Jump to content


Recommended Posts



Posted

Don’t we really need 2nd and 3rd round picks for next year for the points for White? 

  • Like 1

Posted
1 minute ago, Wells 11 said:

strange trade. What value for the crows in that? 

Maybe GWS want only future picks for Peatling

Posted (edited)

I hope we are loading up picks to get another first rounder, maybe even try to turn pick 5 into 7 and 8 from St Kilda.

Imagine getting a Rozee, Butters, Dursma-esq trio to rejuvenate the club. 

We are giving everything to Essendon sadly

Edited by Lord Neville X Flash
  • Like 1
  • Shocked 1
  • Sad 1


Posted
5 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

Going straight out in the Essendon deal. Farewell sweet prince, we hardly knew you 

I think that means we'll get a F3 back in the deal so we have a full suite of futures beyond the F1 that's going.

The only other path I can see is F3 from Collingwood for Tomlinson and that seems unlikely.

  • Like 1

Posted (edited)
7 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

At least we can death ride them back. Could be a pick 37-42 if Essendon have the spectacularly bad year we're all waiting for them to have, given their list sucks and Merrett is their only star.

Edited by John Demonic
  • Like 1

Posted
7 minutes ago, Demonland said:

 

Seems strange for Adelaide with Peatling to get done, 46 could have been useful. 46 + F2 for Peatling + GWS F2 sounds about right to me.

  • Like 2
Posted
2 minutes ago, old55 said:

Seems strange for Adelaide with Peatling to get done, 46 could have been useful. 46 + F2 for Peatling + GWS F2 sounds about right to me.

I don't think GWS want 2024 picks - they generally try to have high picks each year, and they already have 3x first rounders this year. So makes sense for them to load up next year instead

  • Like 2

Posted
2 minutes ago, Lord Neville X Flash said:

I don't think GWS want 2024 picks - they generally try to have high picks each year, and they already have 3x first rounders this year. So makes sense for them to load up next year instead

Probably fair enough, GWS already have 37, 53 and 56 this year too so don't need 46 in addition.

Maybe F2 for Peatling - do you think that's fair? F2 + F3?

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

So what do we have left this year after 5 and 9?

Edit. Pick 49, just saw on another thread, which will likely get used for Harry Sharp deal

Edited by Moonshadow
  • Like 1
Posted

I hope when we win the flag next year the contribution of pick 46 gets acknowledged.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 3

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...