Jump to content

Featured Replies

58 minutes ago, 58er said:

Kynan Brown Pup says Hi  only 2 weeks in a row again. 

Will Goody ever learn?

Also the point about Bedford and Jordon is that the same selection tricks and issues are being played out with Laurie Woe and now Kynan.

If I was Dog Brown I would be furious with the treatment of Kynan.

BTW the record of Schache and Kynan as subs is 1 close win vs Roos 4 pts and  2 losses by 2 points vs Blues in SF and Lions by 5 pts in Round 16. 

Surely you deserve to lose games and players when you burn them at  that rate.

Shameful? good lord.  We are not running a charity mate. If you are the 23rd best available player - you are the sub. The kids would be happy to have a chance especially in their first year.

And good teams lose their 22-28th rated players - it happens.  Was it shameful that the Tigers lost Higgins/Butler etc during their premiership years?  No, just fringe players leaving for more game time or longer contracts

 

Hopefully SG considers this when deciding who should be primary ruck

 

 

 

12 minutes ago, middleagedemon said:

For the record, I think King is clearly knowledgeable. Much more so than any poster on here given his experience as an AFL player and assistant coach at the level. 

The only problem I have is that AFL media is so ove-saturated and he is on so many programs that he is clearly going to be wrong often given the amount of opinions he needs to give on a weekly basis. 

But his stuff with Daniel Hoyne is great. And first crack generally has some interesting insights. Regardless of whether or not one 'likes' the personality. 

Kingy, is that you? 

 
6 minutes ago, roy11 said:

Hopefully SG considers this when deciding who should be primary ruck

 

 

 

Ripping stat.

 

44 minutes ago, roy11 said:

Hopefully SG considers this when deciding who should be primary ruck

 

 

 

Impressive number for roey.

Good evidence to support my opinion he is the best 21 and under key forward in the game.

And arguably the best young key forward full stop.

On that front, preseason i compared his numbers with Amiss, Logan McDonald and Ugle-Hagen. He had all covered at the same point in their career.

And of that group, jvr is the only one of that group who has subsequently improved.

Edited by binman


1 hour ago, Chook said:

Petty has had a lot of trouble getting into the game as a forward. Having him be a defensive ruck following Draper around the ground and helping out defensively could work very well in theory.

1. Gets him into the game
2. Utilises his defensive nous and knowledge of the backline structure
3. Potentially providing a good marking target down the ground
4. Keeps the forward line open for players who know what they're doing (Roo, Melk, Fritta, Kosi) to go to work

Better than Fullerton, who wouldn't really be able to do any of that

Was exactly my thinking. Great post mate.

12 minutes ago, middleagedemon said:

For the record, I think King is clearly knowledgeable. Much more so than any poster on here given his experience as an AFL player and assistant coach at the level. 

King hasn't played at the elite level for 20 years and hasn't coached for close to 15 years. He's knowledgeable based on his access to Champion Data stats, but his analysis is very iffy.

6 minutes ago, binman said:

On that front, preseason i compared his numbers with Amiss, Logan McDonald and Ugle-Hagen. He had all covered at the same point in their career.

And of that group, jvr is the only one of that group who has subsequently improved.

Didn't Amiss kick 4 goals against us? 3rd year player. Pretty sure he'll keep improving.

P.S. Petty had 1 kick that day against Freo

2 minutes ago, Binmans PA said:

Was exactly my thinking. Great post mate.

King hasn't played at the elite level for 20 years and hasn't coached for close to 15 years. He's knowledgeable based on his access to Champion Data stats, but his analysis is very iffy.

On what basis is it iffy? 

Please tell. 

He is an ex AFL player and assistant coach and he is knowledgeable only because of his access to champion data? 

Please stop with the comedy. 

 

I would have selected Petty and agree with the idea of rucking Petty, JVR and Turner. I think Petty will primarily take the centre bounces and then Turner will mostly play as a follower ruckman.

From VFL watching, Fullarton looks to me to be capable player around the ground, but he is not a dominate centre bounce ruckman. I think Petty, JVR and Turner are better or just as good in the centre bounces. (We are still at a disadvantage at centre clearance though.)

In terms of our defensive structure, we can't replace what Max gives us. He stifles the opposition ball movement just by his positioning and our plan is to force the opposition to kick down the line to a contest with Max on a slow play.

In around the ground stoppages, we will need to play with at least equal numbers this week, which could expose our defence. (Salem will need to push up to the stoppage, as I don't think we can play a man down with an inferior ruckman.)

Going forward, we lose Max's marking threat as a deep forward, but we gain a bit more pace and unpredictability.

I don't think we want it to rain because our midfielders are better in the dry. And I think we will want to play a more expansive game style (a bit like last week against the Eagles and not down the line like against the Lions and Roos.)

13 minutes ago, binman said:

Impressive number for roey.

Good evidence to support my opinion he is the best 21 and under forward in the game.

And arguably the best young forward full stop.

On that front, preseason i compared his numbers with Amiss, Logan McDonald and Ugle-Hagen. He had all covered at the same point in their career.

And of that group, jvr is the only one of that group who has subsequently improved.

Something we can agree on, although I'd reserve judgement until  the end of the year given JVR is in a purple patch and some of those other forwards are down and team form is similarly not helping. 

JVR is tracking beautifully. 


Wondering if the selectors googled Tom Fullarton then quickly realised they’d made a huge mistake….

IMG_0736.jpeg.2aae69a69c2b78dcb9b00cbb2dc1461b.jpeg

1 hour ago, The Swimming Dee said:

The Coach bashing is so tiresome.

You are forgetting when he gets it correct same posters come on and acknowledge they got it wrong.

Oh Wait 🤔

 

I think Petty in makes sense.

Its just a shame Jvr will be rucking again.

I get not playing Fullerton and co but the club has been caught out not having a real viable alternative for Max.

I certainly wonder why some of these players are still on our list.

Cone on Petts prove us all wrong and smash the bombers.

 

13 minutes ago, middleagedemon said:

On what basis is it iffy? 

His track record.

Or ridiculous claims like this when recently out of the game - https://www.foxsports.com.au/afl/former-richmond-assistant-coach-david-king-declares-the-tigers-a-certainty-for-afl-top-eight-in-2011/news-story/eda5d63e30819aa35bf90014d0650476

He's a click chaser. That's his job.

3 hours ago, Roger Mellie said:

I feel we have the quinella and possibly the trifecta of umpiring duds with Williamson leading the charge by some margin.

Where do the stats come from? Cheers

Yes, doesn't look good on paper.

I've been doing it manually round by round off the AFL match centre numbers, and just realised I hadn't updated it after the WCE game. See updated stats below.

 

image.png.e3030a36b2c3c16525a212b10e67edb7.png


28 minutes ago, dice said:

Didn't Amiss kick 4 goals against us? 3rd year player. Pretty sure he'll keep improving.

P.S. Petty had 1 kick that day against Freo

And jvr kicked 4 last week. So what? 

Both are good young forwards, hence the comparison

And you'd hope a third year player would improve. 

Ditto for jvr - who is also a third year player.

Not sure what relevance petty's  performance against freo has vis a vis a discussion about the best young forwards.

Edited by binman

25 minutes ago, dice said:

P.S. Petty had 1 kick that day against Freo

Yeah and the rest of the team had 2 kicks that day.
The Petty bashing is nauseating, like the team his confidence has grown the last few weeks. Loved how he attacked packs against the Lions two weeks ago. 

The only positive i can see is this is a game Petty takes over

Runs Draper around the ground whilst kicking a few

 

Lets see

20 minutes ago, Fat Tony said:

.........

From VFL watching, Fullarton looks to me to be capable player around the ground, but he is not a dominate centre bounce ruckman. I think Petty, JVR and Turner are better or just as good in the centre bounces. (We are still at a disadvantage at centre clearance though.)

.........

Imho....  thats exactly what's called for.... a handy follower around the ground.

Not winning the centre bounce isn't EOW stuff... currently we still don't win a lot of centre clearances ( demonstrably )....

Playing a more dedicated role player ( aka a ruck ) would then not necisitate other players removing themselves from roles they are better at.

Still find the whole thing odd.

28 minutes ago, middleagedemon said:

On what basis is it iffy? 

Please tell. 

He is an ex AFL player and assistant coach and he is knowledgeable only because of his access to champion data? 

Please stop with the comedy. 

You certainly seem to have come back with an agenda to have a crack at certain posters.

Where you Dr Who perhaps?


15 hours ago, Sir Why You Little said:

Fascinating Selections

Personally i think The Coaches have worked out a set plan, that will hopefully unsettle Essendrug 

This will be a “Team Game”

Stakes are high for a win here….

Mesmerising, at this point ... already unsettling to what we might have fielded with Max fit. Zonal responsibilities will surely unsettle Essendrug wherein their ruck (perhaps 'two-some') will hopefully struggle to keep up with fitter younger blokes with area responsibilities, including TMac applying defensive wisdoms and his excellent reading of the play. Going to be interesting.

3 minutes ago, beelzebub said:

Imho....  thats exactly what's called for.... a handy follower around the ground.

Not winning the centre bounce isn't EOW stuff... currently we still don't win a lot of centre clearances ( demonstrably )....

Playing a more dedicated role player ( aka a ruck ) would then not necisitate other players removing themselves from roles they are better at.

Still find the whole thing odd.

I think Turner is a more capable player around the ground than Fullarton and Petty/JVR will compete harder in the centre bounces than Fullarton.

It is not that odd. Goodwin and the coaches would have considered the pros and cons. Fullarton has not shown himself to be an AFL standard player and has never played an AFL game as a first ruckman.

 

Our boys may run Draper off his legs. Don't think he has great work rate or fitness and may fade late into this game, especially if we are rotating several players through the ruck. 

 
31 minutes ago, binman said:

And jvr kicked 5 last week. So what? 

Both are good young forwards, hence the comparison

And you'd hope a third year player would improve. 

Ditto for jvr - who is also a third year player.

Not sure what relevance petty's  performance against freo has vis a vis a discussion about the best young forwards.

In your previous comment, you inferred Amiss hadn't improved.

And I brought up Petty as a side note to the relevance of this thread. My apologies

1 minute ago, MrFreeze said:

Our boys may run Draper off his legs. Don't think he has great work rate or fitness and may fade late into this game, especially if we are rotating several players through the ruck. 

Agreed, depends on the intensity our slightly 'lesser' rucks deploy across the ground and the related physicality that they may apply in Draper's direction. It must be remembered, Draper can be a reliable 'grab' across the ground, racking up possessions, so a little bit of 'mongrel' from our enthusiastic youth may well assist in his durational demise. 


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 123 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 36 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 305 replies
  • VOTES: St. Kilda

    Max Gawn still has a massive lead in the Demonland Player of the Year award as Christian Petracca, Jake Bowey, Clayton Oliver & Kozzy Pickett round out the Top 5. Your votes please. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2 & 1

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 31 replies
  • GAMEDAY: St. Kilda

    It's Game Day and the Demons have traveled to Alice Springs to take on the Saints and they have a massive opportunity to build on the momentum of two big wins in a row and keep their finals hopes well and truly alive.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 907 replies