The dogs are an embarrassment 

51 minutes ago, dl4e said:

Walsh out is a blow but he did nothing last week anyway. Lets just hope the hawks can beat dogs as I think Carlton played their final last week. I hate to say it but the filth will probably win. Unlike others I would like to play the filth first up and to give those low life amoebas a good thrashing.

Almost every dees defender has put in some spud games this year but would you drop lever ? Impossible.Its a tough competition.

Walsh out would be a huge loss for the baggers.

Is this the last game in Tasmania?

Probably not but who knows

7 minutes ago, DubDee said:

The dogs are an embarrassment 

They beat us. They’re a glass cannon, their best is very very good, their worst is very very bad.

He's a big boy young Sam Darcy. when he fills out he'll be a serious unit to handle

This is turning into a really good game

Richmonds VFL team wont be in finals now, A little disadvantage for their AFL team if they go deep into September

34 minutes ago, sue said:

Sorry a bit off topic but arises out of the dogs hawks match.  An example of the AFL not thinking clearly about the rules they come up with. 
 A player is on the ground and an opponent pushes the ball under him hoping to get a holding the ball free for pulling it in. The umpire tells them he is not paying the free.  Quite right. But why not penalise the player who pushed it under?  The “pulled the ball” in rule was instituted to stop players holding up play. Whether you pull or push the effect is to do just that. So it should be a free against whoever did the action to hold up play.  Why not?

I’ve often thought this

1 hour ago, Tough Kent said:

This is why I wouldn't be putting the house on Geelong to win the flag just yet.
 

In 2022, Geelong played against teams in the current top 8 only 7 times. They haven’t played a current top 8 side twice. They also haven’t played a current top 8 side for 5 weeks and they’ve played West Coast and North twice.
 

Melbourne have played against current top 8 sides 10 times this year. We’ve played Freo, Collingwood and Brisbane twice, and only played West Coast and North once.

They also have poor final performances in the back of their heads.

We go in as the "invincibles".

Hoping we maintain that confidence. 

1 hour ago, DubDee said:

I thought Kent was to play his 100th and last game? He is named as emergency. 

surely they wouldn’t insult him by having him as sub for a fake ‘game’

Would like to see him get a run late in the game and nail a couple of goals, that effect the percentage enough so we end up 2nd.

Addit: have the med subs been named yet? 

Edited August 21, 20223 yr by kev martin

Dermie really is a bumbling [censored]… I don’t know what fox is thinking having him calling games 

I hate Hawthorn and the Dogs, hope Hawthorn wins because the Dogs have more to lose.

Just now, GCDee said:

Dermie really is a bumbling [censored]… I don’t know what fox is thinking having him calling games 

There's been more  "in swing" and "out swing" today than during a test match.

Usman vs Edwards has been average 

Dogs need around two more goals to edge the blues out of finals 

they have the breeze in the last so should get it done

Time for Cripps & Curnow to earn their 💰💰

Want Dogs to win so then Baggers will need to go all out and with pies also needing a win to stay in 4 it could be on for young and old.

An ordinary spectacle.

Dogs playing dumb footy considering the conditions.

3 minutes ago, DubDee said:

Dogs need around two more goals to edge the blues out of finals 

they have the breeze in the last so should get it done

Get it done and make it interesting I say.

Considering what’s at stake, the mindset of the Dogs compared to that of the Dees on Friday night. 

Underwhelming stuff 

1.8 from the dogs that Q. 

such dumb footy, tried to kick against the wind from 50 time and time again

I would say the Dogs are blowing whatever chance they had to play finals.

34 minutes ago, GCDee said:

Dermie really is a bumbling [censored]… I don’t know what fox is thinking having him calling games 

One can only assume, despite his so called 'name', he's cheap. 

why is it that a player can be out of bounds and play on while out of bounds and it not be called out of bounds? Sidebottom moved off his mark while out over the boundary, seen other players play on by running outside the boundary line before kicking. am i missing something