2 hours ago, titan_uranus said:

Turner's been in and out of the team, but his best game for the year was in the backline last week. If he comes back, it's into the backline, surely.

Turner in releases Rivers to the midfield?

Out: Fullarton, Sharp

In: JvR, Turner

As a selector (on the sidelines)

Out: Spargo, Sharp, Fullerton

IN: Melks (sub), JVR , Turner.

No way Tholstrup comes out. 11th for pressure from 63% TOG. No coincidence are best 2 pressure games with his return to the side.

Frittas 2.2 might save him but for a bloke dropped, showing absolutely zero in the VFL to warrant a return other than Melksham injury it was a really poor night from him.

Zero tackles while the rest of the forwardline are breaking records in F50 tackles.

Maybe it's not expected of him, but his lack of intent and pressure is really disappointing.

Outs - Fullarton, Fritsch, Sharp/Tholstrup

Ins - JVR, Melky, Turner

We must bring in another tall defender. Playing with fire with so few talls in the team. Turner being able to go forward or back is handy. I prefer JVR to AJ as ceiling is higher.

Melky straight back in for Fritsch and straight to McGovern.

Difficult to split Sharp and Tholstrup without knowing their KPIs but I think both have been ok recently. Whoever stays is sub.

8 hours ago, BLWNBA said:

Out: Tholstrup, Fullerton

In: Melksham (if fit), AJ

If Melksham isn’t available, Tholstrup gets another week.

*Obviously JVR ended the game with 5.2, but AJ’s five tackles along with his 3.5. I wouldn’t be totally opposed to the JVR selection, but I’m a big fan of the physicality that AJ has brought since going back to the VFL.

One benefit of AJ over JVR is the ruckwork. A lot of what ifs for AJ if he had kicked better than 3.5 yesterdsy.

7 hours ago, bing181 said:

Turner in releases Rivers to the midfield?

As @dazzledavey36 has said, West Coast have a tall forward line so we may have no choice, but I reckon Rivers has found serious form the last two weeks in the backline so I’m not sure we now want to mess with that too much.

14 minutes ago, godees said:

Outs - Fullarton, Fritsch, Sharp/Tholstrup

Ins - JVR, Melky, Turner

We must bring in another tall defender. Playing with fire with so few talls in the team. Turner being able to go forward or back is handy. I prefer JVR to AJ as ceiling is higher.

Melky straight back in for Fritsch and straight to McGovern.

Difficult to split Sharp and Tholstrup without knowing their KPIs but I think both have been ok recently. Whoever stays is sub.

What is it with posters wanting to drop Tholstrup. Did I watch a different game last night. FFS I thought he did well.

Edited 22 hours ago22 hr by DemonOX

WCE forward line is pretty tall with Allan, Waterman and Archer Reid (203cm). I think we would prefer to play three tall defenders and I like Turner as a player. I would look at Windsor's spot in the back 7 and see if it is working. Windsor's kicking has been poor. Rivers has been much better in defence and I would not shift him and Salem, Bowey and McVee are locks in the side.

JVR for Fullarton seems obvious given how well JVR played yesterday.

Melksham could be the sub if he comes in or he could push Tholstrup or Spargo to be sub.

I would be dropping Fullarton and Sharp. But this means there will be one unlucky player who is dropped from the 23 if all of JVR, Melksham and Turner come back in. Selection this week will be hard (for a good reason).

In Turner Melksham JVR

Out Sharp Fritsch Fullerton

Turner looked excellent back and we are playing too short back for a West Coast taller forwardline. Also frees Rivers up into the midfield rotation.

Fritsch was only in for Melksham injury management. Yes kicked two goals but pressure was poor and continued to not put it to players in best position.

Fullerton has had his chances and just does not display the required intensity. JVR had the mits and kicks working again yesterday at Casey. Being in WA would play him over AJ who was also good.

One of Sharp, Kolt, Spargo will make way. Suggest Kolt will be sub and Sharp miss.

Edited 22 hours ago22 hr by Lil_red_fire_engine

In a perfect world we would have rested Max either last night or next week against the Eagles.

It's time to think of 2026 and to play 2025 more in hope rather than any planned way to make finals.

The Hawthorn match will pretty well decide our season.

Being one for compromise I'd play Tom Campbell as sub. (Weather for Perth is looking warm)

Win in the West and the slight pulse continues.

JVR to return and Petty down back please. (It's the future).

Not having a VFL game next week is a worry. I can understand that 4 emergencies go to Perth but there has to be a better way

11 hours ago, adonski said:

JVR in for Fullarton paying $1.01 (Gamble responsibly)

Whilst there’s NO doubt Fullarton has had very little of the ball there’s also NO denying the following fact.

Van Rooyen Played 5 Lost 5

Fullarton Played 2 Won 2

Just now, Abyssal said:

Whilst there’s NO doubt Fullarton has had very little of the ball there’s also NO denying the following fact.

Van Rooyen Played 5 Lost 5

Fullarton Played 2 Won 2

Are you familiar with correlation vs causation?

3 minutes ago, Abyssal said:

Whilst there’s NO doubt Fullarton has had very little of the ball there’s also NO denying the following fact.

Van Rooyen Played 5 Lost 5

Fullarton Played 2 Won 2

Yeah the Fullo factor no doubt

Not convinced that playing Fritsch benefits the team anymore. Perhaps he should become sub against Weagles. Would like to see May play FF as he is too slow for FB. Turner could become F.B

34 minutes ago, DemonOX said:

What is it with posters wanting to drop Tholstrup. Did I watch a different game last night. FFS I thought he did well.

What he did was great but he didn’t do much. He definitely contributed but I prefer the ins

2 minutes ago, adonski said:

Yeah the Fullo factor no doubt

Joke all you like and post silly 😆s.

I suppose that’s all you’ve got because you can’t argue with :-

Fullarton 2 for 2, Van Rooyen 0 for 5

Ps. Clearly Fullarton isn’t the answer but neither is Van Rooyen the way he was playing.

Unless Van Rooyen can change his ways and get mobile, particularly in leading up to the ball and giving options, I don’t think he makes it.

11 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Out. Fullarton. Gave nothing. Was outmuscled all night. I was so disappointed with his effort. No energy at all and showed no football smarts.

Out. Fritsch. Learned zero. Just laconic. Missed that last goal from 30 metrs out. Kicked two goals but had ZERO tackles and ZERO defensively

Ins. JVR - must play… Simply must play

Ins Turner back after his concussion

Why JVR? You want more of a player wandering around looking lost with little guile in his running patterns and regularly being pushed under the ball. I often watch him pointing to other players to doir job while he is in no-person’s land looking like he doesn’t know what day it is.

And do you like selecting players who even when the ball is delivered properly to them cannot even take a chest mark?

JVR should remain in the seconds until he learns to be a forward which I doubt is possible.

I know it is not a popular view but I have come to the view that he is in the Sam W. mould.

I think the MFC should ensure Turner is developed further as at least he can take a mark and seems to no where to run to get into viable positions. JVR cannot do that.

12 hours ago, Demon Jack said:

Fullerton didn't do much tonight.

Do we pull the trigger on JVR, or really try and get him to smash the door down?

There is no VFL game next weekend so he goes to Perth. I am not a big fan but he is miles better than Jefferson and Fullerton.

12 hours ago, bing181 said:

Melksham for Tholstrup. The lad needs some time at the lower level to develop his game. Catch is, no VFL again this week.

Turner should come in as well in the backline, but not sure who for.

Someone for Fullarton. Anyone.

The problem is bing there is no VFL game next week. So he can only get game time in the seniors. Turner was out with concussion, the extra week off is a good idea. Playing after concussion was terrible in the past it is serious problem so let's be conservative.

12 hours ago, Nasher said:

Out: Sharp, Fullarton

In: Melksham, van Rooyen

Sub: Melksham

(Edited after a rethink)

Spargo is a weak link I would drop him for Milkshake.

12 hours ago, monoccular said:

No VFL again!!!

What an absolute disgrace on the part of AFL for tolerating this as a “support competition”!!!

It's time the media got stuck into the VFL competition it is terrible how can you have 2 byes in a month? But I won't hold my breath. The only up side is we can take a number of emegencies to WA.

1 hour ago, junk said:

Not convinced that playing Fritsch benefits the team anymore. Perhaps he should become sub against Weagles. Would like to see May play FF as he is too slow for FB. Turner could become F.B

My concern also.

Although he still a great defender he is holding on to his opponent if they’re about to get away from him due to his lack of pace and I’m surprised he hasn’t given away more free kicks due to this. Was clear last night and that was against a slow Lynch…

He held on to Mansell a few times also

4 minutes ago, old dee said:

It's time the media got stuck into the VFL competition it is terrible how can you have 2 byes in a month? But I won't hold my breath. The only up side is we can take a number of emegencies to WA.

We would have taken 4 AFL players to Perth as emergencies. These would have been the players on the cusp of selection.

Perhaps a Monday night game or a Monday morning game (remembering most VFL listed players have work/study commitments) would be possible but then the emergencies don't get a break.

The lack of a VFL round during Gather Round was abysmal though.

12 hours ago, DemonOX said:

Wouldn’t be dropping Tholstrup on tonight’s game.

4 disposals? 2 tackles, blinder of a game. Needs to get the ball and run harder. Probably stay in the extended squad as he is from WA.