Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

Demonland

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

Posted

Just announced : the AFL has officially ruled the goal that was paid to Adelaide despite McVee’s efforts, WAS actually touched before crossing the line🤦‍♂️

 

Well it looked touched on the eastern wing at Adelaide Oval.

The goal umpires ruled it a point but for some reason four eyes in the bunker decided to get cute and over rule the goal umpires decision.

Does it really matter though? but we always seem to be on the end of theses bull tish calls.

And Marchbank finally comes clean and says he didn’t touch Petracca’s kick in 2023🤣

It didn’t cost us the Adelaide game, but the review system is [censored] embarrassing.

AFL would have to possess the worst system in world sport, NRL does it so much better.

 

wouldn't have changed the result, crows have been on the other end of about 6 of these that cost them the game in the past few years

21 minutes ago, jaydenh10 said:

wouldn't have changed the result, crows have been on the other end of about 6 of these that cost them the game in the past few years

Brave call, jh10!

If memory serves, the word is 'reasonable'.

To the naughty corner!

😁


Putting aside our dismal performance for the year but we have been on the end of some really poor umpiring decisions at critical moments

1 hour ago, Dee Zephyr said:

And Marchbank finally comes clean and says he didn’t touch Petracca’s kick in 2023🤣

It didn’t cost us the Adelaide game, but the review system is [censored] embarrassing.

AFL would have to possess the worst system in world sport, NRL does it so much better.

did he re Marchbank?

 
2 hours ago, joeboy said:

Just announced : the AFL has officially ruled the goal that was paid to Adelaide despite McVee’s efforts, WAS actually touched before crossing the line🤦‍♂️

Do we get a prize?

2 hours ago, jaydenh10 said:

wouldn't have changed the result,

That we will never know...


all the nitwit commentators were saying it wasn't touched either accept jono brown

anyways, mistakes happen. i still reckon we are better off having a goal review rather than not

Good old sports entertainment hey? When did you last see a free paid against the Pies in the last 5 minutes of a close game? Best it's ever been.

So many manipulated results there's at least 30 games of no consequence in the last 7 rounds. All good though as Collingwood, Geelong and Hawthorn will make the prelims.

22 minutes ago, Clintosaurus said:

Good old sports entertainment hey? When did you last see a free paid against the Pies in the last 5 minutes of a close game? Best it's ever been.

So many manipulated results there's at least 30 games of no consequence in the last 7 rounds. All good though as Collingwood, Geelong and Hawthorn will make the prelims.

add lions/gc to that

Could they also go back and rule on that 21 insufficient intent act by the crows where we.lost by a point?

Just for posterity.


12 hours ago, Phil C said:

Just get rid of it. It’s purely an excuse to advertise Crypto. Infuriating stuff.

I wish I'd bought some too.

Well it looked touched on the eastern wing at Adelaide Oval.

14 hours ago, YesitwasaWin4theAges said:

The goal umpires ruled it a point but for some reason four eyes in the bunker decided to get cute and over rule the goal umpires decision.

Does it really matter though? but we always seem to be on the end of theses bull tish calls.

Not sure it doesn't matter.

If we were closer players may have been more motivated.

What sort of review system takes a perfect umpires call and deems it wrong?

Edited by Previously known as LITD.

We have had too many poor decisions or non decisions in the last year or so. And we say nothing. Goodwin’s record would look better if he had spoken up LOUDLY. But no it’s just a job

7 hours ago, FireInTheBennelly said:

Did they announce what steps they're going to take to ensure it doesn't happen again? Or was it more of a 'soz, not soz'?

They're going to introduce a 'new' rule where if the ball is shown to be touched before crossing the line, or if it is unclear and the umpires initial call was touched, then the umpire's call remains.

Just to give clarity for the future.

17 hours ago, Dee Zephyr said:

And Marchbank finally comes clean and says he didn’t touch Petracca’s kick in 2023🤣

If ever there was a 'sliding doors' moment that was it.

We'd have ended the 2023 season 2nd, not 4th and played Lions in first final at the G and not Coll.

Evey chance we'd have beaten Lions then straight into a Preim and we'd still have Gus❤️💙.

Oh, what might have been🥹


1 hour ago, 640MD said:

We have had too many poor decisions or non decisions in the last year or so. And we say nothing. Goodwin’s record would look better if he had spoken up LOUDLY. But no it’s just a job

How do we know that the club says nothing? Even if Goody spoke ad nauseum in pressers about how the umps are cheats, all he would get is a significant fine, as opposed to the continual favourable treatment McRae and C Scott receive to overcompensate when something trivial goes against either of their teams.

15 minutes ago, Clintosaurus said:

How do we know that the club says nothing? Even if Goody spoke ad nauseum in pressers about how the umps are cheats, all he would get is a significant fine, as opposed to the continual favourable treatment McRae and C Scott receive to overcompensate when something trivial goes against either of their teams.

Dimma and Lyon are pretty good at it too.

1 hour ago, Little Goffy said:

They're going to introduce a 'new' rule where if the ball is shown to be touched before crossing the line, or if it is unclear and the umpires initial call was touched, then the umpire's call remains.

Just to give clarity for the future.

That doesn’t seem new to me. I thought that is how it always was interpreted.

 

Tell me something I dont know. I still havent recovered from that free not paid to Jim Stynes in the goal square. It was such a howler the umpire retired the next day.

18 hours ago, Wells 11 said:

did he re Marchbank?

Nah lol, just running with the shafted theme once again


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • AFLW PREVIEW: Gold Coast

    On Friday, the Demons return to our Casey Fields fortress where they have a 77% win rate. The scent of September is in the air and the struggling Suns are on the horizon. The Cranbourne weather forecast? Ominous, like the match itself: a strong chance of carnage. Let’s be honest, last week’s first half against the West Coast was a training drill but we dropped our guard in the final quarter. While this match is a mismatch on paper — second versus seventeenth — football is won in the wind, the contests, and the moments.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 0 replies
  • 2025 Player Reviews: #32 Tom Sparrow

    The rugged Sparrow’s career appears to have plateaued in recent years. He makes the side on a week to week basis but he is unable to establish a foothold in the team’s midfield and arguably performs best outside of the contest in a forward position without being a goal kicker. He remains a good honest foot soldier but is not a star.

    • 4 replies
  • 2025 Player Reviews: #33 Tom Fullarton

    Fullarton managed a couple of games in the first half of the season but soon found himself back in the VFL. There, he found a niche at centre half back but it was not enough to retain a place on the list at season’s end.

    • 0 replies
  • 2025 Player Reviews: #35 Harrison Petty

    Entering 2025, it looked as if Petty would be secured in a defensive position, but plans shifted and he spent more time forward, averaging just over a goal per game throughout the season. It remains uncertain which area of the ground he will be expected to cover under the new coaching regime.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • 2025 Player Reviews: #36 Kysaiah Pickett

    The dynamic small forward, possessing an innate ability to generate excitement with his explosive play around the goals, successfully transitioned into a role that afforded him more time in the midfield. The club also negotiated a long-term deal with Pickett, thereby eliminating any prospect of a move west by their star young player.

      • Thanks
    • 5 replies
  • 2025 Player Reviews: #37 Kade Chandler

    For a few years now, he has been a reliable, hard working pressure forward, but in 2025, Chandler elevated his performance, becoming an integral component of the team with enough versatility to play effectively on a wing from time to time.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 1 reply

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.