Jump to content

Featured Replies

 

OUT: Schach
IN: Brown

Suspect it'll be Petty (pending concussion protocols) rather than Brown but would prefer the experience of BBB

 

Ideally I'd have.

In: Brown, Petty

Out: Schache, Hibberd

Petty to play back. Hibberd rested.

I'd prefer Laurie to Harmes but much of a muchness when it comes to the sub.

Pretty moot until Casey's game tomorrow though.

 

 

Wonder if Maysie will come under any scrutiny for his hit on Coleman Jones?

Think BBB will need to be considered.


3 minutes ago, dee-tox said:

Wonder if Maysie will come under any scrutiny for his hit on Coleman Jones?

Think BBB will need to be considered.

Not a chance… he hit the ball first and the player ran into his forearm.  

9 minutes ago, Nascent said:

Ideally I'd have.

In: Brown, Petty

Out: Schache, Hibberd

Petty to play back. Hibberd rested.

I'd prefer Laurie to Harmes but much of a muchness when it comes to the sub.

Pretty moot until Casey's game tomorrow though.

 

Great post. 

Like the idea of resting hibbo. 

Sun's aren't the easy beats that they've been in the past but should be a win if the boys front up with the right attitude. 

I know Spargo is rated highly by the FD but I can't see an obvious reason to get him in based on tonight's from 

 

 

out. Schache

In. Petty.

 

Petty or Brown/TMac for Schache. 

If Dunstan plays well again he may get the sub spot at worst. Or maybe Jordon’s spot? I felt Jordon was poor tonight. 

Not sure what we do with Spargo if he’s fit. 


No Touk. If we don’t [censored] this in I’d be very very very disappointed 

I think Petty for Schache is likely, even though I'd like to see it as just Petty for Hibberd, and Petty going back.

Spargo is a potential sub option. 

You have all forgotten Spargo.

IN: Petty, Spargo

OUT: Schache, Jordon

SUB: Jordon

 

Seniors

B: McVee, May, Hibberd

HB: Brayshaw, Lever, Rivers

C: Hunter, Oliver, Langdon

HF: Pickett, van Rooyen, Neal-Bullen

F: Fritsch, Gawn, Chandler

FOLL: Grundy, Petracca, Viney

IC: Bowey, Sparrow, Spargo, Petty

SUB: Jordon

EMERG: Harmes, Schache, Laurie

 

Casey

B: Adams, Tomlinson, D.Smith

HB: Howes, D.Turner, Gregory

C: Woewodin, Dunstan, Steele

HF: Melksham, McDonald, Moniz-Wakefield

F: J.Smith, Brown, Jefferson

FOLL: Schache, White, Laurie

IC: Sestan, Farris-White, Buntine, Bell, 23rd man

 

 

no guarantees on petty given that they gave spargo some extra time to recover, but you'd think they'd be the two likely ins

i still really like the notion of the tall defensive premiership trio of may-lever-petty being back together, but it's hard to see how unless pig is sore and misses with his achilles, in which schache may hold his spot forward unless sideshow bald or plugger mac turn it on in the vfl

Percentage!!!


3 minutes ago, whatwhat say what said:

no guarantees on petty given that they gave spargo some extra time to recover, but you'd think they'd be the two likely ins

i still really like the notion of the tall defensive premiership trio of may-lever-petty being back together, but it's hard to see how unless pig is sore and misses with his achilles, in which schache may hold his spot forward unless sideshow bald or plugger mac turn it on in the vfl

Goody said post match that all indications are that Petty will get thru the protocol fine. Must have been a mild concussion and he must be feeling good. 

38 minutes ago, deanox said:

I think Petty for Schache is likely, even though I'd like to see it as just Petty for Hibberd, and Petty going back.

Spargo is a potential sub option. 

I can see Hibbo being managed soon.

31 minutes ago, Lord Travis said:

Percentage!!!

Nice thaught but I would not be taking Gold Coast up there lightly at all.

2 hours ago, Gawndy the Great said:

Not a chance… he hit the ball first and the player ran into his forearm.  

Yep, it was a genuine contest nothing dirty about it.

1 hour ago, Jaded No More said:

No Touk. If we don’t [censored] this in I’d be very very very disappointed 

Yep, and Rowell has had an underwhelming season so far. We've got the advantage in the guts.


1 hour ago, WERRIDEE said:

You have all forgotten Spargo.

IN: Petty, Spargo

OUT: Schache, Jordon

SUB: Jordon

 

Seniors

B: McVee, May, Hibberd

HB: Brayshaw, Lever, Rivers

C: Hunter, Oliver, Langdon

HF: Pickett, van Rooyen, Neal-Bullen

F: Fritsch, Gawn, Chandler

FOLL: Grundy, Petracca, Viney

IC: Bowey, Sparrow, Spargo, Petty

SUB: Jordon

EMERG: Harmes, Schache, Laurie

 

Casey

B: Adams, Tomlinson, D.Smith

HB: Howes, D.Turner, Gregory

C: Woewodin, Dunstan, Steele

HF: Melksham, McDonald, Moniz-Wakefield

F: J.Smith, Brown, Jefferson

FOLL: Schache, White, Laurie

IC: Sestan, Farris-White, Buntine, Bell, 23rd man

 

 

I’d rather JJ over spargo when kade is playing the way he is

8 hours ago, Demonland said:

The Demons are heading back on the road for the fourth time this season to take on the Gold Coast Suns at Heritage Bank Stadium in a bid to win their third game on the trot. Who comes in and who goes out? 

IMG_6170.jpeg

The most important thing to look at here is the weather report. Last time we headed up north for a game, we felt the heat and had trouble handling the footy. Let’s hope the team gets up there in time to acclimatize and get a decent training run on the surface of the ground.

My Weather Ap forecast for next Saturday is sunny and 23 degrees.

 

Great opportunity for his old mates to get in Mac Andrew's ear and bring him back to rightful home... Casey!

7 hours ago, layzie said:

Let's get some of that sweet, sweet BBB

 

the-simpsons-candy.gif

 

No changes for me barring any one not recovering well.

Edited by AzzKikA


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • NON-MFC: Round 13

    Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • Thanks
    • 30 replies
  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

      • Thanks
    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

      • Thanks
    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
    • 241 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Thanks
    • 47 replies