7 minutes ago, Colm said:

Just wondering if Lurker would be on steroids to help him recover from his illness?! I know my sister was when she was recovering from the same thing. 
Think they give the best chance of lungs fully recovering. 
Would these steroids then mean he wouldn’t be allowed to play?!

I don’t know- just putting it out there to see if anybody else does.

 

The steroids they use to treat severe illness like that are different to the ones used for performance enhancement

13 hours ago, DubDee said:

Fair enough mate 

So who are our small forwards for the first few weeks

Chandler may play the ANB role. Then…

Laurie, Brown, Mentha, Billings?????

C; Lindsay Rivers Billings
HF: Langdon JvR Sharp
FF: Chandler Turner Fritsch 
Foll: Gawn Oliver Viney
Int: Tracc, Sparrow, Langford

I’d say that line up has just enough pace and pressure with the 3 guys off bench rotating mid and forward especially with Viney adding some forward tackling bite at times. But it’s just the 2 talls and doesn’t let us get Langdon on ball or Sharp on the wing for more than rotations. And the depth is very thin.

If Pickett, Kolt and Spargo are all back within the first month or so of the season we might look silly for adding another small who sits at Casey. 

It’s a tricky decision. 

Seems everyone is keen to draw a line through LK. 

Is this because they don't see the promise or they want additional players through the SSP. I think Roy serves a purpose as we are a bit low on small forwards but we may get more out of Culley/Henderson.

Was keen to see LK after a full AFL-Pre-Season but seemingly that's been derailed. 

 

Edited February 17Feb 17 by roy11
typo

5 minutes ago, roy11 said:

Seems everyone is keep to draw a line through LK. 

Is this because they don't see the promise or they want additional players through the SSP. I think Roy serves a purpose as we are a bit low on small forwards but we may get more out of Culley/Henderson.

Was keen to see LK after a full AFL-Pre-Season but seemingly that's been derailed. 

 

I can’t speak for anyone else but I’d be lying if I said this wasn’t a part of my thinking  

No disrespect to Luker but it was a near zero chance he’d be playing AFL this year, and now it’s unclear at what point he’ll return to even playing in the VFL  

I’d still like to keep him on the list to let him develop, but I think adding two ready made players in Culley and potentially Henderson could really strengthen our depth in a way a developing tall simply can’t 

Plus we’ve seen the type of impact these guys can have at a contending club (think Markov at the Pies or Mannagh at Geelong), and I think we’ve been sorely lacking in this recruiting space recently

When life gives you lemons make lemonade 

22 hours ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

Am I allowed to question a player's character based on appalling hairstyle choices?

I’m a fan of the ‘dreads’… get him in.

What’s the cut off date for putting players on the LTI?

Culley

Edited February 17Feb 17 by SthSea22

Culley will get the nod over Roy due to having past AFL experience imo

Roy will continue to play and train at Casey with a chance Mid-Season to be picked up

1 minute ago, SthSea22 said:

Culley will get the nod over Roy due to having past AFL experience imo

Roy will continue to play and train at Casey with a chance Mid-Season to be picked up

For mine that’s like choosing vanilla over chocolate 

36 minutes ago, roy11 said:

Seems everyone is keen to draw a line through LK. 

Is this because they don't see the promise or they want additional players through the SSP. I think Roy serves a purpose as we are a bit low on small forwards but we may get more out of Culley/Henderson.

Was keen to see LK after a full AFL-Pre-Season but seemingly that's been derailed. 

 

Well for a start he hasn't returned to Melbourne after Xmas which is concerning

6 minutes ago, SthSea22 said:

Well for a start he hasn't returned to Melbourne after Xmas which is concerning

He's back in Melbourne at training per GW

  

2 hours ago, Ghostwriter said:

Just spoke with Luker. He’s walking slow laps. I almost didn’t recognise him since he’s lost weight and has grown a mo, he approached me with a huge smile though. He’s feeling a lot better but it’s gonna be a slow and steady process getting him fit again. He’s really happy to be back and says he’s loving living in Melbourne 

 

 

22 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

What’s the cut off date for putting players on the LTI?

 I believe we have three days, including today. 

I suspect there's a chance we'll have two spots available, with LK and McAdam moved to the inactive list in which case we'll add Culley and a small forward. 

1 hour ago, BLWNBA said:

 

 I believe we have three days, including today. 

I suspect there's a chance we'll have two spots available, with LK and McAdam moved to the inactive list in which case we'll add Culley and a small forward. 

AFL rule 26 covers moving a player from the Primary list to the LTI list. 

It's far from straightforward. I reckon there'd be no issue with McAdam. However, I'd doubt the panel would approve the move of LK. Just my opinion/interpretation.

Edited February 17Feb 17 by M_9

2 hours ago, DeeSpencer said:

C; Lindsay Rivers Billings
HF: Langdon JvR Sharp
FF: Chandler Turner Fritsch 
Foll: Gawn Oliver Viney
Int: Tracc, Sparrow, Langford

I’d say that line up has just enough pace and pressure with the 3 guys off bench rotating mid and forward especially with Viney adding some forward tackling bite at times. But it’s just the 2 talls and doesn’t let us get Langdon on ball or Sharp on the wing for more than rotations. And the depth is very thin.

If Pickett, Kolt and Spargo are all back within the first month or so of the season we might look silly for adding another small who sits at Casey. 

It’s a tricky decision. 

Sorry DS. I am still keeping Langdon on the wing.  Billings starts at Casey imv.  
 

I am ok with adding Culley as SSP list addition, with McAdam unfortunately likely to be ruled out for 2025 as LTI.   Apparently Cullet was considered unlucky to get the axe by the Eagles.  Track watchers reports say he’s been impressive over the summer so far and pushing hard for a second chance.  

Edited February 17Feb 17 by spirit of norm smith
GoDees

3 hours ago, Rodney (Balls) Grinter said:

 

If we are looking for a small forward who puts on pressure, then I'd be looking at Pup Brown.  From the limited times I've seen him play, I think he's also got great goal sense and ability to execute.

Love to see this guy given a good opportunity play at senior level.

It’s mystifying to me why Brown hasn’t been injected into the forward line as a pressure small forward considering all our options already on the wing/half forward. 

The cut off date for SSP is Friday afternoon (21st) 

3 hours ago, Clintosaurus said:

Blokes back training after an ACL would be on the inactive list though? I reckon if Luker was no chance of playing this year, make him Inactive, sign him for next year as an act of good faith and add both Culley and Roy (or Jack Henderson) to the list. Maybe ask the AFL for dispensation for Luker to play either at Casey or local footy if up to it later on the season.

The AFL aren’t mugs either.

In order to have a player put on the inactive list, you have to have medical evidence that the player will not be able to play for the whole of the season. 

It won’t happen.

1 hour ago, M_9 said:

AFL rule 26 covers moving a player from the Primary list to the LTI list. 

It's far from straightforward. I reckon there'd be no issue with McAdam. However, I'd doubt the panel would approve the move of LK. Just my opinion/interpretation.

We are owed, after Gus was medically retired by the AFL days after the SSP closed.

Not that that means much.

Edited February 17Feb 17 by Redleg

We are committed to the LK experiment. Solidly built KPF’s that can mark and/or bring the ball to ground are great, especially if they can slot their 2 or 3 opportunities when they come. We just need to give the kid time. I hope he gets well and makes it.

Heart says George, head says Culley. 

3 hours ago, BC_1718_DC said:

It’s mystifying to me why Brown hasn’t been injected into the forward line as a pressure small forward considering all our options already on the wing/half forward. 

If I recall right, he was one of the top finishers in the 3km time trial, so perhaps he's in the mix for the ANB type role.

7 hours ago, hardtack said:

I’m a fan of the ‘dreads’… get him in.

Commiserations to Shane McAdam sadly the ‘Sun Is not Shining’. ‘Don’t Rock My Boat’ but the DL boards need to ‘Lively Up Yourself’. To succeed in the AFL (‘Babylon System’) there’s no ‘Running Away’ from it, clubs must ‘Work’ constantly on their lists to be ‘Top Rankin’.

Simon, Tim and Jason aka ‘Midnight Ravers’ given the tight timeline, hopefully won’t strike ‘Three O’Clock Roadblock’. Stir It Up’ and cause ‘Burnin’ and Lootin’ here.

Whoever gets the nod will leave a ‘Postive Vibration’ with the DL diaspora and get ‘One Love’. Help pull us out of the lower ladder ‘Concrete Jungle’ and on an upward ‘Exodus’. Inevitably ‘Time Will Tell’.

Edited February 17Feb 17 by Tarax Club

Who will Henderson pick? Us or the Eagles?

Late twist as second club joins chase for VFL star

Edited February 17Feb 17 by wheaters31

8 minutes ago, wheaters31 said:

Who will Henderson pick? Us or the Eagles?

Late twist as second club joins chase for VFL star

So it could be be a Cometti favourite - the third of two options (Henderson over both Culley and George)

Makes sense given a small forward is more of a pressing need than an inside mid