While you technological titans are fiddling with the space time continuum, can you tell me where Dangerfield ends up?

Strong rumor has him linked to the "ultimate pig hearders" Albury indoor cricket team

Edit: Will be back page of the hun tomorrow

Edited September 26, 201411 yr by Josh

While you technological titans are fiddling with the space time continuum, can you tell me where Dangerfield ends up?

My mate is a crows supporter and his dogs name is Dangerfield, it farted today and I swear the fart sounded like it said 'Demons'

That's good enough for me and about the best sign yet.

No one has a clue, anyone who suggests otherwise are just feeding their ego.

Edit: last sentence.

Edited September 26, 201411 yr by Ethan Tremblay

While you technological titans are fiddling with the space time continuum, can you tell me where Dangerfield ends up?

It can't be us can it?

If I was running a book it would be something like this:

Adelaide - 2 : 1

Geelong - 5 : 1

Hawthorn - 7 : 1

Collingwood - 10 : 1

Melbourne - 20 : 1

Carlton - 33 : 1

Essendon - 500 : 1

It can't be us can it?

If I was running a book it would be something like this:

Adelaide - 2 : 1

Geelong - 5 : 1

Hawthorn - 7 : 1

Collingwood - 10 : 1

Melbourne - 20 : 1

Carlton - 33 : 1

Essendon - 500 : 1

Are you taking bets? 20 on Melbourne please.

It can't be us can it?

If I was running a book it would be something like this:

Adelaide - 2 : 1

Geelong - 5 : 1

Hawthorn - 7 : 1

Collingwood - 10 : 1

Melbourne - 20 : 1

Carlton - 33 : 1

Essendon - 500 : 1

Fiddy on the Cats please.

Danger to Hawks for mine unless we offer a Gary Ablett like deal.

Relax, Collingwood have got this.

We are still a while off attracting players like Dangerfield.

See, this is how bookies make their money. No one thinks he'll remain a Crow, even if for only a year?

My mate is a crows supporter and his dogs name is Dangerfield, it farted today and I swear the fart sounded like it said 'Demons'

That's good enough for me and about the best sign yet.

No one has a clue, anyone who suggests otherwise are just feeding their ego.

Edit: last sentence.

Ha

There are two components

One pleasing danger field money and Goodwin Vince association

Two draft picks for crows that pies cats etc can't get close as well as cash

I doubt Dangerfield would choose playing for Mr Ego who never proven anything as coach Nathan Buckley over Roos/Goodwin

Pies are falling apart at the seams

If it comes down to Dangerfield choosing us vs the Pies, I am backing us in and I never thought id be able to say that at least not for a few more years

Freeman will be p!ssed. He was meant to be the next Dangerfield.

Latest rumour is that Dangerfiled is so confused that he will seek solace and comtemplate in a Tibetan or Greek monastery next season. All that remains to be decided is whether he'd rather eat yak or goat. And choose to shave his head or grow a beard.

Edited September 26, 201411 yr by america de cali

Operation get Danger ... I like it.

Pick 2 MFC = Patrick Dangerfield.

Crows may lose him as a free agent and only get a pick 11-15.

Operation get Danger ... I like it.

Pick 2 MFC = Patrick Dangerfield.

Crows may lose him as a free agent and only get a pick 11-15.

I believe it would require pick 2 and 3 for Danger and possibly pick 10, or even a 2nd rounder. You would think..We are capable of making a reasonable trade, however, I doubt we can satisfy Dangerfield :S

Edited September 26, 201411 yr by Moneider96

Quite a smug Chris Scott tonight when asked about Danger being linked to us and Collingwood:

"I think a lot of clubs like the idea of Dangerfield wearing their guernsey."

Also refused to answer questions about Mitch Clark meeting with Geelong because it's "inappropriate", and it's up to Mitch and his manager apparently.

Quite a smug Chris Scott tonight when asked about Danger being linked to us and Collingwood:

"I think a lot of clubs like the idea of Dangerfield wearing their guernsey."

Also refused to answer questions about Mitch Clark meeting with Geelong because it's "inappropriate", and it's up to Mitch and his manager apparently.

I hate the Scott brothers......arrogant pr*cks.

I hate the Scott brothers......arrogant pr*cks.

Good blokes when I met them a couple of years back, but yep in football terms they are more than a bit annoying.

i actually think he handled the clark question and the dangerfield question perfectly.

some of the way that other coaches and players have behaved with wantaway players this impending off-season - grand final still to come, ffs! - has been disgraceful.

We would easily have enough salary cap space to sign all three of Dangerfield, Sloane and Tex

Ha, the DeeT'S, I'm shaking with deelight at this years trade & draft periods.

We are probably better off in reality trying to pull off a few more dom tyson/salem deals than throwing everything at one player. Clearly it sounds like we gave to pay more for danger than geelong (where i think he will end up).

how do you guys rate Taylor Adams year? Was highly touted but im not convinced that was a win for the pies.bb

cant see danger at the pies.

Edited September 26, 201411 yr by Norm Smith's Curse

We are probably better off in reality trying to pull off a few more dom tyson/salem deals than throwing everything at one player. Clearly it sounds like we gave to pay more for danger than geelong (where i think he will end up).

how do you guys rate Taylor Adams year? Was highly touted but im not convinced that was a win for the pies.bb

cant see danger at the pies.

No, we need a star for once to attract people to our games, in particular young kids. Plus Geelong have nothing to offer Adelaide that would satisfy them, unless they're willing to trade Tom Hawkins. And I don't think Adelaide are stupid enough to let Danger walk into free agency either. If Danger leaves Adelaide, he should leave in 2014, otherwise, i expect him to stay

Edited September 26, 201411 yr by Moneider96

I'm sick of this conservative [censored]. I just want one, genuine A grader, not more draft picks. If it takes pick 2 and 3 to get Danger by himself, then i will be more than satisfied. Plus, imagine the effect it will have on people's perception on Melbourne when we have Dangerfield

Edited September 26, 201411 yr by Moneider96

I'm sick of this conservative [censored]. I just want one, genuine A grader, not more draft picks. If it takes pick 2 and 3 to get Danger by himself, then i will be more than satisfied. Plus, imagine the effect it will have on people's perception on Melbourne when we have Dangerfield

agree

we need drastic measures to change the rut that this club is stuck in. Getting Roos himself was one such measure, now we need serious talent and we need it now

Having said that, if we miss out on Dangerfield but we draft similarly to last year and get a few solid ones like Tyson, Vince and Cross I will be pretty happy there too

Anything but hanging on to high draft picks and watching them get rolled every week. Anything but that, please.