Jump to content

Featured Replies

14 minutes ago, Colm said:

I know we need an A grade midfielder but what’s peoples thoughts on splitting pick 5? 
Given the evenness and depth of this draft if we could get a top 10 and a later first round pick it might be worth it. Give JT two picks to work with. 
Also I wonder if the combine might change the order a bit more this year than others. Could be a few bolters

This could be how we land Houston and keep a first round pick.

 
6 minutes ago, 640MD said:

Pick 5 to start with   Does that equate  with say 

Houston and pick 13. Just guessing 

or say pick 11 and pick 16

again guessing the numbers but if the draft is as even as suggested then what is smarter ?

trust in JT.  Given us the goods in earlier years why not now !

I pray we don't even contemplate that 640MD

7 minutes ago, Swooper1987 said:

Don't underestimate Reid.  He's coming with a rush. He's highly regarded.

He’s insanely classy but I’m just not sure he’s got enough pace to get anything like Daicos comparisons.

I can see Caleb Serong comparisons with the quick hands. 

I’d like him, but I think we need someone who can really run or can dominate the contest. Ideally both!

 
5 minutes ago, Nascent said:

This could be how we land Houston and keep a first round pick.

With pick 5 we will hypothetically get a 200 game player of elite talent who we can shape the team around, most probably a midfielder to replace Brayshaw.
 

If we trade for Houston and get 13 back, we get an AA half back flanker for another 70-100 games and a speculative mid teens pick. I’m not sure having Houston is really going to evolve our team that much that it will move the needle and put us back into contention. If we are looking to trade pick 5 I think we’d be better going for a Key Position player or an elite midfield talent if available as it is more likely to have a greater impact on our team. One of our best finishers going inside 50 at times was Windsor, if we can find a midfielder in the draft with footy smarts and is a good kick that should compliment our existing midfield. 


14 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

He’s insanely classy but I’m just not sure he’s got enough pace to get anything like Daicos comparisons.

I can see Caleb Serong comparisons with the quick hands. 

I’d like him, but I think we need someone who can really run or can dominate the contest. Ideally both!

Pendlebury doesn’t have much leg speed but is incredible in traffic. I guess it depends if we think he could be a similar player or not

1 hour ago, BDA said:

if the draft is deep this year we should look at trading our future first for another top 10 pick. You would think we are attractive as quite possible next years pick could be high as well. Maybe Freo will trade with us? Deathride them again. that would be fun.

Not supposed to be that deep. 
Hopefully our pick will be outstanding for 300+ games.

That would do. 

 

Bit of Sheezel in Reid, we don't typically take smallish mids, wonder how we view him

 

2 minutes ago, DiscoStu17 said:

Not supposed to be that deep. 
Hopefully our pick will be outstanding for 300+ games.

That would do. 

All the talk is that this draft is super deep with some handy types expected to be picked late in the second and early third round. 
The very top players in this draft don’t seem to be rated as highly as those in the past few years. 


5 minutes ago, adonski said:

Bit of Sheezel in Reid, we don't typically take smallish mids, wonder how we view him

 

Quite possible he goes before our pick. Huge scope with this guy according to someone I trust.

1 hour ago, spirit of norm smith said:

Agree. Lalor at 187cm and Langford at 190cm offer inside footy contests and marking ability. 

Yes to Lalor also

Reid also has the moves, a turn of speed and disposal is first class.

Edited by Demon Dynasty

7 minutes ago, DistrACTION Jackson said:

Pendlebury doesn’t have much leg speed but is incredible in traffic. I guess it depends if we think he could be a similar player or not

Pendles class hides how good and strong at the stoppages he is and his size is vital to that.

But you’re right, if you’re really good size/athleticism doesn’t matter as much.

6 minutes ago, adonski said:

Bit of Sheezel in Reid, we don't typically take smallish mids, wonder how we view him

 

It might be the greatest junior highlights package I’ve ever seen. It’s bonkers.

But it’s also just highlights, and I have doubts on some of the kicking especially where he loops it to space. That won’t work in afl footy.

Right now I’m saying he could be Ablett Jnr, could be Bailey Laurie! 

1 minute ago, DeeSpencer said:

It might be the greatest junior highlights package I’ve ever seen. It’s bonkers.

But it’s also just highlights, and I have doubts on some of the kicking especially where he loops it to space. That won’t work in afl footy.

Right now I’m saying he could be Ablett Jnr, could be Bailey Laurie! 

Lol Laurie came to mind for me too


46 minutes ago, 640MD said:

Pick 5 to start with   Does that equate  with say 

Houston and pick 13. Just guessing 

or say pick 11 and pick 16

again guessing the numbers but if the draft is as even as suggested then what is smarter ?

trust in JT.  Given us the goods in earlier years why not now !

I think there is a general consensus on DL that we trust JT to identify young talent, it’s Tim Lamb & Co that are the worry. If the thinking is that the P window is wide open and we need mature top ups, JT may not be getting the early picks. 

Edited by Earl Hood

Wouldn’t mind if we could get Sid Draper. Not often that an underage player (last year) is close to the best player in the under 18 championship. Has speed as well. Also, he’s another South Adelaide player.

Actually, it would be good to get two of these inside midfielders if we can trade a future pick

Edited by DiscoStu17

12 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

It might be the greatest junior highlights package I’ve ever seen. It’s bonkers.

But it’s also just highlights, and I have doubts on some of the kicking especially where he loops it to space. That won’t work in afl footy.

Right now I’m saying he could be Ablett Jnr, could be Bailey Laurie! 

 

11 minutes ago, adonski said:

Lol Laurie came to mind for me too

No way.  Laurie moves at snail pace and coughs the ball up quite a bit under little or no pressure.

Laurie might be a good ordinary AFL player at some point.

Reid is a fair way ahead even at this early stage.

1 minute ago, Demon Dynasty said:

 

No way.  Laurie moves at snail pace and coughs the ball up quite a bit under little or no pressure.

Laurie might be a good ordinary AFL player at some point.

Reid is a fair way ahead even at this early stage.

Reid looks fantastic to me. Laurie had some special moments to in his draft highlights. 

25 minutes ago, adonski said:

Bit of Sheezel in Reid, we don't typically take smallish mids, wonder how we view him

 

Bit of Travis Johnstone about him too 


1 hour ago, ElDiablo14 said:

Is any of those kids Cripps size mid?

Cripps-Bont type mids are the noted feature of the top end of the 2024 draft.

And there was much rejoicing!

Talls kick in from about the mid-teens through to 30ish.

Basically the perfect draft for our immediate and longer-term needs. Would enthusiastically endorse trading a future first or second.

31 minutes ago, Swooper1987 said:

Quite possible he goes before our pick. Huge scope with this guy according to someone I trust.

He’s a fabulous kid; good leader; in the Robert Harvey mould at junior level - rarely tackled. He was a regular 30-35 touches and 2-3 goals a game at U16 SMJFL. 

We’ve got Spargo coming back, Reid looks a bust to me.

 
20 minutes ago, Demon Dynasty said:

 

No way.  Laurie moves at snail pace and coughs the ball up quite a bit under little or no pressure.

Laurie might be a good ordinary AFL player at some point.

Reid is a fair way ahead even at this early stage.

Ok let me put it this way.

I suspect he’ll be at least 20% better than Laurie and at least 20% worse than Gaz Jnr. Somewhere between one of the best of all time and a vfl player!

Where he fits on that continuum time will tell. Athletic testing and evaluating his scope will be crucial.

51 minutes ago, Roost it far said:

We need to nail this pick……just to state the obvious

We need to NAIL everything this offseason. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 40 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 269 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies