Jump to content

When do players peak?

Previously known as LITD.
in Melbourne Demons

Featured Replies

Posted

Imho, I reckon Dusty Martin played his best footy about five years ago. Not saying hes now a bad player but at 25 his stats and club votes indicate his best year.

So has Trac peaked at 25? Even if he has it's not to say he can't keep playing at the same level for for the next five years.

Oliver is 24.

And we have a great deal of good players under 25.

Obviously it's not just age ...its also the number of games but all things being equal is 25 the consensus for a players best year?

Should we be looking for another young tall forward?

 

Edited by leave it to deever

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     

    I would have thought 25-27.

    Depending on your strength, even longer.  For example Robert Harvey could run all day and no one could keep up with him.

    Trac missed a year with a knee and i dont think has peaked yet and Oliver hasn't (I hope).

    As our goal to goal line is almost old enough to play for Geelong then yes another tall is required.

  • Quote
    • Like 3
    • Thanks 1
    • Haha 1

    It’s completely subjective - many players peak at 19, others aren’t even considered by recruiters until they’re 22.

    Its seemed over the years, the general consensus is 26 - 29 is the sweet spot for age, strength, durability and experience.  
     

    Looking at recent Brownlow winners, though an imperfect metric, gives us some idea…

    Dangerfield 26yo

    Martin 26yo

    Mitchell 25yo

    Fyfe 27yo

    Neale 27yo

    Wines 26yo


     

     

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Thanks 4
     

    • Author
    11 minutes ago, Bring-Back-Powell said:

    25-29 would be the sweet spot as a general rule, I would’ve thought.

    Yep given Oliver@ 24

    Salem, Trac, Gus and Langdon @ 25

     

  • Quote

    This is a really interesting question. I would definitely agree that players reach their peak for accumulating stats in their mid twenties or so. I think that is also pretty much what the Brownlow measures.

     Many players start to have more impact with fewer possessions as they head toward their late twenties though. Dusty is a great example of that, Burgoyne another. 

  • Quote
    • Like 1
     

    Physical peak 25-26, game knowledge and how to put it together 30+
     

    For most the culmination of the 2 will be around 28-29 but if they can keep there physical condition up it’s almost indefinite these days, just look at messi or ronaldo in soccer or Brady in nfl or djokovic in tennis arguably they got better post 30

     

    Edited by Garbo

  • Quote
    • Like 2

    • Author
    46 minutes ago, FlashInThePan said:

    This is a really interesting question. I would definitely agree that players reach their peak for accumulating stats in their mid twenties or so. I think that is also pretty much what the Brownlow measures.

     Many players start to have more impact with fewer possessions as they head toward their late twenties though. Dusty is a great example of that, Burgoyne another. 

    Thanks Fitp.

    I was thinking about the age of our mid players and others who starred this year like Lever and Salem.

    If 25 is the consensus...it partially explains our success this year.

     

    Edited by leave it to deever

  • Quote
    2 minutes ago, KingDingAling said:

    25-27

    Bloody Norah. That would kill an elephant!

  • Quote

    Depends on the player really. Franklin and Judd played their best footy at 21, where as Hawkins reached new heights at 32-33 and is showing no signs of slowing down. 

    I'd also say that modern players are generally more durable than they used to be. I remember when 30 was generally the age you'd expect a player to bow out. It's more like 32-35 now. May and Gawn are both turning 30 very soon but have fresh AA blazers in the wardrobe and should be at their peak a while yet.

    Trac and Clarry  honestly have an eternity of good footy left in them.

  • Quote
    • Like 5
    • Author

    I think I was wondering age wise how we will fare in the future.

    I think we will be relevant with this current list for at least the next five to seven years and win at least one more cup. Hopefully two.

  • Quote

    About 1am is when I do my best work.

     

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    9 hours ago, leave it to deever said:

    Imho, I reckon Dusty Martin played his best footy about five years ago. Not saying hes now a bad player but at 25 his stats and club votes indicate his best year.

    So has Trac peaked at 25? Even if he has it's not to say he can't keep playing at the same level for for the next five years.

    Oliver is 24.

    And we have a great deal of good players under 25.

    Obviously it's not just age ...its also the number of games but all things being equal is 25 the consensus for a players best year?

    Should we be looking for another young tall forward?

     

    Is DM  a one-trick pony? Just asking.

  • Quote

    I'm paraphrasing but I'm pretty sure in the Last Dance, Michael Jordan describes his physical peak in the late 80's when he was mid 20's but his mental peak didn't come until the 90's and only got stronger through that period of winning championships. He won his first championship at 28 and I think that's about the time when physical ability and mental capacity in both understanding your own game and team work combine.

    But it's different for all players and particular sports.

    I think there's a lot of AFL footballers who excel at about 23-27 and after that probably start to lose a bit of step given the physical nature and the extreme athletic demands. Repeat injuries can cause a toll too.

    Other players who rely more on skills and smarts and have the appetite for slowly but steadily improving sections of their game can get stronger and stronger through their 20's and even in to their 30's.

     

  • Quote
    • Like 2
    • Thanks 1

    i think the athletic demands of 'modern footy' has meant that players are hitting their peaks later, once they have the incredible fitness base that is required to compete against experienced, hardened opposition

  • Quote

    When do players peak? How long is a piece of string? What’s more relevant is how long does it take a team peak? in our case I would say the string is about as long as four premierships. 

    Edited by John Crow Batty

  • Quote
    • Author

    The consensus seems to be mid 20s.

    I was thinking about this because I was thinking how many key players had a great year.

    Fritta 24

    Oliver24

    Trac 25

    Lever 25

    Langdon 25

    Gus 25

    So I think next year we should go even better.

    We seem to have the perfect mix of players ages. 

  • Quote
    11 hours ago, adonski said:

    Salem will play til he's 38. Skills persist. 

    I’m 38 and while I’ve obviously never been an athlete, it’s really stark how much more easily I get sore, and how much harder it is to maintain condition even compared to my early 30s, and that’s without decades of punishment of elite contact sport.

    There’s a very good reason why few players can sustain the training required for that long and it’s got little to do with skill.

  • Quote
    •  
    • Author
    15 minutes ago, Nasher said:

    I’m 38 and while I’ve obviously never been an athlete, it’s really stark how much more easily I get sore, and how much harder it is to maintain condition even compared to my early 30s, and that’s without decades of punishment of elite contact sport.

    There’s a very good reason why few players can sustain the training required for that long and it’s got little to do with skill.

    I'm a good deal older than you Nasher but I remember thinking how Fletcher was still playing for the Don's past your age. I have no idea how he did it. Its probably easier for a fullback who probably doesnt run as much as other positions but he was still a freak of nature.

    Edited by leave it to deever

  • Quote
    • Like 1
    • Author
    14 hours ago, bush demon said:

    Is DM  a one-trick pony? Just asking.

    Nup. You dont win a Norm Smith and Brownlow with only one trick in your kit.

  • Quote

    • Join the conversation

    You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

    Guest
    Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
    Reply to this topic...
    Go to topic listing

    Featured Content

    • NON-MFC: Round 13

      Follow all the action from every Round 13 clash excluding the Dees as the 2025 AFL Premiership Season rolls on. With Melbourne playing in the final match of the round on King's Birthday, all eyes turn to the rest of the competition. Who are you tipping to win? And more importantly, which results best serve the Demons’ finals aspirations? Join the discussion and keep track of the matches that could shape the ladder and impact our run to September.

      • 0 replies
      Demonland

    • PREVIEW: Collingwood

      Having convincingly defeated last year’s premier and decisively outplayed the runner-up with 8.2 in the final quarter, nothing epitomized the Melbourne Football Club’s performance more than its 1.12 final half, particularly the eight consecutive behinds in the last term, against a struggling St Kilda team in the midst of a dismal losing streak. Just when stability and consistency were anticipated within the Demon ranks, they delivered a quintessential performance marked by instability and ill-conceived decisions, with the most striking aspect being their inaccuracy in kicking for goal, which suggested a lack of preparation (instead of sleeping in their hotel in Alice, were they having a night on the turps) rather than a well-rested team. Let’s face it - this kicking disease that makes them look like raw amateurs is becoming a millstone around the team’s neck.

        • Thanks
      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • CASEY: Sydney

      The Casey Demons were always expected to emerge victorious in their matchup against the lowly-ranked Sydney Swans at picturesque Tramway Oval, situated in the shadows of the SCG in Moore Park. They dominated the proceedings in the opening two and a half quarters of the game but had little to show for it. This was primarily due to their own sloppy errors in a low-standard game that produced a number of crowded mauls reminiscent of the rugby game popular in old Sydney Town. However, when the Swans tired, as teams often do when they turn games into ugly defensive contests, Casey lifted the standard of its own play and … it was off to the races. Not to nearby Randwick but to a different race with an objective of piling on goal after goal on the way to a mammoth victory. At the 25-minute mark of the third quarter, the Demons held a slender 14-point lead over the Swans, who are ahead on the ladder of only the previous week's opposition, the ailing Bullants. Forty minutes later, they had more than fully compensated for the sloppiness of their earlier play with a decisive 94-point victory, that culminated in a rousing finish which yielded thirteen unanswered goals. Kicks hit their targets, the ball found itself going through the middle and every player made a contribution.

        • Thanks
        • Like
      • 1 reply
      Demonland

    • REPORT: St. Kilda

      Hands up if you thought, like me, at half-time in yesterday’s game at TIO Traeger Park, Alice Springs that Melbourne’s disposal around the ground and, in particular, its kicking inaccuracy in front of the goals couldn’t get any worse. Well, it did. And what’s even more damning for the Melbourne Football Club is that the game against St Kilda and its resurgence from the bottomless pit of its miserable start to the season wasn’t just lost through poor conversion for goal but rather in the 15 minutes when the entire team went into a slumber and was mugged by the out-of-form Saints. Their six goals two behinds (one goal less than the Demons managed for the whole game) weaved a path of destruction from which they were unable to recover. Ross Lyon’s astute use of pressure to contain the situation once they had asserted their grip on the game, and Melbourne’s self-destructive wastefulness, assured that outcome. The old adage about the insanity of repeatedly doing something and expecting a different result, was out there. Two years ago, the score line in Melbourne’s loss to the Giants at this same ground was 5 goals 15 behinds - a ratio of one goal per four scoring shots - was perfectly replicated with yesterday’s 7 goals 21 behinds. 
      This has been going on for a while and opens up a number of questions. I’ll put forward a few that come to mind from this performance. The obvious first question is whether the club can find a suitable coach to instruct players on proper kicking techniques or is this a skill that can no longer be developed at this stage of the development of our playing group? Another concern is the team's ability to counter an opponent's dominance during a run on as exemplified by the Saints in the first quarter. Did the Demons underestimate their opponents, considering St Kilda's goals during this period were scored by relatively unknown forwards? Furthermore, given the modest attendance of 6,721 at TIO Traeger Park and the team's poor past performances at this venue, is it prudent to prioritize financial gain over potentially sacrificing valuable premiership points by relinquishing home ground advantage, notwithstanding the cultural significance of the team's connection to the Red Centre? 

        • Thanks
      • 4 replies
      Demonland

    • PREGAME: Collingwood

      After a disappointing loss in Alice Springs the Demons return to the MCG to take on the Magpies in the annual King's Birthday Big Freeze for MND game. Who comes in and who goes out?

        • Thanks
      • 224 replies
      Demonland

    • PODCAST: St. Kilda

      The Demonland Podcast will air LIVE on Monday, 2nd June @ 8:00pm. Join Binman, George & I as we have a chat with former Demon ruckman Jeff White about his YouTube channel First Use where he dissects ruck setups and contests. We'll then discuss the Dees disappointing loss to the Saints in Alice Springs.
      Your questions and comments are a huge part of our podcast so please post anything you want to ask or say below and we'll give you a shout out on the show.
      Listen LIVE: https://demonland.com/

        • Thanks
      • 47 replies
      Demonland
    View All