Jump to content

Featured Replies

Posted
What are the odds Scott gave his boys the 5 and 4?
 
Votes
Player (Club)
8 Max Holmes (GEEL)
6 Zach Guthrie (GEEL)
5 Jake Lever (MELB)
4 Kysaiah Pickett (MELB)
3 Max Gawn (MELB)
3 Steven May (MELB)
1 Harrison Petty (MELB)
 

Leaderboard

Votes Player Club
55 Isaac Heeney SYD
47 Zach Merrett ESS
40 Caleb Serong FRE
36 Max Gawn MELB
33 Errol Gulden SYD
32 Jeremy Cameron GEEL
31 Tom Green GWS
30 Zak Butters PORT
30 Nick Daicos COLL
29 Marcus Bontempelli WB
28 Matt Rowell GCFC
27 Noah Anderson GCFC
27 Patrick Cripps CARL
27 Harry McKay CARL
27 Gryan Miers GEEL
27 Elliot Yeo WCE
25 Max Holmes GEEL
25 Christian Petracca MELB
24 Connor Rozee PORT
24 Hayden Young FRE
 
2 minutes ago, Demonland said:

What are the odds Scott gave his boys the 5 and 4?

No doubt!

Goody

5 - Lever
4 - Pickett
3 - Holmes
2 - Guthrie
1 - Gawn

Scott
5 - Holmes
4 - Guthrie
3 - May
2 - Gawn
1 - Petty

 

There's a few other way to get the same outcome, which sees Goody give May 1 vote instead of Gawn and a bit of shuffling from Scott. But the bottom line is how Scott didn't find room on his votes for Hawkins, Cameron, Danger and Rohan. 

 

Lever 5 in total for that game give me a spell. Isn't this supposed to be the award most respected by the players?  Should have been minimum 9.

Edited by BigFez
Clarification


If anyone was in any doubt that Scott is a - insert banned word from the Demonland naughty list - then this dispells any doubt he is a petulant and jealous child with low intellect

Remind me who won the game again? What a laughing stock Scott is

Edited by jnrmac

Tell me you’re a sook and a bad loser without telling me you’re a sook and a bad loser 🙄

Jeez Chris Scott is a piece of work - in what world was Holmes the best player on the ground?

I almost forgot how much I hated the Cats before this weekend’s game - won’t be making that mistake again for the rest of the season! 

 

 
15 minutes ago, Demonland said:
What are the odds Scott gave his boys the 5 and 4?
 
 

 

No Votes for Atkins and Dempsey??? Bloody hackers!


The good thing is this means Scott is still massively cut he lost to us.

I hope it burns.  We will repeat the 2018 and 2021 finals thrashing of your club as needed

30 minutes ago, BigFez said:

Lever 5 in total for that game give me a spell. Isn't this supposed to be the award most respected by the players?  Should have been minimum 9.

Butthurt Scott, smug face coach ... loathe him 

Couldn’t believe the votes

Chris Scott is an arrogant [censored], a bad sport & a sook

AND HE GOT TOTALLY OUT COACHED!!

It will come out later in the week half the Cats players had gastro 

Lever, May & Gawn were better, Guthrie & Holmes were the Cats best, but best two on the ground give me a spell

Edited by Billy
Spelling

Scott's likely given his boys top votes despite them having less impact and playing in a losing team.

More concerning for us is the form of Petracca. A month ago he was second in the coaches votes and looked to be vying with Heeney for the Brownlow. He has been below his usual impact the past 3 weeks or so. Hoping he's just slightly down on form and not carrying any injury. We need him firing when the whips are cracking in September.


I’ve always found the Coach’s votes to be impartial and respectful to the spirit of the award.  
 

I’m both very surprised to see such a lack of sportsmanship and very unsurprised to see that it’s come from Scott.

 

 

4 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

Scott's likely given his boys top votes despite them having less impact and playing in a losing team.

More concerning for us is the form of Petracca. A month ago he was second in the coaches votes and looked to be vying with Heeney for the Brownlow. He has been below his usual impact the past 3 weeks or so. Hoping he's just slightly down on form and not carrying any injury. We need him firing when the whips are cracking in September.

I think Oliver returning to form on Saturday will help Petracca.  He’s been struggling with 100% attention whilst Oliver’s been injured.  
 

12 minutes ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

I’m both very surprised to see such a lack of sportsmanship and very unsurprised to see that it’s come from Scott.

 

 

But how do you know who Scott voted for?  He could have given Lever five votes for all we know.

A former coach on SEN once said he just flicked a paper to one of his assistants for the votes after games.

16 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

Scott's likely given his boys top votes despite them having less impact and playing in a losing team.

More concerning for us is the form of Petracca. A month ago he was second in the coaches votes and looked to be vying with Heeney for the Brownlow. He has been below his usual impact the past 3 weeks or so. Hoping he's just slightly down on form and not carrying any injury. We need him firing when the whips are cracking in September.

CP5 has been heavily tagged especially when Oliver was out / below par, yet he was still very influential in the second half when the game was won.  And who was his opponent and what did they do?


7 minutes ago, Demonstone said:

But how do you know who Scott voted for?  He could have given Lever five votes for all we know.

I don’t.

But it’s the kind of passive aggressive posturing that Scott wheels out after every loss.  It is in his character.

It would be surprising for Goodwin to ignore Lever’s massive individual contribution to our win.  That would be highly out of character for Goodwin.

 

 
45 minutes ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

I don’t.

But it’s the kind of passive aggressive posturing that Scott wheels out after every loss.  It is in his character.

It would be surprising for Goodwin to ignore Lever’s massive individual contribution to our win.  That would be highly out of character for Goodwin.

 

Goodwin loves his backline boys, that's for sure.

44 minutes ago, Satan said:

Lucky cameron  or hawkins didnt get a vote

Even more surprising that Selwood didn't get one too. 🤔


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 121 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 380 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies