Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

Jeffo still a year away i think. right spots, just needs another preseason of strength work to build up and he'll hold those marks and not be outbodied anymore like he was a few times today. but he'll make it.

 

Outside of the potentially deviating result to AMW, I actually thought this was a pretty impressive result given our omissions against an almost full strength North. 
 

Sharp was really impressive and I thought AJ did a lot right when he was on. Campbell is a great addition as a ready to go depth player, and St Francis and Langford could be two of our most important additions since we brought in Petracca and Gus together. 

2 hours ago, DeeZone said:

33-27 our favour Roos just snagged one.

Thank you, DZ, a Far King score, at last. Scores are the output of the efforts of players on both sides, in essence.


1 minute ago, Fanatique Demon said:

I said not so impressive. You were impressed by Jefferson today? 

‘Impressed’ would be exaggerating but I think for his first competitive hit out with the “big boys” he showed enough. Had shots on goal, showed some ground level work and got his hands to it. Always room to improve for a young key forward but with an actual run at it I think he’ll play games at senior level this year and kick goals with better players around him. (Considering who we were missing). 

Gee the MFC site is so far telling us nine tenths of nothing about the game. I watched the first half then sadly had to go out. Their only item is a 1 minute video of early in the game. Perhaps I am just expecting too much but surely good results mean membership numbers increase. 

 
20 minutes ago, bush demon said:

He was like a dumb extra. It was always Skull Murphy who applied the sleeper hold...

Did you actually see the wrestling ????

Mark Lewin did the sleeper hold although Tiger Singh had a variation.

Skull Murphy's speciality was the head button.

As much as the result is pleasing given we had 10-12 best 22 out and they had maybe 2 out, it was a practice match so the result is largely meaningless. 

For those who were able to watch, I’m far more interested in our game plan - how did we set up, did we press high, how did we move the ball, etc?


59 minutes ago, monoccular said:

Is Johnson playing?  Surely he should be the relief ruck. 

Agree what are they thinking??

15 minutes ago, biggestred said:

Jeffo still a year away i think. right spots, just needs another preseason of strength work to build up and he'll hold those marks and not be outbodied anymore like he was a few times today. but he'll make it.

If he is a year away he won't make it. 

15 minutes ago, GS_1905 said:

I don’t know why they didn’t go with AJ in place of Jeffo. He does provide that 2nd ruck option to chop out Gawn. I don’t know if that’s the plan with Campbell.

Bill already has his ticket punched and Jeffo looking to be that way as well unfortunately for the both of them. 
 

I did however think Chandler worked really hard playing in that role. Often goes unnoticed as it’s a forward defensive role. 

AJ came on fresh in the ruck against a teenager and looked great but that doesn’t mean we need him for the 15% of game time Max will rest.

Jeffo was chosen because he replaced Fritsch which allowed Turner and JVR to play their roles as they will round 1.

Im yet to see anything that changes my mind that we will just play the 2 talls, Fritsch, Tracc and Langford.

Agree old Dee, the boys put on a clinic in the second half, Rooey, Sharp, Lindsay, AJ, TC, AMW (until that dumb half Arzzed tackle) the whole team really pulled away from the Roos. Our fitness really stood out and a 46 point win was a bit of a tonic in terrible conditions, thought that Billings, Spaz, Rick and Disco also stood out but no passengers today. I can’t believe that I left Clayton, Riv & Kozz out. AG punches well above his weight.😁👍

Edited by DeeZone
Clayton, Riv & Kozz

21 minutes ago, GS_1905 said:

I don’t know why they didn’t go with AJ in place of Jeffo. He does provide that 2nd ruck option to chop out Gawn. I don’t know if that’s the plan with Campbell.

Bill already has his ticket punched and Jeffo looking to be that way as well unfortunately for the both of them. 
 

I did however think Chandler worked really hard playing in that role. Often goes unnoticed as it’s a forward defensive role. 

Chandler NEVER does enough in my book and yep agree Laurie wont make it, but Jeffo showed good signs Imo!


1 minute ago, picket fence said:

Chandler NEVER does enough in my book and yep agree Laurie wont make it, but Jeffo showed good signs Imo!

It’s the 1st preseason game and you’ve already called them done??? Cmon mate! 

19 minutes ago, BC_1718_DC said:

‘Impressed’ would be exaggerating but I think for his first competitive hit out with the “big boys” he showed enough. Had shots on goal, showed some ground level work and got his hands to it. Always room to improve for a young key forward but with an actual run at it I think he’ll play games at senior level this year and kick goals with better players around him. (Considering who we were missing). 

So we’re talking about impressive versus showed enough. Fine.

8 minutes ago, Cranky Franky said:

Did you actually see the wrestling ????

Mark Lewin did the sleeper hold although Tiger Singh had a variation.

Skull Murphy's speciality was the head button.

Must admit, my memory has faded. The head-butt, l guess you meant there...

2 minutes ago, picket fence said:

Chandler NEVER does enough in my book and yep agree Laurie wont make it, but Jeffo showed good signs Imo!

I think that Jeffo showed he is on the way, now has an AFL body and could have nailed a couple.

2 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

As much as the result is pleasing given we had 10-12 best 22 out and they had maybe 2 out, it was a practice match so the result is largely meaningless. 

For those who were able to watch, I’m far more interested in our game plan - how did we set up, did we press high, how did we move the ball, etc?

I’d say we sat fairly deep especially against the wind, but half backs were getting forward. Bowey narrowly missed a goal and AMW had at least one inside 50. Hore came off early for Adams so we were bigger than we wanted inside d50.

With so many first choice backs out it probably hampered our ball movement but there was a plan to use corridor and we saw some targeted kick outs to Petty.

Midfield seemed to focus on cutting off the corridor but weren’t exactly busting it both ways. That said, I expected LDU, Powell and especially Sheezel to get us in space more.

Forward spacing (as much as it can be seen from tv) seemed drastically different. The wind incentivised long and strong but we did have plenty of kicks to JVR, Disco and Jeffo leading up.

Rivers, Pickett and Clarry all looked to run the ball and especially as the game opened up they found space.


1 minute ago, bush demon said:

Must admit, my memory has faded. The head-butt, l guess you meant there...

PS l once got head-butted by Sabbo at Springy High. It was totally un-premeditated.

I'm excited to see how Sparrow goes in the fwd half.

He has an eye for goal and can kick beautifully for goal

In some ways he seems to sacrifice his game too much for the team and defensive running

Give him some licence to run creatively, he will make space with his tank

8 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

As much as the result is pleasing given we had 10-12 best 22 out and they had maybe 2 out, it was a practice match so the result is largely meaningless. 

For those who were able to watch, I’m far more interested in our game plan - how did we set up, did we press high, how did we move the ball, etc?

Ball movement was better. Looks like we have been training the go fast and go slow modes. Kozzy Riv Oliver Billing’s Langford all look to be on the same page. I thought our forward line looked much more Open than what I was used to.
 

Given how much we were missing it’s going to be hard to take much away from this encounter. 

 

I think overall we played well in tough conditions against an extremely poor side. A lot of our young guys stood up and strutted their stuff against North best 22 regulars. Competition for spots this year will be tight and almost ferocious. Which is brilliant 

4 minutes ago, GS_1905 said:

Ball movement was better. Looks like we have been training the go fast and go slow modes. Kozzy Riv Oliver Billing’s Langford all look to be on the same page. I thought our forward line looked much more Open than what I was used to.
 

Given how much we were missing it’s going to be hard to take much away from this encounter. 

I reckon there is plenty to take away from your first paragraph alone. If we sort out our forward line functionality and improve our ball movement the scoreboard and wins will take care of themselves. We have too much talent for it not to. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 25 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies