Jump to content

  • IMPORTANT: PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING

    Posting unsubstantiated rumours on this website is strictly forbidden.

    Demonland has made the difficult decision to not permit this platform to be used to discuss & debate the off-field issues relating to the Melbourne Football Club including matters currently being litigated between the Club & former Board members, board elections, the issue of illicit drugs in footy, the culture at the club & the personal issues & allegations against some of our players & officials ...

    We do not take these issues & this decision lightly & of course we believe that these serious matters affecting the club we love & are so passionate about are worthy of discussion & debate & I wish we could provide a place where these matters can be discussed in a civil & respectful manner.

    However these discussions unfortunately invariably devolve into areas that may be defamatory, libelous, spread unsubstantiated rumours & can effect the mental health of those involved. Even discussion & debate of known facts or media reports can lead to finger pointing, blame & personal attacks.

    The repercussion is that these discussions can open this website, it’s owners & it’s users to legal action & may result in this website being forced to shutdown.

    Our moderating team are all volunteers & cannot moderate the forum 24/7 & as a consequence problematic content that contravenes our rules & standards may go unnoticed for some time before it can be removed.

    We reserve the right to delete posts that offend against our above policy & indeed, to ban posters who are repeat offenders or who breach our code of conduct.

    WE HAVE BUILT A FANTASTIC ONLINE COMMUNITY AT DEMONLAND OVER THE PAST 23 YEARS & WE WOULD LIKE TO CONTINUE TO BE ABLE TO DISCUSS THE CLUB WE LOVE & ARE SO PASSIONATE ABOUT.

    Thank you for your continued support & understanding. Go Dees.


Who are the Dees chasing for 2017 and at what cost?


junk

Recommended Posts

I think we look at other teams game plans regarding drafting another ruckmen. Too many problems convincing another ruck to sign because they wont the safety net of their original club to be a backup, quality ruckmen are already starting 22 so wont budge and that leaves the lesser name bigmen and we all know too well from seasons past that u cant carry players and we aint mediocre anymore (WIPE GEELONG FROM MEMORY BANK). So what to do?... Max is our starting ruckmen and when needs to rest he obviously heads to the forward line and instead of our current situation of part time 2nd ruck we do what teams do to Max to stop his dominance. We use  2 particular big bodies to double team when Max rests. This works for everyone from Max to Spencer. Now draft time comes round we are in a very good position to draft on needs only basis for first time in my memory anyway! Mids and key position defenders or if Goodwin is a betting man we'll target nothing but mids/Agraders  

Thoughts?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/30/2016 at 5:42 PM, dazzledavey36 said:

Its already been mentioned on Talking Footy last night that the dons were interested.

Oh so i shouldn't post things because it might have been said on a random show? or should i run it by you before i post?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

No

Well that settles it.  A comprehensive analysis of his deficiencies.

Just out of interest how many times have you seen Zac Clarke play live since his break-out season in 2014? Once?

Edited by Fifty-5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 8/31/2016 at 10:01 AM, Fifty-5 said:

Well that settles it.  A comprehensive analysis of his deficiencies.

Just out of interest how many times have you seen Zac Clarke play live since his break-out season in 2014? Once?

The challenge here is that Zac Clarke would be moving for opportunities, and being backup to Max Gawn isn't really that, this year he might well have played zero games for us, i do think the club should consider an experienced ruckman who can play as a forward to give Max a chop out but it would have to be the absolute right fit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Abe said:

The challenge here is that Zac Clarke would be moving for opportunities, and being backup to Max Gawn isn't really that, this year he might well have played zero games for us, i do think the club should consider an experienced ruckman who can play as a forward to give Max a chop out but it would have to be the absolute right fit.

He HAS to play fwd-ruck, he's not coming as a back-up 1st ruck, we've got Spencer in that role and he's as good as we'll get.  In fact he may be off elsewhere in 2018 looking for AFL opportunity.  The knock on Clarke from Freo supporters is his intensity and his knee issues - maybe we can address both those with development (e.g. Watts) and medical assessment.  It might be that he hates Ross, Sandi, Perth or all three and a fresh start would see him invigorated.  There's not going to be a perfect option.

As I posted in the Butcher thread - Jacobs and Jenkins were "spuds" traded cheaply a few years ago.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Fifty-5 said:

He HAS to play fwd-ruck, he's not coming as a back-up 1st ruck, we've got Spencer in that role and he's as good as we'll get.  In fact he may be off elsewhere in 2018 looking for AFL opportunity.  The knock on Clarke from Freo supporters is his intensity and his knee issues - maybe we can address both those with development (e.g. Watts) and medical assessment.  It might be that he hates Ross, Sandi, Perth or all three and a fresh start would see him invigorated.  There's not going to be a perfect option.

As I posted in the Butcher thread - Jacobs and Jenkins were "spuds" traded cheaply a few years ago.

Is Clarke a good enough forward? I would say he's not. With Gawn playing 80% of the game as a ruckman, the second ruck role requires 60% of game time as a forward. Personally I think we would be better off going with a key forward first and ruckman second rather than a player who is not quite good enough to play as a genuine forward. Ideally we would recruit someone like a Jenkins, Wright or Lobb, but they are extremely hard to find.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Fat Tony said:

Is Clarke a good enough forward? I would say he's not. With Gawn playing 80% of the game as a ruckman, the second ruck role requires 60% of game time as a forward. Personally I think we would be better off going with a key forward first and ruckman second rather than a player who is not quite good enough to play as a genuine forward. Ideally we would recruit someone like a Jenkins, Wright or Lobb, but they are extremely hard to find.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 minute ago, armstrong35 said:

Would love Rockliff. Mature age, we know he is a great leader and would add to our midfield and yes we need our young midfield to get games we also need to think about if any of them get a serious injury. We need other players to help. I think he'd be a great addition 

He's about to be sacked as the captain of his club.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, armstrong35 said:

Would love Rockliff. Mature age, we know he is a great leader and would add to our midfield and yes we need our young midfield to get games we also need to think about if any of them get a serious injury. We need other players to help. I think he'd be a great addition 

Not so sure on that bit.

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fruit tingles are Adelaide. I think it was KrazyJay that used the expression to describe them the other day. Being an SA boy, he'd know.

Edited by A F
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pedo has been mention as a tall forward/ruck at 193 cm. O'Mac,Weed and Watts are taller and Frost is around the same ht as Pedo. Why not use the taller players as back up ruckman or call them ruck-rovers? How tall is Keity does anyone know?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, ENYAW said:

Pedo has been mention as a tall forward/ruck at 193 cm. O'Mac,Weed and Watts are taller and Frost is around the same ht as Pedo. Why not use the taller players as back up ruckman or call them ruck-rovers? How tall is Keity does anyone know?

194cm 88kgs

Link to comment
Share on other sites


1 hour ago, Petraccattack said:

Of course he will end up at a top 6 club.

Heaven forbid we have an even comp.

To be fair to Adelaide, they have perhaps lost more players than anyone. They are doing remarkably well.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, A F said:

Fruit tingles are Adelaide. I think it was KrazyJay that used the expression to describe them the other day. Being an SA boy, he'd know.

Adelaide have been referred to as the fruit loops, and sometimes licorice all sorts, because of their coloured looped jumpers, rather than fruit tingles. But yeah, Adelaide. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, Fifty-5 said:

He HAS to play fwd-ruck, he's not coming as a back-up 1st ruck, we've got Spencer in that role and he's as good as we'll get.  In fact he may be off elsewhere in 2018 looking for AFL opportunity.  The knock on Clarke from Freo supporters is his intensity and his knee issues - maybe we can address both those with development (e.g. Watts) and medical assessment.  It might be that he hates Ross, Sandi, Perth or all three and a fresh start would see him invigorated.  There's not going to be a perfect option.

As I posted in the Butcher thread - Jacobs and Jenkins were "spuds" traded cheaply a few years ago.

I would say we may look at de-listed aged rucks who would like to go round again, and a young ruck around 22-23 yrs, who is looking for opportunities.

If Vardy gets the shove, that'll be interesting?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, DV8 said:

I would say we may look at de-listed aged rucks who would like to go round again, and a young ruck around 22-23 yrs, who is looking for opportunities.

If Vardy gets the shove, that'll be interesting?

If Vardy was available l say get him subject to a medical of course. We need another backup ruck, forward for Max and Spencil. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 29 August 2016 at 4:30 PM, stevethemanjordan said:

Well I think we have to be if we want to see a jump in ladder position again. And I think the games against Geelong and Carlton have only highlighted the fact that we need to be active. Not only that, it's worth remembering that St Kilda, Collingwood, Essendon and Port will be vying for a top eight position. Supporters tend to forget that other clubs also improve over the off-season.

Whilst I agree that we don't have much to work with at present, I'm hoping we can somehow creatively make a play for some upgraded draft picks which we can ontrade or creatively make a play for topliner. But that's not our only concern.

I think one of the age-old cliches that circulates these parts at the end of the season is the following: 'Natural improvement from young players over the off-season'. An obvious observation in which some supporters (not saying you) seem to magically think doesn't apply to any other club within the AFL. 

If any Melbourne supporter genuinely thinks we'll make the eight next year on the back of only adding Hibberd during the off-season will be in for nasty surprise.

In my opinion there are three key areas that need addressing if we're to make the eight next year:

 

1 - Age and games experience across all lines of the field. 

2 - Foot-skills and running power.

3 - A Ruckman/forward who has the ability to play in tandem with Max Gawn.

 

In my view, all three can be achieved without much fuss. 

For point 1, I really think that we can bring in some guys who will provide leadership both on and off-field and games experience which we desperately. Equally important will be the fact that these players can fill positions that certain players have manfully struggled to fill for the entire year like Oscar McDonald. 

The fact is, our backline is in desperate need of age and games experience to protect and cover for so many kids who have played through there this year. Let's say we landed Hibberd in a trade and signed Nathan Brown as a restricted FA. The entire back six would look and feel so much more cohesive and would be so much better supported.       

B            Jetta           Brown         O-Mac 

HB        Hibberd        T-Mac      (Spot up for grabs)

 

^ Just looking at those names inspires so much more confidence. It allows for one of Frost or O-Mac to continue to develop their game and bodies at VFL level (which frankly is where both should have been this year if it weren't for degenerate leaders; Dunn and Garland). It would provide healthy competition of spots for Oscar and Frost and it increases our key position depth overall. Personally, I'm still not convinced Frost has the fundamental footballing ability to be a consistent performer at this level. He has an incredible athletic profile, but he is way way too much of a risk to carry into a finals campaign as a definite starter at this current point as is Oscar. Especially both of them playing at once. That should be obvious.

A backline with the addition of Hibberd as a flanker would also allow the release of Hunt to come up to the wing and really add a dimension that has been missing through our midfield for a long time. Serious running power. His ability to cut angles and break lines is huge as we have almost nobody else on the list who can do the same and many of our mids are single-geared runners. 

Key area number 2 will commence tomorrow.

To be continued...

When to post and somehow ended up quoting you Steve....

Edited by Bombay Airconditioning
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Tough Kent said:

He's about to be sacked as the captain of his club.

 

6 hours ago, stuie said:

Not so sure on that bit.

 

I heard something on 3AW the other night but didn't catch the whole thing.  Something along the lines of his style of captaincy doesn't sit well with certain players, did anyone else here this? Were they referring to the younger players at the club?  If that's the case I don't think it's such a big deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    GAMEDAY: Rd 09 vs Carlton

    It's Game Day and the Demons are once again headlining another blockbuster at the MCG to kick off the round of footy. The Dees take on the Blues and have the opportunity to win their third game on the trot to solidify a spot in the Top 4 in addition to handing the Blues their third consecutive defeat to bundle them out of the Top 8.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 3

    MELBOURNE BUSINESS by The Oracle

    In days of old, this week’s Thursday night AFL match up between the Demons and the Blues would be framed on the basis of the need to redress the fact that Carlton “stole” last year’s semi final away from Melbourne and with it, their hopes for the premiership.  A hot gospelling coach might point out to his charges that they were the better team on the night in all facets and that poor kicking for goal and a couple of lapses at the death cost them what was rightfully theirs. Moreover, now was

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 1

    UNDER THE PUMP by KC from Casey

    The Casey Demons have been left languishing near the bottom of the VFL table after suffering a 32-point defeat at the hands of stand alone club Williamstown at Casey Fields on Sunday. The Demons suffered a major setback before the game even started when AFL listed players Ben Brown, Marty Hore and Josh Schache were withdrawn from the selected side. Only Schache was confirmed as an injury replacement, the other two held over as possible injury replacements for Melbourne’s Thursday night fixt

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Casey Articles

    THE MEANING OF FOOTY by Whispering Jack

    Throughout history various philosophers have grappled with the meaning of life. Aristotle, Aquinas, Kant, Nietzsche, Schopenhauer and a multitude of authors of diverse religious texts all tried. As society became more complex, the question became attached to specific endeavours in life even including sporting pursuits where such questions arose among our game’s commentariat as, “what is the meaning of football”? Melbourne coach Simon Goodwin must be tired of dealing with such a dilemma but,

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Reports 1

    PREGAME: Rd 09 vs Carlton

    The Demons have just a 5 day break until they are back at the MCG to face the Blues who are on the verge of 3 straight defeats on Thursday Night. Who comes in and who goes out?

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 241

    PODCAST: Rd 08 vs Geelong

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 6th May @ 8:30pm. Join George, Binman & I as we analyse the Demons victory at the MCG over the Cats in the Round 08. You questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human. Listen & Chat LIVE: h

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 71

    VOTES: Rd 08 vs Geelong

    Last week Captain Max Gawn consolidated his lead over reigning champion Christian Petracca in the Demonland Player of the Year Award. Steven May, Jack Viney & Alex Neal-Bullen make up the Top 5. Your votes for the win over the Cats. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 59

    POSTGAME: Rd 08 vs Geelong

    Despite dominating for large parts of the match and not making the most of their forward opportunities the Demons ground out a hard fought win and claimed a massive scalp in defeating the Cats by 8 points at the MCG.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 632

    GAMEDAY: Rd 08 vs Geelong

    It's Game Day and the two oldest teams in the competition, the Demons and the Cats, come face to face in a true 8 point game. The Cats are unbeaten after 8 rounds whilst the Dees will be keen to take a scalp and stamp their credentials on the 2024 season. May the 4th Be With You Melbourne.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 679
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...