Jump to content

Featured Replies

Harsh on Tommy Mac.

But guess they liked what AJ brought to the table squad wise, So it was either T-Mac or Turner and they went with omitting the older option? From a long term perspective it makes some sense, but Tom has been in red hot form.

 

Unfortunately for TMAC, Turner has nailed down that 3rd tall spot. Lever is a must include, just like McVee he will build form in the 1s.

TMAC is definitely stiff but you probably can't play 4 tall defenders at once. No other team has the such high quality key back depth, absolute luxury.

Competiton for spots is really heating up, great work from the fitness team and the playing group.

 

At this stage of his career it would have been polite to call McDonald 'managed'.

7 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

If anything May is the one who looks like he could use a rest. Been battling injuries all season.

Tmac better not be lining up at Casey this weekend.

Yep. I hate to say that about May but he would have been my call. Although one never knows the true reasons. He's a senior player that may have requested a week off for any number of reasons. At least I hope that's the answer as to wth? I'm glad Lever is back but he's been out for a while. Will he be able to play the whole game fully fit? This selection reminds me of a scene from "No country for old men."

Edited by leave it to deever


1 minute ago, roy11 said:

Harsh on Tommy Mac.

But guess they liked what AJ brought to the table squad wise, So it was either T-Mac or Turner and they went with omitting the older option? From a long term perspective it makes some sense, but Tom has been in red hot form.

I'm as surprised as anyone that McDonald is the one to miss out. But the red-hot form he started the season with has tapered significantly in the last couple of weeks. I still think he's been playing better than May who looks to me like he's struggling to bend over. Nevertheless, I suspect there's more method than madness in this selection shock.

T.Mac very stiff but it gives Turner a chance to consolidate the key back position.

Possible line up

B: Turner, May, McVee

HB: Salem, Lever, Bowey

C: Windsor, Oliver, Langdon

HF: Sparrow, Johnson, Petracca

F: Melksham, Petty, Chandler

FOLL: Gawn, Rivers, Pickett

IC: Lindsay, Langford, Spargo, Fritsch

SUB: Sharp

Almost fully fit list makes selection tricky. A good sign that we are dropping good players

 
3 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

Lindsay and Langford playl T.Mac very stiff but it gives Turner a chance to consolidate the key back position.

Possible line up

B: Turner, May, McVee

HB: Salem, Lever, Bowey

C: Windsor, Oliver, Langdon

HF: Sparrow, Johnson, Petracca

F: Melksham, Petty, Chandler

FOLL: Gawn, Rivers, Pickett

IC: Lindsay, Langford, Spargo, Fritsch

SUB: Sharp

Despite Tmac out it won't dampen my enthusiasm in looking forward to seeing Lord Windsor, Lindsay and Landord play.

A solid looking team.

9 minutes ago, MrFreeze said:

Unfortunately for TMAC, Turner has nailed down that 3rd tall spot. Lever is a must include, just like McVee he will build form in the 1s.

TMAC is definitely stiff but you probably can't play 4 tall defenders at once. No other team has the such high quality key back depth, absolute luxury.

Competiton for spots is really heating up, great work from the fitness team and the playing group.

I'm still holding hope on seeing Tmac playing fwd again but probably won't ever happen.


20 minutes ago, binman said:

They should have said managed then. Hopefully they don't play him at Casey so he can actually get a chop out.

If not being tested, its an insanely tough call - tmac has been by far our best, most consistent key defender tgis season.

Agree with all the above but I thought this would happen (truly). We absolutely have to get synergy with May..Lever & Turner as our 3 big backs. This is the backline that we would want to be running with . When our injury list is as good as it is (at the moment) & we had such a thrilling win …it’s hard to leave anyone out. Have to trust the coaches on this one …

31 minutes ago, Yarra Valley Demon said:

Tmac out

Lever in

Once again our selection committee with the unpredictable mind boggling choice

What the ...

Beyond daft.....confused-speechless.gif

31 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

If anything May is the one who looks like he could use a rest. Been battling injuries all season.

Tmac better not be lining up at Casey this weekend.

Said similar somewhere... I.e May looking the most in need of a 'managed' rest.

An odd decision for mine .

Totally agree about not wanting to see him suiting up for Casey.

@binman thoughts on selection ? I’m so confused

I know we are not within the clubs four walls but …

Why is Spargo still in? Underperforming for 7 weeks. Last week he was a liability.

Tmac has been good all year. I get team balance but bringing Lever back was supposed to allow us to potentially put Turner forward. Very harsh on Tmac.

Culley an emergency? He was average for Casey last week Howes or Kynan Brown must be closer to selection

I’m confused ! But again we must trust the brain power of the club insiders


Anyone under an injury cloud to be a late out?

Truly bizarre selection imho. I personally would have given Lever another week at Casey, I also would have dropped May before McDonald.

McDonald is twice the player May is at present and ten times the player Lever has been in the past three years. In a year of poor selection calls, this is by far the worst.

I'd actually drop at least 15 players before McDonald based on contributions this year.

Ridiculous to drop McDonald and keep Spargo. The former is faster over ground than the latter (goes well in the early season time trials), can take a strong mark (whereas the latter doesn’t), tackles at least as well, and can kick it straight and longer than 30 metres. He could play in the forward line and be more effective than Spargo.

I also don’t rate Lever anymore anyway. So there is that.

I would have had Lever do a full game in the ressies, he only played a half or so last week. Get him some match fitness before testing him at AFL level. He could have easily come in against the saints for a full afl game before the crucial KB match

TMac is stiff, however he had three all time terrible turnovers in the first half last week that led to goals. Against a depleted Sydney tall forwardline of Hamling, McLean and Ladhams clearly the match committee is hoping we can intercept and hurt them the other way and think Lever, Turner and May are better at this than plugger. Tom will be back, his lockdown has been outstanding but the connection between Lever and May and Turner’s exceptional form make this the option.

It’s also not a bad idea to give our old boys weeks off, I wish Melksham had played against the Hawks, but maybe his exceptional game against Brisbane was the result, TMac may well need to come back refreshed against Owens and co at the Saints.

Spargo and Sharp would want to play well with Viney closing in on a return.

Edited by deejammin'


2 minutes ago, deejammin' said:

TMac is stiff, however he had three all time terrible turnovers in the first half last week that led to goals. Against a depleted Sydney tall forwardline of Hamling, McLean and Ladhams clearly the match committee is hoping we can intercept and hurt them the other way and think Lever, Turner and May are better at this than plugger. Tom will be back, his lockdown has been outstanding but the connection between Lever and May and Turner’s exceptional form make this the option.

It’s also not a bad idea to give our old boys weeks off, I wish Melksham had played against the Hawks, but maybe his exceptional game against Brisbane was the result, TMac may well need to come back refreshed against Owens and co at the Saints.

Spargo and Sharp would want to play well with Viney closing in on a return.

Agree with this. I'd maybe give May a rest next week v Saints for TMac and have him cherry ripe for Kings Bday the following week.

These guys will need some weeks off to get through a full season!

I’d say this call is due to who we are playing. We don’t need a ‘stopper’ against the Swans. ie a tactical change, not based on form

I thought May or T Mac would be dropped given the opposition, but I’m still surprised Goodwin dropped one of his favourites

Will be interesting to see if turner plays fwd

With an almost complete list there is going to be selection pressure and some collateral damage. Tom will be back, though I suspect it's going to depend on the opposition as much as anything.

Also suspect that Turner will now always be picked ahead of TMac, and therein lies the problem.

Tom's also not always the greatest disposer, and when we're trying for fast ball movement his turnovers can be a bit of a momentum killer.

 
46 minutes ago, Supermercado said:

At this stage of his career it would have been polite to call McDonald 'managed'.

Depends if we want to be a nice, polite club or a ruthless, honest one

T Mac will be back against a taller fwd line

Fit, firing list with a good win on the board from last week and a tough selection call.

Lever in for TMac looks hard on Tom but he may be ready for a light week to freshen up and part of the selection may be on perceived match ups in the Sydney forward 50. We also have the luxury/flexibility of having Petty that we can swing back if required. We could also swap Turner and Petty if we need a bit do variety.

This move also keeps AJ in the team as second ruck. I also like his bull at a gate style of playing. He nailed a couple of good tackles when covering in ruck.

Sharp looks the obvious sub but would not surprise if we went with Fristch and the same strategy as last week.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 61 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 298 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies