Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

May - better after first

Gawn - no votes today

Chandler. - strong running game

Rivers - often an observer

Petracca - important but limited

Fritsch - seemingly without passion

Salem - just a plodder

Oliver - couldn’t handle tag

Lindsay - needed more involvement

Johnson - replace with Roo

Pickett - unfortunately well held

Melksham - little drive today

Turner - a solid game

McVee - not his best

Langford - looking very tired

Windsor - poor under pressure

Langdon - untypically quiet game

Sharp - Viney obviously replaces

Sparrow - little involvement again

Bowey - little defensive drive

Petty - limited contesting effect

Lever - liability in defense

Laurie - made no difference

 
 

Melbourne - Go To Specsavers


14 minutes ago, joeboy said:

May - better after first

Gawn - no votes today

Chandler. - strong running game

Rivers - often an observer

Petracca - important but limited

Fritsch - seemingly without passion

Salem - just a plodder

Oliver - couldn’t handle tag

Lindsay - needed more involvement

Johnson - replace with Roo

Pickett - unfortunately well held

Melksham - little drive today

Turner - a solid game

McVee - not his best

Langford - looking very tired

Windsor - poor under pressure

Langdon - untypically quiet game

Sharp - Viney obviously replaces

Sparrow - little involvement again

Bowey - little defensive drive

Petty - limited contesting effect

Lever - liability in defense

Laurie - made no difference

You are far too kind to nearly everyone, Joeboy.

 

Lindsay, I’m not convinced

Laurie, just as predicted

Lever, what about McDonald

Kozzie, in another headspace

Johnson, Victoria Football League

Oliver, not top 100


MFC: heartbreaking to follow

Langford: Needs a rest

Windsor: Not a backman

Pressure: 8th worst ever

Forward line: Tall mark needed (ability to kick straight an advantage)

Coaching: Lyon wins again

Goal kicking: Words fail me

Backline: : Missing Tom McDonald

Laurie: Too the answer (

Edited by Older demon
Additional info

Melbourne Football Club - Richo’s barn door

Petty - an irrelevant footballer

Lever - limited contemporary skills

May - Looked better today

Rivers - plays for frees

XL - Skilful ball user

AJ - Limited but effortful

Windsor - Continues to decline

Edited by BLWNBA

5 minutes ago, 48 Year Now said:

Lindsay, I’m not convinced

Laurie, just as predicted

Lever, what about McDonald

Kozzie, in another headspace

Johnson, Victoria Football League

Oliver, not top 100

Really, not convinced about Lindsay??

He is the least of our problems. Will be a very good player.

May - very good defence 👍🏻

Gawn - battled hard and was one of our best great contest v Marshall 👍🏻

Turner - yes played well as a 3rd tall defender 👍🏻

McVee - good rebound and run 20 disposals 👍🏻

Bowey - well held in 1st half Good in 2nd half to be ok 👍🏻

Petracca - played in bursts but nothing like last week was okay 👍🏻

Chandler. - contests and runs hard all day 👍🏻

Ummmm the rest …

Fritsch - seemingly played half forward connector and stayed wide and kicked wide too ineffective overall

Salem - likes the boring 15 metre pass defensively caught out too often and looked slow

Oliver - Zac jones tagged him and did a good job Clarry battled on

Lindsay - uncharacteristically is missing goals He nailed them in under 18s Had ok game and excuse as he’s just 1st year

Johnson - big bustling bumbling performance love his heart but limited again

Pickett - simply poor today Windhager tag was too good and frustrated kozzzy

(Why didn’t Goodwin put him forward to one in one in square??)

Melksham - seemed injured and bravely went on yet nothing today

Rivers - he tried and tried and tried but it didn’t happen today

Langford - yes agree he might need a spell as he battles but is looking very tired

Petty - good contest and tackle to goal was good but …

The rest need to go to house of mirrors

Windsor - poor under pressure, turnovers and missed tackles (please please please put him back to the wing, end his defense role now)

Langdon - wow that was a shocker. Had to ask if he was playing. Ed will bounce back

Sharp - so inconsistent- works hard then lets himself down - disappointing!!

Sparrow - where is he at? Defensive forward?? Slow and lacks skill had 3 goal chances for zero goals not good enough

Lever -very disappointing , yes he was a liability in defense & imv physically is not right

Laurie - some might excuse as only had a quarter but looked slow again and I’m still saying he’s not up to it. Maybe give him a few games so we can finally see that he’s not going to make it. Fair enough. He is a good VFL player.

2 minutes ago, Left Foot Snap said:

Really, not convinced about Lindsay??

He is the least of our problems. Will be a very good player.

Agree he’s not a problem, just not convinced he’s as good as commentators talk. Think Windsor better but destroying him at half back.


[censored] that up

Windsor - not a defender.

If they keep persisting with this, they are going to Melbourne him

Edited by deegirl

30 minutes ago, 48 Year Now said:

Agree he’s not a problem, just not convinced he’s as good as commentators talk. Think Windsor better but destroying him at half back.

He has won me over. I didn't like him to start with as he looked like someone I don't like, so he has done well to turn me around.

Windsor will be a very good player as well and while he isn't tearing up half back like I thought he would, he will develop into a well rounded player.

1 hour ago, joeboy said:

Pickett - unfortunately well held

So why wasn't interference run for him. Windhager did a great job on Kozzie, but there needed to be a "screen" for Kozzie. The other thing is again, we give up so much possession from a point kick in. So often, St.Kilda went coast to coast, without a Melbourne player touching the footy. We looked flat today. No spark.


Red Centre Rabble

LYON


GOODWIN

First time Saints have beaten us since 2019 and we had to kick 21 points for them to beat us. Kicking is deplorable.!!!

 
2 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Lindsay - uncharacteristically is missing goals He nailed them in under 18s Had ok game and excuse as he’s just 1st year

He's an absolute ripper 'Norm', will kick one then the monkey will be off his back.

2 hours ago, 48 Year Now said:

Agree he’s not a problem, just not convinced he’s as good as commentators talk. Think Windsor better but destroying him at half back.

I think Lindsay is the better player, I'm more concerned with Langford on a wing & in general. fumbles too much below his knees and gets caught out in 2 way running, would rather Windsor or Langdon back on one wing.

Lindsay is good on the other...

Laurie Not the problem

and

Laurie Not the answer

#19 looking very tired


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 185 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 330 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 31 replies