Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Demonland

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (โ‹ฎ) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

Love the Dunkley comparison

We need midfielders who can defend, run both ways and win their own ball just as much as we need good ball users

Plus at 22 heโ€™s still got scope for further development

Hopefully Finey is on the money and we can bring him in and continue to rebalance our midfield mix

ย 

Offload Trac for a couple of picks to the Hawks and bring in Windshagger for pick 23 and we're cookin

2 minutes ago, adonski said:

Offload Trac for a couple of picks to the Hawks and bring in Windshagger for pick 23 and we're cookin

Windhager actually makes Trac more potent as a mid, because he defends and covers for Trac in defensive transition. His acquisiton could also allow Trac to slide forward Dusty Martin style.

Edited by Adam The God

ย 

Viney not getting any younger and not ageing well. Windhager a ready-made Vieny replacement and a better kick.

2 hours ago, dazzledavey36 said:

It'll be Adelaide more then Port.

There midfield and lack of depth got badly exposed on Thursday night once Dawson was clamped down.

Would not be surprised if Adelaide even reach out in regards to Oliver.

Maybe Oliver was sending a coded message to Adelaide earlier this week when he spoke about Burgess.


8 hours ago, picket fence said:

WE DONT NEED ANOTHER MID WE NEED A POWER FORWARD FFS

No, we've got Jeffo.

6 minutes ago, Slartibartfast said:

No, we've got Jeffo.

Kentfield has a MASSIVE ceiling.. consider his year and the roadblocks he faced.. he could be a genuine monster! And Jeffo isnโ€™t written-off yet, heโ€™s just more of a Gunston type than a power fwd.

Edited by Tolstoys Nudge

9 hours ago, picket fence said:

WE DONT NEED ANOTHER MID WE NEED A POWER FORWARD FFS

But, but, but, but, El Jefe ainโ€™t goinโ€™ nowhere, is he?

ย 
9 hours ago, picket fence said:

WE DONT NEED ANOTHER MID WE NEED A POWER FORWARD FFS

We need what we can get, we are wanting in all parts of the ground for quality players

Itโ€™s amazing how this player is great and a potential boon but also not worthy of any valuable asset.

Literally incredible.


36 minutes ago, hardtack said:

But, but, but, but, El Jefe ainโ€™t goinโ€™ nowhere, is he?

Nowhere but up!!!!

๐Ÿ˜‰

10 hours ago, Jakkaa said:

As long as weโ€™re not getting another one paced ball butcher with no composure in big moments Iโ€™m all for it..we already have enough of those

He might be a one paced ball butcher but we donโ€™t have many of them under 25.

We canโ€™t build around Viney, Oliver and Tracc any more, replacing one of them with Windhager would give us midfield continuity so our young kids can step in when needed.

i like the comparison with harmes

i dunno

windhager seems like the sort of bog standard defensively-minded inside mid who is a good, ordinary soldier and not a 'difference maker' to our side

58 minutes ago, rpfc said:

Itโ€™s amazing how this player is great and a potential boon but also not worthy of any valuable asset.

Literally incredible.

He's a role player that would add value to our team similar to Melksham, Hibberd and Langdon who went for mid to late 2nd rounders. Our early 2nd round pick (23) is fair and if Saints get pissy I'm sure a swap of later picks will sort it out.

Are you suggesting he's worth a first round pick?


23 minutes ago, Random Task said:

He's a role player that would add value to our team similar to Melksham, Hibberd and Langdon who went for mid to late 2nd rounders. Our early 2nd round pick (23) is fair and if Saints get pissy I'm sure a swap of later picks will sort it out.

Are you suggesting he's worth a first round pick?

Windbagger aint worth pick 23 DON'T DO IT!

24 minutes ago, Random Task said:

He's a role player that would add value to our team similar to Melksham, Hibberd and Langdon who went for mid to late 2nd rounders. Our early 2nd round pick (23) is fair and if Saints get pissy I'm sure a swap of later picks will sort it out.

Are you suggesting he's worth a first round pick?

I am suggesting that posters do not engage the reasoning centres of their pre-frontal cortex when they discuss appropriate recompense in matters of football trades.

1 minute ago, rpfc said:

I am suggesting that posters do not engage the reasoning centres of their pre-frontal cortex when they discuss appropriate recompense in matters of football trades.

Post Something GIF

Edit: found a more fitting gif

Edited by Random Task

44 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

i like the comparison with harmes

i dunno

windhager seems like the sort of bog standard defensively-minded inside mid who is a good, ordinary soldier and not a 'difference maker' to our side

We've been desperate for a two way running defensive mid since ANB left. We are desperate for quality depth.

Would be at the least, an immediate upgrade on Spargo/Kolt/Sharp/Sparrow who played a lot this year. Your bottom 6 players might be your most important.

He also has the ceiling to be a lot more than that too.


14 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Windbagger aint worth pick 23 DON'T DO IT!

Why? Pick 23 which will push closer to 30 in a weak draft?

Do you take the 22 year old proven player who already has 75 games under his belt that provides attributes we need and would be immediate best 22.

Or do you bet on an unproven kid who based on the numbers would have a 30% chance of reaching 75 games in his career (players in the 30-35 range).

37 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Windbagger aint worth pick 23 DON'T DO IT!

16 minutes ago, Lil_red_fire_engine said:

Why? Pick 23 which will push closer to 30 in a weak draft?

Do you take the 22 year old proven player who already has 75 games under his belt that provides attributes we need and would be immediate best 22.

Or do you bet on an unproven kid who based on the numbers would have a 30% chance of reaching 75 games in his career (players in the 30-35 range).

Based on the two above posts, I'm pretty sure he's worth a late first rounder.

now that i am aware, thanks to the quotes of others, that picket thinks he's not worth pick 23 i am all for the trade

not a first rounder tho

Edited by whatwhat say what

ย 
5 hours ago, Demongirl35 said:

Aints fans a few weeks were desperate to sign him. They didnโ€™t want him to leave and would be filthy if he left due to some of their linked players Aleer, Silvagni and now Ryan, Now itโ€™s โ€™heโ€™s ordinary and if he wants to go, go.โ€™

Like if heโ€™s so ordinary why do you expect a first rounder? I donโ€™t get saints fans

It's just like reading 'Land.

Our trading of players over the last few seasons has been next to woeful. Is this dude going to be the exception? I donโ€™t think I could take another Sharp, Schache, Daw, Hunter, Dunstan etc.

Edited by Ethan Tremblay


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • 2025 Player Reviews: #7ย Jack Viney

    The Demon stalwart surpassed the number of his father's appearances for the club towards the end of the season. As he approaches his thirties, his pace is inevitably slowing, and he is likely to explore alternative opportunities beyond the team's midfield.

    • 2 replies
  • 2025 Player Reviews: #8 Jake Lever

    The Demon premiership defender who has the reputation the master of intercept possessions as well as great leadership qualities managed only eight senior games this season as he battled injury and form, prompting speculation that he might be enticed to look elsewhere.

    • 1 reply
  • 2025 Player Reviews: #10 Daniel Turner

    โ€œDiscoโ€ took his time (four seasons) but the mid-season draftee has been a shining light of Melbourne's campaign, improving to become a versatile option at either end of the ground. He has great marking skills which allows him to play as a marking target up forward or an intercepting defender down back.ย 

    • 8 replies
  • 2025 Player Reviews: #11 Max Gawn

    The skipper delivered another outstanding season, leading the team from the front, participating in every game, and earning club champion honours, while also securing an equal record eighth All-Australian blazer as a ruckman.ย  Max Gawn is arguably the greatest exponent of ruck skills in the history of the game; an exceptional leader who has guided the club to a premiership, through the challenging times that followed, and now into the next phase of its storied history.

    • 10 replies
  • 2025 Player Reviews: #12 Koltyn Tholstrupย 

    It was a frustrating season for the former number 13 draft selection, who failed to build momentum in his second campaign; Tholstrup played only nine games, having been omitted twice and substituted out three times. However, he demonstrated promising signs in the midfield at Casey towards the end of the season, and big things are anticipated from him in the coming years.

      • Love
      • Like
    • 48 replies
  • 2025 Player Reviews: #13 Clayton Oliver

    Clayton Oliver, a four-time best and fairest winner at the club, has navigated a challenging period over the past two years, marked by injuries and personal issues, but has demonstrated promising signs suggesting a return to his optimal form in 2025. He is presently contracted to the club for an additional five years, with a substantial annual salary of approximately $1.7 million in the final seasons of his agreement. All at Melbourne are eagerly anticipating his resurgence to his previous peak performance levels.

    • 19 replies

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions โ†’ Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.