Jump to content

Featured Replies

 
 

Don’t we really need 2nd and 3rd round picks for next year for the points for White? 

Probably will use this in a bundle for a points trade this year 


1 minute ago, Wells 11 said:

strange trade. What value for the crows in that? 

Maybe GWS want only future picks for Peatling

I hope we are loading up picks to get another first rounder, maybe even try to turn pick 5 into 7 and 8 from St Kilda.

Imagine getting a Rozee, Butters, Dursma-esq trio to rejuvenate the club. 

We are giving everything to Essendon sadly

Edited by Lord Neville X Flash

 

Going straight out in the Essendon deal. Farewell sweet prince, we hardly knew you 

Well we must still be keeping ammo for Sharp and possibly Derksen.


5 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Going straight out in the Essendon deal. Farewell sweet prince, we hardly knew you 

I think that means we'll get a F3 back in the deal so we have a full suite of futures beyond the F1 that's going.

The only other path I can see is F3 from Collingwood for Tomlinson and that seems unlikely.

20 minutes ago, Wells 11 said:

strange trade. What value for the crows in that? 

they think we'll finish bottom 4

We will have:

2024: 5, 9 and 49

2025: 2nd, 3rd (ess), 4th and 5th

 

I guess we use 49 or future 3rd for Sharp,

Derksen seems unlikely to be traded by GWS

 

+ lots of points for White next year


7 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

At least we can death ride them back. Could be a pick 37-42 if Essendon have the spectacularly bad year we're all waiting for them to have, given their list sucks and Merrett is their only star.

Edited by John Demonic

7 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

Seems strange for Adelaide with Peatling to get done, 46 could have been useful. 46 + F2 for Peatling + GWS F2 sounds about right to me.

2 minutes ago, old55 said:

Seems strange for Adelaide with Peatling to get done, 46 could have been useful. 46 + F2 for Peatling + GWS F2 sounds about right to me.

I don't think GWS want 2024 picks - they generally try to have high picks each year, and they already have 3x first rounders this year. So makes sense for them to load up next year instead


2 minutes ago, Lord Neville X Flash said:

I don't think GWS want 2024 picks - they generally try to have high picks each year, and they already have 3x first rounders this year. So makes sense for them to load up next year instead

Probably fair enough, GWS already have 37, 53 and 56 this year too so don't need 46 in addition.

Maybe F2 for Peatling - do you think that's fair? F2 + F3?

So what do we have left this year after 5 and 9?

Edit. Pick 49, just saw on another thread, which will likely get used for Harry Sharp deal

Edited by Moonshadow

 

I hope when we win the flag next year the contribution of pick 46 gets acknowledged.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Port Adelaide

    With both sides precariously positioned ahead of the run home to the finals, only one team involved in Sunday’s clash at the Adelaide Oval between the Power and the Demons will remain a contender when it’s over.  On current form, that one team has to be Melbourne which narrowly missed out on defeating the competition’s power house Collingwood on King's Birthday and also recently overpowered both 2024 Grand Finalists. Conversely, Port Adelaide snapped out of a four-game losing streak with a win against the Giants in Canberra. Although they will be rejuvenated following that victory, their performances during that run of losses were sub par and resulted in some embarrassing blow out defeats.

    • 1 reply
  • NON-MFC: Round 14

    Round 14 is upon us and there's plenty at stake across the rest of the competition. As Melbourne heads to Adelaide, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches of the Round. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons’ finals tilt? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

    • 93 replies
  • REPORT: Collingwood

    The media focus on the fiery interaction between Max Gawn and Steven May at the end of the game was unfortunate because it took away the gloss from Melbourne’s performance in winning almost everywhere but on the scoreboard in its Kings Birthday clash with Collingwood at the MCG. It was a real battle reminiscent of the good old days when the rivalry between the two clubs was at its height and a fitting contest to celebrate the 2025 Australian of the Year, Neale Daniher and his superb work to bring the campaign to raise funds for motor neurone disease awareness to the forefront. Notwithstanding the fact that the Magpies snatched a one point victory from his old club, Daniher would be proud of the fact that his Demons fought tooth and nail to win the keenly contested game in front of 77,761 fans.

    • 1 reply
  • PREGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons are set to embark on a four-week road trip that takes them across the country, with two games in Adelaide and a clash on the Gold Coast, broken up by a mid-season bye. Next up is a meeting with the inconsistent Port Adelaide at Adelaide Oval. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 176 replies
  • PODCAST: Collingwood

    I have something on tomorrow night so Podcast will be Wednesday night. The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Wednesday, 11th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees heartbreaking 1 point loss to the Magpies on King's Birthday Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 37 replies
  • POSTGAME: Collingwood

    Despite effectively playing against four extra opponents, the Dees controlled much of the match. However, their inaccuracy in front of goal and inability to convert dominance in clearances and inside 50s ultimately cost them dearly, falling to a heartbreaking one-point loss on King’s Birthday.

      • Shocked
      • Love
      • Like
    • 532 replies