Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted

The Go Home Factor. That little piece of the recruitment decision that surely must be considered when making a choice on draft picks. There is no denying it is demonstrated how risky it can be to recruit players from interstate.  There was previously some discussion that it was riskier for interstate (non Victorian clubs) teams.  I actually think it is now shown as more difficult for Victorian clubs trying to retain their interstate recruits especially from WA and SA.  Or is it simply the lure of $$$s.  Not necessarily in my view.  

For the Demons, we look back.  

Early days … 

Once the Crows came in, Todd Viney and Steven Stretch were on their radar.  Both were loyal Demons and committed the club resisting offers. Earl Spalding left in strange circumstances    He wanted to go home to the Eagles. The club said ok go. His manager then shopped interest and the Tigers and Blues were making offers. He went to the Blues and won a premiership.  Andrew Obst went back to Port Adelaide after they came in.  

Scott Thompson.  Went back to Adelaide after 4 years at MFC (40 games). Traded to the Crows as he wanted to go back for family reasons.    Played 269 games over 13 years at the crows, including two time B&F winner.  

We know the others 

Jeff Farmer 😭

Jesse Hogan 😭

Luke Jackson 😭

Now … Alex Neal-Bullen 😭

Yes it does work both ways. We got Lever, Langdon & Jeff White as come back to Victoria players. Though Melbourne probably has had the least players brought back for this reason (famously missing out on Chris Judd due to $$ and brown paper bag ambassador roles). 

So we worry about Kozzzy, Riv, JVR, Petty, Sparrow, McVee, Tholstrup.  Will they decide the lure of family or the surf will call them back home. 

Do we look ahead and look to prefer Victorian youngsters. This year most of the top 25 draft picks are Victorian. Probably 21 of the 25.  So no shortage of talent.  Is it a factor? The discussion continues… 

 
17 minutes ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Andrew Obst went back to Port Adelaide after they came in.  

 He went back to Port Adelaide in the SANFL after he retired from the AFL, not Port Power.

Your thread raises a good point, however.  Given the choice of two draftees who couldn't be separated by talent and attitude, you'd always take the one from your home state.  It's definitely a factor.

 

You get a great player and great trade value if they want to go home.

There's also the come home factor.

Step forward Harley Reid.

And would be great to see Mac Andrew in the red and blue seeing as the AFL dudded us there.


4 hours ago, spirit of norm smith said:

 

Scott Thompson.  Went back to Adelaide after 4 years at MFC (40 games). Traded to the Crows as he wanted to go back for family reasons.    Played 269 games over 13 years at the crows, including two time B&F winner.  

 

Jeff Farmer 😭

 

Thompson went back because Daniher wouldn't play him.

The Wizard left and regretted it immediately and to this very day.

15 minutes ago, BDA said:

There's also the come home factor.

Step forward Harley Reid.

And would be great to see Mac Andrew in the red and blue seeing as the AFL dudded us there.

The Sudanese are very close and Mac must be really missing his family. 

3 minutes ago, Redleg said:

The Sudanese are very close and Mac must be really missing his family. 

But not legitimate enough for some if you have a surname called Jackson...

Edited by Engorged Onion

 
1 hour ago, Redleg said:

The Wizard left and regretted it immediately and to this very day.

Didnt seem to regret it when he played against us

  • 4 months later...
On 31/08/2024 at 13:40, Redleg said:

Thompson went back because Daniher wouldn't play him.

The Wizard left and regretted it immediately and to this very day.

My mail is that he was played when injured which upset Scott's dad.


2 hours ago, ManDee said:

My mail is that he was played when injured which upset Scott's dad.

i always thought it was the other way around; thompson was coming back from a broken arm, the side was settled and in finals, hence he wasn't selected

On 31/08/2024 at 13:40, Redleg said:

Thompson went back because Daniher wouldn't play him.

The Wizard left and regretted it immediately and to this very day.

Thompson's relative was dying.

One week before opting to go home, Farmer was saying that he wanted be a ten year MFC player.  Then. MFC would only him one year due to his gammy hammies.  Exactly, the same as Steven Powell.  Both had long subsequent glittering careers, giving the Dees a nice touch up in their homecomings.  BTW, were you on the Board at the time?

12 hours ago, redandbluemakepurple said:

Thompson's relative was dying.

One week before opting to go home, Farmer was saying that he wanted be a ten year MFC player.  Then. MFC would only him one year due to his gammy hammies.  Exactly, the same as Steven Powell.  Both had long subsequent glittering careers, giving the Dees a nice touch up in their homecomings.  BTW, were you on the Board at the time?

I was on the Board in 1985.

Farmer started with us in 1995 and Powell in 1997.

Edited by Redleg

On 31/08/2024 at 13:20, rjay said:

You get a great player and great trade value if they want to go home.

Sadly this is just no longer true. Player comes out and chooses a new club ( usually a finalist) who offers peanuts. We got lucky with Jackson as the dockers cratered. 

34 minutes ago, Wells 11 said:

Sadly this is just no longer true. Player comes out and chooses a new club ( usually a finalist) who offers peanuts. We got lucky with Jackson as the dockers cratered. 

For a player in contract it is still true.

Can't see us caving on Kozzie if he wants out at the end of this season.


On 31/08/2024 at 13:40, Redleg said:

Thompson went back because Daniher wouldn't play him.

 

This is wrong. Thompson was the crucial member of our 2004 on ball brigade, but he injured his foot in round 13 against Essendon when we were 2nd on the ladder and despite a few wins over also-rans and a belated top of the ladder at round 18, we fell away without his contest work and ended up fifth and what's more, what's arguably worse, handed Essendon their last finals win.

I feel like we need to start avoiding interstate players whenever possible. I don't mean completely ignore them, but we should be prioritizing Vic kids IMO. Especially top end picks. The constant speculation surrounding our club and players going home hurts us in so many ways. And for those who think "it goes both ways"....It really doesn't. 

If a top end talent wants to come back to VIC, we are competing against another 10 clubs to attract them and as much as it hurts to say... we are at the bottom lists when it comes to desired destinations. Even when we wont the flag we were not very desirable. If you take your Dees glasses off, why would a player pick the Dees over the Pies, Carlton, Cats etc. The bigger clubs are better place to hold onto interstate players too.

Player movement is only going to increase as it has for the past 10 seasons or so, And an increase in trading doesn't help us in the slightest. We should be doing what the interstate clubs do and prioritize local talent. 

18 minutes ago, Brenno said:

I feel like we need to start avoiding interstate players whenever possible. I don't mean completely ignore them, but we should be prioritizing Vic kids IMO. Especially top end picks. The constant speculation surrounding our club and players going home hurts us in so many ways. And for those who think "it goes both ways"....It really doesn't. 

If a top end talent wants to come back to VIC, we are competing against another 10 clubs to attract them and as much as it hurts to say... we are at the bottom lists when it comes to desired destinations. Even when we wont the flag we were not very desirable. If you take your Dees glasses off, why would a player pick the Dees over the Pies, Carlton, Cats etc. The bigger clubs are better place to hold onto interstate players too.

Player movement is only going to increase as it has for the past 10 seasons or so, And an increase in trading doesn't help us in the slightest. We should be doing what the interstate clubs do and prioritize local talent. 

you always 'draft for talent, trade for need'

retention of wantaway players is just something that has to be managed in a national compettion

5 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

you always 'draft for talent, trade for need'

retention of wantaway players is just something that has to be managed in a national compettion

Correct. Look at Bailey Smith, Vic boy but he has still left the Doggies. You have to back in your club to create a fantastic environment so players want to stay. Won't work out every time, but if you are too scared to pick players because they grew up in another state then you have big issues as a club.

Edited by DistrACTION Jackson


1 hour ago, Brenno said:

I feel like we need to start avoiding interstate players whenever possible. I don't mean completely ignore them, but we should be prioritizing Vic kids IMO. Especially top end picks. The constant speculation surrounding our club and players going home hurts us in so many ways. And for those who think "it goes both ways"....It really doesn't. 

If a top end talent wants to come back to VIC, we are competing against another 10 clubs to attract them and as much as it hurts to say... we are at the bottom lists when it comes to desired destinations. Even when we wont the flag we were not very desirable. If you take your Dees glasses off, why would a player pick the Dees over the Pies, Carlton, Cats etc. The bigger clubs are better place to hold onto interstate players too.

Player movement is only going to increase as it has for the past 10 seasons or so, And an increase in trading doesn't help us in the slightest. We should be doing what the interstate clubs do and prioritize local talent. 

You pick the best Talent available and run a Professional organisation 

stop being so insular 

8 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

you always 'draft for talent, trade for need'

retention of wantaway players is just something that has to be managed in a national compettion

Agree.

And the reality is we haven't lost that many players in the last few years because they wanted to return to their home state.

Working backwards, nibbla, Jackson and maybe Hogan?

Am I missing someone?

If not, that's 3 in aprox 10 years. 

I reckon in that same period we've traded in more vic players from interstate sides than vice versa - langdon, Lever, sharp all immediately come to mind.

31 minutes ago, binman said:

I reckon in that same period we've traded in more vic players from interstate sides than vice versa - langdon, Lever, sharp all immediately come to mind.

+ may + tomlinson + frost + tyson + bugg, if you exptend it back to the 'since roos' era, and i'm sure i'm forgetting some more

the big one was getting 100 fantastic games outta proud south oztrayan bernie vince when the crom decided he was surplus to requirements and he immediately brought a fantastic attitiude and became a much-loved team member at his second club

 
2 hours ago, whatwhat say what said:

you always 'draft for talent, trade for need'

retention of wantaway players is just something that has to be managed in a national compettion

Neither of those lines contradict what I said. 

'draft for talent, trade for need' - Ok, but prioritize drafting Vic Talent whenever possible.... And by doing so are we not "managing" the chances of go home factor?

1 hour ago, Sir Why You Little said:

You pick the best Talent available and run a Professional organisation 

stop being so insular 

Limiting the chances of players wanting to go home is not "being Insular" is called being pragmatic and objective as to  address an issue.  With all the talk of Kozzi wanting to go home I would be shocked if these discussions are not happening internally with the list management team at the club. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 43 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 286 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies