Jump to content

Featured Replies

2 hours ago, —coach— said:

Was listening to ABC radio today and BBBs manager was on talking footy with the ABC commentary team. He was discussing Melbourne and he said he can’t understand why we aren’t playing BBB at the moment.

Now of course a manger will go into bat for one of his own, but what it tells me is that we are simply not choosing BBB as opposed to him being injured or doing a training block or any other reason.

Sometimes players don’t get a great deal of the ball and if you look in isolation at their stats you would say drop them, but some players despite limit stats just make the team better for structural/game style reasons. I wonder if Fritta and JVR wouldn’t be better with BBB in the team. The argument that he can’t pick the ball up from the ground is moot as none of our small forwards are doing that anyway so given you would likely replace a small to bring him in I don’t think we would loose a lot at ground level, but would gain by forcing the oppo to spread their defense a little thinner.

Anyway just thought it was interesting.

He had fluid drained from his knee two weeks ago. Wtf is his manager suggesting? That we play a guy with a busted knee?

 
4 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

He had fluid drained from his knee two weeks ago. Wtf is his manager suggesting? That we play a guy with a busted knee?

Beggars belief doesn't it. Can only think his manager is on a percentage of Brown's match payments 

11 hours ago, Roger Mellie said:

That's the perfect name for KP! Love it

I wish i could take the kudos RM.

Someone else on here coined that one.  Fantastic and everyone should be using it from here where possible.

 
29 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

He had fluid drained from his knee two weeks ago. Wtf is his manager suggesting? That we play a guy with a busted knee?

Im not sure if he's always had that problem since returning from the back injury though Jaded.

Might've just flaired the last few weeks.

If that's the case and i have know idea if it is, then Manager might be referring to prior this issue.

3 hours ago, —coach— said:

Was listening to ABC radio today and BBBs manager was on talking footy with the ABC commentary team. He was discussing Melbourne and he said he can’t understand why we aren’t playing BBB at the moment.

Now of course a manger will go into bat for one of his own, but what it tells me is that we are simply not choosing BBB as opposed to him being injured or doing a training block or any other reason.

Sometimes players don’t get a great deal of the ball and if you look in isolation at their stats you would say drop them, but some players despite limit stats just make the team better for structural/game style reasons. I wonder if Fritta and JVR wouldn’t be better with BBB in the team. The argument that he can’t pick the ball up from the ground is moot as none of our small forwards are doing that anyway so given you would likely replace a small to bring him in I don’t think we would loose a lot at ground level, but would gain by forcing the oppo to spread their defense a little thinner.

Anyway just thought it was interesting.

Sounds like BBB's manager missed a real good chance to keep his mouth shut.

Along with back injuries, having fluid drained from his troublesome knee and VFL form that hasn't been setting the world on fire, why make such a comment? 


On 6/22/2023 at 10:06 PM, adonski said:

IN: Brown, Tomlinson, Oliver, Woewodin
OUT: Smith, Petty, Jordon, ANB

Smith had a good first half until Stewart was put on him. Worth persisting with, even if BBB comes in

Edited by Stiff Arm

12 hours ago, —coach— said:

Was listening to ABC radio today and BBBs manager was on talking footy with the ABC commentary team. He was discussing Melbourne and he said he can’t understand why we aren’t playing BBB at the moment.

Now of course a manger will go into bat for one of his own, but what it tells me is that we are simply not choosing BBB as opposed to him being injured or doing a training block or any other reason.

Sometimes players don’t get a great deal of the ball and if you look in isolation at their stats you would say drop them, but some players despite limit stats just make the team better for structural/game style reasons. I wonder if Fritta and JVR wouldn’t be better with BBB in the team. The argument that he can’t pick the ball up from the ground is moot as none of our small forwards are doing that anyway so given you would likely replace a small to bring him in I don’t think we would loose a lot at ground level, but would gain by forcing the oppo to spread their defense a little thinner.

Anyway just thought it was interesting.

He will play next week! Facts 

The thing about dropping role players who are doing their role, is it encourages other players to chase stat's rather than stick to their role.

ANB likely stays for that reason alone!

Assuming he is doing his role.

 

Inns.. Clarrie (if fit), BBB, Bowser, Melksham

Outs..Chandler, Spargo, Hibbo, JVR ( managed) 

Possibly Thommo in as well, Nibbler extremely lucky if he stays in

Edited by picket fence

Our forwards though need a change up.

They may often find space, but then just wave their arm and wait for the ball to be kicked to them, rather than moving towards the balll.

We have to many specialist small pressure forwards, that don't kick regular goals.

Our talls allow to many intercept marks.

The resting ruck forward becomes a predictable long kick where the opposition then floods the area with numbers, making crumbing goals considerably more difficult.

Smith is veyter suited as the third tall, not full gorward - hes really a backup for Fritsch 


We are also getting regularly getting beaten at the clearances (and spilled marking contests).  We actually don't have enough genuine  midfielder. Spargo, Chandler, ANB, Picket, Rivers and even Jordan are not genuine (nor is Melksam, And at thos stage Woey).

11 hours ago, picket fence said:

Ive seen him play some "Useful" games but he is very very average in quite a few areas

1 Slow

2 Cant kick more than 35-40 m

3 Doesn't kick enough goals to justify his place

Cannot continue to play him for these reasons

Sadly Charlie hasn’t been the same since he was out with concussion just doesn’t seem to be getting to the action like he was prior when he replaced JJ Thursday night their was an immediate drop off, he had two touches in nearly a half a game of football. He played a lot better Friday night at VFL level and perhaps should stay at that level until he gets his spark back.!!

I'd try and address our midfield / small fwd mix by. Noting to many changes is disruptive to team systems.

Lever.     May.     Hibberd/Mcvee

Salem.    Petty    Bowey

Hunter   Oliver    Langdon

Brayshaw JVR.  Pickett

Fritsch.    BBB.    ANB

Gawn Trac Viney

Grundy Sparrow Rivers Harmes/Dunstan

Sub Woey 

Teach Brayshaw to play ANB or Spargos role. Teach Rivers to be midfielder.

Woey as sub

OK this week swap Woey for Harmes So that he debuts in the team.

Thinking slightly outside the square though:

Lever.     May.     Hibberd/Mcvee

Salem.    Gawn    Bowey

Hunter   Oliver    Langdon

Brayshaw  Petty  Trac

Fritsch.    BBB.  Picket  

Grundy Viney Harmes

Sparrow Rivers Dunstan/Laurie Smith

sub Woey

When Gawn rucks Petty/Smith play CHB

Harmes to be the defensive midfielder

Get midfield time into Chandker/Spargo/ANB at Casey

Teach Jordan to take the game on, to move the ball on quicker at Casey

But importantly develop our midfield depth. Is Casey's best midfield Munro, White. Dunstan (that says something).

10 hours ago, layzie said:

Sounds like BBB's manager missed a real good chance to keep his mouth shut.

Along with back injuries, having fluid drained from his troublesome knee and VFL form that hasn't been setting the world on fire, why make such a comment? 

I reckon it's inappropriate for a manager to make any such comments regardless.  Does his player no good either.   Keep it for selling the player to another club at trade time (which will not happen with someone as old as Brown anyway).


1 hour ago, Nudge said:

He will play next week! Facts 

For?

15 hours ago, —coach— said:

Was listening to ABC radio today and BBBs manager was on talking footy with the ABC commentary team. He was discussing Melbourne and he said he can’t understand why we aren’t playing BBB at the moment.

Now of course a manger will go into bat for one of his own, but what it tells me is that we are simply not choosing BBB as opposed to him being injured or doing a training block or any other reason.

Sometimes players don’t get a great deal of the ball and if you look in isolation at their stats you would say drop them, but some players despite limit stats just make the team better for structural/game style reasons. I wonder if Fritta and JVR wouldn’t be better with BBB in the team. The argument that he can’t pick the ball up from the ground is moot as none of our small forwards are doing that anyway so given you would likely replace a small to bring him in I don’t think we would loose a lot at ground level, but would gain by forcing the oppo to spread their defense a little thinner.

Anyway just thought it was interesting.

Now only if the club had recruited a leading type of forward to fill that position instead of bombing the ball in and hoping for a pack mark.... oh wait.......................

1 hour ago, sue said:

I reckon it's inappropriate for a manager to make any such comments regardless.  Does his player no good either.   Keep it for selling the player to another club at trade time (which will not happen with someone as old as Brown anyway).

If he absolutely must say something just go with the tried and true "Ben's working very hard at the moment and I really hope to see him force his way into the team soon" line or something to that effect.

IN: Brown, Bowey

OUT: Gawn, Chandler.

Give Max the weekend to refresh and put some k's into his legs without the body on body impacts of playing.


3 hours ago, YearOfTheDees said:

Think you will find we are holding Brown back for one run at the finals.  

Which may be one game, good strategy

FB: Hibberd May Lever
HB: Rivers Petty Bowey
C: Langdon Petracca Hunter
HF: Woey Smith Sparrow
FF: Pickett Brown Fritsch
Foll: Grundy Viney Salem
Int: McVee Chandler Brayshaw Gawn
S: ANB


In: Bowey, Brown, Woey 
Out: JJ, JVR, ANB

Time to roll the dice with Salem and/or Rivers in the guts to give us some skill and run on ball.

Similarly Woey as the 3rd wing/half forward for some more speed. Langdon some half forward too.

Im hardly convinced Nibbler should be dropped but at the same time he could do with getting some touch and we can use his spot to rotate numbers through the midfield.

BBB a run and JVR a rest. Unless Grundy is in need of a week off.

Coaches to be ready for Petty forward, Gus or Salo back, Woey on ball if needed. But I still think our issues are far more ball movement, run and skill than height.

24 beautiful degrees in the Alice today, but then rain starts tomorrow and continues until Saturday, with big falls of around 20mm on Wednesday and Friday. So the Todd River will be flowing! Thankfully it is forecast as dry on Sunday, but cold, just 11 degrees maximum after three similarly cold days preceding it. And here I was, looking forward to escaping the Melbourne chill. 😒

Will the cold weather help us, who knows?

 
9 hours ago, Ungarieboy said:

Smith is veyter suited as the third tall, not full gorward - hes really a backup for Fritsch 

Agree with all your points @Ungarieboy.

Especially like the term “gorward” as an abbreviation of “gorilla forward” (which of course Smith is not)!


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Port Adelaide

    With both sides precariously positioned ahead of the run home to the finals, only one team involved in Sunday’s clash at the Adelaide Oval between the Power and the Demons will remain a contender when it’s over.  On current form, that one team has to be Melbourne which narrowly missed out on defeating the competition’s power house Collingwood on King's Birthday and also recently overpowered both 2024 Grand Finalists. Conversely, Port Adelaide snapped out of a four-game losing streak with a win against the Giants in Canberra. Although they will be rejuvenated following that victory, their performances during that run of losses were sub par and resulted in some embarrassing blow out defeats.

    • 1 reply
  • NON-MFC: Round 14

    Round 14 is upon us and there's plenty at stake across the rest of the competition. As Melbourne heads to Adelaide, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches of the Round. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons’ finals tilt? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

    • 187 replies
  • REPORT: Collingwood

    The media focus on the fiery interaction between Max Gawn and Steven May at the end of the game was unfortunate because it took away the gloss from Melbourne’s performance in winning almost everywhere but on the scoreboard in its Kings Birthday clash with Collingwood at the MCG. It was a real battle reminiscent of the good old days when the rivalry between the two clubs was at its height and a fitting contest to celebrate the 2025 Australian of the Year, Neale Daniher and his superb work to bring the campaign to raise funds for motor neurone disease awareness to the forefront. Notwithstanding the fact that the Magpies snatched a one point victory from his old club, Daniher would be proud of the fact that his Demons fought tooth and nail to win the keenly contested game in front of 77,761 fans.

    • 1 reply
  • PREGAME: Port Adelaide

    The Demons are set to embark on a four-week road trip that takes them across the country, with two games in Adelaide and a clash on the Gold Coast, broken up by a mid-season bye. Next up is a meeting with the inconsistent Port Adelaide at Adelaide Oval. Who comes in and who goes out?

    • 181 replies
  • PODCAST: Collingwood

    I have something on tomorrow night so Podcast will be Wednesday night. The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Wednesday, 11th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees heartbreaking 1 point loss to the Magpies on King's Birthday Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

    • 37 replies
  • POSTGAME: Collingwood

    Despite effectively playing against four extra opponents, the Dees controlled much of the match. However, their inaccuracy in front of goal and inability to convert dominance in clearances and inside 50s ultimately cost them dearly, falling to a heartbreaking one-point loss on King’s Birthday.

      • Like
    • 533 replies