of the forward line.

Al was much loved.

27 minutes ago, jumbo returns said:

He had a bad day......everyone does.

Unfortunately all his days seem to be bad.

 

i've wondered if Roos plays him to fatten him up for trade, like he did with Frawley and Howe. Only Chris isn't doing his end of the bargain.

Feel sorry for Grimes not being able to get a game when dominating the reserves for the past 10 weeks while in between that time, Dawes gets games, and also Trengove - nothing against Trengove, but he offers no more than Grimes would, let's be honest.


1 hour ago, jumbo returns said:

Dawes blah blah blah....

Dawes bleat bleat bleat.....

Dawes is REQUIRED to give a chop out to Hogan, Watts and our small forwards.

Let it go.

He had a bad day......everyone does.

***a bad 4 years

Would need to be our 42nd man right now. Terlich would've been better.

9 minutes ago, jumbo returns said:

Wow, just wow.

A required player. He has a role.

Watts off the hook, now Dawes.....who's next? Oh, I know.....Bugg!

Not sure what AFL side has a requirement for jogging around, dropping marks, missing kicks and being a complete statue on a football field... Watts off the hook? Because his playing good football. 

 

Its not like he even takes pressure off Hogan.. Teams know they can put anyone on him because he can't take a mark.. He has 16kg on pencil Lever and he still couldn't out body his opponent 

Unfortunately another Neeld era blunder. Payed overs to player as we couldn't attract much to the trainwreck @ the time!

Playing very poor & can't even bring the ball down to create a contest & ball rebounds too quickly!


12 minutes ago, jumbo returns said:

Wow, just wow.

A required player. He has a role.

Watts off the hook, now Dawes.....who's next? Oh, I know.....Bugg!

Required player!? Surely your taking the [censored] now.

Open your eyes mate. Adds zero impact on field. Can't mark, can't run, Can't even go and give Gawn a chop out  because he struggles to get off th5w ground. Oh and most importantly struggles to even kick a goal as a power foward. The main key aspect as a forward.

The sooner he is at Casey fields the better.

1 minute ago, dazzledavey36 said:

The sooner he is at Casey fields the better.

BS. That means he would be potentially taking up a spot for another developing forward.

Development league for mine DD.

The entire panel of On The Couch has just written Dawes off.  Was singled out as being the primary player that now must make way for the future as we can now not possibly play finals. 

But wait, I'm sure in the true spirit of  Demonland everyone on that Panel is a know nothing, has been [censored]. Oh well, best we ignore them and continue with this waste of space Dawes. 

 
9 minutes ago, Hogan2014 said:

Unfortunately another Neeld era blunder. Payed overs to player as we couldn't attract much to the trainwreck @ the time!

Playing very poor & can't even bring the ball down to create a contest & ball rebounds too quickly!

Neeld? Who drafted Hogan, Hogan2014? How's your therapy going? Talk to me....


Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 0 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Shocked
    • 228 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies