Jump to content

Featured Replies



Don’t we really need 2nd and 3rd round picks for next year for the points for White? 

Probably will use this in a bundle for a points trade this year 


1 minute ago, Wells 11 said:

strange trade. What value for the crows in that? 

Maybe GWS want only future picks for Peatling

I hope we are loading up picks to get another first rounder, maybe even try to turn pick 5 into 7 and 8 from St Kilda.

Imagine getting a Rozee, Butters, Dursma-esq trio to rejuvenate the club. 

We are giving everything to Essendon sadly

Edited by Lord Neville X Flash

Going straight out in the Essendon deal. Farewell sweet prince, we hardly knew you 

Well we must still be keeping ammo for Sharp and possibly Derksen.


5 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Going straight out in the Essendon deal. Farewell sweet prince, we hardly knew you 

I think that means we'll get a F3 back in the deal so we have a full suite of futures beyond the F1 that's going.

The only other path I can see is F3 from Collingwood for Tomlinson and that seems unlikely.

20 minutes ago, Wells 11 said:

strange trade. What value for the crows in that? 

they think we'll finish bottom 4

We will have:

2024: 5, 9 and 49

2025: 2nd, 3rd (ess), 4th and 5th

 

I guess we use 49 or future 3rd for Sharp,

Derksen seems unlikely to be traded by GWS

 

+ lots of points for White next year


7 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

At least we can death ride them back. Could be a pick 37-42 if Essendon have the spectacularly bad year we're all waiting for them to have, given their list sucks and Merrett is their only star.

Edited by John Demonic

7 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

Seems strange for Adelaide with Peatling to get done, 46 could have been useful. 46 + F2 for Peatling + GWS F2 sounds about right to me.

2 minutes ago, old55 said:

Seems strange for Adelaide with Peatling to get done, 46 could have been useful. 46 + F2 for Peatling + GWS F2 sounds about right to me.

I don't think GWS want 2024 picks - they generally try to have high picks each year, and they already have 3x first rounders this year. So makes sense for them to load up next year instead


2 minutes ago, Lord Neville X Flash said:

I don't think GWS want 2024 picks - they generally try to have high picks each year, and they already have 3x first rounders this year. So makes sense for them to load up next year instead

Probably fair enough, GWS already have 37, 53 and 56 this year too so don't need 46 in addition.

Maybe F2 for Peatling - do you think that's fair? F2 + F3?

So what do we have left this year after 5 and 9?

Edit. Pick 49, just saw on another thread, which will likely get used for Harry Sharp deal

Edited by Moonshadow

I hope when we win the flag next year the contribution of pick 46 gets acknowledged.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...