Jump to content

Featured Replies

Always disappointing to lose like that but I kind of felt it was a bit of a free kick of a game prior to the first bounce. They had the advantage of playing last week and are one of the most highly fancied teams while we were playing with 5 AFL debutants. As long as we weren’t smashed it seems an acceptable result. 
 

Slight worry for me was our scoring profile. Goals from centre clearance are wonderful to watch but they aren’t reliable. Need to keep working hard on scoring from turnovers and from the back half. 
 

Still much to like but  we got so so close and gave up the lead in the last minute. 

 
40 minutes ago, DiscoStu17 said:

Nah

I was impressed with both of their tackling and pressure. 

AJ competes hard but is not highly skilled.  Needs to keep working at it and stop giving away soft free kicks.  He might make it

Jefferson lacks intensity and needs to go harder at the contest.  Again, with a lot of training, he might make it

Playing AJ, Jeffo & JVR in the same forward line is asking for trouble especially when considering that Fritsch is not great defensively

Just my view but I'd play AJ or Jeffo, not both

Edited by Macca

When it bucketed down harder in the final term gws were just cleaner with the ball.

I know I'll get shot down for this but gawn again couldn't kick the goals when we needed him. That final shot I wasn't sure if he just fell short or he tried to set it up.

I hope they review the final term. Many mistakes were made.

If we won today that would have set up momentum for nth next week 

 

There was one instance in the last where our Sub failed to chase hard, even though unlikely to catch opponent, not impressed when one has such fresh legs. Lindsay looks like another gem - him and Windsor to take a wing each for the next decade.

 


The thing that annoys me is when we kick it down the line to max either van rooyen or Johnson were right there to & they need to take there opponent away so they can't get up and compete against max in the marking contest 

1 hour ago, david_neitz_is_my_dad said:

Proud overall but should have killed it that last 1:30 instead of letting them go through the middle clean

Driving rain 90 seconds to go, defending a kick out from the opposition goal square you [censored] punch the living suitcases out of the sherrin into row 6 every day of the week.

F me.

4 points dropped against a contender.

I cannot stand the people messaging me saying ‘oh you guys tried so hard’ or ‘such a great effort’. No one sends that to Cats or Pies fans when they lose. We expect to win every game, that’s a poor loss in my mind. Only way to become a strong club.

 

Can someone remind me when Kolt is set to return? Really think he brings that manic forward pressure that could help us out.

Just now, Return to Glory said:

Can someone remind me when Kolt is set to return? Really think he brings that manic forward pressure that could help us out.

I think 5-6 weeks


1 minute ago, Return to Glory said:

Can someone remind me when Kolt is set to return? Really think he brings that manic forward pressure that could help us out.

6 weeks

Bitter sweet. Footy is back and so is that sting after a hard fought loss

1 hour ago, Coobs said:

.If we can't beat GWS sans so many of their best we can't at all

GWS missing hogan, stringer and briggs.

we didn’t have may, kozzie and Mcvee. 

GWS also had a run last which definitely helped them today 

10 minutes ago, Macca said:

AJ competes hard but lacks skill and is a bit clumsy (esp in the ruck) Needs to keep working at it and stop giving away soft free kicks.  He might make it

Jefferson lacks intensity and needs to go harder at the contest.  Again, with a lot of training, he might make it

Playing AJ, Jeffo & JVR in the same forward line is asking for trouble especially when considering that Fritsch is not great defensively

Just my view but I'd play AJ or Jeffo, not both

The McAdam injury is so underrated because he was the path to playing just 2 talls. But I thought Jeffo’s defensive pressure was really solid for a young tall and has come along way. I think we’ll persist with him and 2 others but I think Turner will come back for AJ sooner than later. Contest wise I thought Jeffo exceeded expectations. The big challenge for him (and all our forwards) is to draw the footy in good spots by upping his work rate to lead and present. 

I really liked AJ’s game until the last quarter ruck spell where he was caught doing a long stint when he was knackered. My takeaway is he should be good depth this year but could be more than this with a full preseason. 

1 hour ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Typical.

Just knew the moment we missed that goal and they started their transition they would score.

Games have been lost so many times off the back of this. How have we not rectified is beyond me.

 

Whitfield absolutely shanked that kick-in which caused a chaos ball and no one was expecting it to go that way. It was just lucky for them that Callaghan was there to receive the wild handball.


Lindsay looks like a steal, what composure for a first gamer. 

Sharp looked decent too.

Ironically the game was lost by some of the old habits, Salem doing 10m dinky kicks in the wet was terrible, the one to sharp at the 50 to a contest was dumb when there was a long option that puts the ball deep in the F50.

We did much better than I was expecting.

The rain helped us immensely, we likely lose by 5-6 goals if it was yesterday’s weather.

Loved seeing XL’s incredible composure on debut, the new faces being involved and T-Mac having a ripper.

There was plenty of positives but we continue to have a host of players who just do not contribute at all

7 minutes ago, dees189227 said:

The thing that annoys me is when we kick it down the line to max either van rooyen or Johnson were right there to & they need to take there opponent away so they can't get up and compete against max in the marking contest 

Where do you think their opponent will go if they ran away?

If it were Melbourne then Jake Lever would ignore his opponent and go be 3rd man up.
 

The only way to stop having mutiple talls contesting for the same footy is to move it fast. 

2 minutes ago, At the break of Gawn said:

Whitfield absolutely shanked that kick-in which caused a chaos ball and no one was expecting it to go that way. It was just lucky for them that Callaghan was there to receive the wild handball.

Throw much more than handball from Jones too 

1 hour ago, bobby1554 said:

Agree. The fluffed kicks, taking the wrong option, Johnson sprays his kick, GWS clean, untouched to Keeffe who hammers it over the goal umpires head. So typically Melbourne. Our skills are sub standard, we are a mile off it.

In AJ’s defence it was a strong wind at ground level & it made that shot much harder than it looked 


We benefited from it last year and now the opposite with this BS of pitching teams from the Opening Round against a team without that extra 'blowout'. If the AFL must have that hollow, interstate 'half-round' those participants must play only another of those participants in round 1. Stop adding more disadvantages to the fixture. This one probably was the difference today .

35 minutes ago, Demon Dynasty said:

Coaching.

Left Maxy and Claz on the bench for 3 to 5 mins too long in the last quarter.

Couldn't organise numbers behind the ball with only a few minutes to go..... AGAIN!

It's been the same redline play book under Simon since 2022.  Ie,  a losing more often than not.  Unable to protect a small lead or not winning enough close ones coming from behind.

 

.

 

yes. again and again. carlton in the finals. innumerable examples. 

compare and contrast the pies 2022/3. times excellent coaching in that scenario means you don’t lose

 

 

 

20 minutes ago, YesitwasaWin4theAges said:

Driving rain 90 seconds to go, defending a kick out from the opposition goal square you [censored] punch the living suitcases out of the sherrin into row 6 every day of the week.

F me.

4 points dropped against a contender.

At what point in the play from the kick out did the opportunity arise for anyone to spoil let alone punch it over the fence. 
 

At least watch the vision before commenting 

 
1 hour ago, chook fowler said:

Those easy missed goals cost dearly

Agree! 2 shots out on the full and 3 missed set shots.

14 minutes ago, BW511 said:

The rain helped us immensely, we likely lose by 5-6 goals if it was yesterday’s weather.

Loved seeing XL’s incredible composure on debut, the new faces being involved and T-Mac having a ripper.

There was plenty of positives but we continue to have a host of players who just do not contribute at all

What??? Whenever it was dry we capitalised.. as soon as it rained we capitulated. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 210 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 521 replies