Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

6. Petracca (wasn't his best game but we only looked competent when he was around the ball)

5. Rivers

4. May

3. Oliver

2. Gawn

1. Not sure, Hibberd or Salem I guess.

 

  • Demonland changed the title to VOTES: Rd 10 vs Yartapuulti
 
8 minutes ago, Nascent said:

6. Petracca (wasn't his best game but we only looked competent when he was around the ball)

5. Rivers

4. May

3. Oliver

2. Gawn

1. Not sure, Hibberd or Salem I guess.

 

Gawn? My goodness. We were watching different games. 

Gawn was Pathetic🤮


7 minutes ago, Fanatique Demon said:

Gawn? My goodness. We were watching different games. 

Perhaps, though he was our 3rd highest for clearances behing trac and Oliver as our other mids weren't getting it done. Was a huge part of our momentum in the 3rd in my view. Got smashed all night and still provided a better target for us down the flank and wings than our other talls. He's not going to clunk contested marks in these conditions. Most of our players were poor tonight to be honest, perhaps an argument could be made for Hunter to be in there.

Edited by Nascent

16 minutes ago, Nascent said:

6. Petracca (wasn't his best game but we only looked competent when he was around the ball)

5. Rivers

4. May

3. Oliver

2. Gawn

1. Not sure, Hibberd or Salem I guess.

 

Trac had 2 kicks to half time. 
 

gawn had zero marks, 5 turnovers and 33% disposal efficiency 

 

6. Petracca 

5. Rivers

4. May

3. Hunter

2. Salem

1. Chandler

Just now, MoeSyzlak said:

Trac had 2 kicks to half time. 
 

gawn had zero marks, 5 turnovers and 33% disposal efficiency 

And finished with 22 disposals, 1 goal 2 and our second most clearances. Probably the main driver of our comeback in the third and the only one that looked like he could carry the team to victory.

I'll concede Gawn didn't play a great game. I just fail to see who played any better.

Most of our team was rubbish tonight, I don't know why I'm bothering arguing semantics about who was slightly less poor than the others.


6 May - kept us in the game during that dreadful first half.

5 Petracca - based on the second half only.

4 Oliver - also lifted his game after halftime.

3 Fritsch - at least he can kick straight.

2 Grundy - was better than Max on the night.

1 Rivers, but hard to choose on a poor night for many.

Edited by Dee-monic

6.Rivers

5. Petracca

4. May

3. Oliver

2. Salem

1. Hunter

Gawn was Garbage... Period!

6. Fritsch kept us in the game

5. May kept us in the game

4. Rivers 

3.Oliver 

2. Petracca

1. Salem

 

 


14 minutes ago, MoeSyzlak said:

Trac had 2 kicks to half time. 
 

gawn had zero marks, 5 turnovers and 33% disposal efficiency 

Hence pathetic!

6. Rivers

5. May

4. Hunter

3. Fritsch

I don't think our midfield deserve any votes because when they were bad they were atrocious,. but no-one else stood up so ...

2. Oliver 

1. Petracca 

 


6.  May

5.  Rivers

4.  Hunter

3.  Petracca

2.  Oliver

1.  Fritsch

 
4 minutes ago, Swooper1987 said:

None of the mids tonight.  They were completely outplayed.

It's not that simple unfortunately. One or two mids can have good game and the whole midfield thrashed. Oliver, Viney and Petracca at least got us back in the third quarter. Supporting your argument May and Fritta were the only ones to really win their positions.

Melb's problem is the depth of it's midfield compared to the good sides. Butters, Drew, Rozee, Boak, Horne Francis, Wines, etc are better than us. Collingwood has even better depth.


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...