6 minutes ago, Bleasey as that said:

When’s the tribunal?

Wednesday night according to this article

Fox Sports

Inside AFL’s ‘toughest’ case... and how it could open a c...

Inside AFL’s ‘toughest’ case... and how it could open a can of worms

1 hour ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

In somewhat of a win, we’ve hired Adrian Anderson.

Shirley you can't be serious.

I note Anderson lost another one last week

He is the Tom Gillies of player advocates....with more exposed form

it’s a [censored] joke the tribunal is not tonight

that means the appeal will be thursday night when the round is already underway

Any reason for it not being tonight???

2 minutes ago, DubDee said:

it’s a [censored] joke the tribunal is not tonight

that means the appeal will be thursday night when the round is already underway

Any reason for it not being tonight???

He was concussed and can't play this week anyway.

Just now, Gibberish said:

He was concussed and can't play this week anyway.

That’s not the point

51 minutes ago, DubDee said:

it’s a [censored] joke the tribunal is not tonight

that means the appeal will be thursday night when the round is already underway

Any reason for it not being tonight???

Yes, May was concussed and Dees wanted him to have another day to recover, before giving evidence in a stressful environment.

4 hours ago, Sideshow Bob said:

Seriously how many times can he stick his knee with all his weight into people - multiple multiples not even including the petracca incident. That is disgraceful from Moore - obviously deliberate- after Petracca he knows just dangerous his knees are. This should be absolutely called out. Michael Christian is a [censored] cheating [censored] when it comes to his beloved Collingwood

Yeh look I don’t get the difference in play…

A hit that’s an accident which injure a player, I think if they’re going to ban for injury, regardless of how they should be banned.

May clearly didn’t have intent or malice and will probably (even though i vehemently disagree with it) cop weeks.

Moore will argue his knee also wasn’t intentional..

I guess I don’t really see the difference if both “could be avoided”.

They say May should have chosen to tackle or avoid in general. So it should be the same for Moore if he continues to knee everyone in the back.

What your thoughts?

1 hour ago, Redleg said:

Yes, May was concussed and Dees wanted him to have another day to recover, before giving evidence in a stressful environment.

May concussed makes more sense that non concussed May

2 hours ago, DubDee said:

it’s a [censored] joke the tribunal is not tonight

that means the appeal will be thursday night when the round is already underway

Any reason for it not being tonight???

maybe the new bloke who has just stepped in on monday?

6 hours ago, jaydenh10 said:

maybe the new bloke who has just stepped in on monday?

Who's the new bloke? Hopefully Neitz

9 hours ago, DubDee said:

it’s a [censored] joke the tribunal is not tonight

that means the appeal will be thursday night when the round is already underway

Any reason for it not being tonight???

Adrian's gotta watch Dennis Denuto in the castle one more time to get the vibe right for the defence.

It's.. the vibe.. right?

13 hours ago, Jaded No More said:

Please tell me you’re [censored] joking

I'm not joking about hiring Adrian Anderson. The Midweek tackle on Fox Footy mentioned it.

I am joking about the 'somewhat of a win' comment.

13 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

I'm not joking about hiring Adrian Anderson. The Midweek tackle on Fox Footy mentioned it.

I am joking about the 'somewhat of a win' comment.

Attention Paul Guerra

First job when you get into office is to delete Adrian’s number. In fact, burn the phone book.

[censored]

When you look at it May's original position was to take the ball in a chesk mark position but instead of the ball bouncing forward it bounced up when the blues player had it May's arm were still in a chest marking position even through the contact if he gets rubbed out for this then players might as well wear tutu's.

3 weeks. Lock it in.

1 hour ago, jackaub said:

why hire this loser again

surely there are better available

Need carltons person. They are always successful

It is mind boggling we have hired Anderson

What is the club thinking?

Edited July 23Jul 23 by Superunknown

1 hour ago, dees189227 said:

Need carltons person. They are always successful

We needed to hire whoever got Pearce off

may should get off

if anderson is his advocate he is cooked

why oh why do we even go anywhere near anderson?

1 hour ago, daisycutter said:

may should get off

if anderson is his advocate he is cooked

why oh why do we even go anywhere near anderson?

Because we just aren't that shrewd or savvy DC.

Honestly how stupid do you have to be to continually go to a dry well !!

When does this BBQ kick off?

This needs to be thrown out in 3 seconds.

44 minutes ago, Dee Zephyr said:

When does this BBQ kick off?

This needs to be thrown out in 3 seconds.

No you have to marinate the meat

Tribunal started at 5pm

Follow it here:

Fox Sports

Tribunal LIVE: The ‘key’ reason Dees are ‘convinced’ May...

Tribunal LIVE: The ‘key’ reason Dees are ‘convinced’ May will get off big ban

What time does the appeal start tomorrow night?

Think i'll skip entree and go straight to the main course

@Lucifers Hero as I said yesterday the AFL is seeking a 3 week ban, which fits exactly within the guidelines of the charge being careless, high contact and severe impact.

My guess is that the MRO knew we’d argue the careless part and hence it’s gone to the tribunal.

If this useless lawyer can argue his actions weren’t careless he will get off