Jump to content

Featured Replies

1 hour ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Since when??

In comparison to Marvel 😅

 
5 hours ago, Dee-tonator said:

Point 3: Shifting Langdon from his specialist position on the wing seemed daft before the North game and would be even dafter if persisted with.

Point 4: Spargo looks as if he needs at least a couple of runs in the VFL after such a long layoff.

Don't disagree with you per se, but these are the kinds of moves that they're making to try and update the game style. Langdon on ball to provide more run, Spargo into the side ASAP because he's about the most skilful at getting the ball to an I50 target.

Similar re Pickett getting more time on-ball, Windsor to the back line for more speed off HB and Fritsch further up the ground for his disposal skills - he's a better field kick than any of the current mids.

Pretty obvious that little of that worked on the weekend, and we're missing Pickett (amongst others ...), but I'm expecting them to hang tough with all of the above. Not sure there are any alternatives if we're going to move with the times.

 

5 hours ago, bing181 said:

Don't disagree with you per se, but these are the kinds of moves that they're making to try and update the game style. Langdon on ball to provide more run, Spargo into the side ASAP because he's about the most skilful at getting the ball to an I50 target.

Similar re Pickett getting more time on-ball, Windsor to the back line for more speed off HB and Fritsch further up the ground for his disposal skills - he's a better field kick than any of the current mids.

Pretty obvious that little of that worked on the weekend, and we're missing Pickett (amongst others ...), but I'm expecting them to hang tough with all of the above. Not sure there are any alternatives if we're going to move with the times.

 

Sure try things but

langdon runs and runs on the wing.

Spargo had no run so couldn’t get it as not match fit

windsor is a wing man in mould of Flower , position set.

Pickett yes, occasion bursts

fritta close to goals is where he plays best and where he will succeed again when he requests a trade 

 
1 hour ago, 48 Year Now said:

Sure try things but

langdon runs and runs on the wing.

Spargo had no run so couldn’t get it as not match fit

windsor is a wing man in mould of Flower , position set.

Pickett yes, occasion bursts

fritta close to goals is where he plays best and where he will succeed again when he requests a trade 

Whilst there is no excusing Fritsch’s lack of defensive efforts, I can’t help but think if he played for the Hawks, Pies, GWS etc he would be on the end of great delivery in space or in one v ones.

8 hours ago, bing181 said:

Don't disagree with you per se, but these are the kinds of moves that they're making to try and update the game style. Langdon on ball to provide more run, Spargo into the side ASAP because he's about the most skilful at getting the ball to an I50 target.

Similar re Pickett getting more time on-ball, Windsor to the back line for more speed off HB and Fritsch further up the ground for his disposal skills - he's a better field kick than any of the current mids.

Pretty obvious that little of that worked on the weekend, and we're missing Pickett (amongst others ...), but I'm expecting them to hang tough with all of the above. Not sure there are any alternatives if we're going to move with the times.

 

Could we try Salem in that role, he’s a good user of the footy by foot but he’s not quick nor is he a long penetrating kick which for me means he’s not best suited across half back. When Windsor is back get him across half back and Salem as the last kick into fwd 50.


On 23/03/2025 at 20:20, Bring-Back-Powell said:

We haven’t lost to GC since the Easter weekend of 2014.

Oh wow.  That's taking me back.  Heady times.

8 hours ago, bing181 said:

Don't disagree with you per se, but these are the kinds of moves that they're making to try and update the game style. Langdon on ball to provide more run, Spargo into the side ASAP because he's about the most skilful at getting the ball to an I50 target.

Similar re Pickett getting more time on-ball, Windsor to the back line for more speed off HB and Fritsch further up the ground for his disposal skills - he's a better field kick than any of the current mids.

Pretty obvious that little of that worked on the weekend, and we're missing Pickett (amongst others ...), but I'm expecting them to hang tough with all of the above. Not sure there are any alternatives if we're going to move with the times.

 

With all due respect, we are in Round 3 and I can't see any major strategic changes happening to game style at this point.

 

Happy for Spargo to remain in the team, he'll get his legs back this way and his kicking will help us.

It is a risky strategy as we saw last week though as the sub/interchange for AFL is a unique beast with only one option etc.

I wonder if there was any plan/idea to give him 3/4 of a game and then sub him out but the early Jeffo injury ruined that plan.

 
33 minutes ago, Bombay Airconditioning said:

Whilst there is no excusing Fritsch’s lack of defensive efforts, I can’t help but think if he played for the Hawks, Pies, GWS etc he would be on the end of great delivery in space or in one v ones.

Really, how did GWS forward line function last year when Hogan didn’t fire.

Kingsley would not put up with Fritsch refusal to apply second let alone third efforts at the fall of the ball

Edited by Pennant St Dee


3 minutes ago, Pennant St Dee said:

Really, how did GWS forward line function last year when Hogan didn’t fire.

Kingsley would not put up with Fritsch refusal to apply second let alone third efforts at the fall of the ball

He needs to go back to the VFL, give him a few weeks and see if he can rediscover some form.

3 minutes ago, Pennant St Dee said:

Really, how did GWS forward line function last year when Hogan didn’t fire.

Kingsley would not put up with Fritsch refusal to apply second let alone third efforts at the fall of the ball

If he was played one out / with space and had their delivery there wouldn’t be many second or third efforts required. 

1 minute ago, Roost it far said:

Anyone know if Windsor will get up for this weekend?

My gut feel is that he won't. Spotted in crutches after a hospital stay, and the second time dealing with this infection is bad news IMO. Antibiotics are very taxing, in a high performance environment, players need to give 100% to be match fit - giving that 100% makes it much harder to deal with these kind of infections. 

1 minute ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

He needs to go back to the VFL, give him a few weeks and see if he can rediscover some form.

If they’re just going to bomb on his head there what’s the point. 
People bag Fritsch for not laying tackles, what’s the difference between not laying a tackle and all the ineffective tackles that were laid on Sunday? 

12 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

I know a couple of players were ill leading up to the game. I’m wondering if something went through the club? Just a thought. Or, we’re just a rabble once again 🤷‍♂️

To be honest, i wondered the same thing. 

I doubt tracc has ever had a less impactful game. Didn't look right - ditto a number of other players.


2 minutes ago, binman said:

To be honest, i wondered the same thing. 

I doubt tracc has ever had a less impactful game. Didn't look right - ditto a number of other players.

the obvious lack of energy , not just in the last but all day might confirm this. Hopefully it’s that and nothing more culturally sinister.,

19 minutes ago, Bombay Airconditioning said:

If they’re just going to bomb on his head there what’s the point. 
People bag Fritsch for not laying tackles, what’s the difference between not laying a tackle and all the ineffective tackles that were laid on Sunday? 

It's more about taking an underperforming player and setting standards for the rest of the list.

34 minutes ago, Bombay Airconditioning said:

If he was played one out / with space and had their delivery there wouldn’t be many second or third efforts required. 

He doesn’t just not tackle, he doesn’t get any body contact or apply pressure, the GWS, Pies and Hawthorn forward lines all rely on pressure acts and winning the ground ball game. 
Greene, Daniels and Jones

Schulz, Hill and Mcreery

Watson, Moore, Hardwick and Ginnivan 

Fritsch wouldn’t last with his work ethic

12 hours ago, Ethan Tremblay said:

I know a couple of players were ill leading up to the game. I’m wondering if something went through the club? Just a thought. Or, we’re just a rabble once again 🤷‍♂️

Delayed onset of a virus caught from the Cats from the 2021 Preliminary Final 


Hoping they play both Tom Campbell and Max Gawn this week.

Max Gawn can rest in the forward line and hopefully cause a bit of chaos to Gold Coast's defence.

I expect a massive response by the Demons players this week. They need to come out breathing fire against the Suns.

So if players were ill shouldn’t Goodwin have gone with that rather than Max’s personal life? Considering how close everyone else that’s disappointing.

OUT: Jefferson (inj), Woewodin (omit)

IN: Johnson, Langford

Sub: Sharp

 
1 hour ago, Roost it far said:

I can’t make it this week but I’m expecting quite the statement from our leaders. A solid win and we’re away.

But I will be there  So depending....Hope we win but I do not see many, but cannot get to a lot of games   but My Darling and me    will cheer them on for you  Rooster.

2 hours ago, Roost it far said:

Anyone know if Windsor will get up for this weekend?

I hope so. Sleeping the whole weekend can really ruin your week.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Clap
      • Like
    • 91 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Like
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 334 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 47 replies