Jump to content

Featured Replies

We reverted to a lot of ‘bad’ habits in the game.  Like forwards leading into the pockets.  Like kicking it onto the heads of out big forwards.

We were outnumbered at most stoppages (i counted +1 to Freo several times) and only once did I see our players really get on the move to maximise the tap.

These dinky handball chains with lots of underground handballs is not pretty, and is often a turnover source.

we had almost no overlap run and avoided the corridor like it had herpes.

Some good marking by Max and May. However support around them seemed weak.  If they missed these grabs, Freo had easy outs.

Goody talked about efficiency.  I see effort but a lack of cohesion.  Spargo cost us 3 goals by being selfish, and the simple shots missed cost us dearly.

End of the world? No.  Worrying? Yes

 
11 hours ago, Roost it far said:

Every other team knows that we can’t take unrelenting pressure. We crack and our leader falls over under said pressure

Like most sides 

13 hours ago, SPC said:

Not sure if it has been mentioned, cause I haven’t read every post.. but how bad was JVR taking a mark 45 out and Petracca pleading to him to pass it as we had players free forward and he wouldn’t turn around.. then proceeded to kick a point. Die by the sword.

I was screaming to pass it to Brodie. He was literally on his own with not one Freo player around him. I hope that's something that gets pointed out

 

Just watched a some " highlights".

That free to Amiss against May in the first was one of the worst decisions I have seen this year . And I've seen a few. Fgs, Maysie was standing still, Amiss jumps on his back way too  early and somehow he gets the free.

It's like the umps are making it up as they go along sometimes. 

1 minute ago, leave it to deever said:

Just watched a some " highlights".

That free to Amiss against May in the first was one of the worst decisions I have seen this year . And I've seen a few. Fgs, Maysie was standing still, Amiss jumps on his back way too  early and somehow he gets the free.

It's like the umps are making it up as they go along sometimes. 

I watched GC last night get throughly destroyed by the umpires. They still won. 

Yes the umpires were putrid, absolutely terrible. 
 

Welcome to every game in 2023. 


25 minutes ago, buck_nekkid said:

We reverted to a lot of ‘bad’ habits in the game.  Like forwards leading into the pockets.  Like kicking it onto the heads of out big forwards.

We were outnumbered at most stoppages (i counted +1 to Freo several times) and only once did I see our players really get on the move to maximise the tap.

These dinky handball chains with lots of underground handballs is not pretty, and is often a turnover source.

we had almost no overlap run and avoided the corridor like it had herpes.

Some good marking by Max and May. However support around them seemed weak.  If they missed these grabs, Freo had easy outs.

Goody talked about efficiency.  I see effort but a lack of cohesion.  Spargo cost us 3 goals by being selfish, and the simple shots missed cost us dearly.

End of the world? No.  Worrying? Yes

I agree we did get outnumbered at stoppage but looking at the stats we've beaten them in contested ball 157 to 141 and pretty much matched them in clearances. This is without our Mr contested possession Clarence of Oliver.

Something is not adding up, either it's a massive credit to our midfield unit for achieving those numbers without Clarry or we are doing gumball all when we get possession and our execution is to blame. Or both (yeah actually both)

 

I went yesterday.

Things I liked...

Kozzie's miracle

Salem showing strong signs that he is back

Fritta, not only maintaining brilliance with snap shots, but the one forward who spotted up loose teammates with bullet passes

Max treating Darcy and Jackson with disdain in the first

Sparrow kicking another clutch set shot

Langdon's ball carry & run in second half

Petracca 600+ metres gained

Brayshaw 500 metres gained (yes, more than his brother)

Grundy 320 metres gained (yes, more than Jackson)

Edited by waynewussell

13 hours ago, Redleg said:

Well as bad as some say we are, would you agree that if we kicked straight we would have won.

That is what in many respects makes it so infuriating.

And if Port kicked straight we get belted last week.

Even if we had have fallen over the line due to kicking straight it wouldn't change much. Falling over the line against a middle of the road (at best) interstate team on your home deck - I feel were just making up the numbers this year.

It's not about the results it's about how we're playing.

 

Including our straight finals exit in 2022 we have beaten 1 current top 8 team (dogs) in 13 games.  
Who’s fault is this Goody game plan picked apart or players/ culture drop off after climbing the mountain in 21???

Edited by Demonsone

Anyone know what the Gawn spray was directed at during the 3 qtr time break?

Was completely out of character..


27 minutes ago, dees189227 said:

I was screaming to pass it to Brodie. He was literally on his own with not one Freo player around him. I hope that's something that gets pointed out

Never ever walk back after a mark with your back to goal, one of the biggest cardinal sins in football.

3 hours ago, Deemania since 56 said:

Genuine leg speed and an array of very pleasing reliabilities around goal. Capable of giving and taking a knock, too. Imagine his development now, had he been given the opportunities of rapidly tiring others - in operation with Clarrie, Tracca, Gawndy, Rivers, Fritta, JJ and Sparrow (the latter should be groomed as the mobile CHF lynchpin).

Bedford only played well in games where we were well on top. In harder more pressured games he was hardly sighted.

11 hours ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

Serious? We were on the southern wing as always and bemoaned the fact they constantly play the members wing so we can't see anything.

Interesting. If you look at our heat map in the AFL map it clearly shows a concentration of play to one side for 3 quarters. Assuming the map is oriented so north is up then the majority of play is on the south side. But I could be reading the map wrong. 

17 hours ago, Sydee said:

Narrm aren’t much chop I’m afraid 

You do realise Narrm has the exact same paying kist as the Melbourne football club. 

1 minute ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

...........

It's not about the results it's about how we're playing.

Im reminded by this thought when looking at market trends etc.   Its seldom whats happening on the surface....though that is what you see and is often the relevant S.P. etc..   it's what's causing it...  the ebbs, the flows,  the depth to bids/offers... the volumes etc.  They create the substructure upon which it all revolves/evolves.

So too in a sense a game of footy.  Much about a game can be causal and that happens before the ball is bounced.

In market parlance ....we're trending down... we'd be a "sell" 


4 minutes ago, layzie said:

Never ever walk back after a mark with your back to goal, one of the biggest cardinal sins in football.

Unless you're 30m out directly in front...a strong maybe then...    but otherwise...agree 

Just now, beelzebub said:

Unless you're 30m out directly in front...a strong maybe then...    but otherwise...agree 

Unless you're Spargo from 30 out, then you should be looking for leads 

2 hours ago, adonski said:

We run like we're stuck in mud

Certainly stuck in 2021......

12 hours ago, A F said:

No team can take unrelenting pressure. There is nothing insightful about that as a take mate. That's essentially how you win any team sport and certainly AFL football...

Sure, but every time we come up against it by a lesser side such as Freo we should be able to withstand it and beat them. We don’t, we roll over and die, starting with Gawn. 

1 minute ago, Dr. Gonzo said:

And if Port kicked straight we get belted last week.

Even if we had have fallen over the line due to kicking straight it wouldn't change much. Falling over the line against a middle of the road (at best) interstate team on your home deck - I feel were just making up the numbers this year.

It's not about the results it's about how we're playing.

This is still something I think is a massive problem with our supporter base. 

Too many on here have their expectations so high - it seems you expect us to not just beat, but dominate, all sides except, what, Collingwood, Brisbane and Port?

It doesn’t work like that. It never has. 

It’s a separate issue altogether to discuss the parts of our game that aren’t working but defining failure as small wins over mid-table sides sets you up for a season of disappointment. 


Some perspective on Goodwin's coaching and team performance 2021 -2023

MFC in top four 55 out of 57 rounds

MFC top of the ladder on 24 of those rounds

1 minute ago, waynewussell said:

Some perspective on Goodwin's coaching and team performance 2021 -2023

MFC in top four 55 out of 57 rounds

MFC top of the ladder on 24 of those rounds

Reality we have beaten 1 team in the current top 8 the dogs since our straight sets exit in the 2022  finals! It’s either our players have dropped off or Goodys game plan has been worked out! 

 
28 minutes ago, Fidelista said:

You do realise Narrm has the exact same paying kist as the Melbourne football club. 

And yet they can't beat anyone bar a rabble in Norf ? go figure 

Let's hope thats the end of that jumper and the God-awful song.

Its like a new curse we have brought on ourselves. Whats our record? 2 wins 6 games?


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • CASEY: Collingwood

    It was freezing cold at Mission Whitten Stadium where only the brave came out in the rain to watch a game that turned out to be as miserable as the weather.
    The Casey Demons secured their third consecutive victory, earning the four premiership points and credit for defeating a highly regarded Collingwood side, but achieved little else. Apart perhaps from setting the scene for Monday’s big game at the MCG and the Ice Challenge that precedes it.
    Neither team showcased significant skill in the bleak and greasy conditions, at a location that was far from either’s home territory. Even the field umpires forgot where they were and experienced a challenging evening, but no further comment is necessary.

    • 4 replies
  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Haha
    • 206 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Like
    • 518 replies