Jump to content

Featured Replies

Were pretty undefeated playing away games since mid 2021. I am fully confident, brissy don't have the heart.

 
On 3/22/2023 at 8:32 PM, rpfc said:

They stole that from the Champion Data bloke that went on Sportsday with Gerard and Kane the night before.
 

Crazy stat. Such a front runner.

I attended the Gabba Rnd 23 match last year in amongst Lions faithful in a dining area . Many Lions fans giving it to Hipwood and many don't rate him either.

 
On 3/22/2023 at 1:50 PM, titan_uranus said:

There's a lot of confidence on here, and well there should be. We were cooked in the SF. The two H&A games are better indicators of our chances this week IMO.

But there's a touch too much confidence. Hipwood has a history of playing well against us. The Lions mids aren't going to all be sub-20 touches again like they were against Port. Their midfield presents a similar challenge to the Dogs' midfield and at times last week the Dogs were on top. And this time there is a more dynamic forward line, not the Dogs' over-sized and pressure-lacking options.

Pfff.

On 3/22/2023 at 8:57 AM, Sydee said:

Maybe but the sad fact is that apart from Zorko who has very limited football ability IMO the other two are completely devoid of skill - how Matheson remains on their list is a complete mystery to me 

Mind you Matheson is good at fluffing around, puffiing out his chest and picking up some soft possessions,

so there is that !!


  • Author

Thought it might be interesting to see how their view changes as the week goes on.

After Team Selections:

  • look at the competition's best defences and they do not have two unaccountable backmen like we do
  • Wow Fagan had zero tolerance in todays press conference.
  • Panic stations in the backline.
  • Haha guess the experiment with a shorter backline worked for about 1 week.  Ingenious and arrogant by the coaching staff
  • We dropped two “wingers”, for two talls, and brought in a mid forward for a small defender.  So a team that has a problem running, losses two running players, and adds two non runners. 
  • We look suspiciously like the Dogs this week.
  • The only difference to our regular/preferred line up is a second ruck.  And against Melbourne I do t think that is a bad thing.
  • I was a tad worried about tomorrow night, now even more so, we better come with our running shoes on or it could become embarrassing for us, Melbourne are a seriously elite running side.
  • No surprise as Fort comes in for their twin towers.
  • We spend an entire pre-season deciding we need more run and pick a side accordingly for round 1.  Side is smashed because essentially it doesn’t try.  Now we put not 1 but 2 talls back in?!  Seems like panic stations.We now have 8 talls…

 

My favourite:  The response to a prior comment:

  • Don't play Geelong until round 18. They'll either A) be back healthy(ish) or B) their season will have gone to hell…
  • I vote for option B
 

Thanks Luci, was just wondering what they were saying closer to the game.

There’s some serious FFCBBFCBLFCSS going on at Springfield. 


  • Author
18 minutes ago, AzzKikA said:

Thanks Luci, was just wondering what they were saying closer to the game.

Good premonition! 

I'm keeping an eye on their 'Game Day' thread.  Not a lot there right now but thought I would post a 'Game Day' section this afternoon.

From what is there so far, it is all gloom and doom sounding very much like us a few years ago.  They seem to have their own BFCSS, a replica of our MFCSS!! 

Of course, they won't be as bad as last week.  Even if they come out with fire and brimstone it won't last and we will win.

On 3/22/2023 at 1:50 PM, titan_uranus said:

But there's a touch too much confidence.

From some supporters maybe. But we are not the team. The team will be taking the match seriously.


1 hour ago, Lucifers Hero said:

Thought it might be interesting to see how their view changes as the week goes on.

After Team Selections:

  • look at the competition's best defences and they do not have two unaccountable backmen like we do
  • Wow Fagan had zero tolerance in todays press conference.
  • Panic stations in the backline.
  • Haha guess the experiment with a shorter backline worked for about 1 week.  Ingenious and arrogant by the coaching staff
  • We dropped two “wingers”, for two talls, and brought in a mid forward for a small defender.  So a team that has a problem running, losses two running players, and adds two non runners. 
  • We look suspiciously like the Dogs this week.
  • The only difference to our regular/preferred line up is a second ruck.  And against Melbourne I do t think that is a bad thing.
  • I was a tad worried about tomorrow night, now even more so, we better come with our running shoes on or it could become embarrassing for us, Melbourne are a seriously elite running side.
  • No surprise as Fort comes in for their twin towers.
  • We spend an entire pre-season deciding we need more run and pick a side accordingly for round 1.  Side is smashed because essentially it doesn’t try.  Now we put not 1 but 2 talls back in?!  Seems like panic stations.We now have 8 talls…

 

My favourite:  The response to a prior comment:

  • Don't play Geelong until round 18. They'll either A) be back healthy(ish) or B) their season will have gone to hell…
  • I vote for option B

These are some of the most interesting and worthy-of-consideration contributions to DL. Really well done, LH.

Edited by Deemania since 56

No opposition supporter wants to look at team changes and see May, Viney and Fritsch as the ins. It is definitely disheartening. 
 

 

47 minutes ago, Katrina Dee Fan said:

Is it just me, or after years of being [censored], it's really weird to see top sides scared of us?

image.gif.b7c6897373e8cef789d1b9d8aac3128f.gif


  • Author

A new day has barely improved their mood.

GAME DAY!

Their BFCSS

  • much trepidation about this one, low bar for me 100% effort and beaten by less than 3 goals.
  • Zero expectations going in. Don't think we've ever been this low since 2019…
  • Hoping for the best but expecting the worst.
  • Hope we win, just don't see it happening today without a massive attitude adjustment.
  • I remember when we used to go into each game hoping for an honourable loss (that being an upgrade of the standard shellacking), we were looking for signs and potential and each win was a lovely surprise.
  • Win or lose, I just want an effort we can be proud of.
  • Zero expectations going in. Don't think we've ever been this low since 2019.
  • 10 goal loss coming up…
  • I miss being at least a lil bit confident going into games...
  • Before i'd change the players - i think a complete overhaul (keeing the same players) of the coaches would be my go

And the draft talk starts!

  • Helps to have your own first and second round picks in such a scenario.
  • We should get the Dockers or Eagles first this year for Deven Robertson (Poster doesn't know we have Freos's first and second)
  • Currently, this first pick we hold is Geelong’s second round pick. (All aboard the Geelong death ride).  I wish it didn't feel like that today :(

Some Optimism:

  • This is our Tigers 2016 season, Demons 2019 season.  The season they had to have before winning the Grand Final, albeit the Demons had to wait two years.
  • I look at our team and think we have enough good players to get the job done at The Gabba.  Am i confident after last week no, but that will make a win all the better.
  • Geez, one rough week and everyone wants to tear it all down. I'd save the doomsday predictions for the middle of the year after the team has had time to settle into the year..
  • trust this playing group to respond after the disaster last week. Work rate and commitment are non-negotiable's, that's all I want to see from them.
  • Was so bullish before last week, lucky we have 22 rounds to go..
  • If we end up doing well this season, I expect this season to be similar to 2021, where we don't get a win until round 5 (North).  


My Favourite:

  • Mitch Robinson is free to say whatever he likes of course, but I do wish he’d not said anything about the Dees 

Mitch must have read Langdon’s: all duck no dinner Collingwood comment!!  Hope we respond as they did!!

 

NB.  I'll follow up tomorrow with their Post Mortem!!

19 minutes ago, Jaded No More said:

No opposition supporter wants to look at team changes and see May, Viney and Fritsch as the ins. It is definitely disheartening. 
 

 

The Sorbent company is just made for those so suffering!

1 hour ago, McQueen said:

There’s some serious FFCBBFCBLFCSS going on at Springfield. 

Clever.  Well done  McQ !!

 
1 hour ago, Lucifers Hero said:

 

  • Mitch Robinson is free to say whatever he likes of course, but I do wish he’d not said anything about the Dees 

Mitch must have read Langdon’s: all duck no dinner Collingwood comment!!  Hope we respond as they did!!

 

apparently he's commented on "bad blood" between Melbourne and Brisbane in recent years, and made a comment that Melbourne think they're better than Brisbane.  Ummm....yeh!!!

Probably a mistake on his part to make Zorko out to be the victim over the Harry Petty incident.  

Edited by Katrina Dee Fan

15 minutes ago, Katrina Dee Fan said:

apparently he's commented on "bad blood" between Melbourne and Brisbane in recent years, and made a comment that Melbourne think they're better than Brisbane.  Ummm....yeh!!!

Probably a mistake on his part to make Zorko out to be the victim over the Harry Petty incident.  

A brain surgeon he ain’t. 


Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

Featured Content

  • PREVIEW: Collingwood

    Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

    • 1 reply
  • CASEY: Sydney

    The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

    • 1 reply
  • REPORT: St. Kilda

    Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
    This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

    • 4 replies
  • PREGAME: Collingwood

    After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Clap
      • Love
      • Like
    • 210 replies
  • PODCAST: St. Kilda

    The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
    Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
    Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

      • Like
    • 47 replies
  • POSTGAME: St. Kilda

    After kicking the first goal of the match the Demons were always playing catch up against the Saints in Alice Spring and could never make the most of their inside 50 entries to wrestle back the lead.

      • Like
    • 330 replies