Jump to content

JvR Free!!!

Demonland
Demonland
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

2 minutes ago, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

Just said the same to a mate. They are trying to apply civil law principles to a contact sport. There is a voluntary assumption of risk that comes with plying this game. The duty of care argument is a bunch of bulldust. You could argue that the duty of care is breached in every tackle. The aim of the act is to physically challenge an opponent. It’s just outrageous 

This

  • Quote
    • Like 4
    • Angry 1
     

    Duty of care. Where was it when a player kicked the ball off the ground breaking another player’s finger?  

    Miss spoiling the ball by 0.8 of a second and they are suggesting you were going for the man. 

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    • Angry 2
    12 minutes ago, ManDee said:

    Semantics! No injury, incidental contact in play. What semantics? Charge should be withdrawn. 

    I think it’s the correct spelling and pronunciation of his name. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 2
     

    Just BTW friends - do not be too concerned if deliberations take some time. Does not necessarily mean difficulty arriving at a decision. May mean Tribunal members determined a verdict in 30 seconds and are having a scotch to assist the 'optics'.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 6
    3 minutes ago, Dee Zephyr said:

    Duty of care. Where was it when a player kicked the ball off the ground breaking another player’s finger?  

    Miss spoiling the ball by 0.8 of a second and they are suggesting you were going for the man. 

    Yep, there's a lot of kick in danger that is never paid. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    so the spoil is legal unless you allegedly take your eyes off the ball for 0.8 of a second

    As Mr Bumble said.. the law is an [censored]

    (how does a reference to a donkey that is one of the most famous Dickensian quotations ended up censored.)

    Edited by Diamond_Jim

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    1 minute ago, ElDiablo14 said:

    Yep, there's a lot of kick in danger that is never paid. 

    Clarrie’s hand courtesy of Selwood

  • Quote
    •  
    Just now, WalkingCivilWar said:

    Clarrie’s hand courtesy of Selwood

    The laws don’t apply to Geelong players. 
    Take your nonsense elsewhere. 

  • Quote
    • Like 4
    • Haha 1
    • Angry 1
    50 minutes ago, Redleg said:

    Who is this Woods? His statement is moronic. 

    No Way What GIF

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    2 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

    Clarrie’s hand courtesy of Selwood

    No no………Clarrie would be charged with striking Duckwood’s boot.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Clap 1

    #FreeVanRoyen....

    Not sure if it has the same ring to it as 

    #FreeJackTrengove

    Either way both ridiculous reports

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Where was duty of care when Hawkins threw and elbow back into Mays eye socket, With such force it broken his eye socket bone. Seriously? They have no idea how to apply civil law principles to a sport. It’s just plain dumb, if I tackle someone, is it reasonably foreseeable that they might get injured? Absolutely? Do I breach a duty of care? No, because the act is permitted in the sport. Is the spoil permitted - yes! There is no question that was his intent. So is it within rules, yes! It’s the biggest jog on case of all time! And that’s not hyperbole. It wasn’t even careless. It was a play on the ball. 

  • Quote
    • Like 11
    • Clap 2

    6 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

    so the spoil is legal unless you allegedly take your eyes off the ball for 0.8 of a second

    As Mr Bumble said.. the law is an [censored]

    (how does a reference to a donkey that is one of the most famous Dickensian quotations ended up censored.)

    Because Jim, the septic tanks ( in their inimitable way) use the name of a braying animal to describe the derriere .

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    • Haha 1
    • Shocked 1
    19 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

    Awww you know you’ll always be my fave person in the world (checks username of this particular poster), QD 

    You have said it again.

    Twice in one thread you have dumped me.

  • Quote
    • Haha 3
    • Sad 1

    This Zita guy is funny, gives Schnitz a plug.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
    1 minute ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

    S'pose to be writing an essay - cannot focus.

     

    If it’s based on the flaws of the MRO, don’t worry about an essay…………..it would be a thesis.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 1

    image.gif.f10ebb7e6e21cb02bc899d34d032ccbd.gif

    HURRY UP!  I have a “starving” son who’s threatening to call CPS on me. 

  • Quote

    5 minutes ago, Sideshow Bob said:

    #FreeVanRoyen....

    Not sure if it has the same ring to it as 

    #FreeJackTrengove

    Either way both ridiculous reports

    S'pose Christian's sanction is upheld - do we take it further? Go fund me page anyone?

  • Quote
    • Haha 1
    1 minute ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

    image.gif.f10ebb7e6e21cb02bc899d34d032ccbd.gif

    HURRY UP!  I have a “starving” son who’s threatening to call CPS on me. 

    Its Been A Long Time Waiting GIF

    Kids whenever they have to wait for anything for longer than 1.3 seconds….right?!

     

     

    Edit: my dog just reminded me it’s his dinner time. The dog doesn’t wait. He’s the king of the house and my favourite child. 

    Edited by Jaded No More

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 2
     
    21 minutes ago, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

    Just said the same to a mate. They are trying to apply civil law principles to a contact sport. There is a voluntary assumption of risk that comes with plying this game. The duty of care argument is a bunch of bulldust. You could argue that the duty of care is breached in every tackle. The aim of the act is to physically challenge an opponent. It’s just outrageous 

    I think it is called volenti non fit injuria....it's been a while

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • REPORT: Richmond

      The fans who turned up to the MCG for Melbourne’s Anzac Day Eve clash against Richmond would have been disappointed if they turned up to see a great spectacle. As much as this was a night for the 71,635 in attendance to commemorate heroes of the nation’s past wars, it was also a time for the Melbourne Football Club to consolidate upon its first win after a horrific start to the 2025 season. On this basis, despite the fact that it was an uninspiring and dour struggle for most of its 100 minutes, the night will be one for the fans to remember. They certainly got value out of the pre match activity honouring those who fought for their country. The MCG and the lights of the city as backdrop was made for nights such as these and, in my view, we received a more inspirational ceremony of Anzac culture than others both here and elsewhere around the country. 

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Richmond

      The match up of teams competing in our great Aussie game at its second highest level is a rarity for a work day Thursday morning but the blustery conditions that met the players at a windswept Casey Fields was something far more commonplace.They turned the opening stanza between the Casey Demons and a somewhat depleted Richmond VFL into a mess of fumbling unforced errors, spilt marks and wasted opportunities for both sides but they did set up a significant win for the home team which is exactly what transpired on this Anzac Day round opener. Casey opened up strong against the breeze with the first goal to Aidan Johnson, the Tigers quickly responded and the game degenerated into a defensive slog and the teams were level when the first siren sounded.

        • Clap
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 0 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Richmond

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 28th April @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we analyse the Demons 2nd win for the year against the Tigers.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      If you would like to leave us a voicemail please call 03 9016 3666 and don't worry no body answers so you don't have to talk to a human.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/
      Call: 03 9016 3666
      Skype: Demonland31

        • Thanks
      • 13 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: West Coast

      The Demons hit the road in Round 8, heading to Perth to face the West Coast Eagles at Optus Stadium. With momentum building, the Dees will be aiming for a third straight victory to keep their season revival on course. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Thanks
      • 147 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • POSTGAME: Richmond

      After five consecutive defeats, the Demons have now notched up back-to-back victories, comfortably accounting for the Tigers in the traditional ANZAC Eve clash. They surged to a commanding 44-point lead early in the final quarter before easing off the pedal, resting skipper Max Gawn and conceding the last four goals of the game to close out a solid 20-point win.

        • Clap
        • Love
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 294 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland

    • VOTES: Richmond

      Max Gawn leads the Demonland Player of the Year from Jake Bowey with Christian Petracca, Ed Langdon and Clayton Oliver rounding out the Top 5. Your votes for the Demons victory over the Tigers on ANZAC Eve. 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, & 1.

        • Thanks
      • 47 replies
      Demonland
      Demonland
    View All