Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.
Demonland

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Cam Pedersen - anything to worry about?

nutbean
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

Just now, Sir Why You Little said:

You Beauty Full side Round one

haha Daisy Thomas not only useless but he cops 2 weeks

Onya Mick

yes wyl, i've sent mr. thomas an email asking if he would be kind enough to refer to himself in the future as dale, and inform the media

there are standards to maintain

  • Quote
    •  

    Good news indeed.

    Now we need Cameron to miss, Stevie J to do a hammy, Dylan Shiel a groin, Mumford the same ankle and Griffen to do his knee to be a strong chance.

  • Quote
    5 minutes ago, daisycutter said:

    yes wyl, i've sent mr. thomas an email asking if he would be kind enough to refer to himself in the future as dale, and inform the media

    there are standards to maintain

    Hahaha but of course...

  • Quote
    •  
    11 minutes ago, Elusive Tunbridge said:

    Cameron sent directly to the tribunal.  Two weeks minimum, I guess.

    He fractured the cheekbone of the opposing player. 

    I expect he'll get at least 3.

  • Quote
    1 hour ago, Clint Bizkit said:

    Pedersen has only been fined.

    I still dispute that he made contact to the head, but it's a good result for us.

    What a [censored] ruling. Charged with rough conduct. WTF is that? A bump is now rough conduct? What are the custodians of our game doing....

  • Quote

    8 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

    What a [censored] ruling. Charged with rough conduct. WTF is that? A bump is now rough conduct? What are the custodians of our game doing....

    revenue raising? we live in an economy driven by the fine 'em for anything and everything mentality. big gov everywhere

  • Quote
    • Author
    7 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

    What a [censored] ruling. Charged with rough conduct. WTF is that? A bump is now rough conduct? What are the curtodians of our game doing....

    The fine print on the AFL site says that it was low impact to the head. Question is - was it to the head? 

  • Quote
    6 hours ago, Bitter but optimistic said:

    But if you do hit him high then it appears as if your intent was to whack rather than get the ball.

    Don't they have "a duty of care" for their fellow players now? Not if you are a coach, Doc or board member at Ess but fellow players do now days, don't they? I'm sure over heard Dill Trott this line out before. 

  • Quote
    •  
    13 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

    What a [censored] ruling. Charged with rough conduct. WTF is that? A bump is now rough conduct? What are the custodians of our game doing....

    Finally trying to protect players from brain injuries thus indemnifying the AFL from future law suits like Bellys?

  • Quote
    29 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

    What a [censored] ruling. Charged with rough conduct. WTF is that? A bump is now rough conduct? What are the custodians of our game doing....

    IF that is rough conduct, there was a similar hit on Kennedy that was much more forceful a little later in the game.  Where is the rough conduct charge for that one? 

  • Quote

    MRP

    Cameron Pedersen, Melbourne, has been charged with engaging in rough conduct against Nathan Wright, St Kilda, during the fourth quarter of the Round Four NAB Challenge match between Melbourne and St Kilda, played at Etihad Stadium on Sunday March 13, 2016. 

    In summary, his $1500 sanction can be reduced to a $1000 sanction with an early guilty plea. 

    Based on the available video evidence and a medical report from the St Kilda Football Club, the incident was assessed as careless conduct with low impact to the head. The incident was classified as a $1500 sanction. The player has no applicable record which impacts the penalty. An early plea enables the player to accept a $1000 sanction. 

  • Quote

    Cameron Pedersen, Melbourne, has been charged with engaging in rough conduct against Nathan Wright, St Kilda, during the fourth quarter of the Round Four NAB Challenge match between Melbourne and St Kilda, played at Etihad Stadium on Sunday March 13, 2016.
     
    In summary, his $1500 sanction can be reduced to a $1000 sanction with an early guilty plea.
     
    Based on the available video evidence and a medical report from the St Kilda Football Club, the incident was assessed as careless conduct with low impact to the head. The incident was classified as a $1500 sanction. The player has no applicable record which impacts the penalty. An early plea enables the player to accept a $1000 sanction.

    Pedo is a clean skin according to this...  I think maybe we should fight it. to keep his clean record.  who wants points or carryover record for that.  lets not take the soft option.

    http://www.melbournefc.com.au/news/2016-03-14/pedersen-charged-by-mrp

  • Quote

    I'd take the fine and run. $1k is fair.

  • Quote

    All good points Dee Luded

    Take the fine

    Lucky in the current cremate

  • Quote
    3 minutes ago, Bigred said:

    Lucky in the current cremate

    If it keeps on getting warmer, pretty much what it's going to feel like.

    Anyway Pedo, pay the fine. Lucky.

  • Quote

    21 hours ago, stuie said:

    Radio coverage mentioned it a fair bit. SEN saying he will miss at least the first round.

     

    Yes they get it wrong quite often.

     

  • Quote
    4 hours ago, stevethemanjordan said:

    Good news indeed.

    Now we need Cameron to miss, Stevie J to do a hammy, Dylan Shiel a groin, Mumford the same ankle and Griffen to do his knee to be a strong chance.

    We will win no matter who they play.

  • Quote
    4 hours ago, nutbean said:

    The fine print on the AFL site says that it was low impact to the head. Question is - was it to the head? 

    challenge it

     

  • Quote
    30 minutes ago, Demonland said:

    I've never liked this line of thinking. If we can't beat them at their best then do we deserve to win?

    well considering no-one is ever at their best, it's a bit academic. i always take the 4 points. the rest evens out over time 

  • Quote

    7 hours ago, Clint Bizkit said:

    Pedersen has only been fined.

    I still dispute that he made contact to the head, but it's a good result for us.

    Fined....for a bump to the shoulder !!    FCS the MRP are unbelievable  

    6 hours ago, nutbean said:

    The fine print on the AFL site says that it was low impact to the head. Question is - was it to the head? 

    No.  

  • Quote
    6 hours ago, nutbean said:

    The fine print on the AFL site says that it was low impact to the head. Question is - was it to the head? 

    I think it was, but certainly not by design.  But in saying that, it was clear that both players were going hard at the ball and only had eyes for the ball.

  • Quote
    5 hours ago, Barney Rubble said:

    MRP

    Cameron Pedersen, Melbourne, has been charged with engaging in rough conduct against Nathan Wright, St Kilda, during the fourth quarter of the Round Four NAB Challenge match between Melbourne and St Kilda, played at Etihad Stadium on Sunday March 13, 2016. 

    In summary, his $1500 sanction can be reduced to a $1000 sanction with an early guilty plea. 

    Based on the available video evidence and a medical report from the St Kilda Football Club, the incident was assessed as careless conduct with low impact to the head. The incident was classified as a $1500 sanction. The player has no applicable record which impacts the penalty. An early plea enables the player to accept a $1000 sanction. 

    Beginning to get annoyed about how medical reports are "used" in situations like these.

  • Quote
    •  
    38 minutes ago, Akum said:

    Beginning to get annoyed about how medical reports are "used" in situations like these.

    They are always used and the doctors have some responsibility to get them right. I don't hate the medical report, I hate how much they count the impact. 

    Anyway, in this case the medical report was obviously all clear so it's worked for us.

  • Quote
    7 hours ago, nutbean said:

    The fine print on the AFL site says that it was low impact to the head. Question is - was it to the head? 

     

    1 hour ago, hardtack said:

    I think it was, but certainly not by design.  But in saying that, it was clear that both players were going hard at the ball and only had eyes for the ball.

    surely someone around these parts,  has the skill to record this part of game & blow it up,  & put it on youtube so we can see it up close ?

  • Quote

    • Archived

    This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • NON-MFC: Round 01

      With Opening Round done and dusted, Round 1 sees the full AFL competition finally swing into action for 2026. Discuss all the games this week that do not involve the Dees, share your tips, and let us know which results would suit Demons best.

      • 110 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: 2026 Season Preview

      The boys previewed the 2026 Season sharing their early impressions of the new coach, the new players, observations from preseason training, and what they've made of the new game style. They also look ahead to the season with their predictions, the players they expect to rise, their expectations for the team, and what they see as a realistic pass mark for Melbourne in 2026.

      • 14 replies
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: St. Kilda

      When the Demons blew their 46-point lead at Marvel Stadium in Round 20 last year, the fallout was enormous. Like an event straight out of a Shakespearean tragedy, Melbourne’s final-quarter collapse left fans reeling and the club grappling with the aftermath. 

      • 5 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: St. Kilda

      With just over two weeks until their opening match of the 2026 AFL Premiership season, the Demons are already well on the path to redemption and have the Saints firmly in their sights ahead of their mid-March clash at the MCG. What do you think the team will look like when they run out on to the G?

        • Haha
        • Love
        • Like
      • 497 replies
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: 2026 Opening Round

      Finally the 2026 AFL Premiership Season is upon us. While Melbourne sits out Opening Round, there is still plenty of footy to enjoy with five non-MFC clashes to kick off the new season. It all begins on Thursday night with a blockbuster at the SCG as Sydney hosts Carlton in what should be a strong early test for both sides. On Friday night, Gold Coast gets its chance to open the season in front of a home crowd when the Suns and Christian Petracca take on Geelong at People First Stadium. Saturday features a double-header, starting in the afternoon with Greater Western Sydney and Clayton Oliver meeting the Hawks at Engie Stadium. That is followed on Saturday night by Brisbane Lions hosting the Western Bulldogs at the Gabba, with the Lions embarking on their campaign to win the Threepeat. Opening Round wraps up on Sunday night at the MCG, where St Kilda takes on Collingwood in the only game in town in the first week of the season. There is no shortage of storylines across the round, so discuss all the action from the non-MFC games of Opening Round.

      • 557 replies
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Richmond

      Mars is not usually a place known for lighting strikes but on Friday evening it happened twice in the vicinity of the stadium in Ballarat that carries the name and is a half completed building site with limited capacity for spectators.

      • 4 replies
      Demonland
    View All

    Account

    Navigation

    Search

    Search

    Configure browser push notifications
    Chrome (Android)
    1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
    2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
    3. Adjust your preference.
    Chrome (Desktop)
    1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
    2. Select Site settings.
    3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.