Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 minutes ago, Pirlo said:

Nathan Bassett was a boys club appointment. Goody's mate from the Crows who was most recently an assistant coach at Sturt. Not senior coach, assistant. He was never highly regarded as an AFL assistant.

bassett was well regarded at the pear

 
1 hour ago, DemonWA said:

Strongly disagree

The palyers at Casey are not better than this 23

Sure.. If all 23 players are playing their best footy. But most of them are not. And there are blokes busting their guts in the VFL that deserve a crack.

We’re crying out for a bloke that can take a mark & Fullerton has taken 25 marks in 3 weeks & kicked 10 goals. He has EARNED a call up.

We’re crying out for forward half pressure. Kynan Brown had 26 tackles in 3 weeks. He has EARNED a call up.

JVR had 1 mark last week. Sharp had 2 tackles. Where the HECK is our selection integrity. Goodwin has NFI!

 
1 hour ago, bing181 said:

Happy with the changes, Lindsay in is a plus, and backing the players in to get the job done sends a strong internal message on what's expected.

The idea that we have fringe and developing players running round in the two's who'd make any more than a marginal, move-the-deckchairs difference is just delusional.

You've got to be [censored] kidding me if you happy clappy with that.

Seriously... we need to.get better than that.

1 hour ago, ElDiablo14 said:

Fullarton, Brown? At least give you something more than Spargo or Sharp. The Disco dropped when we are lacking at our fwd line?

I'm hopeful they've done some review of the forward line and will be asking Fritta or Melk to play like the 2nd tall. I assume they think smaller players will expose the dons weak backline.


I still can’t work out the Fullarton non selection. What kind of message does it send that you can kick 10 goals and take a bunch of marks in 3 VFL games but still not get selected in the AFL’s worst forward line?

Once again we’re setting JVR up for failure as he has to lead this impotent forward line.

Yet, furthermore we also drop a player who actually has an ounce of goal kicking craft and isn’t allowed to string 2 games together while others like Sharp and Spargo have a golden pass off doing next to nothing this season.

I’m really concerned where we are heading under Simon Goodwin.

11 minutes ago, DeeNA said:

Sure.. If all 23 players are playing their best footy. But most of them are not. And there are blokes busting their guts in the VFL that deserve a crack.

We’re crying out for a bloke that can take a mark & Fullerton has taken 25 marks in 3 weeks & kicked 10 goals. He has EARNED a call up.

We’re crying out for forward half pressure. Kynan Brown had 26 tackles in 3 weeks. He has EARNED a call up.

JVR had 1 mark last week. Sharp had 2 tackles. Where the HECK is our selection integrity. Goodwin has NFI!

Don't let your despairation for a win cloud your judgement

Just now, DemonWA said:

Don't let your despairation for a win cloud your judgement

Yes Master

 
23 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Harry Sharp is on par with Tom Gillies as one of te worst melbourne player i have ever seen and yet he stays in.

Melksham is officially cooked has barely had an impact and he stays in.

Fritta has been absolutely horrific and has been called out by ex footy greats for his selfish attitude but yet he stays.

Goodwin is the most stubborn coach going around. He is delusional in his method and inability to clear out the mediocrity that has creeper in by the same players..they have been left to get away with the same [censored] every week.

No wonder Petracca has had a gut full.

WE all have had a gutful,! Well Brad, what u gonna do?

17 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

You've got to be [censored] kidding me if you happy clappy with that.

Seriously... we need to.get better than that.

You have a minority of supporters who are as delusional as the coach.

Head in sand stuff.


1 hour ago, bing181 said:

Happy with the changes, Lindsay in is a plus, and backing the players in to get the job done sends a strong internal message on what's expected.

The idea that we have fringe and developing players running round in the two's who'd make any more than a marginal, move-the-deckchairs difference is just delusional.

This where you lose me.

You hold absolutist views and don't appear to appreciate there are layers to selection. Yes, stability is important. Yes, the players not in last week's 23 who are available (other than Lindsay) are fringe players.

But where you see "backing the players in to get the job done", most of the rest of us see out-of-form, or even worse, not-playing-their-role players who are continuing to be selected. Repeatedly playing players who are out of form or not playing their role sends bad messages everywhere.

Is there sufficient pressure on Sharp, or Spargo, or Melksham, to lift their games, when they continue to be picked?

Is there sufficient motivation for Fullarton, Laurie, Brown and Woewodin to keep busting their gut at Casey, when they never get picked and/or only get picked as sub?

Further, you say you're happy with the changes, which presumably means you're happy with Turner being dropped. Why does Turner only get one game to try to fit in with the side, when stability is so important?

So yes, stability is important. I accept that there is merit to giving the core of our side more time to work together - forward cohesion requires the mids understanding the forwards and vice versa, and that is harder to develop if we keep changing the personnel. But this has to be balanced against form. Stability cannot, with your level of absolutism, always trump form.

1 minute ago, dazzledavey36 said:

You have a minority of supporters who are as delusional as the coach.

Head in sand stuff.

You might want to just expand a little Dazzle

Do you think the minimal change this week suffices?

3 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

You have a minority of supporters who are as delusional as the coach.

Head in sand stuff.

They are supporters of the Goodwin FC, not the MFC.

Meanwhile how can any of us have any confidence that the FD knows how to improve our forward half woes, when we don't appear to even know how we want to line up in the forward half?

Round 1 we went with JVR, Jefferson and AJ. AJ relief rucked, during which we had JVR and Jefferson.

Round 2 we went with JVR, Jefferson and Turner. JVR relief rucked, during which we had Jefferson and Turner (until Jefferson got injured).

Round 3 we went with JVR and AJ. AJ relief rucked, during which we had just JVR, until the fourth quarter when we also sent Petty forward.

Round 4 we went with JVR and Turner. JVR relief rucked, during which we had just Turner.

Round 5 we are going with just JVR. When he relief rucks...?

AJ's suspension and Jefferson's injury have obviously mucked around with our plans, but to me this is all over the shop.

3 minutes ago, ElDiablo14 said:

They are supporters of the Goodwin FC, not the MFC.

Or people just have different views on this…

I’m not thrilled with the selection either but no need to have a go at people because they see it a bit differently.


42 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Harry Sharp is on par with Tom Gillies as one of te worst melbourne player i have ever seen and yet he stays in.

Melksham is officially cooked has barely had an impact and he stays in.

Fritta has been absolutely horrific and has been called out by ex footy greats for his selfish attitude but yet he stays.

Goodwin is the most stubborn coach going around. He is delusional in his method and inability to clear out the mediocrity that has creeper in by the same players..they have been left to get away with the same [censored] every week.

No wonder Petracca has had a gut full.

Give Goodwin enough rope and it’s only a matter of time. Or at least I bloody hope so.

Just now, Disco InTurno said:

Or people just have different views on this…

I’m not thrilled with the selection either but no need to have a go at people because they see it a bit differently.

There are some people, in my personal opinion, for whom Goodwin can do no wrong.

My sole interest is the future of the club, and Goodwin won't be part of that future.

51 minutes ago, Pirlo said:

Nathan Bassett was a boys club appointment. Goody's mate from the Crows who was most recently an assistant coach at Sturt. Not senior coach, assistant. He was never highly regarded as an AFL assistant.

He had a very good record at Norward I think. He’s not the problem.

Boo hoo he didn’t pick Fullarton. Oh well, I’d rather have JVR in, he’s out of touch but getting his hands to the ball. Once it clicks he’ll be back.

“Send a message!!!” - I’m sure they get the message, no one likes playing bad and losing. They know they need to lift, maybe some would benefit from beating up on some VFL dew kickers but the coaches and selectors know the players better than I do.

Sharp is probably closest to the chopping block than the others for me. Henderson hits targets (although annoyingly not many i50), we’ve got enough smalls. Brown and Woey Jnr are small too so I think we’re stuck with him until Kolt is back to give another decent sized option.


Fritter should have been dropped.

Goodwin is frozen

2 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

Fritter should have been dropped.

Goodwin is frozen

Or Petty.

Pathetic from the selectors and Goodwin

Virtually no changes at all

Spargo - does nothing and still gets a game (negative 2 in SuperCoach)

JVR - needs to go back and get confidence

Melksham needs a game at Casey

Ins Lindsay, Fullarton, and either Kynan Brown-or-jnr Woey

Why is Turner dropped ? Our forward line is a mosquito fleet !!! wtf.

IS GOODWIN HELL BENT ON DESTRUCTION OF OUR TEAM??? Angry Inside Out GIF by Disney Pixar

 
53 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

You've got to be [censored] kidding me if you happy clappy with that.

Seriously... we need to.get better than that.

Like shooting fish in a barrel.

Goodwin has his favourites who are immune to being dropped. Then there’s the players that get a game or two before being dropped. Turner needs to be given a really good run at it, in the forward line, to determine if he’s up to it or not.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 137 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 38 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 314 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 31 replies
  • GAMEDAY: St. Kilda

    It's Game Day and the Demons have traveled to Alice Springs to take on the Saints and they have a massive opportunity to build on the momentum of two big wins in a row and keep their finals hopes well and truly alive.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 907 replies