Jump to content

Featured Replies

 
4 hours ago, DeeZone said:

That how May got concussed as well competing with Lever and Petty for the same ball doesn’t look good when your three tall defenders all go for the same mark and one gets knocked out by his teammate.😢😪

May and Petty are on their men and Lever reads it perfectly to come across and intercept. The issue is May doesn’t see Lever and stay back with his opponent.

If he had his time again May would retreat at the last second or two. No issue with Lever doing his job

5 minutes ago, DeeSpencer said:

May and Petty are on their men and Lever reads it perfectly to come across and intercept. The issue is May doesn’t see Lever and stay back with his opponent.

If he had his time again May would retreat at the last second or two. No issue with Lever doing his job

Yes May got a little push as well...That bloody push does it's damage again..

 

I'd be flabbergasted if Salem plays. For one, he's been tracking behind in his rehab for the last month. For another, he hasn't played footy at any level for 11 weeks.

I'd prefer to see him get a half game at Casey first before we throw him into a block of really tough and important games.

Tomlinson for May. Then Langdon, Harmes and TMac all straight back in for Melksham, Dunstan and Weideman. Bedford back to the sub role, which is harsh but we can't play all of Pickett, ANB, Spargo and Bedford.

I won't lose much sleep if Brown gets dropped instead of Weideman but I don't think Weid deserves the spot any more than Brown, and Brown in my view is more likely to win us a game if he turns his form around than Weideman.

Not sure if Langdon will be back, normally takes 3 weeks for ribs to heal . Salem probably given more time .  Harmes likewise.

Weid out . Tommo in . Mitch Brown in.  May out. 


56 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

I'd be flabbergasted if Salem plays. For one, he's been tracking behind in his rehab for the last month. For another, he hasn't played footy at any level for 11 weeks.

I'd prefer to see him get a half game at Casey first before we throw him into a block of really tough and important games.

Tomlinson for May. Then Langdon, Harmes and TMac all straight back in for Melksham, Dunstan and Weideman. Bedford back to the sub role, which is harsh but we can't play all of Pickett, ANB, Spargo and Bedford.

I won't lose much sleep if Brown gets dropped instead of Weideman but I don't think Weid deserves the spot any more than Brown, and Brown in my view is more likely to win us a game if he turns his form around than Weideman.

Agree about Brown we know he can do the job, Weideman has two games to his name were he was useful. You are  correct I think  there is no chance Salem will play, I think it is very doubtful he will play for Casey next weekend.

B: Lever, Tomlinson, Hunt

HB: Brayshaw, Petty, Bowey

C: Langdon, Petracca, Jordon

HF: Neal-Bullen, Jackson, Pickett

F: Fritsch, McDonald, Spargo

FOLL: Gawn, Oliver, Viney

IC: Rivers, Harmes, Sparrow, Bedford

SUB: M.Brown

 

Casey

B: D.Smith, Turner, Hibberd

HB: Salem, Buntine, Rosman

C: Baker, Dunstan, Woewodin

HF: Melksham, van Rooyen, Chandler

F: Moniz-Wakefield, B.Brown, Ellison

FOLL: Weideman, White, Munro

IC: Daw, Laurie, McVee, Grey, Steele

 

Why would Salem not play in the ones? Eric Hipwood was straight back in for the Lions after an ACL, and in well under 12 months.

 

 

2 hours ago, WERRIDEE said:

B: Lever, Tomlinson, Hunt

HB: Brayshaw, Petty, Bowey

C: Langdon, Petracca, Jordon

HF: Neal-Bullen, Jackson, Pickett

F: Fritsch, McDonald, Spargo

FOLL: Gawn, Oliver, Viney

IC: Rivers, Harmes, Sparrow, Bedford

SUB: M.Brown

 

Casey

B: D.Smith, Turner, Hibberd

HB: Salem, Buntine, Rosman

C: Baker, Dunstan, Woewodin

HF: Melksham, van Rooyen, Chandler

F: Moniz-Wakefield, B.Brown, Ellison

FOLL: Weideman, White, Munro

IC: Daw, Laurie, McVee, Grey, Steele

Interesting W

As much as i like where Bedford is heading I can't see them giving the nod to Bedford ahead of BB.  Stranger things have happened though and he did perform in the first half.  Can't see Mitch as Sub ahead of BB either.

No BB and should we continue to see an out of form Dogga on the park we'll effectively be very undersized up forward.

Possibly the only other alternative is ANB out for Bedford?   Cant see Goody making that tweak either at this point.

You need at least one or two of your medium to tall forwards to fire.  Fritsch about it on the weekend.  Not even the drifters, Maxy & Dogga, managed to bother the scoreboard.

Whereas Lobb owned us and kept them in it in that second quarter.  Looked BOG given the impact and influence he had throughout the game.  Big part of the reason we were so badly out marked also.

Thank goodness for Plugga Mac's form, may it continue.

We better hope another tall gets into gear this weekend as you can't solely rely on him every week.

Spargo back to playing more 50 arc time should help (in theory).  Him & Kozzie front & square more often along with nibbler / Viney / Harmes on occasions and we might start to see a functioning forward line that provides a decent return on all the entries we usually have.

Mids lowering vision and hitting up some targets would be nice.

Hunt's spot is looking shakey with Hibb & Salem returning and would expect Hibb or Salem to make a return against the old enemy if they  get through the warm ups.  Might even be both (Rivers?).

Reckon we might struggle again this week with a bit of an unsettled line up (eg no Maysie, potentially one or two under the weather) and the continuing dysfunctional forward line but also there's the rebound factor.  Boys will be out for redemption.

Fingers crossed the buddy clause doesn't succeed.

Hoping we can get over the line or better!

Edited by Demon Dynasty


30 minutes ago, Clintosaurus said:

Why would Salem not play in the ones? Eric Hipwood was straight back in for the Lions after an ACL, and in well under 12 months.

Hipwood should not have come back in the ones. 11 weeks is a long time out. A game in the 2's to get the rust out won't do him any harm.

2 minutes ago, Demon Dynasty said:

 

 

Interesting W

As much as i like where Bedford is heading I can't see them giving the nod to Bedford ahead of BB.  Stranger things have happened though and he did perform in the first half.  Can't see Mitch as Sub ahead of BB either.

No BB and should we continue to see an out of form Dogga on the park we'll effectively be very undersized up forward.

Possibly the only other alternative is ANB out for Bedford?   Cant see Goody making that tweak either at this point.

You need at least one or two of your medium to tall forwards to fire.  Fritsch about it on the weekend.  Not even the drifters, Maxy & Dogga, managed to bother the scoreboard.

Whereas Lobb owned us and kept them in it in that second quarter.  Looked BOG given the impact and influence he had throughout the game.  Big part of the reason we were so badly out marked also.

Thank goodness for Plugga Mac's form, may it continue.

We better hope another tall gets into gear this weekend as you can't solely rely on him every week.

Spargo back to playing more 50 arc time should help (in theory).  Him & Kozzie front & square more often along with nibbler / Viney / Harmes on occasions and we might start to see a functioning forward line that provides a decent return on all the entries we usually have.

Mids lowering vision and hitting up some targets would be nice.

Hunt's spot is looking shakey with Hibb & Spargo returning and would expect Hibb to make a return against the old enemy if he gets through the warm ups.

Reckon we might struggle again this week with a biti of an unsettled line up (eg no Maysie, potentially one or two under the weather) and the continuing dysfunctional forward line but also there's the rebound factor.  Boys will be out for redemption.

Fingers crossed the buddy clause doesn't succeed.

Hoping we can get over the line or better!

Personally I'd love to see Dogga take over CHF swapping with Maxy in the forward line and in the ruck.

BB's form over the past 2 weeks is too bad to ignore I think he should be dropped and we go smaller with Bedford.

If they think Salem is raring to go then I'd drop Hunt and put Hunt as the sub.

Mitch is in form he can play key or small, back or forward. I think he could be the perfect sub.

Drop Ben Brown and Fritsch and Tmac won't kick goals, team balance is more important than individual stats.

for example: In my son's team, though he's not a high possession midfield, when he's in the midfield the invariably win and our centre invariably gets best on ground: when they go with a high possession midfielder instead our centres game drops off - combinations in footy is important.

Harmes importance in our midfield should also not be underestimated .

 

29 minutes ago, WERRIDEE said:

Personally I'd love to see Dogga take over CHF swapping with Maxy in the forward line and in the ruck.

BB's form over the past 2 weeks is too bad to ignore I think he should be dropped and we go smaller with Bedford.

If they think Salem is raring to go then I'd drop Hunt and put Hunt as the sub.

Mitch is in form he can play key or small, back or forward. I think he could be the perfect sub.

Probs one more credit opportunity for BB.

Mitch is a decent alternative right now and playing some nice footy at Casey for sure.

We need more marking power and/or getting ball to ground up forward by a tall to help out Macca as well as the medium/ small crumbers.

Rotating Maxy & Dogga from CHF through the middle is fine. 

Unfortunately one has been a little off his best and the other....a fair way.  Need at least one to step it up this week.

Edited by Demon Dynasty

1 hour ago, WERRIDEE said:

Personally I'd love to see Dogga take over CHF swapping with Maxy in the forward line and in the ruck.

BB's form over the past 2 weeks is too bad to ignore I think he should be dropped and we go smaller with Bedford.

If they think Salem is raring to go then I'd drop Hunt and put Hunt as the sub.

Mitch is in form he can play key or small, back or forward. I think he could be the perfect sub.

You speak of Mitch Brown like he’s Nat Fyfe. 

He’s Mitch Brown. He’s played solely as a forward his entire time with us. Won’t play defence, and sure as [censored] won’t play small. 


If we are picking Mitch Brown then it signals some serious issues. Not saying we dont, but i think our FWD line is much better with a mobile Tom Mc. He moves, he gets up the ground, he leads, he opens up the fwd line so when we do get it BB gets a decent look.

Think we need to hold the line this week as we get more of our regulars back this week which helps balance.

 

13 hours ago, Superunknown said:

There’s a lot of flu, RSV and a super cold getting around . Could have been anything though 

 

Has it ever been confirmed whether any or all of the players who missed a week due to "Health and Safety Protocols" actually had Covid? If they did, some might still have lingering symptoms. By the way they've been playing, I'd say ANB is fully recovered, but I wonder about Jackson and Brown. Of course, if none of them had Covid, then we need to look elsewhere for their poorer than usual form.

40 minutes ago, titan_uranus said:

You speak of Mitch Brown like he’s Nat Fyfe. 

He’s Mitch Brown. He’s played solely as a forward his entire time with us. Won’t play defence, and sure as [censored] won’t play small. 

How could Mitch Brown be worse than Weideman. At the least he has a bit of presence.

11 hours ago, COOLX said:

Not sure if Langdon will be back, normally takes 3 weeks for ribs to heal . Salem probably given more time .  Harmes likewise.

Weid out . Tommo in . Mitch Brown in.  May out. 

You don't know what the problem is and you are making a diagnosis

 

Impressive

13 minutes ago, old dee said:

How could Mitch Brown be worse than Weideman. At the least he has a bit of presence.

And goal smarts / poise OD.  VERY confident around the sticks.  Sometimes the step up is a little too much though but i recall his game against the Hawks a while back and thought he was serviceable.

He's no world beater but if it came down to having to pick one of the two i'd be giving Mitch a block of matches from here to see what he can do well before finals.  Need to explore all avenues as so far our forward line (in totem...some individual cameos on occasions but pretty random) hasn't been able to get out of 2nd gear.

Edited by Demon Dynasty


9 minutes ago, old dee said:

How could Mitch Brown be worse than Weideman. At the least he has a bit of presence.

I assume there's something about Mitch Brown's game that both Essendon and Melbourne have observed that stops him from getting regular game time. We know he's an excellent kick and that he regularly scores goals when given the chance. I assume, therefore, that there's something else that negates those positives. I don't wish to disparage him unnecessarily, but surely there's an aspect that we can't see?  

11 minutes ago, old dee said:

How could Mitch Brown be worse than Weideman. At the least he has a bit of presence.

Mitch can mark the ball

34 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

Has it ever been confirmed whether any or all of the players who missed a week due to "Health and Safety Protocols" actually had Covid? If they did, some might still have lingering symptoms. By the way they've been playing, I'd say ANB is fully recovered, but I wonder about Jackson and Brown. Of course, if none of them had Covid, then we need to look elsewhere for their poorer than usual form.

BB was a 'close contact' and the rules changed just after he came out of covid protocols.  Close contacts no longer need to isolate.

So Lever, Viney, Jackson, Petty, ANB, Pickett and Sparrow all had covid.

 
10 minutes ago, jnrmac said:

Mitch can mark the ball

Yep sometimes at VFL level. 

He does bring the ball to ground by competing in the air and in my opinion is less likely to be completely out positioned like Weid seems to consistently.  

Having said that TMac is a far better bet if fit than Mitch Brown at AFL level

Really hard to make a case for BB getting a run based on his recent efforts

I was really disappointed when Joel Smith got injured because he is so important in terms of giving us more options to shuffle players when we have injuries or form issues. As an example he would allow Petty to move forward and let BB find form at Casey

30 minutes ago, La Dee-vina Comedia said:

I assume there's something about Mitch Brown's game that both Essendon and Melbourne have observed that stops him from getting regular game time. We know he's an excellent kick and that he regularly scores goals when given the chance. I assume, therefore, that there's something else that negates those positives. I don't wish to disparage him unnecessarily, but surely there's an aspect that we can't see?  

The same people constantly pick Weideman for almost no contribution LDC.


Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

Featured Content

  • GAMEDAY: Brisbane

    It’s Game Day, and the Demons are back on the road with a massive challenge ahead — facing the reigning premiers, the Brisbane Lions, at their Gabba fortress. The Lions are licking their wounds after a shock draw in Tasmania last week, while Melbourne’s season hangs in the balance. Can the Dees defy the odds and pull off a miracle to keep their razor thin finals hopes alive?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 17 replies
    Demonland
  • NON-MFC: Round 10

    The Sir Doug Nicholls Round kicks off in Darwin with a Top 4 clash between the Suns and the Hawks. On Friday night the Swans will be seeking to rebound from a challenging start to the season, while the Blues have the Top 8 in their sights after their sluggish start. Saturdays matches kick off with a blockbuster between the Collingwood and Kuwarna with the Magpies looking to maintain their strong form and the Crows aiming to make a statement on the road. The Power face a difficult task to revive their season against a resilient Cats side looking to make amends for their narrow loss last week. The Giants aim to reinforce their top-eight status, while the Dockers will be looking to break the travel hoodoo. The sole Saturday game is a critical matchup for both teams, as the Bulldogs strive to cemet their spot in the top six and the Bombers desperately want break into the 8. Sundays start with a bottom 3 clash between the Tigers and Kangaroos with both teams wanting to avoid the being in wooden spoon contention. The Round concludes with the Eagles still searching for their first win of the season, while the Saints look to keep their finals hopes alive with a crucial away victory. Who are you tipping and what are the best results for the Demons?

      • Thanks
    • 165 replies
    Demonland
  • PREVIEW: Brisbane

    And just like that, we’re Narrm again. Even though the annual AFL Sir Doug Nicholls Round which commemorates the contributions of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture to our game has been a welcome addition to our calendar for ten years, more lately it has been a portent of tough times ahead for we beleaguered Narrm supporters. Ever since the club broke through for its historic 2021 premiership, this has become a troubling time of the year for the club. For example, it all began when Melbourne rebranded itself as Narrm across the two rounds of the Sir Doug Nicholls Round to become the first club to adopt an Indigenous club name especially for the occasion. It won its first outing under the brand against lowly North Melbourne to go to 10 wins and no losses but not without a struggle or a major injury to  star winger Ed Langdon who broke his ribs and missed several weeks. In the following week, still as Narrm, the team’s 17 game winning streak came to an end at the hands of the Dockers. That came along with more injuries, a plague that remained with them for the remainder of the season until, beset by injuries, the Dees were eliminated from the finals in straight sets. It was even worse last year, when Narrm inexplicably lowered its colours in Perth to the Waalit Marawar Eagles. Oh, the shame of it all! At least this year, if there is a corner to turn around, it has to be in the direction of something better. To that end, I produced a special pre-game chant in the local Narrm language - “nam mi:wi winnamun katjil prolin ambi ngamar thamelin amb” which roughly translated is “every heart beats true for the red and the blue.” >y belief is that if all of the Narrm faithful recite it long enough, then it might prove to be the only way to beat the Brisbane Lions at the Gabba on Sunday. The Lions are coming off a disappointing draw at Marvel Stadium against a North Melbourne team that lacks the ability and know how to win games (except when playing Melbourne). Brisbane are, however, a different kettle of fish at home and have very few positional weaknesses. They are a midfield powerhouse, strong in defence and have plenty of forward options, particularly their small and medium sized players, to kick a winning score this week after the sting of last week’s below par performance.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 11 replies
    Demonland
  • REPORT: Hawthorn

    There was a time during the current Melbourne cycle that goes back to before the premiership when the club was the toughest to beat in the fourth quarter. The Demons were not only hard to beat at any time but it was virtually impossible to get the better them when scores were close at three quarter time. It was only three or four years ago but they were fit, strong and resilient in body and mind. Sadly, those days are over. This has been the case since the club fell off its pedestal about 12 months ago after it beat Geelong and then lost to Carlton. In both instances, Melbourne put together strong, stirring final quarters, one that resulted in victory, the other, in defeat. Since then, the drop off has been dramatic to the point where it can neither pull off victory in close matches, nor can it even go down in defeat  gallantly.

      • Clap
      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 1 reply
    Demonland
  • CASEY: Footscray

    At twenty-four minutes into the third term of the game between the Casey Demons and Footscray VFL at Whitten Oval, the visitors were coasting. They were winning all over the ground, had the ascendancy in the ruck battles and held a 26 point lead on a day perfect for football. What could go wrong? Everything. The Bulldogs moved into overdrive in the last five minutes of the term and booted three straight goals to reduce the margin to a highly retrievable eight points at the last break. Bouyed by that effort, their confidence was on a high level during the interval and they ran all over the despondent Demons and kicked another five goals to lead by a comfortable margin of four goals deep into the final term before Paddy Cross kicked a couple of too late goals for a despondent Casey. A testament to their lack of pressure in the latter stages of the game was the fact that Footscray’s last ten scoring shots were nine goals and one rushed behind. Things might have been different for the Demons who went into the game after last week’s bye with 12 AFL listed players. Blake Howes was held over for the AFL game but two others, Jack Billings and Taj Woewodin (not officially listed as injured) were also missing and they could have been handy at the end. Another mystery of the current VFL system.

      • Thanks
    • 0 replies
    Demonland
  • PREGAME: Brisbane

    The Demons head back out on the road in Round 10 when they travel to Queensland to take on the reigning Premiers and the top of the table Lions who look very formidable. Can the Dees cause a massive upset? Who comes in and who goes out?

      • Thanks
      • Like
    • 284 replies
    Demonland