Jump to content

JvR Free!!!

Demonland
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

2 minutes ago, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

Just said the same to a mate. They are trying to apply civil law principles to a contact sport. There is a voluntary assumption of risk that comes with plying this game. The duty of care argument is a bunch of bulldust. You could argue that the duty of care is breached in every tackle. The aim of the act is to physically challenge an opponent. It’s just outrageous 

This

  • Quote
    • Like 4
    • Angry 1
     

    Duty of care. Where was it when a player kicked the ball off the ground breaking another player’s finger?  

    Miss spoiling the ball by 0.8 of a second and they are suggesting you were going for the man. 

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1
    • Angry 2
    12 minutes ago, ManDee said:

    Semantics! No injury, incidental contact in play. What semantics? Charge should be withdrawn. 

    I think it’s the correct spelling and pronunciation of his name. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 2
     

    Just BTW friends - do not be too concerned if deliberations take some time. Does not necessarily mean difficulty arriving at a decision. May mean Tribunal members determined a verdict in 30 seconds and are having a scotch to assist the 'optics'.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 6
    3 minutes ago, Dee Zephyr said:

    Duty of care. Where was it when a player kicked the ball off the ground breaking another player’s finger?  

    Miss spoiling the ball by 0.8 of a second and they are suggesting you were going for the man. 

    Yep, there's a lot of kick in danger that is never paid. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    so the spoil is legal unless you allegedly take your eyes off the ball for 0.8 of a second

    As Mr Bumble said.. the law is an [censored]

    (how does a reference to a donkey that is one of the most famous Dickensian quotations ended up censored.)

    Edited by Diamond_Jim

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    1 minute ago, ElDiablo14 said:

    Yep, there's a lot of kick in danger that is never paid. 

    Clarrie’s hand courtesy of Selwood

  • Quote
    •  
    Just now, WalkingCivilWar said:

    Clarrie’s hand courtesy of Selwood

    The laws don’t apply to Geelong players. 
    Take your nonsense elsewhere. 

  • Quote
    • Like 4
    • Haha 1
    • Angry 1
    50 minutes ago, Redleg said:

    Who is this Woods? His statement is moronic. 

    No Way What GIF

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    2 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

    Clarrie’s hand courtesy of Selwood

    No no………Clarrie would be charged with striking Duckwood’s boot.

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Clap 1

    #FreeVanRoyen....

    Not sure if it has the same ring to it as 

    #FreeJackTrengove

    Either way both ridiculous reports

  • Quote
    • Like 1

    Where was duty of care when Hawkins threw and elbow back into Mays eye socket, With such force it broken his eye socket bone. Seriously? They have no idea how to apply civil law principles to a sport. It’s just plain dumb, if I tackle someone, is it reasonably foreseeable that they might get injured? Absolutely? Do I breach a duty of care? No, because the act is permitted in the sport. Is the spoil permitted - yes! There is no question that was his intent. So is it within rules, yes! It’s the biggest jog on case of all time! And that’s not hyperbole. It wasn’t even careless. It was a play on the ball. 

  • Quote
    • Like 11
    • Clap 2

    6 minutes ago, Diamond_Jim said:

    so the spoil is legal unless you allegedly take your eyes off the ball for 0.8 of a second

    As Mr Bumble said.. the law is an [censored]

    (how does a reference to a donkey that is one of the most famous Dickensian quotations ended up censored.)

    Because Jim, the septic tanks ( in their inimitable way) use the name of a braying animal to describe the derriere .

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    • Haha 1
    • Shocked 1
    19 minutes ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

    Awww you know you’ll always be my fave person in the world (checks username of this particular poster), QD 

    You have said it again.

    Twice in one thread you have dumped me.

  • Quote
    • Haha 3
    • Sad 1

    This Zita guy is funny, gives Schnitz a plug.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
    1 minute ago, Queanbeyan Demon said:

    S'pose to be writing an essay - cannot focus.

     

    If it’s based on the flaws of the MRO, don’t worry about an essay…………..it would be a thesis.

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 1

    image.gif.f10ebb7e6e21cb02bc899d34d032ccbd.gif

    HURRY UP!  I have a “starving” son who’s threatening to call CPS on me. 

  • Quote

    5 minutes ago, Sideshow Bob said:

    #FreeVanRoyen....

    Not sure if it has the same ring to it as 

    #FreeJackTrengove

    Either way both ridiculous reports

    S'pose Christian's sanction is upheld - do we take it further? Go fund me page anyone?

  • Quote
    • Haha 1
    1 minute ago, WalkingCivilWar said:

    image.gif.f10ebb7e6e21cb02bc899d34d032ccbd.gif

    HURRY UP!  I have a “starving” son who’s threatening to call CPS on me. 

    Its Been A Long Time Waiting GIF

    Kids whenever they have to wait for anything for longer than 1.3 seconds….right?!

     

     

    Edit: my dog just reminded me it’s his dinner time. The dog doesn’t wait. He’s the king of the house and my favourite child. 

    Edited by Jaded No More

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Haha 2
     
    21 minutes ago, Kick_It_To_Pickett said:

    Just said the same to a mate. They are trying to apply civil law principles to a contact sport. There is a voluntary assumption of risk that comes with plying this game. The duty of care argument is a bunch of bulldust. You could argue that the duty of care is breached in every tackle. The aim of the act is to physically challenge an opponent. It’s just outrageous 

    I think it is called volenti non fit injuria....it's been a while

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • GAMEDAY: Port Adelaide

      It’s Game Day, and the Demons are on the road for the next month and will be desperate to claim a crucial win to keep their finals hopes alive against Port Adelaide.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 786 replies
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Port Adelaide

      With both sides precariously positioned ahead of the run home to the finals, only one team involved in Sunday’s clash at the Adelaide Oval between the Power and the Demons will remain a contender when it’s over.  On current form, that one team has to be Melbourne which narrowly missed out on defeating the competition’s power house Collingwood on King's Birthday and also recently overpowered both 2024 Grand Finalists. Conversely, Port Adelaide snapped out of a four-game losing streak with a win against the Giants in Canberra. Although they will be rejuvenated following that victory, their performances during that run of losses were sub par and resulted in some embarrassing blow out defeats.

        • Love
        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • NON-MFC: Round 14

      Round 14 is upon us and there's plenty at stake across the rest of the competition. As Melbourne heads to Adelaide, it's time to turn our attention to the other matches of the Round. Which teams are you tipping this week? And which results would be most favourable for the Demons’ finals tilt? Follow all the non-Melbourne games here and join the conversation as the ladder continues to take shape.

        • Thanks
      • 193 replies
      Demonland

    • REPORT: Collingwood

      The media focus on the fiery interaction between Max Gawn and Steven May at the end of the game was unfortunate because it took away the gloss from Melbourne’s performance in winning almost everywhere but on the scoreboard in its Kings Birthday clash with Collingwood at the MCG. It was a real battle reminiscent of the good old days when the rivalry between the two clubs was at its height and a fitting contest to celebrate the 2025 Australian of the Year, Neale Daniher and his superb work to bring the campaign to raise funds for motor neurone disease awareness to the forefront. Notwithstanding the fact that the Magpies snatched a one point victory from his old club, Daniher would be proud of the fact that his Demons fought tooth and nail to win the keenly contested game in front of 77,761 fans.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Port Adelaide

      The Demons are set to embark on a four-week road trip that takes them across the country, with two games in Adelaide and a clash on the Gold Coast, broken up by a mid-season bye. Next up is a meeting with the inconsistent Port Adelaide at Adelaide Oval. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Thanks
      • 181 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: Collingwood

      I have something on tomorrow night so Podcast will be Wednesday night. The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Wednesday, 11th June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we dissect the Dees heartbreaking 1 point loss to the Magpies on King's Birthday Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show. Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 37 replies
      Demonland
    View All