Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

guesses at squads:

blue (likely rd 1?):
1. may
2. van rooyen
3. salem
4. mcvee
7. viney
10. turner
11. gawn
13. oliver
14. billings
15. langdon
17. bowey
19. lindsay
20. langford
21. jefferson
22. howes
24. rivers
30. sharp
31. fritsch
32. sparrow
35. petty
(20 players spotted)

white:
16. laurie
25. mcdonald
26. adams
27. hore
29. campbell
36 pickett
39. mentha
40. woewodin
41. brown
42. johnson
45 moniz-wakefield
+ roy george
+ jai culley
(13 players spotted)

injured / didn't spot:
5. petracca
6. windsor
8. lever
9. spargo
12. tholstrup
18. melksham
23. mcadam
28. verrall
33. fullarton
37. chandler
38. sestan
44. kentfield
(12 not spotted)

i'd guess at rd 1 based on players expected to be returning from injury...

B: McVee - May - Lever
HB: Windsor - Petty - Salem
C: Langdon - Petracca - Billings
HF: Sparrow - Fritsch - Sharp
F: van Rooyen - Jefferson - Chandler
Foll: Gawn - Oliver - Viney
I/c: Langford - Rivers - Sharp - Turner
Sub: Lindsay

Edited by whatwhat say what

  • Popular Post

Today’s MFC main session:

Rehab: Lever and Spargo running laps.  Lever was running short distances at a fast click as well as having kick to kick with a trainer. He seems unimpeded.

Petracca, Chandler, McAdam and Fullarton doing non-contact kicking and handball drills on the adjacent oval.  All moving freely at pace. 

I didn’t notice Windsor, Melksham, Verrall, Tholstrup or Kentfield, but it could have just been an oversight by me.

Today’s main session comprised of 3 x 20 minute quarters of contested match simulation under the guidance of two AFL umpires (no boundary umpires). And it was very much a probables vs possibles for round one, which is why Pickett was with the possibles.

So when you’re trying to drift off to sleep at night while picking your best team from the backline to the forwards keep the following in mind.

Probables – Blue:  May, Petty, Howes, Salem, Bowey, and McVee in defence; Gawn, Oliver, Rivers, Viney, Langford, Ed Langdon, Sharp, Billings, Sparrow, and Lindsay rotating in the mids, and van Rooyen, Turner, Jefferson, Fritsch as the main forwards.

Ed Langdon, Lindsay and Billings all spent time on the wing. Langdon and Billings also occasionally rotated through a half-forward flank, while I noted Langdon attended a lot of CBAs. Lindsay was predominantly just wing.  

Along with Ed Langdon, Oliver, Viney, Rivers and Langford had the bulk of the CBAs.

It was quite noticeable that Blue had a heap of left footers: Viney, Langford, Lindsay, Billings, Salem, May, Fritsch. Just need to get Chandler and Brown into the team.

• I’m saying Ed Langdon, because a lot of posters are saying Langdon when they mean Langford

Possibles – White:  McDonald, Pickett, Brown, Adams, Laurie, Woewodin, Mentha, Campbell, Hore, Moniz-Wakefield, Johnson, Sestan, George, Yze, Culley, plus a few other Casey players

White got off to a flyer with the first 3 goals. George kicked 2 (one lead and mark and the other a good crumbing goal) and Mentha one on the run from about 40 metres. Gradually Blue wrestled control and ran out 38 point winners (10 11 71 to 5 3 33).

I don’t believe there were any injuries, although Viney copped a high one, which set him back in his tracks.  I think he was fine.

Lots of switching with short and long kicks before trying to spot up forward leads if possible, or long kicks when necessary.  The game was a bit scrappy with some skill errors, including dropped chest marks (my pet hate), intermingled with some quality ball movement.

Gawn and Campbell nullified each other. Gawn wasn’t able to take his trademark contested marks, but I never expect ruckmen to be marking at their best in early February.

Ed Langdon was prolific.  He was constantly an option and seemed to be relishing a bit more freedom through the midfield.  I was surprised by how many centre bounces he attended.

Lindsay didn’t get a lot of it and made a couple of errors but generally used it well.

Langford was busy and contested as you’d expect.  Took a nice mark and kicked a goal from a left foot snap 35 metres out.

Billings was one of the busiest. He’s finding the footy with ease and was used a lot.

Salem is also finding plenty of it. Bowey also got a heap of it.  May was his intercepting self and uses Salem and Bowey as the outlet kick. McVee was also busy. 

Howes was good. He links up well with his fellow defenders.  He seems to be having a very good preseason.

Petty did what he had to do, which wasn’t much.

Rivers and Oliver were the best mids for Blue.  It’s great to see Oliver looking like he’s back to his best and Rivers looks a natural mid to me.

Sharp was neat. Did a great spoli which became a mark deep in defence and 30 seconds later was hitting van Rooyen lace out in the forward pocket.

The tall forwards were pretty quiet.  Jefferson took a double grabber 35 metres out and converted.  He also kicked one off the ground in the last. I thought he competed well. Van Rooyen kicked a nice goal from a difficult angle, and he also went up against Johnson in the ruck for a while.  Turner was quiet. Fritsch was the most lively of Blue’s forwards.  He also got on the scoreboard.

I liked the look of Culley. A very tall mid, but looked good.  Kicked a goal for White.

Lastly, a special mention to the brothers. Pickett was fantastic despite getting caught by Langford.  He played 90% in the midfield and was just so clean, quick and creative. His delivery was very good.  He teamed up well with Mentha and George, who both looked likely.  He’s got a touch of class Mentha and the more nuggety George also looks like he could belong at AFL level. They were up against it with a strong Blue backline and White had no key talls to crumb off, but both looked dangerous and had multiple shots at goal.

Edited by Gator

 
57 minutes ago, Gator said:

Today’s MFC main session:

Rehab: Jake Lever and Charlie Spargo running laps.  Lever was running short distances at a fast click as well as having kick to kick with a trainer. He seems unimpeded.

Christian Petracca, Kade Chandler, Shane McAdam and Tom Fullarton doing non-contact kicking and handball drills on the adjacent oval.  All moving freely at pace. 

I didn’t notice Caleb Windsor, Jake Melksham, Will Verrall, Koltyn Tholstrup or Luker Kentfield, but it could have just been an oversight by me.

Today’s main session comprised of 3 x 20 minute quarters of contested match simulation under the guidance of two AFL umpires (no boundary umpires). And it was very much a probables vs possibles for round one, which is why Kysaiah Pickett was with the possibles.

So when you’re trying to drift off to sleep at night while picking your best team from the backline to the forwards keep the following in mind.

Probables – Blue:  May, Petty, Howes, Salem, Bowey, and McVee in defence; Gawn, Oliver, Rivers, Viney, Langford, Langdon, Sharp, Billings, Sparrow, and Lindsay rotating in the mids, and van Rooyen, Turner, Jefferson, Fritsch as the main forwards.

Ed Langdon, Xavier Lindsay and Jack Billings all spent time on the wing. Langdon and Billings also occasionally rotated through a half-forward flank, while I noted Langdon attended a lot of CBAs. Lindsay was predominantly just wing.  

Along with Ed Langdon, Clayton Oliver, Jack Viney, Trent Rivers and Langford had the bulk of the CBAs.

It was quite noticeable that Blue had a heap of left footers: Viney, Langford, Lindsay, Billings, Christian Salem, Steven May, Bayley Fritsch. Just need to get Chandler and Kynan Brown into the team.

• I’m saying Ed Langdon, because a lot of posters are saying Langdon when they mean Langford

Possibles – White:  McDonald, Pickett, Brown, Adams, Laurie, Woewodin, Mentha, Campbell, Hore, Moniz-Wakefield, Johnson, Sestan, George, Yze, Culley, plus a few other Casey players

White got off to a flyer with the first 3 goals. Roy George kicked 2 (one lead and mark and the other a good crumbing goal) and Ricky Mentha Jr one on the run from about 40 metres. Gradually Blue wrestled control and ran out 38 point winners (10 11 71 to 5 3 33).

I don’t believe there were any injuries, although Viney copped a high one, which set him back in his tracks.  I think he was fine.

Lots of switching with short and long kicks before trying to spot up forward leads if possible, or long kicks when necessary.  The game was a bit scrappy with some skill errors, including dropped chest marks (my pet hate), intermingled with some quality ball movement.

Max Gawn and Tom Campbell nullified each other. Gawn wasn’t able to take his trademark contested marks, but I never expect ruckmen to be marking at their best in early February.

Ed Langdon was prolific.  He was constantly an option and seemed to be relishing a bit more freedom through the midfield.  I was surprised by how many centre bounces he attended.

Lindsay didn’t get a lot of it and made a couple of errors but generally used it well.

Harvey Langford was busy and contested as you’d expect.  Took a nice mark and kicked a goal from a left foot snap 35 metres out.

Billings was one of the busiest. He’s finding the footy with ease and was used a lot.

Salem is also finding plenty of it. Jake Bowey also got a heap of it.  May was his intercepting self and uses Salem and Bowey as the outlet kick. Judd McVee was also busy. 

Blake Howes was good. He links up well with his fellow defenders.  He seems to be having a very good preseason.

Harry Petty did what he had to do, which wasn’t much.

Rivers and Oliver were the best mids for Blue.  It’s great to see Oliver looking like he’s back to his best and Rivers looks a natural mid to me.

Harry Sharp was neat. Did a great spoli which became a mark deep in defence and 30 seconds later was hitting Jacob van Rooyen lace out in the forward pocket.

The tall forwards were pretty quiet.  Matt Jefferson took a double grabber 35 metres out and converted.  He also kicked one off the ground in the last. I thought he competed well. Van Rooyen kicked a nice goal from a difficult angle, and he also went up against Aidan Johnson in the ruck for a while.  Daniel Turner was quiet. Fritsch was the most lively of Blue’s forwards.  He also got on the scoreboard.

I liked the look of Jai Culley. A very tall mid, but looked good.  Kicked a goal for White.

Lastly, a special mention to the brothers. Pickett was fantastic despite getting caught by Langford.  He played 90% in the midfield and was just so clean, quick and creative. His delivery was very good.  He teamed up well with Mentha and George, who both looked likely.  He’s got a touch of class Mentha and the more nuggety George also looks like he could belong at AFL level. They were up against it with a strong Blue backline and White had no key talls to crumb off, but both looked dangerous and had multiple shots at goal.

Did you get into the ground?  Great report, many thanks. 

Thanks for the report very much appreciated 


18 minutes ago, Gator said:

 

Langford was busy and contested as you’d expect.  Took a nice mark and kicked a goal from a left foot snap 35 metres out.

 

Woohoo!!!

Going by the video, which is extremely limited, the things that were immediately obvious to me good and bad.

Our ball movement out of the back half appears to be more dynamic. Using a combination of short 45 kicks, handballs and overlap. I suspect this will continue our evolution of scoring from back half and hence more focus on punishing teams through the turnover game, which has been an issue for us for a while now.

We still don't look great moving it beyond half forward and into the 50 though i hope this was just a poor selection of video's. 

Defence looks pretty solid. May looked excellent and appears to be moving very freely

Kozzy looks just like he can be anything. A bit scrappy but he is definitely an x-factor in the middle. 

I hope Campbell is better than we think he is because Gawn didnt look that convincing in the middle.

First time i have seen Mentha in action. Definitely something there.

Oliver didn't have many cameo's. Was it just poor video selection in editing or was he not as prominent today?

Our injury list to the A-team is starting to look concerning. Windsor, Trac, Lever.. arguable McAdam, Melk.  

Thanks for the reports @Gator

How was Kynan Brown? Looked lively in the mat simulation video. 

 
39 minutes ago, Slartibartfast said:

Did you get into the ground?

1:32 is your clue.

9 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

Thanks for the reports @Gator

How was Kynan Brown? Looked lively in the mat simulation video. 

He played off a wing and used it well.  He's got quite a lot of competition for his outside mid role, but I think he'll be a player.  Just has to do his apprenticeship.


Thanks Gator that’s a great training report and all posters and special comments.😁

Thanks for a great write-up Gator.

1 hour ago, Gator said:

Pickett was fantastic despite getting caught by Langford.  

And the doubters at draft time thought Langford was too slow and wouldn't be up to AFL speed 😆 If he can get his hands on Kozzie, he'll adjust fine!

  • Demonland changed the title to PRESEASON TRAINING: Friday 7th February 2025
1 hour ago, GS_1905 said:

Our injury list to the A-team is starting to look concerning. Windsor, Trac, Lever.. arguable McAdam, Melk.  

I reckon the quantity of injuries and rehabbers would marry up with this time last year, and we all bemoaned how bad of a pre season we had last year.

I wonder why Lever is back in rehab? Hopefully there's no issue with Windsor.

 


 

9 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

I reckon the quantity of injuries and rehabbers would marry up with this time last year, and we all bemoaned how bad of a pre season we had last year.

I wonder why Lever is back in rehab? Hopefully there's no issue with Windsor.

 

??

2 hours ago, GS_1905 said:

Was it just poor video selection in editing or was he not as prominent today?

I assume we would be very selective with the 'highlights' that are posted publicly for other teams to see

3 hours ago, adonski said:

 

How’s the one handed bounce on the run from Kozz tho… goodness me😩

Started watching this on the toilet but I'm talking this one to the bedroom.


Not a fan of Jefferson yet but his kicking action looks very good indeed. 

Kozzie is a cut above

3 hours ago, whatwhat say what said:

guesses at squads:

blue (likely rd 1?):
1. may
2. van rooyen
3. salem
4. mcvee
7. viney
10. turner
11. gawn
13. oliver
14. billings
15. langdon
17. bowey
19. lindsay
20. langford
21. jefferson
22. howes
24. rivers
30. sharp
31. fritsch
32. sparrow
35. petty
(20 players spotted)

white:
16. laurie
25. mcdonald
26. adams
27. hore
29. campbell
36 pickett
39. mentha
40. woewodin
41. brown
42. johnson
45 moniz-wakefield
+ roy george
+ jai culley
(13 players spotted)

injured / didn't spot:
5. petracca
6. windsor
8. lever
9. spargo
12. tholstrup
18. melksham
23. mcadam
28. verrall
33. fullarton
37. chandler
38. sestan
44. kentfield
(12 not spotted)

i'd guess at rd 1 based on players expected to be returning from injury...

B: McVee - May - Lever
HB: Windsor - Petty - Salem
C: Langdon - Petracca - Billings
HF: Sparrow - Fritsch - Sharp
F: van Rooyen - Jefferson - Chandler
Foll: Gawn - Oliver - Viney
I/c: Langford - Rivers - Sharp - Turner
Sub: Lindsay

Dbl sharp bit good side — McAdam for 2nd Sharp perhaps 

 
25 minutes ago, RedLegs23 said:

How’s the one handed bounce on the run from Kozz tho… goodness me😩

Started watching this on the toilet but I'm talking this one to the bedroom.

How’s the tackle from Harvey.. sheeeeeesh!!!

1 hour ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

I reckon the quantity of injuries and rehabbers would marry up with this time last year, and we all bemoaned how bad of a pre season we had last year.

I wonder why Lever is back in rehab? Hopefully there's no issue with Windsor.

 

Not even CLOSE.. 

we’re WAY ahead this year and have had far more still do full km’s just less contact which is an totally diff thing. We’re absolutely FLYING atm and have over 80% of players done 80% of the pre-season easily by some reports. LY we had way more that did far less, Clarry was miles off, Melksham, Petty, McAdam did barely runnthru’s only.. May was barely moving!

 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

    • 17 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 232 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 47 replies