Jump to content

Featured Replies

On 16/03/2025 at 18:21, Bang Bang Bang said:

AJ might be suspended and Howes ain’t it IMO. Otherwise I’m happy for the same squad. I’m even OK if they give Howes another run given the injuries. 

Hoping Hore can step up after this week if he performs.

McVee the obvious swap once he's back.

It wont happen but Fritsch could also be considered for a few matches till McVee returns?

But who replaces Fritta?

AJ out as well.  Campbell?

Edited by Demon Dynasty

 
On 16/03/2025 at 21:47, Redjacket said:

I'm very worried and nervous buy this upcoming game.

Of that's the case i would not be purchasing a pay-for-view RJ

45 minutes ago, Demon Dynasty said:

Hoping Hore can step up after this week if he performs.

McVee the obvious swap once he's back.

It wont happen but Fritsch could also be considered for a few matches till McVee returns?

But who replaces Fritta?

AJ out as well.  Campbell?

I'd like Hore to come in for Howes too, but he's coming back via Casey (mentioned by Selwyn I think).

 

Can't see Campbell getting a run in place of the suspended AJ.

Roo will get the 2nd ruck duties against Darling

In -Disco and Woewodin

Out - AJ and Howes

B: Jake Bowey, Tom McDonald, Jake Lever 

HB: Caleb Windsor, Harry Petty, Christian Salem  

C: Trent Rivers, Clayton Oliver, Xavier Lindsay

HF: Tom Sparrow, Matt Jefferson, Kade Chandler

F: Harry Sharp, Jacob van Rooyen, Bayley Fritsch

FOL: Max Gawn, Christian Petracca, Jack Viney

INT: Taj Woewodin, Ed Langdon, Harvey Langford, Daniel Turner, Jack Henderson

 

Edited by SthSea22

6 minutes ago, Roger Mellie said:

I'd like Hore to come in for Howes too, but he's coming back via Casey (mentioned by Selwyn I think).

Yes i mentioned 'after this week' RM

His first game back and will probs need two weeks.


9 minutes ago, SthSea22 said:

Can't see Campbell getting a run in place of the suspended AJ.

 

Why not 22?  While he may not be a direct like for like for AJ the bloke can play some seriously good footy in the ruck and around the ground.

I've seen it first hand against Sandy where he was the difference in them being very good on the day vs just 'ok'.

A great chop out for Max.  Will help to keep Max fresh if used off the bench wisely and both can occasionally rest forward to stretch and test the oppo tall defenders.

Edited by Demon Dynasty

19 minutes ago, Demon Dynasty said:

Why not 22?  While he may not be a direct like for like for AJ the bloke can play some seriously good footy in the ruck and around the ground.

I've seen it first hand against Sandy where he was the difference in them being very good on the day vs just 'ok'.

A great chop out for Max.  Will help to keep Max fresh if used off the bench wisely and both can occasionally rest forward to stretch and test the oppo tall defenders.

Xerri and Darling are also huge units, if we want to protect Gawn we should use another big body to match up against them

23 minutes ago, Demon Dynasty said:

A great chop out for Max.  Will help to keep Max fresh if used off the bench wisely and both can occasionally rest forward to stretch and test the oppo tall defenders.

Is this a Grundy discussion?

 

Unless we're planning to play Campbell approximately 12% time on ground (while Max is on the bench), he won't play


Wondering that myself. Looked on Marvel site and they are yet to announce where GA seats will be located. I also just want something in top deck between the 50 meter lines but no seats on sale for top deck as yet. Assume when they do open parts of it up it will be GA but not sure.

2 hours ago, SthSea22 said:

Can't see Campbell getting a run in place of the suspended AJ.

Roo will get the 2nd ruck duties against Darling

In -Disco and Woewodin

Out - AJ and Howes

B: Jake Bowey, Tom McDonald, Jake Lever 

HB: Caleb Windsor, Harry Petty, Christian Salem  

C: Trent Rivers, Clayton Oliver, Xavier Lindsay

HF: Tom Sparrow, Matt Jefferson, Kade Chandler

F: Harry Sharp, Jacob van Rooyen, Bayley Fritsch

FOL: Max Gawn, Christian Petracca, Jack Viney

INT: Taj Woewodin, Ed Langdon, Harvey Langford, Daniel Turner, Jack Henderson

 

Possibly, but I can’t see the sense in starting Langdon, who can play 100 mins game time, on the bench.

2 hours ago, The Taciturn Demon said:

If you buy a GA ticket to The [censored], can you sit on the top level?

I think that's your only option if you wish to sit.

14 minutes ago, M_9 said:

I think that's your only option if you wish to sit.

No GA on lower at all? Thought there was a small section on Level 1 last time I went, although i may have just stolen someone's seat after a few tins.

2 hours ago, The Taciturn Demon said:

If you buy a GA ticket to The [censored], can you sit on the top level?

 

1 hour ago, Big Gun said:

Wondering that myself. Looked on Marvel site and they are yet to announce where GA seats will be located. I also just want something in top deck between the 50 meter lines but no seats on sale for top deck as yet. Assume when they do open parts of it up it will be GA but not sure.

With North Melbourne home games at Marvel they open the top level for GA but they generally close about half of the bays.

 


40 minutes ago, roy11 said:

No GA on lower at all? Thought there was a small section on Level 1 last time I went, although i may have just stolen someone's seat after a few tins.

I stand in the concourse near the Victory room. Most entrances to level one are guarded and you need a ticket. 

Less guards at low ranked teams and more empty seats. If you wander along the concourse you may find an 'opening'.

1 minute ago, M_9 said:

I stand in the concourse near the Victory room. Most entrances to level one are guarded and you need a ticket. 

Less guards at low ranked teams and more empty seats. If you wander along the concourse you may find an 'opening'.

Thats what I’ll be doing 

3 minutes ago, M_9 said:

I stand in the concourse near the Victory room. Most entrances to level one are guarded and you need a ticket. 

Less guards at low ranked teams and more empty seats. If you wander along the concourse you may find an 'opening'.

This was Saints vs Melb, so not much of a blockbuster. 

Campbell is zero chance as neither him or Gawn can play 70% forward  He is there in case Gawn gets injured 

Cant see Hore coming in this quickly. Also if Howes was to be dropped we’d really want someone who can play small and Hore is more an intercept mark. Reckon we’ll give Howes another week

AJ out for Turner


Larkey, Zurhaar and Curtis pose a big threat to us, and if we can shut 2 of these guys down, then that will go a long way towards winning.

Larkey's an obvious danger with May out, but it's the small -medium forwards that are continuing to cause us (and the wider AFL) damage as per Greene and Coniglio last week.

In - Turner

Out - AJ (although has it been confirmed that we accepted the week)

Langford to get a full game.

Sharp to start as sub.

Also need to be mindful that Windsor might not be available.

At the risk of upsetting my friend  @Ghostwriter, and a few others, and not disrespecting hs fantastic '21 GF, but I have Bailey F getting 2 more matches to show some form. Something is off, I accept that he has been hindered by injuries for awhile, and this is meant to be his first good pre season in a long time, but I would like to see more endeavour. I was however super pleased with Bowey's game last week, the arc of his kicks were much flatter, I was really worried he'd lost it. And I am firming up on Windsor through the middle before Langdon and Rivers.

21 hours ago, Roost it far said:

The hardest positions to fill are the key positions. They’re just isn’t that many kids who are nearing 200cm who can play footy at the top level, it’s pretty much always been this way and now there’s 18 teams chasing them. Richmond had Lynch and that was it, they went ok. I’m not sure this means that 2-3 big forwards is a thing of the past. We don’t have an abundance of small running forwards like Hawthorn but that doesn’t mean we can’t beat them with 2-3 quality talls playing a system that works. I’ll give it more than 1 week before I decide which method is best. I’m confident in JVR and Turner, I thought Jefferson had an excellent debut. AJ I like but I think he’ll end up fringe to our best 22. My concern atm is Fritsch. I don’t remember his last great game. Again I’ll give him a few weeks but with Pickett, Spargo and Melksham soon to be back he will want to start contributing meaningfully. 

Fritsch is the best forward we have had in 50 years. We’ve was the last generational forward of any team dropped? 

 
26 minutes ago, Oxdee said:

Fritsch is the best forward we have had in 50 years. We’ve was the last generational forward of any team dropped? 

I don’t care if he’s the best forward in the history of world sport. He’s not delivering, if that doesn’t change and guys like JVR, Jefferson, Turner, AJ, Pickett are all playing good football then his spot may be at Casey for a few weeks. Also I’d take Neitz, Lyon, Robertson and a few others ahead over the last 50 years. 

Edited by Roost it far

39 minutes ago, Oxdee said:

Fritsch is the best forward we have had in 50 years. We’ve was the last generational forward of any team dropped? 

I like Fritta, he's been a great player and perhaps one of the best natural forwards we've had in the last 50 years.

Nowhere near the player David Neitz was. 


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 3 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 193 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 506 replies