Jump to content

Featured Replies

Love that Petracca was laying hard tackles today also. He needs to build the defensive side of his game to become a well-rounded player and he's already showing signs he has worked on it the last few weeks.

Love how he gets around tacklers too. If he starts nailing those shots at goal he is going to be very dangerous!

 
23 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Yep - and the only vision that is close to accurate is the goal line one to see if a ball is touched/marked before or over the line (see Tippett example from Friday). But the amateur AFL won't even fork out to ensure the goal post cameras are installed at every ground! What a farce.

And they can only get away with it on the goal line because it's more obvious if it's crossed the posts.  Anything before the goal line- like a touched ball off a soccer kick is still inconclusive. It's funny that in a billion dollar industry that a review system is based off rewind then play at quarter speed lol. 

The umpires are part time,  in a game that is the hardest to officiate,  and the review system is primitive. It's only a matter of time before this kills someone in a massive game. 

But hey,  as OD says,  the  pies are cheaper! Thank God for that hey? 

1 hour ago, Jesse Christ said:

  Upgrade your cameras and review system AFL you tightarses 

Unfortunately the monies they could've used to upgrade the review system are otherwise spent on pointless overseas junkets.

 
3 hours ago, brendan said:

The truck is now $3.25 favorite for rising star 

I'd have Oliver ahead of him, but Oliver is the sort of player, like Sam Mitchell, that will go unnoticed for years.

4 hours ago, chook fowler said:

As an aside that goal review was one of the worst decisions I've seen - that third umpire should be banished. The decision went against all the principles of a review .

Can I just say that for a billion dollar organisation, they are absolute amateurs at times. How can you not send a memo out to the clubs if the umpires are going to start focusing on new procedures or interpretations? The new interpretation of the deliberate rushed behind and the goal review after every goal - since when? Clearly they've both started this week. No communication out of AFL House though. Hopeless.

Edited by AdamFarr

18 hours ago, DemonAndrew said:

kid looks a jet in the making.

 

should've nailed at least three of his four points today.

He did nail one of them......a totally inexplicable score review robbed him of that one.

Great game young man.


4 hours ago, chook fowler said:

As an aside that goal review was one of the worst decisions I've seen - that third umpire should be banished. The decision went against all the principles of a review .

It will be interesting to hear the maggot apologists justifying that one.

Who actually called the review?  Should be shot at dawn, or maybe midnight to avoid time wasting.  

If whomever asked for it did in response to the defender claiming they had touched they are even more gullible than I could have though.   And the evidence to change the call was just not there.  

Is it true that deliberate rushed behind is now being more rigorously enforced?  I thought it was just a  thought bubble from one of the geniuses at AFL HQ as something that might come in.  One of the commentators did imply that it was true, but I have zero confidence that those guys know what they are talking about.  Anyone know for sure?

28 minutes ago, monoccular said:

It will be interesting to hear the maggot apologists justifying that one.

Who actually called the review?  Should be shot at dawn, or maybe midnight to avoid time wasting.  

If whomever asked for it did in response to the defender claiming they had touched they are even more gullible than I could have though.   And the evidence to change the call was just not there.  

...be interesting to hear Whateley's take on it tonight. He's been one of the systems biggest critics, I hope the AFL don't get to him first.

 
3 hours ago, Deeoldfart said:

According to the Fox commentary team, the Lions player who claimed he had touched it was already back in the centre waiting for a bounce to restart play when the 'behind' decision was announced.  Go figure ........

Based on this review result,does the MFC have the right to request another review on the Todd Goldstein pulling the ball out of the third row of the Grandstand  in Hobart  and kicking a goal.It was clearly over the line so how long after a score has been awarded does that score stand, is there a time limit and why have goal umpires if  decisions can be made by some faceless person  somewhere up in the Grandstands.....

3 hours ago, AdamFarr said:

I'd have Oliver ahead of him, but Oliver is the sort of player, like Sam Mitchell, that will go unnoticed for years.

Can I just say that for a billion dollar organisation, they are absolute amateurs at times. How can you not send a memo out to the clubs if the umpires are going to start focusing on new procedures or interpretations? The new interpretation of the deliberate rushed behind and the goal review after every goal - since when? Clearly they've both started this week. No communication out of AFL House though. Hopeless.

They've always said that every goal gets reviewed anyway since the introduction of the review system. It happened in one of our game's a couple of years ago where the ball was about to be bounced then was called back as it was overruled as a point.


8 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

They've always said that every goal gets reviewed anyway since the introduction of the review system. It happened in one of our game's a couple of years ago where the ball was about to be bounced then was called back as it was overruled as a point.

That fateful night against the Dogs in 2010....

16 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

They've always said that every goal gets reviewed anyway since the introduction of the review system. It happened in one of our game's a couple of years ago where the ball was about to be bounced then was called back as it was overruled as a point.

I don't remember that, but thanks mate. Why was Vince's goal against Richmond never reviewed then? That was a metre and a half over the line, but was called touched and then never reviewed. The commentators didn't mention anything, so it wasn't even replayed. I was in a perfect position for that. It was well over.

3 minutes ago, AdamFarr said:

I don't remember that, but thanks mate. Why was Vince's goal against Richmond never reviewed then? That was a metre and a half over the line, but was called touched and then never reviewed. The commentators didn't mention anything, so it wasn't even replayed. I was in a perfect position for that. It was well over.

Only goals are reviewed I think cos there's a stop in play. Reviewing points would take too long and stop a team from kicking in.

9 minutes ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Only goals are reviewed I think cos there's a stop in play. Reviewing points would take too long and stop a team from kicking in.

Makes sense. Thanks mate.

10 minutes ago, AdamFarr said:

I don't remember that, but thanks mate. Why was Vince's goal against Richmond never reviewed then? That was a metre and a half over the line, but was called touched and then never reviewed. The commentators didn't mention anything, so it wasn't even replayed. I was in a perfect position for that. It was well over.

That sort of thing happens too often.

Blatent errors never reviewed.

Cole ones never decided correctly.

we as a team do not carry on and remonstrate nor stage and fake for frees which may be Roos instructions.

Should pay off eventually but currently we get the rough end.

 

 


4 hours ago, monoccular said:

It will be interesting to hear the maggot apologists justifying that one.

Who actually called the review?  Should be shot at dawn, or maybe midnight to avoid time wasting.  

If whomever asked for it did in response to the defender claiming they had touched they are even more gullible than I could have though.   And the evidence to change the call was just not there.  

If we miss out on finals by 0.00132 of a percentage point....we will find him.

  • 4 years later...

Trac has massively improved his forward pressure; previously he would just jog around I50 and let his opponent waltz away with the ball but tonight he was applying maniacal pressure I50 which lead to a few goals. Good on you trac!

Question is   how many Brownlow votes will he get ?

He seems to be developing a signature move with that 360 degree spin out of a pack, ala Dustys fend off.

The Petracca Spin

48 minutes ago, 640MD said:

Question is   how many Brownlow votes will he get ?

6


  • 1 month later...
On 8/27/2014 at 11:18 PM, spirit of norm smith said:

Petracca will be a star. Pick 1 or 2. Hope Saints go for McCartin. Then we get Petracca and Brayshaw. 

Hi all 

Well let’s all congratulate Trac on his first B&F.  
This is the story of the night. Truly deserved after a big preseason and some maturity. Great talent that I think with the right guidance can keep getting better. In fact still room to dominate like a Danger or Dusty. 

 

First off well done Spirit that was a great call way back then and so insightful.

Congratulations Christian Petracca on winning your first Keith "Bluey" Truscott Trophy. You have have been a real revelation in 2020, you showed the promising signs in 2017 - 2019 but your confidence in your body and improved fitness and strength have really shown out in 2020. A very worthy winner indeed. Congratulations also to May, Langdon, Viney and Clarry (who I think was a bit stiff).

Go Dee's!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!. 

 

  • 1 month later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Brisbane

    And just like that, we’re Narrm again. Even though the annual AFL Sir Doug Nicholls Round which commemorates the contributions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture to our game has been a welcome addition to our calendar for ten years, more lately it has been a portent of tough times ahead for we beleaguered Narrm supporters. Ever since the club broke through for its historic 2021 premiership, this has become a troubling time of the year for the club. For example, it all began when Melbourne rebranded itself as Narrm across the two rounds of the Sir Doug Nicholls Round to become the first club to adopt an Indigenous club name especially for the occasion. It won its first outing under the brand against lowly North Melbourne to go to 10 wins and no losses but not without a struggle or a major injury to  star winger Ed Langdon who broke his ribs and missed several weeks. In the following week, still as Narrm, the team’s 17 game winning streak came to an end at the hands of the Dockers. That came along with more injuries, a plague that remained with them for the remainder of the season until, beset by injuries, the Dees were eliminated from the finals in straight sets. It was even worse last year, when Narrm inexplicably lowered its colours in Perth to the Waalit Marawar Eagles. Oh, the shame of it all! At least this year, if there is a corner to turn around, it has to be in the direction of something better. To that end, I produced a special pre-game chant in the local Narrm language - “nam mi:wi winnamun katjil prolin ambi ngamar thamelin amb” which roughly translated is “every heart beats true for the red and the blue.” >y belief is that if all of the Narrm faithful recite it long enough, then it might prove to be the only way to beat the Brisbane Lions at the Gabba on Sunday. The Lions are coming off a disappointing draw at Marvel Stadium against a North Melbourne team that lacks the ability and know how to win games (except when playing Melbourne). Brisbane are, however, a different kettle of fish at home and have very few positional weaknesses. They are a midfield powerhouse, strong in defence and have plenty of forward options, particularly their small and medium sized players, to kick a winning score this week after the sting of last week’s below par performance.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Hawthorn

    There was a time during the current Melbourne cycle that goes back to before the premiership when the club was the toughest to beat in the fourth quarter. The Demons were not only hard to beat at any time but it was virtually impossible to get the better them when scores were close at three quarter time. It was only three or four years ago but they were fit, strong and resilient in body and mind. Sadly, those days are over. This has been the case since the club fell off its pedestal about 12 months ago after it beat Geelong and then lost to Carlton. In both instances, Melbourne put together strong, stirring final quarters, one that resulted in victory, the other, in defeat. Since then, the drop off has been dramatic to the point where it can neither pull off victory in close matches, nor can it even go down in defeat  gallantly.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Footscray

    At twenty-four minutes into the third term of the game between the Casey Demons and Footscray VFL at Whitten Oval, the visitors were coasting. They were winning all over the ground, had the ascendancy in the ruck battles and held a 26 point lead on a day perfect for football. What could go wrong? Everything. The Bulldogs moved into overdrive in the last five minutes of the term and booted three straight goals to reduce the margin to a highly retrievable eight points at the last break. Bouyed by that effort, their confidence was on a high level during the interval and they ran all over the despondent Demons and kicked another five goals to lead by a comfortable margin of four goals deep into the final term before Paddy Cross kicked a couple of too late goals for a despondent Casey. A testament to their lack of pressure in the latter stages of the game was the fact that Footscray’s last ten scoring shots were nine goals and one rushed behind. Things might have been different for the Demons who went into the game after last week’s bye with 12 AFL listed players. Blake Howes was held over for the AFL game but two others, Jack Billings and Taj Woewodin (not officially listed as injured) were also missing and they could have been handy at the end. Another mystery of the current VFL system.

    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Brisbane

    The Demons head back out on the road in Round 10 when they travel to Queensland to take on the reigning Premiers and the top of the table Lions who look very formidable. Can the Dees cause a massive upset? Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 125 replies
    Demonland
  • PODCAST: Hawthorn

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 12th May @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Demons loss to the Hawks. Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.

    • 52 replies
    Demonland
  • POSTGAME: Hawthorn

    Wayward kicking for goal, dump kicks inside 50 and some baffling umpiring all contributed to the Dees not getting out to an an early lead that may have impacted the result. At the end of the day the Demons were just not good enough and let the Hawks run away with their first win against the Demons in 7 years.

      • Haha
    • 364 replies
    Demonland