Jump to content

  • IMPORTANT: PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING

    Posting unsubstantiated rumours on this website is strictly forbidden.

    Demonland has made the difficult decision to not permit this platform to be used to discuss & debate the off-field issues relating to the Melbourne Football Club including matters currently being litigated between the Club & former Board members, board elections, the issue of illicit drugs in footy, the culture at the club & the personal issues & allegations against some of our players & officials ...

    We do not take these issues & this decision lightly & of course we believe that these serious matters affecting the club we love & are so passionate about are worthy of discussion & debate & I wish we could provide a place where these matters can be discussed in a civil & respectful manner.

    However these discussions unfortunately invariably devolve into areas that may be defamatory, libelous, spread unsubstantiated rumours & can effect the mental health of those involved. Even discussion & debate of known facts or media reports can lead to finger pointing, blame & personal attacks.

    The repercussion is that these discussions can open this website, it’s owners & it’s users to legal action & may result in this website being forced to shutdown.

    Our moderating team are all volunteers & cannot moderate the forum 24/7 & as a consequence problematic content that contravenes our rules & standards may go unnoticed for some time before it can be removed.

    We reserve the right to delete posts that offend against our above policy & indeed, to ban posters who are repeat offenders or who breach our code of conduct.

    WE HAVE BUILT A FANTASTIC ONLINE COMMUNITY AT DEMONLAND OVER THE PAST 23 YEARS & WE WOULD LIKE TO CONTINUE TO BE ABLE TO DISCUSS THE CLUB WE LOVE & ARE SO PASSIONATE ABOUT.

    Thank you for your continued support & understanding. Go Dees.


Dank involved at Demons?


McQueen

Recommended Posts

I posted this on another thread and I would love to know the answer.

Is Demetriou more angry with us for answering a specific question he asked, which has proven to be the correct answer, but at the same time omitting to volunteer further information to a question not specifically asked, than he is with Essendon for injecting players in the stomach with unknown substances and having secret contracts that the AFL was not aware of?

I would love any media person in this country to have the guts to ask that simple question.

I don't know the answer to that either, and agree it will be interesting (very) to find out. You would imagine that Caro's "drug laboratory" at Windy Hill SHOULD be a much graver sin, but...

One thing though is for sure, right at this moment we are a much softer target than the mighty and powerful Essendon FC.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know the answer to that either, and agree it will be interesting (very) to find out. You would imagine that Caro's "drug laboratory" at Windy Hill SHOULD be a much graver sin, but...

One thing though is for sure, right at this moment we are a much softer target than the mighty and powerful Essendon FC.

IMO the difference is the Bombers got on the front foot by admitting they had a problem.

The MFC deceived the AFL ( maybe un wittingly ).

That puts us in a poor position. When you get the AFL off side by making them look silly look out.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

IMO the difference is the Bombers got on the front foot by admitting they had a problem.

The MFC deceived the AFL ( maybe un wittingly ).

That puts us in a poor position. When you get the AFL off side by making them look silly look out.

FWIW, and I think I posted this elsewhere, apparently Karen Hayes (from the Board), spoke to a gathering of members at the match on Sunday, and reiterated that the board were happy with the submission they made to the AFL re this, but that Dr. Bates had not revealed his association(s) with Dank.

Just re an earlier post of yours here OD, this is different (very!) to the tanking investigation, simply because the ACC and ASADA are into it. They very much have a "take no prisoners" approach, and at the whiff of anything, from any club or player, at anytime, will be on to it.

Finally, just re the thread in general, we just have to wait to see who did what, who knew what, and who took what. There are some very long bows being drawn here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the good doc was prescribing supplements that had an effect on players' fitness (as has been indicated), then David Misson - who is described as "Melbourne's elite performance manager" - surely had a pretty strong interest in knowing what the doc was doctoring his players with.

And while we're on the subject, once the Essendon/Dank stink happened and the AFL questioned each club on their dealings with Danks, if McLardy knew of the doc's dealings with Dank but didn't inform the AFL very openly and transparently (despite it maybe not being a speific answer to the particular question they asked) then he will be gone very quickly. If on the other hand, McLardy didn't know of the doc's dealings with Dank, then why on earth didn't he - as president - make damn sure that he had left no stone unturned in discovering what if anything was going on in the ranks in relation to interaction with Danks? Again, it's symptomatic of gross corporate negligence and he has disqualified himself as being fit to continue as our president.

The only hope for McLardy is that he made strenuous efforts to discover any and all club connections to Danks, but was bare-faced lied to by the doc.

This little gem surfaced after the GWS game:

MELBOURNE president Don McLardy has urged the AFL to guarantee that only people with integrity and the highest of values are attracted to positions of power in football clubs.

http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/sport/afl/melbourne-president-don-mclardy-says-the-afl-must-guarantee-the-integrity-of-the-league/story-e6frecm3-1226625296519

Indeed!

I'd say this about Neeld, not McLardy.

McLardy doesn't handle and coach the players, he is the president.

It's worrying that Neeld says he didn't know about this, because he should've known, he definintely should've known.

And.. If he did know, then he is lying by telling us otherwise.

It's obvious that Neil Craig knew, so Neeld would've known.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd say this about Neeld, not McLardy.

McLardy doesn't handle and coach the players, he is the president.

It's worrying that Neeld says he didn't know about this, because he should've known, he definintely should've known.

And.. If he did know, then he is lying by telling us otherwise.

It's obvious that Neil Craig knew, so Neeld would've known.

Of course none of this has anything to do with your desire to see Neeld gone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW, and I think I posted this elsewhere, apparently Karen Hayes (from the Board), spoke to a gathering of members at the match on Sunday, and reiterated that the board were happy with the submission they made to the AFL re this, but that Dr. Bates had not revealed his association(s) with Dank.

Just re an earlier post of yours here OD, this is different (very!) to the tanking investigation, simply because the ACC and ASADA are into it. They very much have a "take no prisoners" approach, and at the whiff of anything, from any club or player, at anytime, will be on to it.

Finally, just re the thread in general, we just have to wait to see who did what, who knew what, and who took what. There are some very long bows being drawn here.

The worst part IMO is that Acc and ASADA are political organisations.

Months after the big meeting in Canberra there is still no one named, arrested or charged.

Again IMO don't hold your breath this is going to take months and months and there may never be a resolution.

People's reputations have already been damaged with no recourse.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The worst part IMO is that Acc and ASADA are political organisations.

Months after the big meeting in Canberra there is still no one named, arrested or charged.

Again IMO don't hold your breath this is going to take months and months and there may never be a resolution.

People's reputations have already been damaged with no recourse.

Yes OD, but soon, once the reputation of every player and every administrator in the AFL has been sullied, we will be back on a level playing field and it will be just like nothing ever happened :-)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The worst part IMO is that Acc and ASADA are political organisations.

Months after the big meeting in Canberra there is still no one named, arrested or charged.

Again IMO don't hold your breath this is going to take months and months and there may never be a resolution.

People's reputations have already been damaged with no recourse.

Relax old bean. It was claimed that the review by ASADA will take a number of months.

They are still progressing on Cronulla which arose before Essendon.

In respect of people's reputations well some of those people are squarely responsible for putting Essendon in the vice. There actions have also put the lives and good names of others at risk. It's terrible stuff.

It is hoped that the Switkowski inquiry and the AFL inquiry will deal with those issues outside ASADAs. If found guilty by ASADA heads will really roll. If ASADA finds no issue to answer then I believe a number of senior people should still be in the gun. Essendon's lack of knowledge of what was going on and the lack of oversight protocols over player welfare is appalling.

If the ACC and ASADA are properly funded and resourced I have no problem with them Government agencies. You would not think the private sector could handle this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Relax old bean. It was claimed that the review by ASADA will take a number of months.

They are still progressing on Cronulla which arose before Essendon.

In respect of people's reputations well some of those people are squarely responsible for putting Essendon in the vice. There actions have also put the lives and good names of others at risk. It's terrible stuff.

It is hoped that the Switkowski inquiry and the AFL inquiry will deal with those issues outside ASADAs. If found guilty by ASADA heads will really roll. If ASADA finds no issue to answer then I believe a number of senior people should still be in the gun. Essendon's lack of knowledge of what was going on and the lack of oversight protocols over player welfare is appalling.

If the ACC and ASADA are properly funded and resourced I have no problem with them Government agencies. You would not think the private sector could handle this.

Justice delayed is justice denied RR.

If anyone is convicted I will be surprised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats pure crap OD.

Justice should always based the accumulation of evidence.

Such doping investigations take time.

Surely Danks must have something for your chronic pessimism.

This is not the way the law normally operates RR.

The longer it takes the more innocent people get their reputations shredded.

Your last line is just a put down and nothing to do with any thing in the discussion besides you shouting down someone who does not agree with you.

I could make a number of smart comments about you but I choose not to use that technique.

  • Like 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats pure crap OD.

Justice should always based the accumulation of evidence.

Such doping investigations take time.

Surely Danks must have something for your chronic pessimism.

Really?? How do you explain the 'tanking' inquiry and finding that we did not tank??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is not the way the law normally operates RR.

.

And you would know....spare me.

Really?? How do you explain the 'tanking' inquiry and finding that we did not tank??

When the findings of the closed session investigation uncovered practices that were not in accordance with the rules of the game, the outcome was contrived by the AFL and the Board for the good of the game. Officially we didn't tank but $500k, employee suspension and soon after departure of the CEO would suggest otherwise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you would know....spare me.

When the findings of the closed session investigation uncovered practices that were not in accordance with the rules of the game, the outcome was contrived by the AFL and the Board for the good of the game. Officially we didn't tank but $500k, employee suspension and soon after departure of the CEO would suggest otherwise.

I'm going with the official line

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And you would know....spare me.

When the findings of the closed session investigation uncovered practices that were not in accordance with the rules of the game, the outcome was contrived by the AFL and the Board for the good of the game. Officially we didn't tank but $500k, employee suspension and soon after departure of the CEO would suggest otherwise.

Or was it contrived solely so that the AFL didn't lose face, after their QC told them they had nothing and would get smashed in a Court hearing? Also was it agreed to by the MFC, because they were told no more AFL money and you play in New Guinea and Mexico for your home games from now on?

PS. I believe it had absolutely nothing to do with the good of the game. Do you have any different information that would assist me in changing my view?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Justice should always based the accumulation of evidence.

I can't believe you have written that. I am just stunned. So much of what is written here is based on media allegations, without proof and I have railed against it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The lack of understanding about the rule of law which underpins the principles of our democratic society is palpable. People are found guilty around here on the basis of supposition and guesswork. Guilty until they can prove their innocence even if the charge is based on rumour, innuendo and the say so of people who have zero credibility. Welcome to the banana republic Redleg.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites


Or was it contrived solely so that the AFL didn't lose face, after their QC told them they had nothing and would get smashed in a Court hearing? Also was it agreed to by the MFC, because they were told no more AFL money and you play in New Guinea and Mexico for your home games from now on?

PS. I believe it had absolutely nothing to do with the good of the game. Do you have any different information that would assist me in changing my view?

If you could move beyond your "MFC is the victim" mindset you might go a long way to answering your questions.

I can't believe you have written that. I am just stunned. So much of what is written here is based on media allegations, without proof and I have railed against it.

Well done on taking my statement of belief out of context. It was made in reference to the investigative processes of ASADA and all you can do is get overexcited again about your issues with the media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you could move beyond your "MFC is the victim" mindset you might go a long way to answering your questions.

Well done on taking my statement of belief out of context. It was made in reference to the investigative processes of ASADA and all you can do is get overexcited again about your issues with the media.

Most people tire of condescending posters, clearly the penny hasn't dropped yet.

Edited by Redleg
  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Demonland Forums  

  • Match Previews, Reports & Articles  

    OVER YET? by KC from Casey

    The Friday evening rush hour clash of two of the VFL’s 2024 minnows, Carlton and the Casey Demons was excruciatingly painful to watch, even if it was for the most part a close encounter. I suppose that since the game had to produce a result (a tie would have done the game some justice), the four points that went to Casey with the win, were fully justified because they went to the best team. In that respect, my opinion is based on the fact that the Blues were a lopsided combination that had

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Casey Articles

    CENTIMETRES by Whispering Jack

    Our game is one where the result is often decided by centimetres; the touch of a fingernail, a split-second decision made by a player or official, the angle of vision or the random movement of an oblong ball in flight or in its bounce and trajectory. There is one habit that Melbourne seems to have developed of late in its games against Carlton which is that the Demons keep finding themselves on the wrong end of the stick in terms of the fine line in close games at times when centimetres mak

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons

    PREGAME: Rd 10 vs West Coast Eagles

    The Demons have a 10 day break before they head on the road to Perth to take on the West Coast Eagles at Optus Stadium on Sunday. Who comes in and who goes out?

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 133

    PODCAST: Rd 09 vs Carlton

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Sunday, 12th May @ 8:30pm. Join George, Binman & I as we analyse the Demons loss at the MCG against the Blues in the Round 09. You questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human. Listen & Chat LIVE:

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 24

    VOTES: Rd 09 vs Carlton

    Last week Captain Max Gawn consolidated his lead over reigning champion Christian Petracca in the Demonland Player of the Year Award. Steven May, Jake Lever, Jack Viney & Clayton Oliver make up the Top 5. Your votes for the loss against the Blues. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 39

    POSTGAME: Rd 09 vs Carlton

    The Demons were blown out of the water in the first quarter and clawed their way back into the contest but it was a case of too little too late as they lost another close one to Carlton losing by 1 point at the MCG.  

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 486

    GAMEDAY: Rd 09 vs Carlton

    It's Game Day and the Demons are once again headlining another blockbuster at the MCG to kick off the round of footy. The Dees take on the Blues and have the opportunity to win their third game on the trot to solidify a spot in the Top 4 in addition to handing the Blues their third consecutive defeat to bundle them out of the Top 8.

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Melbourne Demons 959

    MELBOURNE BUSINESS by The Oracle

    In days of old, this week’s Thursday night AFL match up between the Demons and the Blues would be framed on the basis of the need to redress the fact that Carlton “stole” last year’s semi final away from Melbourne and with it, their hopes for the premiership.  A hot gospelling coach might point out to his charges that they were the better team on the night in all facets and that poor kicking for goal and a couple of lapses at the death cost them what was rightfully theirs. Moreover, now was

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Match Previews 1

    UNDER THE PUMP by KC from Casey

    The Casey Demons have been left languishing near the bottom of the VFL table after suffering a 32-point defeat at the hands of stand alone club Williamstown at Casey Fields on Sunday. The Demons suffered a major setback before the game even started when AFL listed players Ben Brown, Marty Hore and Josh Schache were withdrawn from the selected side. Only Schache was confirmed as an injury replacement, the other two held over as possible injury replacements for Melbourne’s Thursday night fixt

    Demonland
    Demonland |
    Casey Articles
  • Tell a friend

    Love Demonland? Tell a friend!

×
×
  • Create New...