Jump to content


Recommended Posts



Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Redleg said:

Wonder what the hurry is?

GC probably have the same philosophy as us. Get a deal done early and move on to the next one.

Plus these discussions would have been going on for weeks.

Edited by mo64
  • Like 2
Posted

10 and 17 are of interest if Gold Coast had them from the Dogs for 4.

Same basic scenario, though not quite such a premium pick.

Would a future first and a collection of our points-effective second-rounders do the job?

Posted

1 X top 10 and 2 X top 20 picks (second one could be high depending on dogs season next year) for pick 4 is a high price IMHO. Id prefer the 3 picks. They must be really keen on someone and think that we are keen on them as well. 

  • Like 1

Posted
19 minutes ago, Bates Mate said:

1 X top 10 and 2 X top 20 picks (second one could be high depending on dogs season next year) for pick 4 is a high price IMHO. Id prefer the 3 picks. They must be really keen on someone and think that we are keen on them as well. 

Agreed, I think the market is a bit skewed at present. No current player is generally considered to be worth three first rounders of any kind... but unproven top draft picks are. Strange to me. We would have received less for Oliver! 

Think I read somewhere the Dogs are keen on Watson. 

  • Like 4
Posted

Dogs are paying overs; they must be very keen on someone.  It’s also a strange move as they’ve commented on the difficulties of building their list after having to use so many picks on JUH and Darcy.

I hope we go hard for GCs new pick 10.

Posted
22 hours ago, Jibroni said:

Not sure how we beat the Dogs offer of Picks 10, 17 and Future 1st?

If that’s what they are offering they are just plain stupid. Pick 4 is not worth that much at all. My guess is it’s 10 and F1 and we can definitely beat that with our collection of 2 and 3rd round picks and a F1. 


Posted
1 minute ago, Gawndy the Great said:

If that’s what they are offering they are just plain stupid. Pick 4 is not worth that much at all. My guess is it’s 10 and F1 and we can definitely beat that with our collection of 2 and 3rd round picks and a F1. 

deal is seemingly done, as outlined

Posted
10 minutes ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

Dogs are paying overs; they must be very keen on someone.  It’s also a strange move as they’ve commented on the difficulties of building their list after having to use so many picks on JUH and Darcy.

I hope we go hard for GCs new pick 10.

Nick Watson

  • Like 2

Posted
31 minutes ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

Dogs are paying overs; they must be very keen on someone.  It’s also a strange move as they’ve commented on the difficulties of building their list after having to use so many picks on JUH and Darcy.

I hope we go hard for GCs new pick 10.

Well it’s 2 for 1 since they have a father son they want to get a pick before, if they wait till pick 10 they probably have to use it already. So they can afford to pay overs

Posted
2 minutes ago, Garbo said:

Well it’s 2 for 1 since they have a father son they want to get a pick before, if they wait till pick 10 they probably have to use it already. So they can afford to pay overs

Using next year’s R1 pick is the concern.

 

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, TeamPlayedFine39 said:

Using next year’s R1 pick is the concern.

 

Sure but I don’t think even in dogs worst fear they would end up with a pick 4 next season so they are effectively paying next years 1st and alate 1st round this year for pick 4

Edited by Garbo
  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, Garbo said:

Sure but I don’t think even in dogs worst fear they would end up with a pick 4 next season so they are effectively paying next years 1st and alate 1st round this year for pick 4

Assuming croft nominates them, which I'm sure he will, it's a smart play.


Posted

Libba feeds it out to Smith

Smith handballs to Bont

Bont drives it inside 50

Naughton brings it ground

Watson roves, snaps, goals!

Bulldogs trail 112-184....

  • Haha 4

Posted
4 minutes ago, dazzledavey36 said:

 

 

Depending how good Croft is its not a bad trade for both parties.


Posted

Guess this thread can be closed.

Posted
11 minutes ago, Jibroni said:

Guess this thread can be closed.

... or change '4' to '10'.

  • Like 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...